The writings of Reinko Venema. 

 Click the pic for the history of this main page... (The archives)


Just some WarArt files
The (short) Story index
Index to the BigStory


-Dring dring, there the door bell goes. Reinko opens the door and it is Arty! Hey come on in Reinko says. 

Arty: Shit man, all these years you let me dry out in the beautiful Afhganistan landscape and now I must come here to eat cookies?

-Reinko: Oh, you got the message wrong: In this country it is illegal to send so called cookies along with your website. 

But I cannot control the cookies my dear Arty, that problem is around for many years: 
Visitors get a cookie, but it is not done by  me... .

Arty (looking difficult): So what do we need to do?

-Reinko: We must eat the cookies before they eat us..

 Arty (smiling): Ok ok, I have to go back to my home country, so bye bye 




(27 July 2015) Those pictures and movies from the Pluto mission are not only awesome, they are ultra awesome.   

Therefore I have decided to unveil a new class of new trigonometric identities and for one week this class of infinitely many identities will have the name of 'NASA identities'. 

After the next week the class of trigonometric identities, I am so sorry, but they must have their old name back and the old name is:  

Determinants of exponential circles & curves. 

Item 1) For seven days on a row they are named 'NASA equations'. 

 Item 1) For seven days on a row they are named 'NASA equations'. 

Now why only seven days on a row name it the NASA equations or the NASA identities?

That is because far to often equations are given the name of the human person that more or less discovered those equations for the very first time. 

That is a stupid way of labeling math equations, paramount should be what these particular set of equations do or try to describe. 

And as such 'determinant of exponential circles' is far more informing compared to 'NASA equations in three dimensions'.  

Let's leave it with that. Here is the teaser picture for the NASA 3D equations: 


Let's leave it with that. Till updates.   


(21 July 2015) The last days I wrote two appendices to the 'screen shot update' on the higher dimensional complex numbers.
Appendix 1 is about how I found the modified Dirichlet kernels &
Appendix 2 shows six different ways to find the exponential circle in 3D space. 
Here is the link to the appendices.  

But today we are using so called 'angular momentum theory' for electrons to destroy once more the idea that electrons are magnetic dipoles on their own. 

Item 1) How to add magnetism.

 Item 1) How to add magnetism.

First we are going to do a thought experiment with bar magnets (square shaped bar magnets so all four of the long sided of the bar magnet have equal area).
But first you must know what magnetic dipole moment is. 

Magnetic dipole moment is easy to understand; it is the strength of the magnet multiplied by the height. Or, more precise: multiplied by the distance between the north and south pole. 

Now for a bar magnet this is easy to calculate if you know the strength of a particular metal you can make magnet from. For example iron; if the magnets are produced properly the strength is proportional to the amount of iron used. 

Magnets can have all kinds of shapes, for example sphere shaped or egg shaped.
We will not go into that. 

Now to the electron; here is the source file from wikipedia: 

Angular momentum operator  


Now we do our thought experiment: 

Take two bar magnets and put them together so that the length doubles, of course you must attach north to south in the middle. 

It is 100% obvious that because the distance between north and south is now double, the magnetic dipole moment is now double. You can code this as NSNS.

Now you put the magnets together in such a way that the thickness doubles, code it like


So you twist one magnet 180 degrees and put them together. 

What happens to the magnetic dipole moment? 

That has become less because where the magnets touch all magnetism stays indide.
You can argue that since two sides are now packed together there are only 6 remaining sides where with the long NSNS magnets you still had 8 sides. 

So total 'magnetic dipole moment' is roughly 1.5 times that of one bar magnet.

It is important to remark this construction is a magnetic quadrapole and not longer a dipole so 'dippole moment becomes a fuzzy notion...   

You see that if you put two dipole magnets together the way they are oriented in space becomes very important because sometimes the dipole moments enforce each other but if you turn one magnet total magnetism becomes less because they are eating each others magnetic field instead of making it only stronger... 


In this simple formulae the J stands for the total and L stands for orbital magnetism and S is the so called spin magnetism. 

But nowhere there is talk about the orientation of the magnetic dipole stuff L and S. 

Now since L is orbital magnetism related to the electrons going round the nucleus of the atom we can be 100% sure that L is related to a magnetic dipole. 

But if you can always add the S to it, the logical conclusion is that spin cannot be a magnetic dipole thing... 


Now this is a very general thing: always when there is talk about magnetic spin you can always add it up or subtract it and never the orientation in space is mentioned.  

Hence magnetic spin of electrons is not dipole in nature but monopole, exactly like the electrical charge of an electron... 


You know there are days that I wonder how the professors could get so retarded.
The math professors with their complex numbers, they have only the 2D version of it.
The physics professors with magnetic dipole electrons. 

I mean this whole universe could not be the way it is if the professional physics professors were telling the truth... 

Till updates my dear reader.  


 (14 July 2015) Ok 21 fresh pages on a subject known as the missing equations. 

It is on page 3 of the higher dimensional complex numbers although in this long update I only used circular numbers. 

Item 1) The missing equations.

  Item 1) The missing equations.

You can check all the given screen shots for yourself using an applet named Animated drawing that you can find here: 


On page 21 of the long update you find the sum of 11 coordinate functions in 11D space; look for the explicit function variant of Animated drawing and cut and past the next text into it and observe you get the constant value 1. 

((1/11)*sin(11*(x))/sin(x)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - pi/11))/sin(x - pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 2*pi/11))/sin(x - 2*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 3*pi/11))/sin(x - 3*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 4*pi/11))/sin(x - 4*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 5*pi/11))/sin(x - 5*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 6*pi/11))/sin(x - 6*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 7*pi/11))/sin(x - 7*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 8*pi/11))/sin(x - 8*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 9*pi/11))/sin(x - 9*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 10*pi/11))/sin(x - 10*pi/11))

Click on the third teaser picture in order to land on the latest math update about the missing equations: 


Till updates my dear reader.  


(13 July 2015) In one or two days I will hang in the next math update; it is not really math but more like math done physics style. I have all these missing equations so a math approach is more or less impossible, so if a particular equation passes a test this validates my theory of modified Dirichlet kernels ruling the higher dimensional complex numbers... 

Item 1) The second teaser picture for the missing equations update.

 Item 1) The second teaser picture for the missing equations update.

The second teaser picture is a fragment from the biggest collection of equations I have ever solved in my life. 

Now it is not that I have to solve this problem and arrive at a solution, no it is the other way around: I have a perfect solution but I lack equations... 

And the higher the dimensions get, the more stuff that is missing but, ha ha ha, my solutions stays perfect. 


If you want to see the largest system of equations I ever solved, click on the above picture. 

End of this update, till updates.  


(10 July 2015) Since it is Greece week, why not post that Google talk about that ancient Greek computer?  

After all in this Google talk we observe how images can be modified to show deep detail and this is nicely in line with something like two decades ago when I found the perfect format for 3D imaging.  

Of course Dutch universities, skilled as they are, never picked up on the theory of geometric differentiation or on geometric integration. 

Once a retard, always a retard. 

Item 1) The most perfect Google talk ever observed....

 Item 1) The most perfect Google talk ever observed....

It is just a link to some good math perfection, decades ago I envisioned this kind of math with geometrical objects. And as usual nothing happened because the Dutch universities are so full of shit. 

It is very interesting to observe that the Dutch academic folks are very full of shit;
If you weigh the amount of shit before & and after a toilet visit, there is no significant difference.  

Lets leave it with that and post one of the most beautiful math insights on 3D imaging:  

Imaging the Antikythera Mechanism  

Till updates my dear reader.   


(09 July 2015) I thought I asked the people from the science of physics to 'make some noise' so I wonder why I do not hear anything... Why live like those math professor weasels and non-performers? Get a life, make some noise! 

Item 1) What if electrons were magnetic dipoles? Part 2.

 Item 1) What if electrons were magnetic dipoles? Part 2.

If electrons would be magnetic dipoles as the professional physics professors believe they are, how come that in all chemical bonds it is the electron pair that rules the thing? 

If electrons were magnetic dipoles, all kind of weird electron configurations would be observed to the degree the science of chemistry would be so different it makes we wonder if life could exist in the very first place... 

Now the idea of electrons being magnetic dipoles can be disproved in hundreds of ways, today I will show you that magnetic dipoles can be stacked together in all kinds of ways that electrons do not do.

In all chemical bonds it is the electron pair that spans up our planet, but if the professional physics professors were telling the truth we would also have electron triples, quadruples, etc etc. 

So the next picture with six magnetic dipole macro world magnets says its all:

The professional physics professors should do a little bit of rethinking:

As you see on inspection, magnetic dipoles can be stacked up into any kind of number...

The prevalence for electron pairs is nowhere observed, hence electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. Till updates my dear reader.  


(08 July 2015) Today I more or less enjoyed very much the sounds coming from the European parliament where the Greek pm Tsipras hold a speech and weirdly enough a lot of countries voiced precisely what they thought.   

Well my position is clear, but I was glad to see some democracy in action...
May be, very may be I will participate in future elections again... 

Anyway today we will be looking at electrons once more because it would be a true disaster if they really were magnetic dipoles as they are in the belief system of the professional physics professors on all universities around the world. 

Once more: If you organize your science as a substitute for religion you will run into the exact same problems as the Catholic church with Galileo...

Item 1) What if electrons were magnetic dipoles? 

 Item 1) What if electrons were magnetic dipoles? 

From the science of chemistry we know that electron pairs are more or less the driving force in all chemical bonds inside molecules. Only electron pairs have been observed, there is plenty of electron pair theory around. 

But if electrons were magnetic dipoles and not magnetic monopoles, how can it be they only come in pairs and not in more complicated structures??? 

Here is a wiki upon electron pair theory: 

Polyhedral skeletal electron pair theory  

As far as I understand reality, it has to be that the electron pair is the smallest magnetic dipole there is. The particles known as neutrinos are much smaller that the electron but neutrinos as so weak in interactions that I do not think they have a magnetic charge or an electric charge at all. 

Now the idea of electrons being magnetic monopoles makes a lot of sense compared to what those professional physics people talk, so we do a bit of 'though experiment' and we buy for 1.50€ six dipole magnets in a shop.

How can we arrange them and we wonder if electrons were magnetic dipoles how can it be we only observe electron pairs? 

Here are the six magnets for 25 cents each, I let them into the plastic shielding because that represents the repelling force electrons have from having the same electrical charge... 


These are disk shaped macroscopic magnets, I was lucky to buy a packet where the magnetic north or south was up or down in 3 magnets. That explains why this cluster of 6 magnetic dipoles sticks together... 

Another way of arrangement goes like this: 


Once more: the plastic layer represents the repelling forces from equal electrical charges. The 1€ + 50 cent coin represent the total costs of this physics experiment. 

Let's leave it with that, till updates my dear reader. 


(05 July 2015) A short update on the outcome of the Greece referendum; I will explain in very simple terms why I am in favor of a debt reduction to 15 thousand per Greek capita citizen. That would be a reduction of about 8 thousand € per Greek person. 

Item 1) One decade of economical havoc is enough for Greece.

 Item 1) One decade of economical havoc is enough for Greece.

From the beginning our political leaders constantly had other insights compared to me; for example when the credit crisis broke out (by the way the political talking heads of today did not see it coming, for me it was 100% it was coming) it was a feature that private debt collapsed, clustered together and taken over by the diverse governments. 

In the case of Greece this was a bit mistake; the private debt holders had some haircuts but the European leaders should never have taken over this debt. 

But they did because they were afraid that a bankrupt Greece would spread out... 

Anyway to make a long long story short; at present the Greeks are supposed to pay all the debt back in a time scale of 32 years, anyway that is what Jeroen Dijsselbloem said this week. 


The present deal with Greece is rooted in emotions from the time we had only golden and silver coins; yet modern money if fiat money and if handled carefully there is unlimited supply of that stuff...  

Why is one decade of misery for Greece enough? 

Ten years of misery is enough to burn it into the collective memory that debt hugging is very unwise. Now the Greek economy is in a state where fiat money cannot work...

For myself speaking, the Dutch government has borrowed about 1000 € per Dutch citizen, a write off to the 15 thousand per Greek citizen would leave me at a loss of like 300 to 400 €. 

Now in Greece about 30% of all children live under the so called poverty line and I have decided I don't need those 300 to 400 €. I consider it blood money so I don't want it. 


More fun stuff from Greece: 
The 2000 Year-Old Computer - Decoding the Antikythera Mechanism (2012)  

Till updates my dear reader & live well in our system of fiat currency.  


(02 July 2015) The last weeks I have been working an a math update known as 'the missing equations'. That is because those modified Dirichlet kernels might do a perfect job but if we raise the dimension above 3 you already have the very first missing equation.

I have tried to find the answer to this problem of missing equations for about 18 months and I did not make one millimeter of progress. 

Item 1) The first teaser picture to the update related to the missing equations. 

 Item 1) The first teaser picture to the update related to the missing equations. 

It is just a teaser picture although it contains rock hard math.  

It is just a teaser picture but it contains math that the general university math departments cannot explain at all. Might that be a source of their weird weird silence??       


It is just a teaser picture, do not worry that time lags rule the world. 


You can check for yourself that these five coordinate functions squared add up to 1 (so you can use them as probability amplitudes like they do in quantum physics). 
You must first search for a function graph plotter on this website from the Leiden university, I cannot link directly for you because it is an interactive server: 


Here are the five squares, just cut and paste it in the function graph plotter:

((1/5)*sin(5*x)/sin(x))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-pi/5))/sin(x-pi/5))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-2*pi/5))/sin(x-2*pi/5))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-3*pi/5))/sin(x-3*pi/5))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-4*pi/5))/sin(x-4*pi/5))^2  

If all goes well you get the constant function with value 1.  It must look like this: 


All these new trigonometric identities are awesome...     

Till updates.  


(27 June 2015) A short update on Greece since it is highly likely they will miss 
the IMF payment that supposedly had to be paid this week.
So Greece will go bankrupt and leave the Euro as her currency... Or not?    

Item 1) In the year 2009 I wrote: Let's kick Greece out and let Poland in. 
Item 2) A very short food update. 

 Item 1) In the year 2009 I wrote: Let's kick Greece out and let Poland in.

Of course all political leaders thought in the year 2009 that they could hang out the math professor and just ignore that weirdo from

Now my own home country has lend money to Greece in the order of about 1000 € per capita Dutch citizen. As a comparison every citizen from Greece is about 23,000 € in the red ink.  

Needless to say 23,000 € is just too high so for myself speaking I am glad we have this present situation. Europe should have lowered that amount far more to say something like 15,000 € per Greek citizen. 

But hey when I wrote that; guess three times what our political elite did? 

Once more the hang out the math professor; ignore the insight, look away, talk about teleportation with quantum computers & so on and so on.


Will there be market turmoil on the financial markets? 

I hope so because I have still about 5 to 10 thousand € to invest in my pension portfolio so with a bit of luck I can buy a bit on the dips...  

Item 2) A very short food update.  

On a website named science 2.0 I found a relative good article about weight loss.
It has a bit of a strange title namely 

Why Fat People Don't Lose Weight. The Diet Delusion 

Of course diet is not a delusion, after all a diet that works perfectly goes as this:

No sugar, no grains, plenty of exercise and you eat only when you are hungry. 

Basically it is that simple. Till updates my dear reader. 


(24 June 2015) An update on food because now in the USA the number of obese people have passed the number of overweight people.

In the meantime the average lifespan in the USA is still not declining but somewhere in the next years the average lifespan will start declining because of the strange food they eat over there. 

Item 1) The number of obese above the number of overweight US folks? Yeah yeah...

 Item 1) The number of obese above the number of overweight US folks? Yeah yeah...

It is no secret I was more or less slim my entire life until 2005 when I started gaining weight. At some point I was a staggering maximum of 108,9 kilo and I decided to cut the crap. 

At present day I am terribly stable at about 80 kilo, just as an example I still weigh myself in the morning although there is no reason for it any longer. 

The last 10 days, for example, say: 

80.1  80.4  80.4  80.4  80.4  80.7  80.5  80.1  80.1  80.0 

One of the problems is that people understand next to nothing about the food they eat, that goes from poverty stricken families to government institutions. 

For example in my home country the Netherlands the government still promotes the eating of bread. But after eating bread your body simply refuses to burn body fat and as such you grow hungry far too early and the process of overeating sets in just by eating bread on a daily basis... 

And if you eat bread on a daily basis you take up too much meals a day or you start snacking in between meals so you constantly have insulin running around in your body. 

Now guess what? You develop slowly but surely a nice nice nice insulin tolerance; your body cells do not react to insulin any longer and as such your body cells are starved while you load in food all the time... 

I mean this is no higher math, any body can understand how stuff works. 

But nothing happens, in my home country they will keep on promoting crazy food like bread and in the USA they will keep on using a poison named high fructose syrup (sponsored by the USA government). 

It will take some time but more and more the future will look like this: 


Yeah yeah, if you do not understand the food you eat rather likely your children will not understand that weird food either.  

Links that might be interesting: 

5 Shocking Facts About Obesity in America  

The basis of my thinking about food is that you should not eat stuff your body cannot digest, for example eating stones every day is not good for your health.
And beside the vegetables that contain the fibers that are non-digestible, is it wise for humans to eat wood on a daily basis? 

Actually the food industry uses plenty of wood, they think you are not human but a wood worm and they name it emulsifiers:   

Is common food additive to blame for rising rates of bowel disease?

So unless you have a strong desire to breed very fat babies, one should avoid the things your human body cannot digest. And eating wood is not a wise thing if you would ask me. 

End of this food update, till updates.  


(21 June 2015) Correction on my previous update from 15 June; I made an interpretation fault and that has to be corrected of course.

Item 1) Correction and addendum to the previous update.

 Item 1) Correction and addendum to the previous update.

It was only this weekend that I found the time to read the publication they talk about in the vids of the previous update and I was totally wrong. 

They were not trying to exploit the magnetic dipole stuff of an electron but weirdly enough the electric dipole stuff of an electron? 

Electrons as electric dipoles?????????? 

Yes, it is a bit strange but you need that for stuff like super symmetry to be true. 

Now super symmetry is one of those things I do not even try to understand because just like with string theory you have these people that say: 

But the math is so beautiful, it just has to be true...   

Always when I hear such words I run for cover; the people are not capable of understanding 3D complex numbers but their math is 'so beautiful it has to be true'. 

Of course an electron is an electric monopole and very very likely it is also a magnetic monopole. These physics people have been wrong for decades on a row so likely their condition of not understanding the electron will last a few decades more... 

Some links related to the spherical electron; 

Scientific American: 
Electron Appears Spherical, Squashing Hopes for New Physics Theories   

And, highly technical but only five pages long on the pre-print archive: 

Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron  

For me it is 100% weird to observe that there is a group of physics people that hunt down the electric dipole character of the electron while there is no experimental evidence for the electron being a magnetic dipole at all. 

Ok ok, when electrons truly go around the nucleus that gives some magnetic dipole stuff on their own they must be magnetic monopoles. You know I have two lists: 

List 1 contains reasons as why they are monopoles and
List 2 contains reasons as why they are magnetic dipoles. 

In over a year time list number 2 is still empty. 
The only time electrons create a dipole magnetic field is when they are in those s-orbitals going around the nucleus of an atom. (An s-orbital is a spherical orbit.) Bbut that is the same as an electrical current in the wires of a coil; it creates a magnetic field but this does not stick to the electron itself... So list 2 stays empty for the time being.


This is the end of this correction & addendum stuff. Let me close with that nice teaser picture once more since after my view this is the way math should be done; keep it simple like a fist in you face. 


Till updates.  


(15 June 2015) A short update with two links where it is explained UK physics people cannot find the dipole magnetic moment of an electron...

Of course they are not going to find that, after all there are no experiments that validate that electrons are magnetic dipoles. Anyway I have never seen them. 

Item 1) Two vids from Sixty Symbols.

 Item 1) Two vids from Sixty Symbols.

Spherical Electron - Sixty Symbols  

Spherical electron (extra footage) 

The actual experiment is explained a bit in minute 8.00 in the first vid; an electric field is reversed but the electrons refuse to show any dipole magnetic behavior. 

Well this all is nicely 100% in line with what I was thinking after the Stern-Gerlach experiment. But hey, this is strange: the S-G experiment was done in 1922, almost one century back. 

Why the hell was there never ever a physics guy stating it had to be done by magnetic monopoles? Well, physicists are university people and they only think 'What will the colleagues think of it'. And as such instead of hunting down big results, the emotional basis of their ways of thinking ensure they are only catching flies... 


But hey, much more important: don't forget the latest update of 15 pages on a very simple model for the strong interaction. After all the strong force is the strongest of the fundamental forces and if you have good math with that; that is the stuff that counts. And not like the local retards do with their flies catching behaviour... 

Till updates.  


(14 June 2015) Fifteen fresh pages on the strong interaction making a very simple model for how nuclear particles like the proton and the neutron are hold together. 

And, ha ha ha, yesterday I was viewing a historical oversight of string theory. Now guess what? Originally they tried to explain the strong interaction with it but they failed. Of course if you use the wrong math it all will fail completely, just like all those weirdo's that want to make quantum computers using only 2D complex numbers. 

The item for today: 

Item 1) Strong Interaction, a simple math model. 

 Item 1) Strong Interaction, a simple math model. 

For me it is a great honor to publish this update because what I consider myself as my greatest math findings, the exponential circle and exponential curves, are a one to one match when it comes down how protons and neutrons are bound. 

That goes for here on earth but also one billion light years from here and not only now but also a billion years in the future. 

So I am very satisfied with 'just another day at the office', now how will the people from the academic world react on this math? 

My guess is it will be the usual reaction: Neglect, look away, never mention that guy, we need more money, we need more money and we will build quantum computers for the future of humanity & so on and so on. 


The math professors here in Groningen will not like it I am publishing the math only here. Now they cannot do the plagiarism play like they did in the 1990-ties.  


But let's not nag at the local retards. Again for me it is a great honor to hit the button 'publish website' and here are the 15 pages of Strong Interaction. 

I also activated the three teaser pictures from previous updates to this homepage. 

End of this update, till updates. 



(10 June 2015) I will not deny this update is a small attack on the suckers that suck in tax payer money in order to study 'vibrating strings' from so called 'string theory'.   

If you give me only one working vibrating string, I will bow for your insights. 

This is not the case in the year 2015,  so we craft a bit of 'string theory' ourselves using modified Dirichclet kernels for ourselves. 

Item 1) Teaser picture number 3 using Dirichclet modified kernels.

 Item 1) Teaser picture number 3 using Dirichclet modified kernels.

Let me not do difficult on the math details because if you need to publish 3 teaser pictures before there is an good reaction you know: 

These people are dumb and stupid for a good reason. 


After having said that, here the third picture tease:  


Now for the time lag g(t). 

See you in about 300 years when finally the human universities wanted to act as humans... 

Till updates.  


08 June 2015) Why not a second teaser picture for that strange branch of physics known as 'string theory'. Call me old fashioned but if you cannot verify your theoretical results via experiment, why would you pursue a career as a string physics professional???  

Item 1) Second teaser picture for the impending math update.

 Item 1) Second teaser picture for the impending math update.

Yes why would people enter a career as a string theory professional when you never ever can check your stuff via experiment? 

That would be an odd thing to do. 

Now one can argue that since string theory is so beautiful when it comes to the math involved, it must have some kernel of truth... 

That all remains to be seen and that all is about what is 'beautiful math' anyway.  

Because retarded people if they find out that 3 + 7 = 10, they will say 'that is a beautiful result'.  

So here is the second teaser picture while the first teaser picture is found scrolling down only to 04 June below. 


Yes my dear physics professors; why is that? 

I could give you mathematical answers but in practice the coordinate function values are simply amplitudes of 11-dimensional probability distributions...  

Just like it is in the 2-dimensional complex plane. 


End of the second teaser update, till updates. 


(04 June 2015) I am working on a relatively long and detailed update on particle physics using 3D circular numbers for making models for the proton and the neutron.

But in the science of physics there is also that strange brand known as string theory. 
I am not a big fan of string theory because you cannot validate via experiment if the theoretical results are actually true.  

Now those string theory folks always talk about vibrating strings and that it is all 'mathematically perfect' so it must have some kernel of truth... 

And always you have that 11 dimensional space popping up; in order for string theory to make sense they need 11 dimensions where there are 3 dimensions for our space and 8 more that are bounded and very small... 

So I am making a challenge out out of it, that is the item of this update:   

Item 1) People of string theory: give me your 11 dimensional coordinate functions.

 Item 1) People of string theory: give me your 11 dimensional coordinate functions.

If indeed our universe is build from vibrating strings on an extremely small scale, one way or the other the concept of time also plays some role. So for example of the proton and the neutron; what is exactly vibrating in 11 dimensions and please give me the coordinate functions for all these 11 dimensions. 


In about one week my detailed update on particle physics related to the proton and the neutron will be ready and in a small appendix I will give you the details of crafting a curve that is periodic in 11 dimensions.  

That is the end of this update; show me the money, what is the math behind the vibrating strings anyway??? 


Till updates.  Update from 05 June; teaser picture for the string theory folks: 

This graph from a modified Dirichlet kernel is the very first coordinate function x(t), the other 10 coordinate functions are time delays of this very first coordinate function. 

If you put it together in an 11-dimensional space you end up with a periodic curve, the only problem is: it is not vibrating at all... 


So once more: show me the money.
Or better: show me the math.
Till updates.  


(02 June 2015) Very interesting is the BUK news of today; the Russian manufacturer Almaz Antey that produces the BUK systems claims it cannot be a Russian BUK but one from the Ukrainian forces because it was an older type that was used.  

That was what I was thinking in the very first place, the idea that lives in the Western world that the Russian government did send advanced weaponry to the Ukraine and shot our Dutch folks from the sky was a pipedream in the first place. 

A very important detail that is missing: Was the crew that operated the BUK system from Russia yes or no? From the very first beginning I always thought they were Russians. 

Can we blame the Russian government for that? No, they are not dictators like in that weird nation North Korea so when volunteers go to the Ukraine that is more or less allowed... 

That is today's item: 

Item 1) Almaz Antey is willing to explain technical details on filght MH17.

 Item 1) Almaz Antey is willing to explain technical details on filght MH17.

Almaz Antey is willing to detonate a modern version of the BUK system attack rockets, of course there is no reason to do this on high altitude. I hope my fellow Dutch folks react a little bit enthusiastic on this news. 

But once we have the warhead, we can also let it explode our selves. Basically what we need are a few old warheads and one of the more advanced versions from now. 

Like I wrote before: we need the metal shrapnel after the explosion of the warhead, fragments of that must be buried inside the wreckage of flight MH17.  


Now the company Almaz Antey also has proof that the BUK was actually fired from a position controlled by the Ukrainian government. 

That is a very interesting position to take but it raises questions about why the Ukrainians would like to down this particular flight. 

I am sorry but from day one the most likely scenario was a BUK system stolen from the Ukrainian forces operated by voluntary Russians with no knowledge of the air space being used by commercial flight. 

The war tribunal has spoken: I do not blame the Russian government for this.
It was all more or less a freak accident.


Picture source: 

Missile-maker could blow up passenger jet to ‘prove MH17 not downed by Russian weapon’

Let's leave it with that, till updates my dear reader. 


(31 May 2015) On 15 Sept 2014 I made a math update on how you could use 3D numbers to make a superposition of three quantum states.
Although I cannot find it back I also gave an example where you can rotate three quantum states into each other. 

Yesterday I found it turns out this is the way protons and neutrons work; that is what this small update is about. 

Item 1) Strong interaction.

 Item 1) Strong interaction.

Yesterday like an innocent lamb I was just Youtubbing around with a bit of weak force vids and a few strong force vids and I came along a vid with the title Strong interaction. 

I had absolutely no clue what strong interaction was; only some vague notion it could be related to the strong force that binds the quarks into protons and neutrons and holds the nucleus of atoms together.  

This is what I viewed: 

Strong Interaction: The Four Fundamental Forces of Physics #1a 

Strong Interaction: The Four Fundamental Forces of Physics #1b 

To my surprise what I did last September with rotating the three colors of quarks into each other, it happens all the time. With present day knowledge we understand it are the gluons that constantly transport the so called 'color charge' of the quarks around. 

It is truly amazing; this math of 3D complex and circular numbers have in their very heart the behavior of all protons and neutrons in our universe. 

So will the physics professors make some noise or will they do weasel stuff like all math departments do??? 

Let's hope for the best but we must never forget that physics people are university people too so they are basically only interested about what their colleagues will think of their contributions... (That is the way 21-th century science works by the way, all these scientists are only pre-occupied about what the colleagues will think of it.) 

This is a small screen shot from the #1b Youtubber: 


So I wish every body good luck in trying to understand the higher dimensional exponential circles and what you can do with them. 
Of course that does not go for the math professors of this world; as far as I am concerned they can get any cancer there is around there... 

Till updates 


(29 May 2015) A small thought experiment on electrical charges, in it I will make the same fault that physicists have made with magnetism (I mean they think that electrons are magnetic dipoles but they have no experimental proof whatsoever). 

Item 1) A small thought experiment on electrical charges. 

 Item 1) A small thought experiment on electrical charges.

Take any piece of matter that is electronically neutral, so to say it has no net charge. 

For example one kilo of iron. 

Now cut it in half, you will see that both half kilo's are electrically neutral; there is no charge in any of the two parts.

Keep on chopping the stuff into smaller and smaller parts. 

Every time you will observe no overall charge. 

Finally you come down to one atom of iron, if it is not ionized the iron atom is electrically speaking neutral.  

Now you separate the electrons from the iron atom; the collection of electrons is electrically neutral just as the nucleus of the iron atom. 


Here we stop our thought experiment because it has run off the rails of common knowledge: at present day we believe strongly that electrons are negative and protons positively charged particles. 


But with magnetism we are always told by professional physics professors that electrons are magnetic dipoles because of a vague property known as spin. 

And the professional professors speak words like:

In the Stern-Gerlach experiment the bipolar electron anti-aligns itself with the inhomogenous magnetic field. So half of them align and the other half anti-aligns itself.

After that they often wave their hands a bit and tell you that quantum mechanics is so weird and so different from our macroscopic world that it all behaves like no sane human could understand.... 


Well for myself speaking I have drawn my conclusion and I make the following statement: 

For the time being I consider the Stern-Gerlach experiment the fundamental proof of electrons being magnetic monopoles simply because a bipolar magnet of the size of an electron cannot go 'anti-align' itself. 

I have spoken, let's listen if their will be a response...
(Or will it be just like the faggots and cowards from the math departments? 
Silence year in year out? 
I hope it not but you never know with these people from the universities.
After all they are some kind of perfumed princes living in a world of luxury.)

In the next picture the words 'ga terug' mean like you have guessed go back. 
Of course that symbolizes physics should hunt down the magnetic monopole once more but now properly until you have it clear cut in your mind. 


End of this update. 


(26 May 2015) Stuff that goes under the name tetraneutron is a configuration of 4 neutrons and this configuration cannot be explained by the present theory on nuclear forces. So let's do it 'magnetic monopole style'. 

Item 1) Tetraneutron explained as four magnetic monopoles. 

 Item 1) Tetraneutron explained as four magnetic monopoles. 

There is only one observation of tetraneutron and even that one observation is disputed. From a distance I cannot judge if this disputing makes sense, we must also take into account since the standard model of particle physics cannot explain such stuff, automatically it will come under attack.

Or, what I am having with the higher dimensional complex numbers; the so called 'professional professors' are trying to silence me to death. But I have declared these people as pseudo scientists a long time ago and as such the universities are all ngelectable quantities... 

The next wiki gives the details: Tetraneutron 

The French team in Caen used a highly instable isotope where the nucleus has a so called halo of the four neutrons together. 


Under the hypothesis that all spin half particles are magnetic monopoles, we already understood that this gives rise to the existence of electron pairs. Because electrons are electrically charged they cannot form structures that are beyond the pair. 

A neutron is not charged, anyway the total charge is zero according to the standard accepted theory of quarks, so if neutrons are also magnetic monopoles they can also come in numbers like 2, 4, 6, 8 etc. As even numbers. 

But it could also come are a cube shape with 8 neutrons where on every corner a north pole magnetic monopole neutron is connected with 3 south pole neutrons (and vice versa; it has to be an alternating structure where no two equal magnetic monopoles touch each other). 

Recall there are also neutron stars; likely they are build in a similar fashion. 


It was over one year ago that I realized electrons could very well be magnetic monopoles and until now I have not found one detail that points into another direction. Ok ok, you have all those physics professors that say electrons are magnetic dipoles, but they have no theoretical or experimental proof for that. 

It is just an assumption they believe in, they have no proof whatsoever. 


A nuclear halo? Nature has amazing strange ways, but for this halo stuff there is indeed experimental confidence because such nuclear structures with a loose halo are far bigger compared to a nicely packed compact nucleus from a stable isotope.  

This is the wiki: Halo nucleus  

This is a screenshot from that very wiki suggesting strongly that neutrons and protons can indeed form pairs while neutrons can also come in a quadruplet.  


Ok, that's it for this update. Till updates.  



(22 May 2015) On a wiki on electrons I found a perfect photo that could show that electrons are magnetic monopoles. Wikipedia wants me to 'attribute the author'. 

Ok, but is the 'author' also the person that took the photo in the first place?
Anyway, the attribution goes to:
"Cyclotron motion wider view" by Marcin Białek - Own work. 

Ok, it says 'own work' so thanks for the wonderful photo Marcin! 

Item 1) From old television tubes to this cyclotron photo.

 Item 1) From old television tubes to this cyclotron photo.

Old black & white televisions needed about 10 to 12 thousand Volts in their electron canon to work properly, the color televisions (if memory serves) needed about 50 to 60 thousand Volt. Anyway the voltage is not important, the relevant fact is that although beam of electrons are intrinsically unstable because due to the equal electrical charge the beam will widen over time, it was possible to write about 600 lines with those electrical canons. 

These tubes were marvelous creations of electrical engineering, at the back of the television was a manual regulator and with that you could control the so called 'synchronization' that ensured the electron cannon was at the right point for every new batch of 600 fresh lines to be written on the screen.   

The fact sync worked in the first place is a true miracle; there is a small island of stability and the engineers were capable of hunting it down... 


Ok, lets return to our present year 2015 updates on electrons being magnetic monopoles, look at the picture below. 

The electrons make only one round but this is done in a homogeneous magnetic field. 
The electron cannon spits out electrons at the cathode and they are absorbed by the positive anode.  

As you see in inspection, halfway into the loop the electrons are widely dispersed. Ok ok, this could be related to having a lousy electron cannon but it could also be caused by electrons being magnetic monopoles.

After all these electrons are exposed to a magnetic field perpendicular toward the curve they are forced to take. And the magnetic monopole nature of the electrons make them spread around... 


Nice picture isn't it? 

Source: Electron 


Dutch learning's on the 'little donkey bridge' or as we say it: 

het ezelsbruggetje.  

A donkey bridge is a simple way to memorize stuff in such a way that minimizes future faults. 

An example is cnap. 

All you have to do is memorize the word cnap.
And after that for the rest of your life you will know that:

Cathode = negative while
Anode = positive. 


After this Dutch learning, please observe in the above picture that even applying a large anode, the electrons still have a strong tendency to spread out. 

Do not believe the bla bla talk of physics professors; they talk about 'align with the magnetic field' and 'anti-align with the magnetic field'. 

In the world physics professors live in, you are not allowed to say what it is:

Magnetic monopoles.


End of this update, till updates. 


(20 May 2015) A short update on the Gauss insights on magnetic monopoles, he thought magnetic monopoles do not exist. 

Yet our little though experiment as electrons being magnetic dipoles showed life on earth could not exist if electrons were magnetic dipoles.
And you cannot argue with that; after all life on land exists...

Item 1) How Gauss viewed the stuff.

 Item 1) How Gauss viewed the stuff.

During the time Gauss lived electrons were still not discovered so Gauss had no idea of their properties. The ideas of Gauss boil down to the simple insight that magnetic field lines are always closed, they are continuous loops contrary to electrical fields that can go from plus to minus. 

Now for a standard bar magnet or magnetism from electricity, the Gauss ideas are about one hundred percent correct. But if electrons are magnetic monopoles, in practice all our permanent magnets would not behave exactly like Gauss predicted. 

Since I like Gauss a lot, for me it is a great honor to put forward one of his formulations of the magnetical stuff. It is the version where all flux that goes in also should go out; and mark my words; the mathematical representation is perfect.  

(Only those pesky electrons spoil all this perfection in math...) 


Source: Gauss's law for magnetism  


Now if indeed electrons are magnetic monopoles, the picture changes dramatically and we have to rewrite the basic laws of magnetism in a way that looks very similar to electricity. 

I am not going to do that because I am a math guy. 

End of this short update, till updates. 
Added 21 May: The electron was discovered in 1897. The next link is about that discovery and these pages are definitely from the stone age of the internet but anyway; it is a perfect read and not too hard. 

The Electron, J J Thomson 1897 


End of the extra update. Till updates.  


(17 May 2015) Ha ha ha, the well known 21 cm wavelength from hydrogen explained via electrons being magnetic monopoles + the ultrafine spectrum ideas. 

Item 1) What causes the well known 21 cm wavelength radiation?

 Item 1) What causes the well known 21 cm wavelength radiation?

In the science of astronomy the electro-magnetic wavelength of 21 cm are studied because this is a very common wavelength observed throughout the universe and, for example, you can use it to validate the so called 'red shift' that says our universe is expanding everywhere.  

Except for black holes, according to the Einstein stuff black holes suck in space at the speed of light... So black holes more or less act as the vacuum cleaners of all that interstellar space that only produces more space.  

Anyway, as I view the stuff with electron spin there is nothing spinning at all since the observe magnetic forces are so high the electron would be spinning at speeds far beyond the speed of light. 

Since an electron still has a tiny mass, this cannot happen so why we are still talking about the spin of an electron in the year 2015 beats me. 

Electrons are basically magnetic monopoles, electrons have only two possible quantum states when it comes to magnetism: it is either north or south. 

In that regard electrons are very different from all macroscopic structures where there always are bipolar magnets observed.  

Now below you see a nice picture about the 21 cm wavelength radiation, this wavelength is not only a fingerprint of the expanding universe but also a fingerprint to the smallest possible magnetic monopoles. 


In the above picture you see the so called 'hyperfine structure' but what is ultrafine structure? Very simple: although the magnetic monopole of a proton is nothing compared to those of the electrons, nuclear spin of the proton could also point down and while the hyperfine structure gives two values for the hydrogen thing, the ultrafine spectrum would give four different jumps in energy levels when ionization takes place... 

Source of the picture: 

End of this update, till updates.  


(15 May 2015) A short update on the earth magnetic field and a giant breach of that magnetic field that reportedly by NASA was ten times as big as present day science could explain.  

Of course 'present day science' thinks that electrons are magnetic dipoles; of course this is not forbidden but if that leads to all kinds of completely bizarre results or theories you can also ponder the question as why electrons have to be magnetic dipoles. 

Item 1) NASA reports giant breach of the earth magnetic field (in 2008) 

 Item 1) NASA reports giant breach of the earth magnetic field (in 2008) 

If your mind is open to electrons being magnetic monopoles, in that case you would be able to understand what happens during solar storms. 

Yet if we believe the science of physics, for some strange reason that nobody can explain properly or in some transparent fashion, electrons have to be magnetic dipoles. 

Now why do all those physics professors tell you that electrons are magnetic dipoles while if that were true life on earth could not exist? 

That is because sciences like physics and math are crafted just like they are one of the main religions going round. When it comes to math & physics it looks mostly like the religion of Christianity and the Muslim faith. 

There are a few 'founders of that religion' like Jesus or Mohammed and after that believers think those prophets had 'eternal wisdom'. In science we also have prophets, they have names like Einstein or Dirac or whatever what. 


If you free yourself from the way your mind works, you can do so called 'thought experiments'. And if the thought experiment is solar wind or solar storm you have a better understanding of what is happening in the first place. 


Let me end the bla bla bla and post only one link to my bla bla bla: 

Giant Breach in Earth's Magnetic Field Discovered 

End of this small update, till updates. 


(11 May 2015, updated with isospin on 12 May) Yesterday I added six links to the latest update in the math files that explores the possibility that all spin half particles are magnetic monopoles. 

And until yesterday I lived in a world where protons would always have spin +1/2 and neutrons always -1/2. Today I observed all kinds of weird information that shakes my simple view on the neutron; that is the small update for today. 

Item 1) Things I don't understand about neutrons. 

 Item 1) Things I don't understand about neutrons.

Inside the science of chemistry the basic view is the period table of elements, but elements like magnesium or whatever what can also have isotopes. These isotopes can be stable or radioactive and decay over time in other stuff. 

The only difference between isotopes is the number of neutrons.
So basically the picture should be very simple: one more neutron should lower the total spin of a nucleus while one less neutron would raise the total spin. 

Remark once more that I think there is nothing spinning, it's all magnetic monopoles. And the sole fact that neutrons can alter the magnetic spin of an atomic nucleus also says all those physics professors are totally wrong with relating the magnetic properties of small particles to rotation & spinning stuff.  

To make a long story short; adding or subtracting only one neutron can alter the magnetic properties of an atomic nucleus beyond belief. 

In the next picture you see a bunch of isotopes from magnesium and at the bottom you see a very weird picture that supposedly contains the present day insights in proton & neutron spin. 

I would like to remark that I have no means to check of this information is actually true, so for the time being we suppose it is all correct... 


Let me first give you the source files;
The table is from a website named webelements dot com, there for all atomic elements you can find lots of properties of them. The table is from the next page: 

Magnesium: the essentials 

And the mind blowing picture on the proton comes from the High Energy Physics information system.  If the https link does not work, try 


In the table you observe adding one neutron does weird things to the overall spin of a particular nucleus; are there more spin half particles that are changing sign and if so, WTF is going on??? 


Now I do not want to be left in all kinds of details, but the word 'spin' for talking about magnetic properties of small particles is a disaster in the first place. Ok, I will not deny that a spinning electrical charge creates a magnetic dipole. 

After all that is the way these very words are written down; via electricity I can download it to my website and those kinds of transports are always based on dipole magnetism. 

Let's leave it with that, but don't forget to check out a few of those six links I posted yesterday: The Aurora Borealis and magnetic monopoles  


Till updates.  One day later; problem solved! Quarks that form protons and neutrons are called up and down, but this does not mean their magnetic spin is also up or down!
The names up and down are related to something completely else: isospin.
I was thinking that magnetic spin in quarks was related to their electrical charge; so I am glad I figured out my fault...
So it is perfectly possible that adding one neutron to an isotope completely changes the magnetic properties of the nucleus in question.  
(Well I am not a particle physicists of course...)  


(09 May 2015) A few day back in the math files on higher dimensional complex numbers I posted an update about the polar lights being caused by the fact that spin half particles could be magnetic monopoles.    

So that is the item for this update: 

Item 1) Are all spin half particle actually magnetic monopoles?

 Item 1) Are all spin half particle actually magnetic monopoles?

Electrons, protons and neutrons are all so called spin half particles. But even the more basic building blocks of nuclear particles like proton and neutron are supposed to be of the spin half type of particles. 

For electrons it is very simple to create an experiment that will make the case for being magnetic monopoles. As a matter of fact it already has been done; it is the famous Stern Gerlach experiment. 

But the original Stern Gerlach experiment does not prove at all that electrons are magnetic monopoles; for that you need the present day techno known as the MRI scanning device as it is found in every big hospital in our Western world. 

If the results of the Stern Gernlach experiment can be done inside the working of a modern MRI scanning device, that will prove electrons are magnetic monopoles... 


But hey, I am spinning off from my direction of posting a so called 'teaser picture' for the latest math update. 

It has to be remarked that it is five pages long and from the onset I tried to prevent writing down any calculation whatsoever; but after a few days the blood creeps where it cannot go and without thinking I wrote down example number 2. 

So that explains the content of the teaser picture; Even if I try to write only in words, one way or the other the math will set in... 


Ha ha, I never thought I would write on random walks... 

Let me pop another beer to make the walk of my life a bit more random!  

Anyway, till updates. 


 (03 May 2015) This update is a small so called 'thought experiment' on electrons being magnetic dipoles. As a matter of fact it turns out that life on earth is not possible if electrons were not magnetic monopoles...

Item 1) Hello physics professors; what happens if electrons are magnetic dipoles?

  Item 1) Hello physics professors; what happens if electrons are magnetic dipoles?

Hello physics professors from the noble science of physics; since you are a strong believer in the evolution of theory via experimental results that speak for themselves, you are on the side of the reasonable sciences. 

So that is completely unlike my own science, in the science of math we only have lunatics and cowards; may be that is caused by the fact inside math you cannot do experiments in some kind of 'real world'. 


Anyway, this is a short update. The thought experiment is very simple: 

You are an electron going via solar wind or solar storm towards planet earth and we suppose you are a bipolar magnet because of supposed 'intrinsic spin' or other 'bla bla bla stuff'. 

You are an evil electron, you have magnetic bipolar disorder and you are approaching planet earth. What will happen?  

That is very simple: the bipolar electron has a magnetic north and a south. 

From the viewpoint of the impending electron, all forces cancel out: 

The earth has a magnetic North and a magnetic South; what forces will the earth North pole do on the electron? 

Again very simple: The earth North will repel the electron north and attract the electron south by the same amount. Hence the result is a zero force. 

The earth South pole will repel the electron south and attract the electron north by the same amount. Hence the result is zero force. 

Since both magnetic poles of the earth contribute to nothing at all on the impending electron, the only thing the impending electron has to do is to align itself with the earth magnetic field and after that it can penetrate the earth magnetic field perpendicular. 

That spells trouble, the electron will land in the ozone layer that protects the earth for billions of years... 

Now loose electrons and loose protons are highly ionizing particles, so they will destroy the ozone layer and life on this planet as we know it has never been there in the first place. 


End of this very simple to understand thought experiment, I would like to remark a more 'professional reaction' is expected by me from the physics professors and not act like those sleaze balls and douche bags that run the scene in the science of math... 

Till updates. (One day later on  04 May I corrected the word 'slease' into 'sleaze' and I corrected the start before item 1 and now it says life one earth can only exist because electrons are magnetic monopoles...) 



(27 April 2015) Polar light is a mysterious phenomenon, the theory says it is solar wind from the sun going to the North and South pole. The solar wind itself is plasma so loose electrons and protons and may be the occasional helium nucleus.  

But why do they go to the magnetic poles of our planet?
After all if the physicists are right and electrons are really magnetic dipoles, in that case they could not be attracted by either the North pole or the South pole.
After all in an electron the magnetic poles are so close that the attraction delivered on the one pole is compensated by the repelling of the other magnetic pole of the electron.  

That is our item for today: 

Item 1) Polar lights and the electron as magnetic monopoles.

 Item 1) Polar lights and the electron as magnetic monopoles.

I am still amazed that I just cannot succeed into finding just one example where electrons are truly dipoles (ok ok, one electron circling one proton must be one, but that is viewed as an electrical current). 

It explains why electrons come in pairs in the chemical sciences, that last fact explains as why molecule orbits can only be full with an even number of electrons. So the electrons being magnetic monopoles lies at the very heart of how chemical reactions take place and at the very heart of how molecules are build up.  

Now it has been found in the last century that the polar light is incoming solar wind along magnetic lines from the earth magnetic field. But my dear professional physicists; does a small magnetic dipole do such a thing? 

No that does not work, if you use a difficult line of reasoning like 'the one magnetic pole is a tiny closer to earth compared to the other, so the dipole closes to earth wins it and it gets attracted to earth' is rubbis:
If that were true the electrons (and protons) would come in at such a slow speed we would not see any light at all... 

That amazing thing that we see light is just one of the many reasons that electrons must be magnetic monopoles.  

Very likely the professional physics professors will react exactly the same as the cowards from mathematics; They will stay silent. 

So let's not waste time on a collection of cowards with severe cognitive malfunction. Let's look at a nice video of the polar light itself and in the meantime wonder if electrons could be magnetic dipoles via another line of reasoning... 


Title Youtuve video: Het Noorderlicht  (The Polar light).


From the social point of view I expect physics professors to react the same as the non reacting math professors on the higher dimensional complex numbers.  

But where my own kind of math folks are just too fucking stupid combined with cowardice, the physics professors will over time understand that electrons being magnetic monopoles is not the most crazy idea in the world. 

So only cowardice will be the main source of their non reacting, whereas with math professors you have this wall to wall & floor to ceiling stupidity. And there is no cure for stupidity... 


End of this update, till updates.   


(25 April 2015) On 08 Sept 2014 I started the third gluten experiment about how the gluten in your daily bread is completely non bio-degradable and as such eating bread gives a wide spectrum of health issues in humans.  

After over 6 months the final results are in and they are very interesting.
That is today's item, a food item about that poison named gluten. 

Item 1) Final photo result of the third gluten experiment.

 Item 1) Final photo result of the third gluten experiment.

Gluten is one of the set of molecules that are hard to digest, just like drinking mineral oil is bad for your health, eating gluten erodes your long term health.  

For the wheat gluten is God's gift to wheat; without the gluten all grains would rot away during the winter season and as such wheat has adapted itself to grow in places with greater seasonal changes. (Read spread out to the colder climates.) 

It is no secret that I am allergic to gluten, therefore it has my interest in the first place... 

If you do your daily shopping I always have a strong interest in what unhealthy looking people buy for their daily food. So often it is a bread that they are buying, it is amazing once you realize this that so often bread consumption is tied to bad health.

Young people have no problem with it, they are like a 'boss' in video games; they can eat all the bread they want until, ha ha ha, if you shoot long enough in a video game all bosses can be killed.  


For myself speaking; in the first 50 years of my life I was not allergic to the grain named wheat but when I started consuming a so called 'health product' from the company Unilever my health spiraled down rapidly. 

Checking the details, it was one of the food additives known as the 'taste enhancers' that changed my food intolerance towards a deadly allergy. 

Therefore in the future I will destroy the market value of the company named Unilever; do you think I am bluffing??? Better think twice.  

The third gluten experiment is also is way of understanding how the food industry makes consumers to overeat, and there are many legal ways to make consumers food addicts. 

In the third gluten experiment I added a lot of Camembert fungus to the gluten in order to observe how the gluten would bread down. How 'dio degradable' is it? 

After all, when I am brewing beer the gluten is killed in about 75 minutes during the mashing process, but for that you need the enzymes inside your malts and wheat just has none of those enzymes.  

To make a long story short: You should not eat stuff your body cannot digest. Just like you do not drink petroleum or gasoline or breath natural gas, you should not eat the biggest money maker in the food industry: Wheat & all things related to wheat. 

After 7 months of waiting, the latest non digestible parts of pure gluten are finally under the surface: 


It took a long time to degrade, but now it looks like a liquid. Yet just below the surface their are still blocks of gluten.  


In the next gluten experiment I will add the enzymes from barley. My expectation is that the enzymes from barley kill all the attitudes the wheat gluten has. 

End of this update, till updates. 


(18 April 2015) This day I hang the 16 pages on the curves of grace into this website. It is 3D stuff only, in higher dimensions like 5D or so you have much much more of them.  

Item 1) The curves of grace (3D version only)

 Item 1) The curves of grace (3D version only)

Ok, I will explain as why I breach my own embargo of publishing at most 10% of new results found. It is very simple: may be with cracking the Riemann hypothesis in dimensions above 2 (the complex plane) you need knowledge upon these curves of grace. 

I think that zero's of the Riemann zeta function are found in the direction of the tau number (just like in the complex plane where they are on the so called critical line inside the critical strip). 
Previously I said: Look in the direction of the 'imitators of i'.
The imitators of i and their time evolution are always factored by curves of grace. 


Well enough of the bla bla bla, I composed the 16 pages long update such that even so called 'professional professors' in math could understand it (if they wanted it).

But given their fundamental love for being incompetent, likely they even do not want it... 

Let it be, click on the teaser picture to land on the latest update:  


End of this update, till updates. 


(17 April 2015) Wow wow wow, I just finished the impending 16 page long math update upon the curves of grace. Therefore while drinking another home brew of beer, lets look at coffee:  

For a few weeks I am roasting coffee beans for myself and I have to say:
This is so much better compared to what you can buy as pre-roasted coffee that I will keep on roasting my unroasted coffee beans for a few more years... 

Roasting coffee is very simple; compared to roasting malts for beer brewing it is a plane cake walk. 

Only one item for today, I am a big fan of the company named SpaceX.
And today SpaceX delivered a coffee machine to the international space station. 

Item 1) Coffee in space. 

 Item 1) Coffee in space. 

I am completely unfamiliar with coffee in space, so the intellectuals from the British Telegraph will do the talking for me:   

SpaceX Dragon delivers espresso maker to International Space Station.

End of this important update upon coffee in space.  

Till updates. 


 (15 April 2015) Oh oh, how could I make a teaser picture riddled with so many faults?
The answer is simple: Never update math stuff while drinking too much home brew beer.  

So this small update is only showing the more or less correct teaser picture as it should have been in the first place. 

Item 1) Teaser picture without all those drunk from beer faults. 

 Item 1) Teaser picture without all those drunk from beer faults. 

Anyway to make a long story short: After thinking a few days upon the way black holes work using my simple math model of time evolution like e^jt, I think I have made good understanding in the geometry of a black hole sucking in all that matter from a so called accretion disk.  

Of course I cannot expose it in detail because that costs so many hours of work while the so called 'academic professionals' show 0.0 interest.  

Why should I waste my time on garbage people?
Why should I waste my time on pseudo scientists?  


After having said that, here is the teaser picture as it was supposed to be: 


Till updates.  


(12 April 2015) A small update on so called 'curves of grace'. 

Item 1) Impending math update: The curves of grace. 

 Item 1) Impending math update: The curves of grace. 

About 25 years ago I studied the properties of the 3 Taylor series as you see on the bottom of the teaser picture. These are extensions of the sin, cos, sinh and the hyperbolic cosine. 

But that was before I found the higher dimensional complex numbers and if you only have Taylor series in you mathematical toolbox, you will make some progress but not much... 

Yet let me not do negative on Taylor series, if you see them for the first time they are magical, or aren't they?  


Anyway, I just finished a relatively long investigation into the 3D curves of grace and like I expected they could be the perfect starting point of making a math model of how matter behaves around black holes. 

Ok ok, the model needs some perfection because with e^jt the matter goes from outside of the accretion disk to the outside of the alpha line. But it keeps accelerating exponentially. 

So I have to temper the speed of time a little bit...  

May be in the future I will try to temper time with the way time slows down using the ideas of the Einstein guy... 

But the extremely simple model e^jt works perfect in the sense that matter inside the accretion disk goes indeed into the black hole. 


Like said before: The way black holes behave is the shortest possible advertisement for 3D complex numbers. Of course that will fall on deaf ears because for the professional professors being incompetent is a choice they make day in day out again.  


Enough of the bla bla bla, here is a teaser picture and it is important to remark I did not use any theory of differential equations but only a mixture of 2D numbers from the complex plane together with my own 3D complex numbers.  


(Ha ha, yesterday I forgot the division by 3 in the coordinate functions; may be I should not update after a few liters of home brew...;)

The update will be rather long so in a week or so it will be published; in the meantime the professional math professors could prove they are actually worth all those boatloads of tax payer money by finding the solutions to the non-alternating Taylor series in the above picture. 

Till updates.  


(09 April 2015) A few days back I posted a short update on my views as electrons being magnetic monopoles. I think electrons are magnetic monopoles and that the transition from the north state to the south state can be calculated precisely.  

So in this update I show you one of those weirdo's that try to build quantum computers based upon the idea that electrons on their own are magnetic dipoles... 

Item 1) With scientists like that, when will the first quantum computer be there? 

 Item 1) With scientists like that, when will the first quantum computer be there? 

If you keep on thinking electrons are dipole magnets whatsoever, you will never be able to harness the power of a quantum computer. If you for vague emotional reasons keep on hanging to a belief system that just does not work, all your ideas about quantum computers will fade into insignificance. 

I have selected for you a moment in time where so called 'leading scientists' expose their emotional bounds to electrons being magnetic dipoles all of the time.

I think it is a bag of rubbish and because it is a bag of rubbish all those so called quantum computers that they build at for example the D-wave factories, they will not work... 

That's what I think; the 'moment of time' is one minute and ten seconds, or 1:10 in the next Youtubber: 

How Does a Quantum Computer Work 


Electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles, if they were dipoles only a very small fraction would go against the inhomogenous magnetic field. But if about half of the electrons are capable of fighting the stronger part of the magnetic field, this can only mean they are magnetic monopoles...

About 3 days back I posted this monopole stuff on electrons.  

End of this update, till updates.  


  (02 April 2015) An update in Dutch because our minister of economical affairs made a few comments lately about stopping the gas production in a fundamental way.
For the first time I agree with him and I would like to explain why this is good over a long long time haul (centuries so to say).

Item 1) Voordelen van aardwarmte.

  Item 1) Voordelen van aardwarmte.

Meer restwarmte en aardwarmte gebruiken is een goed idee, men probeert nog veel meer zoals bijv biobrandstoffen. Maar bio brandstoffen lossen het probleem van te hoge concentraties broeikas gassen helemaal niet op; je ziet al die maffe auto's rondrijden met daarop 'Wij rijden duurzaam op aardgas'.

Nou nee dus, bio brandstoffen zijn misschien minder idioot dan zo snel mogelijk de voorraad aardolie & gas opmaken, maar het probleem van te hoge concentraties broeikas gassen blijft gewoon bestaan.

De planeet aarde is, net als de zon, een enorme zak warmte. Heel langzaam komt die warmte naar buiten, bijv de ijzeren kern van de aarde groeit elke 1000 jaar ongeveer 1 contimeter. Per miljoen jaar dus ongeveer 10 meter; dat komt omdat de radioactieve processen die de kern van de aarde warm houden natuurlijk ook eens opraken. Maar dat duurt enorm lang gelukkig.

Nou wat is het grote voordeel van aardwarmte gebruiken?

Eenvoudig: Je verstookt veel minder fossiele brandstoffen en het is de enigste manier om het overschot aan warmte hier op aarde simpelweg het heelal in te stralen.

Elke keer als het helder weer is dan straalt elke huis warmte het heelal in.


Technische kanttekeningen; Als je warmte oppomt dan is dat equivalent met het koelen van de bodem op grote diepte; echter transport van warmte gaat enorm langzaam. Ik weet niet hoe snel maar als je teveel warmte oppompt dan werkt zo'n plek na een aantal jaren niet meer.

Maar als wij voor hele stadswijken warmte gaan oppompen dan hebben we heel veel nodig want bijv in het jaar 2199 wil men ook graag elke dag een warme douce nemen.

Het is daarom waarschijnlijk verstandig om bij het boren direct drie of vier verschillende aftappunten te hebben. Als je dan één jaar zo'n aftappunt gebruikt hebt, dan ga je naar de volgende die bijv een aantal honderden meters dieper ligt. Na vier jaar kom je dan weer bij je eerste aftappunt uit.

En al dat boren in de grond dan?

Nou hebben we al niet een club die dat goed kan?

Dat is de NAM enzo...


Kijk dit is enorm duur natuurlijk; aan de andere kant de gewonnen warmte is gratis. En als het zo gemaakt kan worden dat één boorput makkelijk 50 jaar meegaat dan zullen de kosten op termijn best meevallen. 

Maar dit is echt zo'n geval van 'De kost gaet voor de baet uit'. 


Dat was het, tot opdatums. 

Till updates.  


(29 March 2015) A short food update upon the Alzheimer disease that is now declared diabetes type 3. For myself speaking I was more or less totally surprised by the fact our own brains also make insulin. So I was chewing on that a few weeks. 

Item 1) I think type 3 diabetes is for real, but lots of stuff is still unknown.

 Item 1) I think type 3 diabetes is for real, but lots of stuff is still unknown.

A relatively good starting link is the next:

Alzheimer's Is Type 3 Diabetes 

In the above link there are many good links to other pages.  

Another link contains the name of a chick named Suzanne de la Monte. I don't know much about her but it seems she can do animal experiments in such a way they develop Alzheimer. 

If true, Suzanne is at least worth her weight in gold... 

Alzheimer's Disease Is Type 3 Diabetes–Evidence Reviewed 



Last December it came out the Unilever is separating her spread division from the core kernel of her other commercial activities. Investors applaud this for reasons of 'declining returns' and so. 

After my humble opnion; these investor folks do not understand what Unilever knows about food and future judicial stuff. If indeed the dangers of transfats are understood by Unilever food experts for decades, it is indeed very wise to separate the spread division... 

Here in one of the separated products: 


Let's leave it with that. 


(26 March 2015) Today I finished the nine page update on the Riemann zeta function in 3D complex number space. It is nine pages of what is supposed to look as numerical mathematics, I have to say it was a pleasure to write it.  

Item 1) Zeta on the critical strip (3D version only).

 Item 1) Zeta on the critical strip (3D version only).

Let me repeat the teaser picture, if you click on it you are supposed to land on the latest math update.  


End of this update, till updates. 


(23 March 2015) Because I am a very lousy computer programmer I wrote a 9 pages piece that might help skilled computer programmers to find the zero's of the most famous math problem that is standing open into higher dimensions. 

At the same time I am trying to learn one of those modern computer programming languages, namely C sharp. And that is the item of today: 

Item 1) C# or C sharp? For me it is C stupid. 

 Item 1) C# or C sharp? For me it is C stupid. 

Let me be clear: This is not an attack on the software company Microsoft because after all they have their customer base and as such it is highly logical that even modern computer programming languages do not suit the math mind. 

But I do not complain, yet it has to be in these files that when I execute the command

Xcoord[k] = Xcoord[k]/3 

I get the correct answers inside C sharp. 

But if I do 

Xcoord[k] = Xcoord[k]*(1/3)

the whole thing reacts very differently and I only get zero's... 


My dear Microsoft, how can this be?


Anyway, lately I am hunting down the zero's of the Riemann zeta function in higher dimensional number systems. And although there is some progress on my side of the story, for me it is frustrating that even modern computer languages are so bad at math. 

But the hunt itself is very beautiful; If the zero's of the Riemann zeta function fall outside any exponential circle or higher dimensional exponential curve; rather likely the universe will collapse instantly. 


End of the bla bla bla, here is a nice picture with the explicit formulas included for the Riemann zeta function zero's in 3D. 


In the picture you see that 14, 1347 etc. Well that is the first non-trivial zero of the Riemann thing. As far as I understand reality, this stuff can be used for all zero's as they are found inside the complex plane. 

I crafted these three coordinate functions in such a way you can fill in the values as they go around for the Riemann stuff in the complex plane...  

Updated on 24 March: With every update I forgot to correct what I said in previous updates; If there are zero's of the Riemann zeta function in 3D and you use the Dirichlet eta function, in that case you will not get a zero but a multiple of the number alpha. 

So a multiple of  a = (1, -1, 1)/3. 

The reason is the same as discussed in the 05 Jan 2014 update: 

Adding stuff up from the exponential circle gives an extra alpha, for example the geometric series for the roots of unity in 3D. 

See the old update: 

The Song of Omega Reloaded,
The 3-dimensional roots of  unity omega


Till updates.   


(19 March 2015) A food & celebrities update; Reinko goes show news gossip style...     

Item 1) Has Amy Macdonald stopped eating bread? 

 Item 1) Has Amy Macdonald stopped eating bread? 

Amy Macdonald is a Scottish singer and by sheer accident the Youtube channel started beaming the registration of a concert from 2014 to my flatsceen monitor. 

Anyway, I was struck by the change in appearance.
This is how a female like Amy is supposed to look when not eating all that weird food:  

Amy Macdonald - Baloise Session 2014 - Full Concert 

Now compare that to the way she looked during their first hit 'This is the life' 

Amy Macdonald - This Is The Life 

Here you see the striking difference; females that eat bread every day often have those weird deposits of fat that aren't supposed to be there. Bread is just one of those examples: after eating bread your body refuses to burn fat so you get that strange accumulation of fat while feeling hungry at the same time... 


Yeah yeah, it is not much of a miracle as why the food industry promotes bread: if you cannot burn your body fat you will get hungry much faster. 

And that my dear reader is the way it works in a capitalist system. Not that I am against the principle of capitalist economies, but people often think the food industry will never sell poison if they get an extra profit from that. 

These people are dumb & deserve to die before their time. 

By the way; the gossip is: Has Amy stopped eating bread?  


End of this update. 


(16 March 2015) Two items today; the first about a remark the Russian prez Vladimir Putin made & the second item is a teaser picture related to the most famous math problem around: the zeta function hypothesis.  

Item 1) Russia was willing to go nuclear over Crimea. 
Item 2) Teaser picture on the Riemann conjecture.

 Item 1) Russia was willing to go nuclear over Crimea.

The last days it was more or less in the media that Vladimir Putin had said that in the end the Russians would be willing to go nuclear over the Crimea thing. 

That looks a bit over the top, but now one year later what is the outcome of this all? 

Only 5000 to 6000 casualties while at present date we can hope the truce will stand. 

As a comparison, 5000 is only 2% of, for example, the Syrian equation. 


So can we learn a lesson from this? 

Yes we can; it shows that symmetric warfare is better compared to asymmetric warfare. My original estimations from the day the Ukrainian prez Viktor disappeared were about 100 times as high. 


From the War Tribunal point of view: I thank the Russians for their efforts.
Despite all that weird international sanction stuff, facts are that when push comes to shove, the Russians act clever. So thanks!       

 Item 2) Teaser picture on the Riemann conjecture.

A very different item compared to item number one; lately I have been working on stuff that could help computer programmers to find the zero's of the zeta function in higher dimensions.  

For the last 100+ years finding proof that the zero's of the Riemann zeta function are on some critical line seems to be the most famous math problem around. 

And I have to admit; it is very hard to crack. 

I too cannot do this; for example I have no clue whatsoever about how to give pure analytical expressions for those zero's. All we can do is the computer dance, but oh oh I am the most worse computer programmer in the world. 

Anyway, over the centuries this problem will be cracked further and with that in mind it would not be a bad thing if this problem would be looked upon in higher dimensions and not only the the two dimensions of the complex plane... 

Let's leave it with that, in this teaser picture I try to show the similarity between calculations inside the complex plane and the same calculation in 3D. 

Here is the teaser picture: 


The above calculation is only related to the alternating sums of Riemann zeta stuff, that is known as the Dirichlet eta function. More info on that via:   


Till updates. 


 (14 March 2015) I am humming with satisfaction because all the time I thought that you can only develop Alzheimer disease if you eat bread on a daily basis.  

Well now there are some folks that say Alzheimer disease, or dementia, is just another type of diabetes and now it has number 3. 

Item 1) Is Alzheimer disease really diabetes 3?

 Item 1) Is Alzheimer disease really diabetes 3?

Alzheimer disease is a horrible way to die. Only humans have it, in the animal kingdom no other species have this disease. Therefore it is logical that Alzheimer disease is related to food because animals don't eat processed foods and we humans do eat processed foods. 

Why do I think bread is the main culprit?  

Very simple: most of our elderly do not eat snickers or other forms of candy all day long, but they strongly believe in the health of bread. Preferably whole wheat bread is healthy is what the average elderly thinks... 

That is one 100% nonsense; bread kills in more ways than you can imagine. 

For example: 

Over twenty years back I had an accident in traffic and one of my arms got out of the armpit. It never healed, my arm always stayed weak year in year out. 

Only now when I stopped eating weird stuff like bread, the joints are finally as what they were supposed to be. 


Back to Alzheimers: 

I am to lazy to explain in detail why bread is the main culprit, but everybody can do the google thing and search for "diabetes type 3". 

End of this update, do the google thing or eat more bread. It is your life and not mine... 


For the Dutch: Op is wel een leuke documentaire te vinden van 35 minuten over dit onderwerp. Het is belangrijk op te merken dat de samenstellers van deze documentaire niet veel van voedsel begrijpen omdat ze steeds weer praten over 'suiker samen met vet'. Maar goed, geen gemopper meer, hier is de link

Diabetes type 3: Alzheimer

Till updates.  


(11 March 2015) Today I posted an appendix in both versions of the pdf file under the name 'Ten styles for product integration'.
After all that Raabe formulae is to good to be neglected; in a fundamental way the gamma function is all about multiplication and that is why it fits so perfectly into the theory of product integration. 

Item 1) The two versions of the 'Ten styles of product integration'. 

  Item 1) The two versions of the 'Ten styles of product integration'. 

The old version is Product_integrals.pdf and later when I finally could import additional packages for my math typing program I could use the curly product symbol as made by Richard Gill. 

That is Product_integrals_curly.pdf.  


For the reminder of this update I only would like to repeat the shortest possible advertisement for 3D complex numbers. One way or the other it is fantastic to observe the most weird things in our universe behave like the set of not-invertible numbers...

Professional math people always avoid such stuff and always instantly go to things they call 'fields'. In a finite dimensional field there is only one element (or number) that is not invertible and that is the zero. 

Why they do that is unknown to me, after all if you need some math for example for quantum physics, all that field stuff is rather weird math to apply.
It is like making a car with only square parts while everybody knows square wheels give a bad ride all of the time... 


This is amazing but the accretion disk is the tau calculus and those two beams that shoot our perpendicular is the number alpha. Furthermore with 3D complex numbers you can craft super-position of 3 independent quantum states.
So from the very small to the largest objects in the universe; the 3D numbers are a perfect fit. 

That also explains as why professional math professors do not talk about it; progress in science without big bucks is a taboo. Or am I now to negative on those sleaze balls?  

Till updates my dear reader. 


(10 March 2015) Ha, this is funny; yesterday a few political shuffles were done. The minister of justice lost his job because he had told untrue facts to the Dutch parliament and with that also the deputy of our minister of justice had to go.   

Both are from a political party under the local name of VVD; in our political landscape these are rightwing liberals. But I do not care one second about minister Opstelten that has lost his job; like a lion I will chase minister Kamp from the economical department because that guy is a total retard when it comes to our local gas mining problems.... 

After having said that, the positive news of today is that after about 175 years of wall to wall stupidity by math professors I can repair a bit of the damage done by worthless math professors. That is the item for today. 

Item 1) Finally after about 175 years the result is used as it should be.

 Item 1) Finally after about 175 years the result is used as it should be.

Oh oh, product integration once more but what is it? 

If you are a student of math or physics or chemistry or whatever exact science, you can always ask your math professor the next simple question: 

"Dear professor, you always talk about those integrals but these integrals only add stuff up. They only do addition.
Now is there a way to replace addition with multiplication my dear professor?" 

Of course the average math professor will deny in a loud voice that this is not possible except using math techniques that dumb students will not understand in a thousand years... 


But, ha ha ha, when I found the result of Mr. Raabe from about 175 years ago (Raabe was a math professor in those long lost years) I decided to honor his magnificent result. This 'honor' is the small formulae in the right-down corner of the next picture:     


Source of the Raabe formulae: 

Gamma function 


End of this update (but do not forget to slaughter the career of minister Kamp from the department of economical affairs, the story simply needs another kill.)     

Till updates. 


(05 March 2015) I finished the update on the gamma function in 3D. Here it is or click on the teaser picture from 27 Feb below. Till updates.  


(04 March 2015) A short update in Dutch about our weak and dumb minister of economical affairs Henk Kamp. Here we go:  

Item 1) Ja hoor, daar is meneertje slap gelul weer.

 Item 1) Ja hoor, daar is meneertje slap gelul weer.

Eeuwig en altijd moet meneertje slap gelul weer advies hebben van 'experts'.
Nou ja, eigenlijk ben ik blij dat Henk het zelf nog eens een keertje zegt want daarmee hebben we direct een fundamenteel bewijs dat meneertje slap gelul echt helemaal niets van de gaswinning snapt. 

Anderhalf jaar terug heb ik voorgerekend dat de Groninger bodem over de volle breedte van ongeveer 900 vierkante kilometer minstens 3 meter zal dalen. 

Echter, ik baseerde mijn berekenig op gas dat dan van 5 kilometer diep zou komen, in werkelijkheid komt het meeste gas van ongeveer 2600 meter diep en omdat de druk daar maar de helft is zal het gas veel meer volume innemen.
Dientengevolge zal de totale bodem daling uitkomen op ongeveer 6 meter, maar dat is een gemiddelde omdat het gasveld niet helemaal aaneengesloten is. 
Als we rekening houden met de hogere temperatuur op 2600 meter diepte dan is 6 meter nog te laag geschat...

Nou en als je dan bedenkt wat dat voor gevolgen heeft voor de dijken, de kanalen, de sluizen etc etc dan ben ik benieuwd wat de regering zal gaan doen.

Nou ja, helemaal niets; dit jaar nog steeds ongeveer 40 kubieke kilometer gas en Henk Kamp, randdebiel als hij blijkbaar is, heeft steeds meer adviezen nodig van steeds meer experts. 

Het beste zou zijn, en dat meen ik, dat iemand Henk gewoon een doodschop geeft zodat wij met een nieuwe minister van economisch zaken verder kunnen.
Zijn we ook eens van dat slap gelul af... 


Kijk in het landschap hier duiken er steeds meer huizen op die er zo uitzien. En dit is in wezen nog maar het begin. Maar er zijn meer minkukels dan Kamp; ook het KNMI dat altijd zegt hoeveel het deze keer weer was op de schaal van Richter zegt niets over schattingen over de totale bodemdaling. 

Waarom dat is weet ik niet; blijkbaar wil iedereen graag de wiskunde prof uithangen:
laf en zwijgzaam. 


Einde van deze update; till updates. 


(27 Feb 2015) Oh oh, why did I do that? 

Item 1) Oops I broke the math embargo!

 Item 1) Oops I broke the math embargo!

A few days back I finished a nine page long update under the title Punishment for funny math professors but on page 10 I more or less started bragging that I think that a particular set of zero's is also found in 3D. 

May be you have never heard of it; but it is more or less the most famous problem in mathematics. It is easy to understand and hopeless to prove.
It is called the Riemann conjecture (things that are unproven are often called conjectures). 

Well I did it myself, just like a few weeks back I accidentally broke the beer glass I have been using on a daily basis for over 35 years... 

Anyway one thing leads to another and I had to post even two appendices to comment on why I think that stuff on the Riemann hypothesis.  

But ok, I did it myself so I won't complain; I should have thought twice because of course I want to keep my advantage at the worldwide mathematical community as large as possible... 


This week I finished a short piece on the so called gamma function in 3D. 


Never heard of the gamma function? Here is a good starter (and take at least one week to let it sink in): 

Gamma Function 


And completely unrelated to the gamma function but more to math updates before that, a wiki upon Hermann Günther Grassmann who got his math work completely neglected for over two decades by incompetent so called 'professional math professors'. 

Sounds pretty familiar over here. The difference between Hermann and I is that Hermann lost all interest in math while I already 25 years back understood I was surrounded by incompetents. 

Hermann Günther Grassmann 

But once you have a good math idea, regardless of the incompetent math professors, these days we still have Hermann's optical law: 

Grassmann's law (Optics) 


Ok, end of this update & as usual: till updates. 


(21 Feb 2015) According to the theory of quantum physics, for a short time nature can borrow a bit of energy and create a particle with that. The heavier the particle, the more energy has to be borrowed and the shorter the particle will live.   

Item 1) Punishment for funny math professors. 

   Item 1) Punishment for funny math professors. 

That process of particles jumping in and out of existence bears a great similarity with how the brains of math professors work; but instead of borrowing energy the brains of math professors borrow consciousness and they use that to craft mathematical ideas. 

So inside the brain of math professors, all the time mathematical ideas pop in and out of existence. If a mathematical idea is relatively complicated, it will survive only a very short time. 
Sometimes, and this is a very seldom thing, the mathematical idea get stored into the memory of the brain of a math professor; although the original idea has popped out of existence, a copy of that idea is stored in the memory. 

A lot is known about the brains of math professors; for example it is flat and squared and very small; just a few millimeters across. Biologists have a theory that says the brain of math professors is flat because of the use of 2D complex numbers and that the use of 2D complex numbers also explains as why the brains of math professors have stopped evolving so very long ago. 

If you cut the skull of a math professor open with an axe, precisely in the middle of the head you can find that tiny tiny brain. Under the microscope it looks something like this:     


The white parts is where a math idea has popped out of existence and the shadowy parts is where with the help of borrowed conscience a mathematical idea has popped into existence. 

Sometimes an idea gets stored in the memory of the brains of that particular math professor; for example the idea that you can take the cross product of a scalar and a 3D vector could, in theory anyway, get stored into the memory. 

If that happens, the brain of the math professor will look like this:      

It is well known that math professors always write publications but why they do that is less well understood. Ok, we can infer from this activity that math professors can actually read and write, but why they write stuff nobody else wants to read is unknown. 

Biologists think that writing so called publications has to do with territorial instincts and that writing publications is a way of marking off the particular territory. 
But the problem with that is just like dogs that when they take a shit, they align themselves with the earth magnetic field. From that we can infer that dogs have a biological compass but we do not know why dogs align to the earth magnetic field while taking a shit...   

Anyway to make a long story short: If a professional professor in math publishes something that was stored in the memory, it looks something like this:


Now serious: What is the punishment for the Nottingham math professors?  

In a few days time I will update about 10 new pages with more or less the net content: 

1) The cross product in 3D and 4D. 

2) In 3D and 5D we form pairs of imaginary numbers that imitate the number i from the complex plane. 

The punishment is as next:
The Nottingham professors must investigate if in 3D there are non-trivial zero's of the famous Riemann zeta function. 


And the Youtube video from the channel Numberphile that started it all (once more): 

Math Jokes Explained 

End of this update. Till updates. 


(13 Feb 2015) Today I finished updating the electricity update and because it is now the year 2015 I opened page 3 from the primer on three dimensional complex numbers. 

Item 1) Three phase electricity and three dimensional circular numbers. 

  Item 1) Three phase electricity and three dimensional circular numbers. 

This update contains no new math, on the contrary: the goal is to illustrate that you can use higher dimensional complex & circular in any way you like. 

For example the most difficult math I used was only this: 


In another development today when I rode my bicycle a bit around the local landscape, I suddenly realized that these math professors from Nottingham are completely wrong. 

Look in the previous update from yesterday for the details, but you can easily in three dimensions cross a scalar with a vector. 

Once more we observe how dumb all those math professors become when they year in year out refuse to study higher dimensional complex numbers. In a few months time I have published about the stuff for 3 full years. 

From that relatively long timespan you can deduce how smart those people from the universities really are..... 

Till updates.  


(12 Feb 2015) The UK based university of Nottingham has a nice channel named Numberphile on Youtube; on a regular basis they post videos for a wider audience. \\

In general it is very nice but lately I came across a horrible video where these evil monsters poked fun at my 3D number systems...
This cannot be, I will protect my little baby numbers with all my cognitive powers!  

Item 1) Punishment for funny math professors.

  Item 1) Punishment for funny math professors.

First look at the root source of all evil in this world: 

Math Jokes Explained 

The accumulation of pure evil is at about 5 mins into the video.
Ok ok, may be it is not pure evil but total ignorance. 
And we must never forget what Jesus said: 
Blessed are those with the simple minds. 

So the Nottingham university professors are, just like the professors here in Groningen, extremely blessed! What more could they wish for?  


Ok ok, let me give the Nottingham people a hint:
In the first problem, one of the factors is (x + y + z) so if you factor that out from
x^3 + y^3 + z^3 - 3xyz you can prove it is zero. 

For the second problem I do not know any method that does not use 3D numbers... 
Or, may be it is just the same as (x + y + z)^3.
(Yes, that is true but the expression itself comes from the third power of a 3D number.)

That's it for this update, till updates.  


(09 Feb 2015) Today I finished a small 6 to 7 page long piece on 3 phase electricity using 3D complex or circular numbers. And I am considering publishing it because:
1) It contains no new math &
2) It is important to show you can use these higher dimensional numbers in all sciences that use advanced mathematics.  

There is absolutely no reason to stick to the complex plane only (like the weird behaving professional math professors do). 

Yet today's update is the smallest advertisement possible for 3D complex numbers: 

Item 1) A math model for black holes.

  Item 1) A math model for black holes.

The 'math model' is as simple as possible:
Take the 3D complex or the circular numbers, use the set of non-invertible numbers to mimic the accreditation disk and the beams going out.  

It looks like this: 


End of the advertisement. 


Yeah yeah, there will be no mercy for the incompetent so called 'professional' professors from the science of mathematics.  

The way black holes are structured is exactly the same as non-invertible numbers in three dimensions... 

The similarities are striking: mass that gets sucked in to the accreditation disk is indeed 'no longer invertible' and the other way around:
Once you are on the main axis of invertible numbers (the multiples of the number alpha), you will never leave that axis. 

(The last statement is not true when you can use addition, for example 1 + alpha is perfectly invertible. But let me spare you the technical side of stuff; all in all these black holes look just like the space of non-invertibles...) 

End of this update, till updates. 


(08 Feb 2015) A small update on quantum mechanics because after all those people from the overpaid math professors at the universities can only add up two quantum states into a so called superposition of independent quantum states.  

Once more I say that for three quantum states you need 3D complex numbers... 

Item 1) Roger Penrose on Schrödingers cat and stuff like that.

 Item 1) Roger Penrose on Schrödingers cat and stuff like that.

In a relatively old Youtube vid from the year 2003 I found Roger Penrose using a so called overhead projector. Teens very likely have not seen much overhead projectors but the origin goes back to the cave people who sitting in their cave at night used the light from the wood fire to project shadows on the wall. 


Ok, when it comes to the so called superposition of quantum states, the math is hard.
With 2D numbers from the complex plane you can only add two of such quantum states. 

And there is that stuff known as 'phase shift' that says you can in a continuous way shift from one state into the other (as long as there is no observer from the macroscopic world watching). 

But Roger knows his stuff, here is a screenshot from that 2003 video, at about 11 min 36 seconds Roger shows this overhead projection to the audience: 


Do you see the w and z? 

You see Roger has put them perpendicular because the two quantum states are independent. And that is where the present day science of quantum mechanics run into serious trouble: 

They cannot superposition more than two quantum states because they only use 2D complex numbers... 

Roger Penrose on Quantum Mechanics and Schrodinger's cat  


End of this update, till updates. 


(04 Feb 2015) A small food update that might explain a little bit why the brains of humans are so large compared to the other apes.  

Item 1) What happened to gene MYH16? 

 Item 1) What happened to gene MYH16? 

Often it is stated that chimpanzees are our closest relative in the animal kingdom; and indeed we share a very large pool of identical genes. But why are the brains of chimps so small compared to the apes named humans? 

Is that because our jaw muscles are so weak that for example your brain can grow and grow until you are an adult? (The weak jaw muscles allow your skull to be much more loose, this in contrast to chimps that do not have this benefit.) 

Brain size of a chimp is at most something like half a liter while human brains are about three times as large. That's a big time difference... 
(But sperm whales seem to have the largest brains, about 8 kg or five times the human brain. Beside actual brain size you also have to take into account the ratio between brain size and body size because a large body needs more brain to control it.) 

Now a long long time ago people started cooking their food to the extent that at present day people can no longer eat raw meat like the meat from cows or so. 

And that seems to be related to gene MYH16. 

Nice quote: 

In addition, the scientists discovered that mutations deactivated the gene MYH16, which is linked to jaw muscles, after the ancestors of chimpanzees and hominins diverged, but before the ancestors of modern humans split from those of Neanderthals and Denisovans. This may explain why modern and extinct human lineages have relatively weak jaw muscles compared with ape relatives such as chimpanzees. The researchers suggested that this gene loss may have occurred after the development of cooking, which can make food easier to eat, lessening the need for stronger jaw muscles. 

Comment: If true, cooking food allows for the gene MYH16 to get razed from the gene pool allowing for bigger brains while at the same time you need some brains to get the fire going... If you look at humanity today, I think it is all true. 

Source: Different Tastes: How Our Human Ancestors' Diets Evolved   


So that explains a little bit why we eat the food we do, only that bread keeps on going to be a strange thing. But all animal species will have their own blind spot when it comes to food, after all nature wants you to die as soon as possible so nature can proceed with her experiments on evolution... 

End of this update. 


 (30 Jan 2015) Yesterday I hang a short pdf file in this website about so called Clifford algebras. Clifford algebras are famous because of their role in the science of quantum mechanics. 

Embargo considerations: I have done a lot of work lately, so you can be assured that these new Clifford algebras fall deep behind the 10% threshold of new stuff found.   

Item 1) A teaser picture for some cheap math with two fingers in the nose written. 

 Item 1) A teaser picture for some cheap math with two fingers in the nose written. 

Yes, let's not do difficult: Any mathematical lightweight human could write cheap stuff like this. So for me it was important to show that I can be just a non-performer of math just like the professional math professors are. 

All these precious professional professors do is producing pseudo science, and miracle miracle they get boatloads of money for that pseudo science. 

Now, I can make pseudo science too... 

Don't believe me? 

Just click on the next picture and you will know that whatever the future of humans will bring, it is worthless knowledge.  


End of this update, but once more I am glad I can write useless knowledge too... 

Till updates. 


(23 Jan 2015) A short update on the European Central Bank new policy of buying 60 billion € a month in government bonds. 

Item 1) Has the ECB gone bonkers?

  Item 1) Has the ECB gone bonkers?

I did not see the press conference today but in the intro ECB prez Mario Draghi clearly stated that as far as the ECB is concerned, they will lay the foundation for future economical growth. 

Mario clearly stated that without political help like transforming your economy this massive bond buying program will not work. 

Furthermore, and that is very important, if government bonds are bought, 80% of the risk goes to the local Central Bank of that country and 20% will rest on the shoulders of the ECB. 


What can I say? 

Not much; I think that this all is not going to work because the problem countries like France and Italy will never ever make the changes needed. 

Politics in countries is never driven by economical or mathematical insights, most of it is only local emotional stuff. 

As we observe on inspection; an unemployment rate of 25% in Spain does not trigger any political reform at all. 


But as a mathematical dynamic system it will be funny to observe local Central Bank pump up their balances with local government bonds.... What will happen to future losses on those local Central Bank balances? 
The USA & the Japs are already in dire straits...

When will debt huggers learn the math? 


End of this update, till updates. 


(17 Jan 2015) A small math update with one of those 'numerical proofs'.
Of course these are not real proofs, but anyway.
I respect the embargo because time in and again I have stated the determinants of exponential circles & curves is 1. So there is nothing new under the sun...   

Item 1) Don't worry; there is nothing new under the sun.

 Item 1) Don't worry; there is nothing new under the sun.

One picture with some words in it: 


The 'animated drawing' applet can be found here:   

End of this update, till updates. 


(14 Jan 2015) Finally I printed it all out; 225 pages printed while on this website only about 140 pages of math around higher dimensional complex numbers are found... 

So the embargo is gathering some beef; a lot of stuff will never get published. 

Item 1) The publication embargo is gathering beef.

 Item 1) The publication embargo is gathering beef.

Finally on the last day of the year 2014 I went to the printing shop and printed it all out.
And for only 12 € I had the very first version in my hands, although I had written it all myself even for me it was more or less impressing what is inside it. 

The 225 page long pdf print contains only one picture, in the 140 pages on this website a whole lot of pictures from outside sources are included. So I am very satisfied with how the boycott of new results is going. 

This is how it looks in print, just 12 € and it will be the only copy forever. 


Yeah, only one copy forever. 

After all the professional math professors do their thing and I know from experience that if you want to find better math you avoid these people like they have the pest. 

And they have the pest, they can only do 2D complex numbers... 


End of this update, till updates.   


(12 Jan 2015) This is a small math update in the Dutch language; the accountancy firm Deloitte is arguing for more investments into the math departments of the Dutch universities. Needless to say I am against giving more money to people that have a solid track record of being incompetent to the bone. 

Even if you give them boatloads of math for free, they do not respond.
So will giving them much more money be good for the Dutch economy in the long run? 

Here is the item in the Dutch language:

Item 1) Volgens Deloitte is wiskunde goed voor 160 miljard per jaar. 

 Item 1) Volgens Deloitte is wiskunde goed voor 160 miljard per jaar. 

Om de gedachten even scherp te zetten is het verstandig om eerst de advertentie van Deloitte lezen want alle details die erin zitten lijken op het eerste gezicht logisch. 

Dus hier is de link naar de advertentie van Deloitte: 

Wiskunde nodig om arbeidsmarkt te redden
Wiskunde verdient jaarlijks 160 miljard voor Nederland BV

Ik zal niet ontkennen dat met het juiste gebruik van wiskund de economishe groei voor vele decennia gewaarbgorgd is, maar dan moet je wel een zootje competente wiskundigen klaar hebben staan natuurlijk.

Vergelijk het met een pan perfecte soep: Als in die pan soep ongeveer 10 gram zout nodig is om de smaak en voedingswaarde perfect te krijgen, kun je dan zeggen

"Tien gram zout geeft een pan gezonde soep!"  

Dat is onzin omdat behalve het zout je allerlei andere grondstoffen nodig hebt. 


Laat ik een ander voorbeeld geven: 

Een belangrijk deel van de huidige wiskunde is gebaseerd op het gebruik van complexe getallen uit het complexe vlak. En een belangrijk deel van onze economie is gebaseerd op inzichten daaruit, bijv electriciteit.

Nou komt er een wiskunde student voorbij die vertelt hoe je vanuit dat complexe vlak naar de hogere dimensies kunt gaan en wat denk je dat die professor mafketels doen? 

Nul komma niks. 

En deze wiskunde is op termijn veel meer waard dan 160 miljard per jaar.  


Conclusie: Omdat in de jaren 1990 - 1992 de wiskunde professoren al veel te veel geld kregen voor hun prestaties waren ze veel te veel met geld bezig. 

Laat je ze wiskunde zien dat echt een beetje helpt, dan zien ze de lange termijn waarde niet want ze zijn bezig met hun geldje enzo. 

Daarom is mijn advies veel minder geld naar die mafketels van die belastinggeld betaalde wiskunde professoren... 

End of this update & till updates.  


(09 Jan 2015) Ha ha, do you think I would comment on the terror attack in Paris? 

Come on, only twelve people dead. No time will be wasted on that. 

This is a food update and I would like to give my well meant compliments to the USA based Food & Drug Agency.

Item 1) The FDA bans all use of trans fats in food products.

 Item 1) The FDA bans all use of trans fats in food products.

Now what are trans fats? That is very simple: to normal fats there are extra hydrogen added in the 'trans way'. That makes these fats much more stable and prolongs the shelf life of food products where trans fats are added to.

But very likely, because the shelf live is larger, your body has all kinds of troubles with digesting it.  

Just a few examples: Doritos potato chips or the halverine spread for your bread contains a lot of trans fats. Therefore after five years if you open your healthy halverine spread or after 50 years you open your healthy Dorito potato chips, it is still perfectly edible.  

Since it is my opinion that you should avoid eating stuff your body cannot digest, it is not unwise to avoid processed food that contains trans fats. 


So I was flabbergasted to observe the USA based FDA banning all use of trans fats anyway. 


In the meantime we have about 30 million Americans that have diabetes type two, that is about 10% of the entire population. And that relates to hundreds of extra amputees for the lower of the patients legs day in day out. 

If you compare that to the weird stuff related to the Paris attack, who is the crazy one?

Day in day out the food kills, it starts at young ages: 



End of this update.  


07 Jan 2015) A short food update upon havermout or as it is known in the English language, the oatmeal.   

Item 1) Feed the kids oatmeal, not bread, and they will live longer.

 Item 1) Feed the kids oatmeal, not bread, and they will live longer.

This is a very simplistic title because our bodies have thousands of genes containing the information for producing specific proteins to build your body. So in theory there can be many food allergies because of your genetic constellation but in practice a lot of food allergies and/or food intolerances are related to dangerous grains like wheat. 

Oatmeal does not fall in the category that shortens your lifespan without reason. 

The other grains always interfere with your blood sugar levels in a way that only makes your body gain more and more fat while you cannot burn your fat away even if you exercise...
The grains are unwise food, but when you are young you don't drop dead from it. 


For myself speaking I classify oatmeal as a fast food because I consume it with milk and a little bit of sugar. And indeed since it is a fast food you can run faster or get a higher average speed on your bicycle.
But oatmeal is much more safe because you do not gain weight from eating it, contrary to bread, wheat, corn & the likes, the fast food dimension is much more related to the milk and the five grams of refined sugar that comes with it. 


What about milk?
My body processes milk perfectly, but for most of humanity this is not the case. 

Now why should oatmeal be an allowed food?
Make up your own mind, I did not read the fine details but the abcnews says: 

Bowl of Oatmeal a Day May Be Key to a Longer Life, Major Study Finds 

In case you want to know why oatmeal is not a bad grain?
Very simple: It does not break down into sugars within a few minutes after passing your stomach & entering your intestines. 

Till updates. 


(28 Dec 2014) A short math update in the so called 'Gauss style'.  

Item 1) A short math update in the so called 'Gauss style'.  

 Item 1) A short math update in the so called 'Gauss style'.  

After Euler the Gauss guy is definitely on my shortlist of good guys. 
A major reason for this is that it is estimated that because Gauss never published a lot of work the whole of science was set back by something like 50 years. 

I think that is a rubbish estimate, would Gauss have published in time because of the sheer incompetence of other professional math professors, science would also be set back for 50 years. 

So Gauss was completely in the right with his 'few but ripe' policy of publicizing things.  


After having said that, there are also strong differences between me and Gauss. For example I usually think that transparency is very important and that costs me an awful lot of time to get it right.

For example the proof that in 3D the exponential circles are indeed flat circles; outlining the proof was about 25 to 30 seconds. Writing it all down and hitting the button named 'publish website' is like 6 to 8 hours of work. 

People often complained that Gauss lacked transparency, he just stated results.
Gauss compared it to for example the restoration of a building; all the time there is all that scaffolding around and when it is finished the scaffolding is removed. 

So today, with a little smile on my face, the embargo forces me to not publish the 100% transparent pages and only the end result.

It is a bit like going 'Gauss style'. Here is the end result:   


So my dear professional professors, can you prove with your own theories if this is true or not? 

Let's leave it with this, till updates. Updated on 05 Jan 2015: 

Ok, let's hope that at least a few amongst you have wondered what the hell the 'A' is in 
A = B and A = C implies B = C.
Well that is in the picture below: It is the first coordinate function from the exponential circle, but it is run at 3 times the normal speed. 

You can break down the formulae with the sin(9x)/(3sin(3x)) using the de Moivre formulae in the complex plane, that gives the B. 
You can also do this in the three dimensional complex numbers, that gives the C.  


Because it does not matter what kind of complex numbers you use (the 2D complex plane or the 3D complex space) this indicates that my way of generalizing the complex plane to all higher dimensions is indeed valid. 

Not that the mathematical 'professionals' are interested, those people are so incompetent they cannot even distinguish between a left and a right shoe or so...
But for me this is important because the higher dimensional number systems are not some freak show but the only way to generalize the complex plane. 

And what the professional professors think or say is 100% irrelevant. 


By the way; I wish you a happy new year & till updates. 


(26 Dec 2014) This is a short food update in the Dutch language. 

Item 1) Daar zijn die imbicielen weer van het Voedingscentrum.

 Item 1) Daar zijn die imbicielen weer van het Voedingscentrum.

Ach tja 'eerlijk over voedsel' en dan zo'n dike laag aan nonsense gaat mij te ver.
Het kan dus wel tweede kerstdag zijn maar ik wil even kort ageren tegen die idioten genaamd Eddy Zoëy en een snol genaamd Jenneke Heising. 

Zij geven voorlichting over het gluten in brood op de website van het Voedingscentrum. 

Nou ik wil kort zijn maar ze hebben in hun update bij het voedingscentrum maar één detail echt goed: 

Als er meer gluten in het brooddeeg zit dan is het soepeler en meer elastisch. 

Al het andere, daar klopt nul komma niets van. 

Lees die rotzooi eerst maar eens door: 

Gluten zijn slecht voor me denk ik

Niks maar dan ook niks klopt van deze vreemde bizarre denkwereld; hooguit 1% gaat extra vroeg dood als ze brood blijven eten vanwege koeliakki? 

Snapt snol Jenneke & pooier Eddy wel waarom zoveel mensen rugklachten hebben? 

Ok ok, van een auto ongeluk kan je ook rugklachten krijgen. 

Maar alleen als je dat gezonde brood eet dag in dag uit blijven die rugklachten bij je voor de rest van je leven. 


En al die omatjes die een nieuwe heup moeten hebben? Allemaal broodeters. 

Ga je naar de dokter met gewrichts klachten en je vraagt: Heb ik misschien reuma?
Dokter zegt: Nee hoor, reuma begint bij je handen en polsen.
Maar waarom kan ik mijn teen niet meer bewegen dokter? Het gewricht is stuk! 
Dokter zegt: Geen idee. 

Laten we het daarbij houden, maar heb je regelmatig last van je gewrichten dan zal alleen een wiskunde professor niet proberen om gewoon eens een tijdje te stoppen met brood en al die andere tarwe producten... 

Tot opdatums, till updates.  


(21 Dec 2014) Because in a few days time I will have a new computer I thought why not upgrade my math type setting stuff to the present Miktex2.9?  

Of course I had to prove it once more:
On my computer it is impossible to include pictures in your math texts. 

To my surprise a true miracle happened: Not only after a few faults I was able to get one picture on a correct spot, on top of that even after making a pdf from it the output still looked the same! 

That sure was a miracle & that is item number one for today: 

Item 1) The Christmas miracle is there!

 Item 1) The Christmas miracle is there!

It is unbelievable but all those years in the past it was always the so called 'encapsulated postscript' or the eps extension that never worked. Jpg pictures worked better but also too unreliable. 

And now suddenly at least one picture is in the correct place, in the meantime I also discovered a new species of math professors: 


It is a true miracle; not only is the picture placed there where it is supposed to be (at the top of my 222 page long main article). But also this new species of math professors are looking very high IQ compared to the human variant that is only wasting tax payer money.

I am humming with satisfaction... 


Now why did I go to that website 

That is because I was looking at one of those video's that try to popularize quantum mechanics and I stumbled on a nice vid from the Imperial College London where they use alcohol to visualize muons in public places. And that too is a miracle.  

Quantum theory: it's unreal  


Many aspect of quantum physics look unreal, for example that entanglement stuff where is there is large spatial separation between entangled particles a measurement of the one rams the other particle into the same quantum state. 

Anyway, that is what they claim that happens over and over again but I have never done such experiments myself. 

End of this update.  


(16 Dec 2014) What did Hamilton do wrong when crafting the four dimensional quaternion numbers?  

After all he tried to find 3D complex numbers... 
Hamilton did about everything fault in trying to find 3D complex numbers, in this short update of 3 pages we analyze from what wrong assumptions he reasoned. 

Click on the next picture to land on those 3 pages: 



Source:  Liberation_Of_Algebra_part1.avi 

Further reading: Quaternion  

End of this update. 


(15 Dec 2014) This is a food update, we are pondering the question if all calories are born equal. So the zero hypothesis is that all calories are equal and it does not matter what food you eat against the alternative that some kinds of food are so that you will overeat & that you will die far to early...      

Item 1) Are all food calories born equal? 

 Item 1) Are all food calories born equal? 

Of course not all food calories are born equal, after all my own father died when he was only 67 years of age and with what I know now it was the bread and the wheat that killed him prematurely. 

I will not repeat the faults my parents made so for me it is simple: If I die beyond the age of about 72 years, in that case I stopped eating bread in time. 

And compared to my previous generation, I will have lived about five years longer. 


Now are all food calories born equal? 

Suppose there is food out that if you eat it, your body will refuse to burn fat but you are not aware of it. 

Does such food exist? 

Yes, your puffy fluffy bread is such a food. 
If you eat bread (or other food with all that high sugar index stuff), after getting satisfaction for your calorie need, your body refuses to burn fat.  

Don't believe me? 

Here is a simple graph of my own body weight, all the time when I was eating bread I could not go below 88 kilo of body mass. Even if on my bicycle I ride 500 kilometers week in week out, my body refused to go below 88 kilo of body mass...  


Are all food calories born equal? 

No they are not; in the next picture you see my own body weight and you must know I came down from weighing an amazing 109 kilo. 

But I was not able to go below 88 kilo, still staying in dangerous BMI index ranges. 

Only with simply skipping bread I was able to make it to what my goals actually were. 


And now, every week again and again I have to buy a few bags of nuts and overeat on my own terms. 

And not on the terms of the food industry. 


End of this update, till updates.  


(09 Dec 2014) A few updates back I joked a bit like the entire of humanity need at least 265 years to find only one exponential circle while I, Reinko, now publishes 10 more.
So on my own I did about 2600 years of average mathematical progress...  

Now can I improve on those 2600 years?
Yes I can; there is a formulae from Abraham de Moivre that even predates the first exponential circle as found by Leonhard Euler. But during the last centuries professional math professors have found two more, so until now they had only 3 of them. 

Well, with every exponential circle/curve you also have these Moivre formulaes.
I won't write them all out.
It is reasonable to add about 900 years improvement to the 2600 years, that gives a total of about 3500 years... ;) 

Item 1) Abraham de Moivre formulae, 3D version.

 Item 1) Abraham de Moivre formulae, 3D version.

In case you do not know what the Moivre formulae is, please study the next page first: 

De Moivre's formula

From the historical point of view this Moivre formulae is very important, for us living in the century number 21 it is hard to judge if Euler would have found the very first exponential circle if he would have no knowledge at all about the Moivre thing... 

But history is not a repeatable process, we can only guess and that's it. 


In three dimensions I took the circular multiplication and looked for the most simple Abraham de Moivre formulae I could think of. Of course that would be the square of the three coordinate functions of the exponential circle in 3D.

I made two versions of it, this is not an official publication or so nor are they 'teaser pictures' for impending publications. One way or the other; I have to obey the embargo years until the university people finally start acting normally. 

And that my dear reader, could take a long long time... 


The two versions are precisely the same in mathematical content, only the background is different. The first one is named kitsch & the second has the name normal. 

Here they are, this is the kitsch version with parquet: 


And precisely the same without any kitsch parquet in it: 



Don't forget: This is the most simple version of de Moivre formulas it you leave the two dimensional complex numbers.   

Let's leave it with that. 

Till updates. 


(05 Dec 2014) Another detail of the Direchlet kernel in five dimensions, a small numerical proof from a detail of the sphere-cone equation in 5D.

Item 1) Diving in 5D with help of the Dirichlet kernel.

 Item 1) Diving in 5D with help of the Dirichlet kernel.

Ha ha, never in my life I would have thought this Dirichlet kernel would carry so much importance, but for the time being I am humming with satisfaction because it looks like this particular kernel fits a lot of exponential circles & curves. 

To be a bit more precise: They give me the actual coordinate functions & and together with a little bit of Floris Takens time delay musings it looks like I have found a very good yet partial description of  at least my theory until dimension number five...

Today only a small numerical detail, of course the math embargo is still out and until those weirdo's from the local university here in Groningen act starting doing normal the math embargo will be lifted. 

Anyway, here is the numerical detail: 


Never ever in my life I wrote an expression so long that only says it is zero all of the time. All that sinus stuff is only implementing the time delay from Floris while Reinko says it should be zero. 

Here is the numerical expression: 

f_0 * f_1 + f_1 * f_2 + f_2 *  f_3 + f_3 * f_4 + f_4 * f_0 =

((1/5)*sin(5*x)/sin(x)) * ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-0.62832))/sin(x-0.62832)) + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-0.62832))/sin(x-0.62832)) * ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-1.256637))/sin(x-1.256637)) + 
((1/5)*sin(5*(x-1.256637))/sin(x-1.256637)) * ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-1.8849556))/sin(x-1.8849556)) + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-1.8849556))/sin(x-1.8849556)) * ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-2.513274))/sin(x-2.513274)) + 


Ha ha, anybody sees instantly this has to be zero... Or not? 

Till updates. 


(03 Dec 2014) Correction: I wrote Diriclet in the previous update where it should have been Dirichlet... Sorry for that.  

Now we have only one day of lifting the math publication embargo with this Dirichlet stuff, why not dive in a bit deeper? 

Item 1) Diving in 5D with the Dirichlet kernel. 

 Item 1) Diving in 5D with the Dirichlet kernel. 

To put it simple:  

Now I understand the usage of the modified Dirichlet kernel a little bit, computer proof that the sum of squares of the coordinate functions equals 1 is easy crafted. 
Just like the fact that the sum of the coordinates is also 1. 

Ha ha ha, this time around there is no mercy for the weird behavior of the local math professors here in Groningen: I applied just a little bit of Florens Takens time delay & as usual year in year out you will act like the weirdo's you are. 

But let's skip the emotional parts of my brain & dive into the good cognitive parts. 

The numerical parts of  my insights are easy to harvest, this picture clearly says the sum of squares of the coordinates equals 1, just like the sum of the coordinates does.

How to turn this into good math? So not that stupid computer proof math?


End of this update, till updates. 


(29 Nov 2014) Ok ok, today I am in a good mood so for one day the  math embargo & boycott is neglected. But it is only for one day...  

Item 1) Holy shit; are coordinate functions actually Dirichlet kernels? Why?

 Item 1) Holy shit; are coordinate functions actually Dirichlet kernels? Why?

Today I am in a good mood so I throw in an open problem I cannot solve myself.
I do not have any kind of proof for it, but lots of times the coordinate functions of exponential curves and stuff are a simple transformation of the so called Diriclet kernel from Fourier analysis. 

Why this is, I do not know. 


Useful links:  

Takens' theorem in action for the Lorenz chaotic attractor


Let's leave it with that, till updates. 


(26 Nov 2014) I finished turning the math text into 19 jpg pictures, so today the stuff can be published. Take your time, do not try to understand all 19 pages in one go...  

Item 1) Ten exponential circles and curves.

 Item 1) Ten exponential circles and curves.


Again, do absolutely not try to grasp everything directly. 
After all, it took me about one and a half year...  

Till updates. 


(25 Nov 2014) Today I finished turning the impending update on exponential circles & curves into internet-digestible jpg pictures; 19 of them. 

So before I hang these 19 pictures in this website, the last teaser picture is there.
And that is the only item of today: 

Item 1) The last teaser picture. 

  Item 1) The last teaser picture. 

This is the last teaser picture and in it I challenge all those dumb so called 'professional math professors' that think higher dimensional complex numbers do not exist.  

How much more fundamental proof do you need to understand humans are only a branch of primates, always having a bad brain day and never ever we are echo's of God. 

By the way, that goes for me too... 


But here is the last teaser before the hard math will strike in a few days of time. 


End of this update, till updates. 


(22 Nov 2014) The last years I always have problems with the telephone; people who are supposed to contact me cannot get through.   

I have accepted that as a fact of life; you might know I am not satisfied with math professors, but believe me: compared to math professors the real utter slime is police forces and stuff. Lately there are also more and more internet connection problems, for example I cannot even download a small 3,1 MB file from a company named Microsoft. 

And that is where I draw a line in the sand, the rest of this update is in the Dutch language. 

Item 1) Waarom doet dat internet zo gek?

 Item 1) Waarom doet dat internet zo gek?

Kijk dat mijn telefoon afgetapt wordt door die achterlijke politie, dat is iets waar ik al vele jaren mee weet te leven. Bovendien is er ook nog zoiets als fiets en met fiets kan je gewoon een handgeschrven briefje ergens heen brengen als dat nodig is zonder telefoon te gebruiken. 

Telefoon aftap is altijd makkelijk te begrijpen; er zijn altijd veel te veel van die enorm rare fouten. 

Bijv: Familielid maakt telefoontje, gesprek is afgelopen en familielid hangt op.
Daarna gaat de telefoon dan 1 keer over.  

Maak ik zelf telefoon gesprek en ik hang op, dan nooit gaat ie nog 1 keer over. 

En dat gaat dan rustig een maand of drie door totdat ik er iets van zeg op deze webpagina... En verhelpen ze de fout.  

Conclusie: Achterlijke politie die op 21 oktober 2001 begon met mij te stalken is mijn telefoonlijn aan het aftappen. 

Recent in het jaar 2014 zijn er weer allerlei telefoon problemen en omdat de laatste jaren onze minister Ronald Plasterk constant staat te beweren in het parlement dat zoiets altijd gaat met een ministeriële handtekening, heb ik een probleem met Ronald.
Maar ook met Opstelten want die gaat over de politie enzo. 

Kan dit soort van onzin eindelijk eens stoppen? 

Als je wat wilt weten gebruik dan de methode genaamd 'deurbel' ipv altijd dat laffe gedoe als telefoon taps en aanverwant laf gedrag... 


Geloof je me niet dat het internet enorm raar doet?
Hier is een eenvoudig screenshot bewijs dat ik niet eens 3 MB van Microsoft kan downloaden: 


Omdat onze mooie Ronald altijd van die mooie kletspraatjes heeft in het parlement en omdat de AIVD onder zijn bevoegdheid valt kan ik maar één ding zeggen tegen deze incompetente imbiciel: 

Sterf Ronald Plasterk, STERF!!! 

Maar goed, het kan ook een Opstelten probleem zijn. 


Laten we het daarbij houden. Tot opdatums. 

Till updates.  


(19 Nov 2014) Today I finally finished my oversight of exponential circles and curves. I restricted it to 10 because otherwise I would clearly break my own embargo that says:   

Only 10 to 20% of new results will be published until those crazy math professors finally will act in an adult way and not like inside the sandpit where small children play.  

Item 1) The last teaser picture for the exponential circles & curves.

 Item 1) The last teaser picture for the exponential circles & curves.


End of this update, till updates. 


(16 Nov 2014) About one year ago on 08 Nov 2013 I wrote an update on 17-dimensional exponential circles. Now ha ha ha , they do not exist at all. 

So I crafted a small correction on that particular update from about one year ago & that is the item for today. 

Item 1) Naming and shaming incompetent math professors.

 Item 1) Naming and shaming incompetent math professors.

Yeah yeah Marius, you said it yourself: 

Equations of Diophantus are more important. 

So bye bye professor number one... 



End of the start of the slaughter of math professors reputations... 

Till updates. 


(12 Nov 2014) From the previous update we had an open problem; the solution to that open problem will be given and a new open problem emerges. 
Ha ha ha, that new problem is not easy to solve in six days or so...  

Item 1) Leonhard Euler saves the day. 

  Item 1) Leonhard Euler saves the day. 

Ok, I did not set this up because when writing an oversight of all inns and outs of exponential circles and curves in low dimensions I finally had to tackle this problem.  

Let's not do difficult, the solution to the open math problem lies in understanding projections & also understanding as why in quantum mechanics all measurements are basically projections. 

So here is my solution to my open problem from six days ago: 


The last question is very philosophical.  

Till updates.  


 (06 Nov 2014) One item with a mathematical challenge to the entire global math community. I want a brain proof done by a human brain without the use of a machine...   

Item 1) Musings on an open problem.

  Item 1) Musings on an open problem.

It has to be true because if not all my other math work on higher dimensional complex numbers will come crashing down hard and after that I would feel the need to commit suicide or start eating bread again. 

But leaving jokes aside, why is the next problem that you see in the jpg picture below so hard to crack? My brain cannot prove it with just my brain & a bit of old fashioned paper & pencil. 

An internet applet for the exponential matrix gives (of course) the correct answer, but I refuse to bow for the wisdom of machines. I just want to understand the math with my own few pounds of human brain tissue...  

The number 1.047198 you see is of course pi divided by 3. 

So this is the open problem:

How do you, as a human with only paper & pencil, go from the 'entered square matrix' to the result? 


Ok, every day I am making a little bit of progress into my oversight of exponential curves and exponential circles. 

But this detail is still not solved in full order for a human mind... 


End of this update, till updates. 


(04 Nov 2014) A small food item that has some statistical clues that it is indeed the wrong food that makes you fat, food like bread that prevents your body from burning fat later on.  

Item 1) A trap door function named bread.

 Item 1) A trap door function named bread.

First a small anti bread rant; Why does bread score so enormously high on the sugar index (the glycemic index)? Where glucose is indexed at 100 whole wheat bread often scores ranges like 71 to 74. After all starch is starch isn't it? 

Modern bread as baked by the food industry not only contains elevated levels of gluten that ensures also whole wheat bread are those puffy sponge like things; the added amino acid L cystine acts as a gluten enhancer making the gluten properties even more dominant. 

Your bread contains all kinds of small bubbles, that is the gluten, the starch is (mostly) on the outside of all these miniscule small bubbles. That means the starch is smeared out over a large area. Just like your lungs and intestines have a large area, bread has the same. 

So there is also a down to earth simple mathematical reason why bread is so dangerous for the fluctuations in blood sugar; a slice of bread has a very large area of chemical interactions. On top of that the starch in bread breaks very easily down into sugars. 

That's why if you want to eat bread you better not eat bread at your breakfast but also bake your own bread. Add some onions and garlic (mix them with a blender with the water or the milk) and your bread will be much more compact and the glycemic load will be the same but it's glycemic index value will be much lower. 


To put it simple: bread is a crazy food that you should not be eating on a daily basis... 


Ok, now for those obese females. In an article in National Geographic they claim obese females have a lower income compared to thin females and obese males. Now I don't want to go into any sex oriented discussion, but only quote a very interesting statistical observation, quote (Nat Geo link): 

Shinall’s analysis found, somewhat counter-intuitively, that obese women are more likely to work in physical jobs than other jobs. In fact, the heavier a woman is, the more likely it is that she’ll work in a physical job. (Obese men are also more likely to have physical jobs, but that’s not true for morbidly obese men.)

Comment: There is absolutely nothing 'counter intuitively' about this; if you eat the wrong kinds of food like bread or you are even that stupid to drink the Coca Cola, after that your body refuses to burn fat. 

So if you eat the wrong kind of food, this is how you will look with all those fat rolls that no animal in nature has. This is the appearance of a typical bread eating person: 


Yet in practice there are huge differences, my sister grew bigger when she was in her teenage years. I started gaining weight when I was about 43 or 44 years of age. 

The principle of your body not capable of burning fat is just so important, if you can't burn fat you get all that hunger and all that hunger makes you eat more, collect more fat etc etc. 

In mathematics we call that a trap door function; it is easy to proceed but extremely hard to get back where you started from...

Let's leave it with that. 


(02 Nov 2014) One math item about a possible oversight of all exponential circles & exponential curves found until now.  

Item) This oversight might, or might not, be published here.

 Item) This oversight might, or might not, be published here.

Of course I have to take into account these are the embargo years so only a tiny fraction of valuable results can be published because of lack of interest from the academia's and universities. 

One can honestly say: The more money they have, the more stupid they are. 

Let's leave those non-performing people with that and let's look at a long teaser picture I crafted yesterday.
The only new result is the second five-dimensional exponential curve that you find at the end of the teaser picture. That is the only detail from the previous 15 pages that fall under the embargo. 

Once the university people finally after 23 or 24 years will start behaving normally, the embargo could be lifted. But say for yourself: If it is incompetent 23 years on a row, how likely is it they will do something about it? 

It is also important to emphasize that it is irritating the people from the universities act so cowardly but the other side of that coin is rather pleasant:
The university people only have their two dimensional complex numbers & all the higher dimensions are for me.

That is not a situation one should have fundamental complaints about... 


So my dear math professors from the local university in Groningen, why don't you eat a bit more of that healthy whole wheat bread? It's good for the brain isn't it? 

Till updates. Updated 03 Nov with an example that the sixth exponential curve indeed produces the basis vectors in five dimensional space, this was done with the circular multiplication so j^5 = 1 and basically the basis vectors are also the roots of unity with respect to five dimensions...

The applet we use is for calculating the exponential matrix, you can find it on


Ok, let's hope this brings some clarity inside the strange and weird heads of all those incompetent math professors that absolutely understand nothing about the higher dimensional complex numbers... 

End of this update within an update. 


 (31 Oct 2014) Food awareness is still on the climb here in my home country and that is logical because we want to avoid all those fatbags rolling around like we have in the USA. And although it is pretty common knowledge, I want to talk about the sugar index.

So this is today's food item: The glycemic index for your blood sugar level.  

Item 1) The glycemic index or the sugar index.

 Item 1) The glycemic index or the sugar index.

The problem with a food named bread is that your blood sugar index gets so high that if you eat bread your body cannot burn fat later on. If you are hungry and you beat your hunger via eating bread, your blood sugar goes from very low to very high. 

And your body simply decides to stop burning fat. 

Look at all these fat people; even if they do hard work like a farmer or a brick layer in house building, how come they are fat while they have all that hard labor going on? 

Very simple: Look at what they eat, they always eat bread. 

And after eating bread and going from hungry to saturated from bread, your body refuses to burn fat. And if you cannot burn fat you have to eat more and guess what they eat? More bread and wheat related products.  


If your body cannot burn fat, you might end up with all kinds of problems.
Like I had for about 30 years: In the middle of the night you wake up and you have to eat because you are so hungry. 

Ok ok, now I have stopped eating bread sometimes I wake up because I need something to eat. But it is no longer almost every night...
When I stopped eating bread my nightly eating disorder fades away. 


The glycemic index tries to compare food to the most sugary stuff around. 

The most sugary is of course a difficult concept because there are so many sugars chemically speaking, but as far as I known it is measured against the effect of glucose. 

I do not know if it is actually true, but if your blood measures one 100 that means one hundred mircrograms of sugar in 100 ml of blood. Well that is very interesting and it shows that medical doctors are math non-performers too because that would amount to 1 gram of glucose for every liter of blood you have. 

Again, I do not know if it is true because if I taste my own blood out of a wound or a cut, it always tastes much sweeter...  


In a reasonable world it might be expected that bread producing industries try to protect their stuff and launch propaganda affords. 

Indeed this is observed, here in my home country we have  and indeed at they explain why such measured of blood sugar reactions on bread are completely useless and not do-able.

They say: You have to eat four slices of bread without anything else. 

So they cannot perform the test. 


This is a lie, but ha ha ha it comes from the bread industry. 

Eggs and butter score extremely low on the sugar index, so with just some eggs and butter you could get a reliable score. But my home country bread industry does not want to know it. 


The above link is in the Dutch language, I love it that the bread industry does not like the sugar index. 

Just like those filthy math professors do not like my math stuff. 

Idiots run the place until they no longer run... 

Till updates. 


(30 Oct 2014) This day I stumbled on a French music composer under the name Yann Tiersen. If beside music sung by sexy chicks every now and then you are also into classical music, I strongly advise you to Youtube the Yann Tiersen name. 

For the remainder of this update, a small anti math-establishment rant.
Here we go with just one item: 

Item 1) After 23 years we still do not have the 3D version of the Mandelbrot fractal.

 Item 1) After 23 years we still do not have the 3D version of the Mandelbrot fractal.

Yes, how come that after 23 years there still is no three dimensional version of the Mandelbrot fractal? 

Well that is very simple to understand: when 23 or 24 years ago I discovered the three dimensional complex numbers all of the math professors here in Groningen were just too fucking stupid to understand just one iota from that. 

Now it is well known that stupidity is a choice of nature: 

If with your level of stupidity you can survive, nature ensures that you will stay on that level of stupidity. So the Groninger math professors cannot help it: nature rules. 

But as time goes by, for example over two decades, you might think the professional math professors might think twice and declare we made some faults back then but higher dimensional complex numbers are here to stay now they have been found for real. 


Nothing is far more from the present reality: Sheer incompetence still rules at the math department of the university here in Groningen. Always that bla bla bla as 'Working on the borders of human knowledge' but when push comes to shove the academic society here in Groningen is just another bunch of parasites.  


Now why do we still not have a 3D Mandelbrot set? 

Do not blame me but put the blame on the math department of the University of Groningen; They are the ones to blame.  

Let's leave it with that. 

Source of this update is a person wondering why we do not have a 3D Mandelbrot set: 

Till updates. 


(25 Oct 2014) Is our whole-wheat bread illegal according to our Dutch laws? 

This update is in the Dutch language because the local law is written in Dutch. 

Item 1) Voldoet volkorenbrood wel aan de wettelijke eisen mbt gluten?

 Item 1) Voldoet volkorenbrood wel aan de wettelijke eisen mbt gluten?

Kijk iedereen die wel eens een broodje bakt weet uit ervaring dat als je er allerlei extra spul in gooit zoals bijv tomaten en ui dat het brood dan slechter rijst.
Om toch veel extra ingredienten in je brood te krijgen zodat het iewat gezonder is moet je toch echt je hersens gebruiken om het brood goed te laten rijzen.
Bijv tikkeltje minder zout, beetje meer suiker, iets langer laten rijzen etc etc.

Nou hoe zit dat nu met ons volkorenbrood dat volgens de advertenties zo ontzettend gezond is?

Nou ja, een naief persoon zoals ik gaat gewoon het deeg eens uitwassen om te kijken wat je zoal aan dat gezonde gluten verkrijgt.

En, ha ha ha, er zit veel meer gluten in volkoren deeg.

Waarom is dat? Nou ja, als je wel eens een brood bakt dan weet je dat al die extra dingen in je brood ervoor zorgen dat het slechter rijst.

Maar met meer gluten erin kan je dat compenseren. Het is verboden maar de voedsel inspecteurs in ons land zijn onderdeel van het Ministerie van Landbouw. Dus de voedsel inspecteurs gaan echt niet moeilijk doen over wat gluten gezeik.

In wezen is het probleem veel breder; Geen enkele overheids organisatie controleerd of de ingredienten op de verpakking daadwerkelijk terug gevonden kunnen worden in het voedsel.
En of er missende vermeldingen zijn? Niemand weet het, alleen de fabrikant.


Nou waarom is al ons volkorenbrood illegaal?
Dat staat eenvoudigweg in het Warenwetbesluit Meel en Brood, artikel 16 om precies te zijn, quote:

Het woord 'volkoren' mag onderdeel uitmaken van de aanduiding van een in dit besluit bedoelde waar, voor zover in de aldus aangeduide waar [lees bijvoorbeeld volkorenmeel of volkorenbrood] alle van nature voorkomende bestanddelen van de desbetreffende graansoort in hun natuurlijke verhouding, al dan niet na een bewerking te hebben ondergaan, aanwezig zijn.

Commentaar: Als er echt meer gluten in volkoren brood zit dan in wit brood, dan is dat illegaal. En tja, jaar in jaar uit is volkoren meel altijd veel duurder dan gewone bloem dus de economisch wetten zeggen dat er iets aan het volkoren meel is toegevoegd dat het zoveel duurder maakt...

Bron van het citaat: 

Wat staat er over volkoren in de wet?


For the English speaking community: 

Rather likely the Dutch whole wheat bread is illegal by definition of our own Dutch laws. I do not have any problem with that. 

It is like Charles Darwin said: 

Nature will separate the idiots from the slightly less idiots & the slightly less idiots might eat less bread but will die anyway... 

Till updates.  


(23 Oct 2014) A small math item and a small food item. 

Item 1) 15 pages of five-dimensional complex numbers that do not get out. 
Item 2) The scientific journal Nature believes in 'beer bellies'.

 Item 1) 15 pages of five-dimensional complex numbers that do not get out. 

There is good news & there is bad news on the higher dimensional complex numbers. 

The good news is that if for example you make a Google search on 'three dimensional complex numbers' inside the 'picture search',  a picture + a link show up on page number one of the search results. 

That is good news because the bad news is that at all universities on a global scale they still stay numb. Ok ok, it is not very surprising all those universities stay numb. Like I said so often: all these professional math professors are incompetent.  

A very important characteristic of  an incompetent person doing a job above his or her capabilities is that when confronted with the setbacks of their incompetence, they always blame outside forces for the problems.


In the last 2 to 3 weeks I went on with the five dimensional complex numbers, I have to say I solved a problem that I thought would take years and years and years. 
But I cannot publish it because that would break my embargo rules. 

So unless the math professors change their weird weird attitude, there will be only void void void & more void. 


On 30 Jan of this year I published the first stuff on 5D complex numbers, if the incompetent professional math professors keep on with their routine it will also be the last...  Here is page 2 where the 30 Jan update is found.   

 Item 2) The scientific journal Nature believes in 'beer bellies'.

On the food front it is amazing how little people understand about food.
It has to be remarked however that understanding food is the same as understanding all proteins and all the possible interactions and compared to higher dimensional stuff of math, the latter is the cakewalk. 

But beer bellies do not exist. 

If a bread eater also consumes beer, most people contribute the body fat to the beer while it is the bread that causes all these fatty problems. 
Every day you can do the simple statistic testing for yourself in your local supermarket:  

What do fat people buy in your local supermarket? 

On statistical inspection, it is always those sugar stuff included the wheat sugars.
Let's leave it with that. says in an article: 

Fossils reveal 'beer-bellied dinosaur 


In general, when a beer is brewed properly, your body cannot get fat from it. 

But if you also eat bread, the story is very different. 

Till updates. 


(12 Oct 2014) Two food items: 
The first item in Dutch about food; the scientific council for long term government policy has written a piece about food. As you might know we the Dutch produce and export enormous amounts of food and as such the food industry is a large part of the economy.
The scientific council proposes that beside production of food it should also be safe to eat... I agree with that. 
The second item about the tremendous amount of food additives in the USA.

Item 1) Van landbouw naar voedselbeleid. 
Item 2) PEW on the 10.000+ food additives in the USA.

 Item 1) Van landbouw naar voedselbeleid.

Historisch gezien is landbouw natuurlijk een belangrijke pijler van onze economie, maar de laatste 50 jaar heeft de rest van de voedsel industrie steeds meer terrein gewonnen.
Met als resultaat dat bijv in bijna alle bouillion blokjes van die vreemde smaakversterkers zitten die absoluut niet in het originele bouillion zaten...
Het is maar een voorbeeld, maar in een verbazing wekkende hoeveelheid 'levensmiddelen' zitten allerlei stoffen die je lichaam niet kan verteren.
Mijn inschatting is dat we minstens vijf jaar te vroeg sterven, gemiddeld genomen natuurlijk, alleen omdat we al die rare voedsel producten hebben.

In wezen is het vrij eenvoudig om op termijn de voedsel situatie weer normaal te laten zijn. We moeten dan, net als bijv bij de BTW, onderscheid maken tussen het dagelijks voedsel en de luxe producten.
In het dagelijks voedsel mogen gewoon geen producten zitten die je lichaam niet kan verteren. In luxe eten mag alle rare spullen zitten die je niet direct dood doen vallen. 
Natuurlijk zijn daar direct al weer allerlei uitzonderingen op; groente en fruit is gezond omdat er oa vezels in zitten, die vezels zijn niet verteerbaar maar dat is juist één van de gezonde aspecten. En bijv dat conserverende spul dat botulisme voorkomt is niet echt gezond te noemen, maar dat botulisme gif is het sterkste gif dat bekend is. Met een kilotje kan je de hele mensheid uitroeien... Nou ok, dat E nummer mag er dus in.
Dus de regel is er mogen geen spullen in die je niet kunt verteren en daarna ga je kijken wat er dan toch aan niet verteerbaar spul in moet.

Voor de luxe spullen, zoals bijv brood met al dat onverteerbare gluten erin, kan de situatie min of meer blijven zoals zij is; wil je dat soort rotzooi eten, ga dan vooral je gang.


Maar goed even een quote uit het WRR rapport:

Van landbouw- naar voedselbeleid.
Een voedselbeleid houdt rekening met de uiteenlopende waarden rond voedsel,
met de samenhang tussen productie en consumptie en met de veranderde machtsverhoudingen.
Het overgaan van landbouw- naar voedselbeleid betekent niet dat aan de landbouw minder waarde moet worden gehecht: de primaire sector blijft een cruciaal onderdeel van het voedselnet. Het betekent wel dat de huidige en toekomstige maatschappelijke opgaven op het gebied van ecologie, volksgezondheid en robuustheid beleid vergen dat zich behalve op de landbouw ook op andere belangrijke spelers en vergen in het voedselnet richt.

Commentaar: Geen commentaar. 

Bron: Naar een voedselbeleid


In wezen is het dus extreem simpel:
Maak onderscheid tussen het dagelijks voedsel en de luxe producten.

Filosofische vraag: Zal dat gebeuren?

Praktisch antwoord: Natuurlijk niet, politici zijn achterlijk en dat zal niet veranderen.

Tegenvoorbeeld: Additieven in tabak.
Het is allang bekend dat er in tabak allerlei additieven zitten die er op lange termijn voor zorgen dat je meer en meer gaat roken.
Nou vele landen hebben een rookbeleid, maar de laatste 50 jaar heeft nul komma nul procent van al die politici en beleidsmakers ook maar iets gedaan aan de additieven in tabak.

En al die jaren was het zo simpel: Je mag in mijn land alleen tabak verkopen als er geen additieven in zitten. Echter in een halve eeuw tijd heeft geen land dit gedaan.

Mijn inschatting is dat het met voedsel net zo zal gaan... 

Meer over additieven in tabak: 

Tobacco additives 


Slotopmerking: Door de basis voedsel producten 'dagelijks voedsel' te noemen suggereer je meteen dat je die luxe producten niet dagelijks moet eten...

 Item 2) PEW on  the 10000+ food additives in the USA.

The best argument against a totally united Europe is not only the financial situation with a Federal Reserve that in fact is broken to the bone (try to sell 2 trillion of garbage bonds on the free markets) but also the food situation over there. 

The weirdo's over there have over 10 thousand strange food additives in their food chain. Needless to say when you have come to the point there are over 10 thousand weird things in you food chain that nobody understands, you will run into severe problems.  

How stupid can you be?
Thousands and thousands of poison in your food & not expect trouble.

We close this update with a picture of tobacco plants: 


Till updates. 


 (08 Oct 2014) After 50 days I close the second gluten experiment. 

So only one item: 

Item 1) After 50 days we close the second gluten experiment.  

 Item 1) After 50 days we close the second gluten experiment.  

After about 50 days I close the second gluten experiment because there are constantly those small white worms coming out and I think they are from the eggs of those metallic looking flies. 

And after all, the most important goal of the gluten experiments are to give solid prove that your body simply cannot digest the gluten that is in the wheat and the wheat related products like bread, pizza & all those other wheat products. 

The last four weeks the gluten experiment stuff was standing outside in the garden and guess what: Even nature cannot break the gluten down if it is in a fermentation state... 

But if nature cannot break it down, why do we eat stuff like this? 

Gluten is in all bread, pasta, pizza & a whole lot of other things. 

Why do you eat that stuff because it is more or less like rubber & as we all know if you eat rubber you will die prematurely from horrible illnesses.  


The food industry, they have their big big marketing budgets. 

I do not have big marketing money, but I have my brain and that is what I usually like to protect. Therefore just a picture of the second gluten experiment after 50 days of fermenting it with Camembert and beer yeast. 

Click on the picture for a larger version of 50 days waiting: 


After 50 days the gluten still does not rot and the food industry is using this in your daily bread. So take a nice bite tomorrow when you have your breakfast... 

Till updates. 


(02 Oct 2014) Correction and addendum. 
Yesterday I made a terrible mistake: 

I wrote 'specis' where it should have been 'species'. 

I don't know why I made that typo, it might be my mind was a bit more busy about completely destroying that Islamic state.  

Or it was something else that drove me towards self destruction via stupid mistakes. 


So that is the item for today: Correction & addendum. 

Item 1) Correction & addendum.

 Item 1) Correction & addendum.

Correction: It should have been 'species' and not specis. 


Again I am so sorry for making a typo, so I felt the heart strong desire to make the next addendum:  


Till updates.  


(01 Oct 2014) Let's keep on bombing that 'Islamic state' for a few decades my dear readers, only a few decades more will bring the lessons to those weirdo's that always say 'We love death while the enemy loves life'.  


After having said that, just a small food item about the strange prices of whole wheat flower for you whole wheat bread. 

Item 1) Why is whole wheat flower always so expensive? 

 Item 1) Why is whole wheat flower always so expensive? 

Ok, the wheat is milled layer by layer.
The outer parts are sold as cattle feed, the inner core is for the humans. 

Economics say: Human food is more expensive compared to the food for the cattle. 

Observation says: Over the years one kilo of white wheat flower is 35 cents while whole wheat flower is always 85 cents, so whole wheat is about 2.5 times more expensive compared to white wheat... 

Since I did buy my first bread machine over five years ago, I never understood why whole wheat was so expensive. It looked like the normal laws of capitalism did break down; why is it so much more expensive? 

A naive person might argue: since cattle feed is cheaper and since the milling of the 'whole grain' is cheaper compared to white wheat flower, all in all whole wheat flower should be the cheaper thing. 


Yes, in theory whole wheat should be cheaper, so what explains the extreme price differences over all the wheat brands over all the different supermarkets? 

The answer is found when you wash out the dough of a whole wheat bread; it contains much more gluten. 

And gluten is much more expensive. 

Why do they add more gluten to whole wheat? 

Very simple: Without the extra added gluten the whole wheat bread will not rise as nicely as your white wheat bread does. And if you buy that marketing trick that whole bread is more healthy compared to white bread, the food industry has you in the corner where they want you to be: 

Paying more for things that you think are healthy but in fact make you overeat. 


If you have a better explanation as why whole wheat is 2.5 times more expensive compared to standard white wheat over all these years, be my guest... 


Till updates.  


(27 Sept 2014) Two food items today, the first about the third gluten experiment and the second item is in the Dutch language about the lies of the government subsidized food center. 

Item 1) How to make cheese pizza without that expensive cheese.
Item 2) Een paar leugens van het voedingscentrum.

 Item 1) How to make cheese pizza without that expensive cheese.

Some time ago it was suddenly in the news that the food industry on a large scale made pizza's without actually using cheese. So you might wonder; how do they do that? 

Three weeks ago I started the third gluten experiment with the gluten from 1.1 kilo of whole wheat bread dough. I put it in a fertilizer bottle and put a piece of camembert on top of it plus a little bit of water. 

After some time it starts smelling strongly to cheese, actually it is very pleasant to smell. Anyway, below the gluten something started to grow and now after waiting three weeks I decided to turn it over. 

The stuff that has grown is now on top, the gluten is below that.
Click on the picture if you want to see a larger version: 


If you mix this strongly tasting stuff with hardened fat, color it yellow and grind it down into what looks like grinded cheese, you have an ultra cheap replacement for that expensive cheese. 

By the way, did you know that they make those stable food colorings and dyes from coal and petroleum? And did you know those food colorings are ultra-mega-über-safe because the governments allow them in the food...  

 Item 2) Een paar leugens van het voedingscentrum.

Kijk iedereen heeft recht op het spuiten van zijn of haar mening, maar het voedingscentrum zegt zelf uitsluitend wetenschappelijk bewezen feiten te gebruiken.  

Doen ze dat echt?  

Welnee, ze zijn echt achterlijk daar.
Bijv over gluten denken ze dat gluten normaal verteerd worden in je darmstelsel.
Nou ja, ik laat toch al weken en maanden lang zien dat dit niet zo is? 

Je lichaam maakt zelf ook allerlei stoffen die biologisch niet afbreekbaar zijn, bijv je gewrichten, je haar, je tanden en je huid om maar een paar to noemen.
Het is namelijk reuze handig als je huid niet elke week wegrot... 

Die voedingscentrum gasten snappen echt niets van voedsel, kijk maar naar de volgende quote: 

Niet waar. Gluten zijn eiwitten die normaal gesproken gewoon worden verteerd in je maagdarmstelsel. Een klein deel van de mensen is overgevoelig voor gluten. 
Zij moeten producten met gluten, zoals tarwebrood of speltbrood vermijden.

Commentaar: Veel meer bewijs dat ze bij het voedingscentrum echt helemaal niets over gluten weten is niet nodig. Maar, ik moet wel opmerking dat er in je darmflora wel degelijk afbraak van gluten plaatsvind. Echter dat is minimaal en ha ha ha, dat geeft juist die gluten morfines die er ook voor zorgen dat je elke dag brood wilt eten... 

Bron van bovenstaande quote: Gluten zijn slecht voor me denk ik


Ook interessant is hun gezwets en gezwam over jodium in het brood.    

Bron: Ik denk dat ik veel gezonder eet als ik helemaal geen brood eet

Kijk, dit is toch achterlijk? In zes sneetjes volkorenbood zit hooguit een kwart theelepel zout, in Nederland is al het zout allang gejodeerd. Je grbuikt toch ook zout bij het koken van aardappelen of op je eitje? 
Zie je hoe totaal achterlijk ze daar zijn bij dat voedingscentrum? Quote:  

Hoe krijg je genoeg jodium binnen als je geen brood eet?
6 sneetjes volkorenbrood bevatten 145 microgram jodium. Dat is bijna de dagelijkse aanbeveling. Dat kun je ook zo binnenkrijgen:

220 gram vette vis
of 5 kilo runderlappen
of 11 glazen halfvolle melk
of 7 kilo groenten
of 8 gekookte eieren
Dat bovenop de dagelijkse aanbevolen hoeveelheden die er al zijn. 

Commentaar: Dit is zo stom dat ik er gewoon geen commentaar op kan geven. 


Ik noem het voedingscentrum alleen maar omdat die met overheidsgeld overeind gehouden worden. Als al hun financiering van de voedsel industrie zou komen had ik ze nooit genoemd natuurlijk. 

Laten we het daarbij houden, tot opdatums. 

Till updates. 


(26 Sept 2014) Oh oh, everybody is nervous about the Islamic state but they forget our own food industry like the shitholes from Unilever kill much more people compared to what those weirdo's can cough up... 

So we neglect the weirdo's and dive in the third gluten experiment. 

Item 1) How whole is our whole wheat flower?

 Item 1) How whole is our whole wheat flower?

On 08 September I washed out 1.1 kilo dough made with whole wheat in order to check about the gluten in it.
Why whole wheat?
That is because most people think that whole bread is a healthy choice compared to white bread.  

After baking 1.1 kilo dough gives more or less one kilo bread. 

How much wet gluten is in it? 

The results are very sobering, after washing out the dough I was left with 170 grams of wet gluten. That means whole bread even has more gluten in it that white bread.  

Now what about fibers and bran? 
The food industry always advertises about the extreme high amount of fibers and bran in whole grain products. 

Well that is also very sobering; yes there is bran in it but it is all extremely short in length. Fibers need to have some length in order to help the stuff passing your intestines, this whole wheat bran is more like dust.  

Ok ok, if it is not digestible it is not unhealthy. But if you would ask me I would think a small bowl of pumpkin soup contains far more fibers and most of these fibers are much longer compared to the bran as found in the Albert Heijn whole wheat flower. 


If you know a big more about milling wheat you know that all ingredients from the wheat get separated because if you simply mill the whole grains the shelf life is a disaster.  

And if you check a lot of Youtube video's about milling whole flower you always see the same:
They separate the ingredients and for making 'whole flower' they add a bit of bran back into it. 

To put it simple: They fool you and you are not even aware that they fool you. 

If the whole flower would truly be whole flower the shelf life would be different, so what do I have in my kitchen and what is the maturity date? 

I have Albert Heijn Basic wheat flour (white) that expires on 5 Oct 2015 &
I have Albert Heijn Whole wheat flour that expires on 2 July 2015. 

Not that I eat that shit any longer, but you see the whole wheat also has a long long shelf life... (That means it isn't whole wheat flower, it is just another product that makes you overeat.) 

Here is how the first day of the third gluten experiment looks, this time I tried to prevent all kinds of infection via using my standard beer brewing & wine crafting knowledge. So the gluten was sterilized before the Camembert cheese was added... 


I heated the 170 grams of gluten in the magnetron, that made it less stiff and that is why you see that layer of brown gluten below the white Camembert. 


Now how 'whole' is our whole wheat flower? 

It is garbage just like the white wheat flower, some stuff is added back but that what is known as 'whole bread' is not a healthy food choice over white bread.
It is all garbage. 

Till updates. 


(25 Sept 2014) We love death and we seek martyrship... 

Item 1) The problem with ISIS, ISIL and Is stuff; lunatics to the bone.

 Item 1) The problem with ISIS, ISIL and Is stuff; lunatics to the bone.

The problem of a lot of those ISIS, ISIL & other Islamic state weirdo's is very simple to understand: 

Year in year out they say that they love death while the enemy loves life and year in year out they declare that they are actively seeking for being a martyr... 

And now, after only a tiny bit of air power done in Syria and Iraq, they complain that they do get killed... 

My dear mujahedin; Why do you complain about what you were seeking in the first place? 


End of this update, till updates.  


 (24 Sept 2014) Oh oh those ISIS people, they want an Islamic state but at the same time they are scrapping math from the things children should learn...
So there will be no Islamic state related to ISIS or ISIL.  
Anyway not in 500 years or so... 

Those lunatics will never understand it; memorizing the Koran is only for idiots with empty lives.  


Therefore in this update we only look at a nice gluten picture because the food of future generations is far more important compared to the ISIS stuff... 

Item 1) The gluten experiment as it looked on 15 September.

 Item 1) The gluten experiment as it looked on 15 September.

If you are young you can eat bread as a source of energy. The bread gives you an enormous amount of energy, look for example at those Tour the France bicycle runners that eat a lot of pasta made from wheat for breakfast.   

If you get older the disadvantages of industrial bread become more prevalent, and when the gluten comes leaking through your skin you might think it is about time to stop eating bread.  

The second gluten experiment was made from gluten as you can buy it in the bakery industry, the next photo once more explains that your body just cannot digest it. 


Your body, just like the rest of nature, cannot digest this.
So why do you eat bread? 


But what about fibers in vegetables? 

You cannot digest the fibers in fruits & vegetables.... 

That is true, but the fibers in fruits & vegetables do not come out leaking through your skin. 

End of this update.     


(18 Sept 2014) Only a food item; what food is the most dangerous? 

Item 1) What do obese people buy? What is the most dangerous food?
Item 2) What happens to your blood if you eat American & European food? 

 Item 1) What do obese people buy? What is the most dangerous food?

A long time ago my maximum weight was 109 kilo. So for me now I have lost all that weird fat and understanding a little bit more about the food we eat, it is always great to observe what those ultra fat people like 150+ kilo buy... 

A few weeks back I observed one of the ultra fat throwing his stuff on the cash conveyer belt in the supermarket and it went like this: 

1) Four bottles of Coca Cola or six liters of that stuff.
2) Three loaves of white bread, about 2.5 kilo around here.
3) Two pounds of diet margarine. 

What are the dangers lurking within these food choices? 

1) Coca Cola; six liters of Coca Cola contain over 3 grams of Phosphoric acid, anyway that is what the Coca Cola company claims but there is no way of checking if indeed that level is there.
Phosphoric acid is great stuff, it can easily get as low as 1.5 on the pH scale of acid thingelings... So what is 3 grams?

2) Bread, it is loaded with that nice stuff named gluten and if you are young and have healthy intestines, you can retrieve a lot of energy from it. The energy you get is a huge amount  because bread is basically sugars & water. 
All that talk of vitamins & minerals is nonsense.
Well gluten is discussed enough around here; if eating bread can give you Alzheimer, why not eat a bit more of that because every body is seeking Alzheimer... 

3) The diet margarine is a so called 'health product' as crafted by the food industry. Nobody checks if what is on the list of ingredients is actually inside the product. (Anyway in my country never ever it is the government agencies that discover the crimes done, in my country the food inspectors work for the Agriculture ministry.)   


My dear reader, please use your own brain: 

What food is the most dangerous? 

I would go for number 3, for about 50 years I knew what to eat but when I chanced diet and used a so called 'health product' crafted by Becel (from the Unilever conglomerate) I developed much deeper health problems related to the gluten from number 2.

So I would say the so called 'health food' from weirdo's like Becel are just as dangerous as Coca Cola or the bread. 

 Item 2) What happens to your blood if you eat American & European food? 

For myself speaking, I stopped using all refined sugar decades ago.
But decades ago I did not understand that bread is just pure sugar and a bit of water. 

At present day we can observe what the sugar does to our blood, it is fascinating how our bodies easily can withstand such attacks.  

Your red blood cells should be separated in order to transport as much oxygen as needed, so what happens if you eat your ordinary American or European meal???


Till updates. 


 (15 Sept 2014) A math update and lately these have to obey the embargo:
Only 10 to at most 20% of new results will be published.  

Item 1) Using 3D numbers to describe the superposition of 3 quantum states.

 Item 1) Using 3D numbers to describe the superposition of 3 quantum states.

I will not deny it is a bit weird to publish only about 10% of new results, but the present day universities are filled with people that are not capable of finding higher dimension complex numbers for themselves. 
And at the same time, they think their research is important & they publish 80 to 90% of new results found. 

Publish or perish they say. 

It is just like all those bread eaters that guess what, after eating bread just a few hours later they are hungry again. Those bread eaters cannot go without a meal for 18 hours and still feel no hunger, those people are the lunatics of understanding food... 


After having said that, the superposition stuff is found in the link if you click on the next picture: 


Till updates.  


(14 Sept 2014) Today an item on flight number 17.    

Item 1) Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov wonders why this and why that.

 Item 1) Russian foreign minister Sergei Lavrov wonders why this and why that.

With interest I did read the comments of Sergei about our Dutch folks having lack of interest to aggressively do research on the site where flight number 17 ended.  

Well those comments are all very interesting, but what more can be found over there? 

The stuff is spread over a 9 kilometer range, we have good pictures of penetrated skin of the aircraft. Also nice; inside the bodies of the pilots metal pieces have been found. 

So if Russia would like to be helpful, please share the technical details of the metals the BUK system spreads out.  

If the Russians are not willing to share those important details, please Sergei, can you shut up your mouth? 


Russian Times reporting Sergei wondering the lack of Dutch enthusiasm: 

Lavrov: No haste in MH17 tragedy probe, despite media hype  


Let's leave it with that, till updates.   


(11 Sept 2014) Ha ha, originally I planned an extremely insulting update for New York Pizza on this lovely day; for example the promotion of a food additive made from air plane fuselage in order to make people even eat more more and more...  

But since it looks like the Ukrainians can act like adults I decided to change course.
Hard to say how the Ukrainian equation will evolve, but I want to stress an extremely important point:
Until now we only have a few thousands of deaths, given the start of this all with the ouster of prez Viktor this is a miracle. Normally spoken we would have at least 20 to 30 thousands of deaths. 

So whatever happens and whatever the emotions are, do not forget that my dear Ukrainians... 


Ok, since the Ukrainians behave a bit like they are adults, why not a tiny bit of math flown in?  

Item 1) Teaser picture for the update on superposition of quantum states.

 Item 1) Teaser picture for the update on superposition of quantum states.

Later this week I will finish the stuff.
I already crafted a teaser picture in order to draw a bit of attention from the math community, not that the professional math professors will understand it, but anyway here is the teaser picture: 


Later this week I will finish the details. 

Till updates. 


(10 Sept 2014) There is an old love of mine where I compare total financial debt growth to real economical growth, before the so called 'credit crises' broke out I understood it would be there. 

So after the credit crisis has waned and the USA is showing strong economical growth while Europe still licks it's wounds, have we learned anything? 

Item 1) Credit crises update; have we learned anything?

 Item 1) Credit crises update; have we learned anything?

If inside any economy the debt levels are always rising faster than the underlying economy, at one point in time there will be problems observed when it comes to paying back the debt owned.  

You can argue that one dollar of debt is one dollar of ownership for another party, but that is just a dumb as stating one calorie in = one calorie out. 

To put it simple; a fish hook in = a fish hook out? You cannot eat fish hooks because they have a strong capacity of never leaving your body. 


One of the best internet links that still lives today is from the USA Federal Reserve, for me it took some time to understand the dimensions of the information that is offered within.
But basically if debt growth gets to large some shaving will be done, so how is the USA doing from the year 1979 until 2014 when it comes to total debt of only  42.5582 trillion US$?

Understanding long term growth is simple; back in 1979 the same statistic was 3.5965 trillion so over the decades total debt levels are about 12 times as high. 

Now 2014 - 1979 = 35 years of timespan, so average debt growth would be about 12^(1/35) = 7.35% of debt growth a year. 

Needless to say, USA economic growth is not 7% year on year. 

So the USA is still living in fantasy land when it comes to debt and credit stuff. 

Source file:  D.3 Credit Market Debt Outstanding by Sector 


Let's leave it with that because the folks will only learn stuff via crashes that 'nobody has ever foreseen'. 

Till updates.    


(08 Sept 2014) Will the cease fire in the Ukrainian landscape last? 
Or is there a strong emotional reason for longer war activities?
So that is what we ponder today;  

Item 1) Will the Ukrainian cease fire last?

  Item 1) Will the Ukrainian cease fire last?

Let's not do difficult; the last time I gave some advice to Kiev about a new 10 day cease fire it was not followed up and in that 10 day time frame some Dutch plane was shot from the skies... 

From Kiev came sounds like 'never ever a new temporary cease fire'. 
So let it be. 

Well now a few weeks later, a new cease fire is in place.
Will it work? 

That depends on the nice thing known as 'rigid battlefield discipline', are the Ukrainian military forces just another bunch of Vodka drinkers or do they use their brain also for other activities? 

Until now, as the weeks pass and pass, it looks like the separatists have more of that vague stuff known as the rigid battlefield discipline.  


Let's leave it with that. 


But the flag looks nice, it symbolizes blue skies over yellow wheat fields...
Till updates.  


(07 Sept 2014) Gluten fermentation update. 

Item 1) After 20 days the gluten is still going strong.

 Item 1) After 20 days the gluten is still going strong.

Although the gluten has been compromised by flies that have laid their eggs in it, the gluten still refuses to rot. On the contrary, there is a lovely smell coming off with lots of cheesy flavors in the air. 

This second gluten experiment is a success because even when flies have laid their eggs in it, the gluten still refuses to surrender it's molecular buildup. It still does not rot, on the contrary it is definitely weakening but it still smells good. 

So I can understand why the food industry makes all those taste multipliers with this stuff, yet the human body cannot digest this so it is the same as eating plastic or synthetic rubber... 

This is how it looks after 20 days: 


On the left you see the Camembert version and on the right the beer yeast version. 

A standard bread contains about 10% of it's weight in gluten, furthermore a standard bread as baked by the food industry also contains food additives that enforce the properties of the gluten. 

These people from the food industry, they are crazy beyond belief.
Why do they do this? And you, why do you eat this? 

Till updates. 


(06 Sept 2014) Musings on human suicides; we compare global figures against USA military veterans.  

Item 1) US military suicides versus the global population.

 Item 1) US military suicides versus the global population.

According to some United Nations outlet there are about 800.000 suicides a year globally speaking. To be honest, I do not have a clue if this figure is a good estimation of total global suicides. 

If for simplicity we take total humanity as 7 billion people, that would amount to 1 in every 8750 persons that kill themselves each year.  

From the US military veterans we know that about 22 military vets kill themselves on a daily basis, that would be about 8000 a year. 

If all figures are correct (once more: I know absolutely nothing about suicide statistics) the US military vets are about 1% of global human suicides. 


Is this an elevated number? 

That depends on how large the pool of US military veterans is, if the suicide rate among US military vets is the same as for the whole human population, the size of the military vets would be about 70 million. 

(70 million = 1% of 7 billion.) 

Of course there are no 70 million US military veterans, how much have served over the decades I do not know but any fool can see that indeed suicide rates are very high. 

So we wonder as why the US military veterans are so depressed that the only way out they see is killing themselves because that is the only thing that will make the suffering less... 


Two very different explanations: 

Explanation 1: USA military veterans are extremely highly standing humans and once they understand that the War on Terror is not precisely what Fox News tells them, they feel remorse for what they have done and the only way out is to kill yourself. 

Explanation 2: They all eat weird food, right now there are about 10.000 different food additives in the USA food chain so there is no avoiding it. So their brains got literally sick from the weird food they eat, and that explains the high level of not only military veteran suicides but also overall murder rates in the USA.  


For me it is clear; if you eat the wrong food and it passes the brain-blood barrier, not much of a miracle that both murder rates and suicide rates will be elevated big time. 

If you think otherwise, go visit the USA and eat their food for just a few weeks... 


Source of the picture: A CNN file about daily average suicide of vets; 

Why suicide rate among military vets may be more than 22 a day 

And the ridiculous number of weird food additives is found on the Washington Post; 

Food additives on the rise as FDA scrutiny wanes  


End of this update. Till updates.  


(05 Sept 2014) A short update on why antibiotics are used in cattle food. 

Item 1) A strong paradox observed, grass fed versus grain fed cattle. 

Item 1) A strong paradox observed, grass fed versus grain fed cattle.  

Most people are aware of the fact that antibiotics are mixed with the feed that is given to the cattle. Of course that is a reason for concern because once a new superbug is there, it cannot be killed by existing antibiotics. 

But what I did not know was the little fact that antibiotics are mixed in when the animals start eating grains... Most of the time the rationale that is given goes like:
Well these animals are kept in crowed conditions and if one animal gets sick the entire herd goes to death and since we love our cattle we give them a tiny bit antibiotics. 

That might all be true, but I was unaware that it was so strong related with dietary changes towards being grain fed cattle... 

And if you think about it, do cows eat grains in the wild?
No, they eat grass, grass and more grass. 
And what about pigs and chickens?
In the wild, do they eat grains at all?  

And if you compare fruits to grains; for a lot of fruits the seeds can only shoot root if they have passed the digestive system of an animal. For example wild apples cannot shoot root if they have not been eaten.
Yet grains do not need animals, hence there is no evolutionary reason as why grains should be healthy. All grains have their form of gluten and that is their stockpile of energy to grow a new generation of that particular grain.  


So the paradox is simple: 

If cattle goes on a grain based diet, they need antibiotics.
If we humans eat grains, it is always supposed to be healthy. 


Yet not all grains are pure poison of course, I cannot stand rye but I love rice. 
Not that it has much nutrition value, but I like it a lot. 

By the way; Why do they feed cattle grain?
Answer: It makes them gain weight fast. 

But in humans, the bread does not make you overweight. 
Anyway, that is what those weirdo's from the food industry claim. 
Just a dumb as Coca Cola stating you should drink the phosphoric acid in their product because phosphor plays an important role in the energy transport inside all living stuff... Idiots is what they are. 

Food for thought: 


Till updates. 


(03 Sept 2014) Another fantastic food product observed: Meat glue. 
In item 3 the latest pictures of the second gluten experiment.

Item 1) Transglutaminase: Safe to use food product for gluing meat and fish... 
Item 2) Transglutaminase: When it comes out through your skin. 
Item 3) Finally after 16 days the gluten starts to rot... 

 Item 1) Transglutaminate: Safe to use food product for gluing meat and fish...

The 'trans' in transglutaminase is not so important; it is a chemical thing.
It means that in the Lewis representation of a molecule all hydrogen atoms are also found on the other side; the lewis representation is symmetrical. 

You can buy this stuff for use in the kitchen, you can use it to glue together different kinds of meat. For example an expensive thin slice of beef on the outside and on the inside cheap pork, and voila there is a brand new meat product. 

You also use it to glue fish to bones from land animals or the other way around. 


In the USA the stuff is approved by the Food & Drug Agency.
In the history of humanity the FDA is surely one of the most retarded health agencies, just look at the average street view in the USA with all those one yard wide people; they all eat healthy food approved by the FDA... 

This is how the products look that you can make of it, it might look cute but all gluten related products are pure poison so you better not eat this kind of stuff. 


So far for this weird gluten products that once more states where the name gluten comes from: it comes from glue. 

  Item 2) Transglutaminate: When it comes out through your skin.

A few times I have told you that when I had that nasty skin condition related to health products from a company named Unilever, the gluten came out of my skin. 

But that was based on only one observation when I put one of the last gluten grains that came out of my skin under the microscope. So I was a bit unsure as to write it down because I could not repeat the experiment. 

For me, since the gluten is not bio degradable by our bodies, those skin diseases are only a manner of the body to get rid of the excess gluten that enters you bloodstream.
But it is hard to find confirmation of that in medical related literature...

Yet it has been found before, just a small quote: 

Anti-transglutaminase antibodies are found in celiac disease and may play a role in the small bowel damage in response to dietary gliadin that characterises this condition.[3] In the related conditiondermatitis herpetiformis, in which small bowel changes are often found and which responds to dietary exclusion of gliadin-containing wheat products, epidermal transglutaminase is the predominant autoantigen.[5] 

Source: Transglutaminase  

Comment: The words 'epidermal transglutaminase' means the stuff coming out through your skin. Why does it come out through your skin?
Well your body cannot process all that is in the wheat and bread, so if you live long enough the damage will accumulate so that finally the food industry can kill you. 

 Item 3) Finally after 16 days the gluten starts to rot... 

In the first gluten rot experiment after about 10 days the rot did set in.
In the second gluten experiment where I try to ferment it with beer yeast and Camembert fungus it takes a lot longer for the rot to set in. 

Now if you are a bread eater, about 10% of the weight of the bread is the gluten.
After 16 days the Camembert version looks like this (click on the picture for a larger version):   


So the next time you are eating bread or pasta, try to use your brain and do not forget the food industry is just another gigantic dynamical system that is controlled by nobody and only expands and expands and expands... 

Till updates. 


(01 Sept 2014) It would be easy to craft another anti food industry update, but you cannot live on food alone. So a tiny tiny math update about whole numbers. 
And, ok ok, a small update on another Fields winner. 

Item 1) The Tuthola of a natural number. 
Item 2) How far can you break down computer programs?  

  Item 1) The Tuthola of a natural number.

What gluten is in the bakery industry (a product you cannot digest) is the Tuthola for natural numbers. A very important mathematical fact is that all numbers have a unique prime factor representation, for example 15 = 3*5 and no other set of prime numbers can make up 15. 

Now what is the Tuthola of a number? 

For that we need a minor change what a prime number is, as you all know the first prime numbers are given by 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13 and so on.
So in that language 5 is the third prime numbers. 

Now for the Tuthola to be meaningful, 1 should also be counted as a prime number and if you do not like that you have to take a different technical path. 

1 = prime number 1
2 = prime number 2
3 = prime number 3
5 = prime number 4
7 = prime number 5
11 = prime number 6
13 = prime number 7 and so on and so on. 

We place all prime numbers on a long long list and we number that list... 


Let us calculate, as an example, the Tuthola of the number 2310.
Why 2310?
Well the product of the first six primes is 1*2*3*5*7*11 = 2310. 

The first Tuthola layer is therefore given by 1*2*3*4*5*6 = 720.  

Now 720 also has a prime factorization and that is easy to find if you have the first Tuthola layer: 

720 = 2*2*2*2*3*3*5. 

From this prime factorization we make a new Tuthola layer, that is the second Tuthola layer. Now the factors 2 and 3 are Tuthola 2 and 3 but 5 is Tuthola 4. 

So the Tuthola of 720 becomes 576 because 

576 = 2*2*2*2*2*2*3*3.

Therefore the Tuthola of 2310 is 576 and the Tuthola process is two layers deep.  


All other layers of Tuthola for 576 stay at 576 because for all the factors we have 

Tut (2) = 2 and
Tut (3) = 3 

And inevitably whatever big prime factorization you start with, all natural numbers have their Tuthola decomposition.  

 Item 2) How far can you break down computer programs?   

Oops, that is a difficult question because present day computer programs do not allow for prime decomposition of building factors. 

But beside that Iranian chick that received a Fields medal did a guy named Subhash Knot also get one? 

If so, congratulations, but do not think you are anything special. 

A grand vision for the impossible 


End of this update.  


(31 Aug 2014) Two items, the second one is in Dutch:  

Item 1) Gluten fermentation after 14 days; it smells strong. 
Item 2) Goedkope leugens van het Voorlichtingsbureau Brood.

  Item 1) Gluten fermentation after 14 days; it smells strong.

You know there are all those websites and all those articles about the gluten from wheat, but nobody does conduct any kind of experiment with it anyway. 

My dear reader, if you are a bread eater you should at least once in your lifetime wash out the dough until you have a nice ball of pure gluten.
The washing out is a very primitive way of how your body processes bread, and since we live in a free world, after that you can decide for yourself if you want to eat that stuff. 


The food industry is making the five gluten salts (they are all taste multipliers, or taste enhancers as they say) from fermented gluten.
So I decided to ferment a bit of gluten for myself and in the picture below you can see how 125 gram of gluten looks after 14 days.  


Needless to say; your body cannot digest it but I still have to carry out the gluten experiment with dipping it in battery acid for more ridged validation of this. 

The reason I have not carried out the battery acid experiment is simple: 
Almost all companies that sell car parts do not sell battery acid and those that do do not sell it to consumers.  


The smell of the fermenting gluten is strong, but it is not so strong I have to remove it from the kitchen. After 14 days the Camembert gluten is even a little bit pleasant, of course you cannot eat it but from a distance of about one meter it is not a bad smell.  

 Item 2) Goedkope leugens van het Voorlichtingsbureau Brood.

Die vieze vuile kaffers van het Voorlichtingsbureau Brood spuiten hun vieze vuile leugens weer eens rond.

Zo zou brood je bijvoorbeeld niet dik maken.

Die vieze vuile namaak Joden weten het weer leuk te brengen:

Gebruik niet meer dan de Dagelijks Aanbevolen Hoeveelheid & je zult lang en gelukkig leven.

Dat vieze gore ongedierte gaat toch eventjes voorbij aan mijn persoonlijke ervaringen;
wat ik ook deed mijn zogenaamde Body Mass Index bleef hangen in gevaarlijke hoogtes en alleen radicaal stoppen met al dat tarwe gedoe bracht verlichting. 

En in het laatste jaar van mijn brood etende leven at ik maar 2 sneetjes zelfgebakken brood per dag; ongeveer 180 gram per dag. Nou zelfs 180 gram kan al forse schade toebrengen weet ik nu. 

Ronduit walgelijk is hun stom gezwets, beneden is een link naar de vieze vuile kaffers van het Voorlichtingsbureau Brood en daarin kun je een plaatje vinden van een graankorrel.

Nou, denk jij dat je die hele graankorrel in je brood krijgt?

Vergeet het maar, alleen het zetmeel deel krijg je in je brood en van de rest maken ze veevoer.

Nou dan ga je toch samen met je kindertjes een gezond bruinbrood kopen?
Ach tja, doe maar eens een Google search op 'kleinbrood verbeteringsmiddel' en dan blijkt dat het verschil tussen witbrood en bruinbrood alleen de gebruikte kleurmiddelen zijn...

Achterlijk en verraderlijk tot op het bot zijn ze bij instanties als het Voorlichtingsbureau Brood.


Is brood een dikmaker?


End of this update, till updates. 


(30Aug 2014) More on the pig hair that is used in bread; why is it not on the list of ingredients of our beloved bread that is given to us by The Lord? 

Item 1) Another safe to use food number observed: E 920. 
Item 2) When it comes to bread, people will never learn it. 

  Item 1) Another safe to use food number observed: E 920.

Ok ok, E 920 is an amino acid (those amino acids are the building blocks for the larger proteins) and it is found in animal hairs and also in bird feathers. 

It is also found in grains, but the scary thing is they say it is made via fermentation... 

So very likely E 920 is another fantastic fermentation product made from gluten. 

Those food industry engineers; stupid without borders. 


Anyway, to make a long story short: Why Do They Use That Stuff? 

Simple answer: It makes the bread even more fluffy and lightweight. 

So adding E 920 makes the elastic properties of the gluten even more prevalent, and I wonder how stupid you can be. 

Because even the food engineers visit the funerals of their parents and their grand parents when they have died from lovely diseases like dementia.  

And those food engineers, they do not understand they did not only kill their own parents prematurely but also their own children will die before their time. 

Don't forget, animals never ever develop Alzheimer or dementia, it has to be a food problem... 

Link (in Dutch) 
Nederlandse fabrikanten gebruiken plantaardige L-cysteïne


Why is E 920 not on the list of 'used ingredients'? 
That is because the food industry succeeded in convincing the European food authorities that it is not found back in the final product and as such it 'only helps' in the baking process.
Well, go to the supermarket and buy some of that bread.
Go home and cut a bit of your own hair, put it on fire and smell the smell.
Now you put a leave of your supermarket bread in a toaster, turn it on and enjoy the smell. 

You clearly smell the smell of burned hair, it is subtle but it is there...    

 Item 2) When it comes to bread, people will never learn it. 

I already linked to part II of an anti-gluten tirade from that USA medical doctor Auer, but in part I of that anti gluten tirade the next hilarious quote is found (source): 

In 1843, a physician named Stanislas Tanchou spoke at the Paris Medical Society Conference. He claimed that he could predict the cancer rates in major European cities over the next 50 years. He based his predictions on the percentage of grains being consumed in each major city. What is astonishing is that, over time, his predictions turned out to be correct. In the cities that had the highest grain consumption, cancer rates were the highest. This is in stark contrast to the fact that in populations who did not consume grains, cancer did not exist.

Comment: This is amazing and I was shaking from laughter when you see that year 1843. For so long the dangers of grain must be known but nothing happens of course. 

Predicting cancer rates accurately over 150 years ago and today the bakers of the bread still do not understand what they are baking... 

Once more; I am shaking from laughter, but I am now free of that weird stuff the laughter comes easily.  


It is not for nothing I am accusing the food industry of taking down the average lifespan of the population by at at least five years.  

So for my home country where we have about 16 to 17 million citizens, that would amount to about 80 to 85 million stolen years of life. 

And that my dear reader, influences a whole lot of people. 


End of this update, if I count it correctly this was update number 32 on our beloved food industry. Till updates. 


 (29 Aug 2014) More on gluten; a nice picture from under the microscope.  

Item 1) What is so special about the wheat gluten?

 Item 1) What is so special about the wheat gluten?

Now don't get me wrong, I do not hate the wheat or even the gluten in it.
For the wheat the gluten is a perfect way to story protein, just like all other grains have their form of storage of proteins.  

There is nothing wrong with that. 

Yet when I had that skin disease named Lupus, I had those weird stuff coming out of my skin. And I should have done it earlier, but at the end stages I finally put it under the microscope.   

The evening I put it under the microscope was also the evening I washed out one kilo of bread dough and I swear what I saw under the microscope looked a lot like that washing out of the wheat dough... 


My skin got healthier and I was not able to reproduce what in a great hurry I only observed for a few seconds. 

Of course I will not return to my old ways of eating bread now I have recovered from that weird kind of food. 

And I cannot prove it but for me it was clear; that gluten that cannot be processed by my body is trying to get out via my skin.  

Don't forget that the human body is far more complicated than the higher dimensional complex numbers & we all know how popular the higher complex numbers are: 

Zero point zero popularity in academic circles... 


From a screenshot from a previous Youtubber, gluten looks like this under a more advanced microscope: 


Just look at it; if you know your body cannot break this down, guess three times what will happen if it gets into your bloodstream? 


Source file of the picture is that Youtubber at about the 25-th minute: 

Spectrum of gluten related disorders  


The relation with stuff like Alzheimer's disease is not obvious, but one very interesting thing about that brain sickness that there is a whole lot of stickiness observed. 

So from the statistical point of view it is very simple:  

Have all patients with Alzheimer been eating wheat bread all of their lives yes or no?  

My guess is that you can only get the lovely Alzheimer disease if you are eating bread... 

More on the sources of Alzheimer in another Youtubber: 

Unraveling the mysteries of Alzheimer's disease 


Understanding gluten is a fine art.  

End of this update, till updates. 


(28 Aug 2014) Holy cow; there seems to be a book with the title: 
Complex Numbers The Higher Dimensional Forms. 

So that is the item of today. 

Item 1) This is weird; is it an American that found them too?

 Item 1) This is weird; is it an American that found them too?

By sheer coincidence I found that guy named Dennis Morris that wrote a book with the title above and I was curious about the content. 

So I went to the bookstore, but even with the ISBN numbers it was not available. 
So I looked up the publisher, but the publisher published only one book. 
And that book is about the higher dimensional complex numbers.   


It is not hard to guess what has happened: 
Because without doubt that publisher has gone broke because even on the academic level like the universities and other forms of higher education, nobody is waiting for higher dimensional complex numbers.  

I know that from experience for about 23 years, the book from Dennis was published in the year 2007.  

Dennis, I can tell you these university professors are a disaster just like the food engineers in your country and on my continent: 
Only when disaster strikes they will change course. 

In the meantime Dennis, all the average professional math professor can handle is the two dimensional complex plane. 

They are the people that live in the flat land & are capable of getting a fairly overpaid salary from it and boatloads of social standing. Because if you are a professional professor in mathematics, all other people think you are actually a very smart person... 


This is how the cover of the book looks: 


Poor Dennis, the average professional math professor is just too fucking stupid to understand higher dimensional complex numbers in the first place. 


Let's leave it with that, till updates. 


 (27 Aug 2014) Update number 30 on the food stuff already... 
Two items, an update on the gluten fermentation and a 70 minutes long Youtubber on why we get fat. 

Item 1) The Camembert version after 8.5 days. 
Item 2) Wise remarks from a guy named Gary Taubes; why we get fat. 

  Item 1) The Camembert version after 8.5 days. 

This is day number nine in fermenting the wheat gluten, in the first experiment where I only tried to make the gluten rot it was already much more liquid compared to the more controlled versions with Camembert and a home brew beer yeast depot.   

The smell is also much less, but it is definitely a strong smell and I understand much better why the food industry is using dangerous stuff like this. 

Dangerous? Well, to my body it is.
How far this is dangerous to the general public, I don't know. 

This is how the Camembert version looks after 8.5 days, the gluten gets softer and softer but it is still extremely sticky. May be it is the sticky property that damages the inside of your intestines; it simply rips off the follicles that are in your intestines.
(Until now I have no proof for that, so it is speculation but it is not unfounded.)
Here is the picture: 


You still see the cheese in the middle, the fungus is spreading out more and more and it smells hefty like cheese... 

But seriously; you cannot eat this. 

 Item 2) Wise remarks from a guy named Gary Taubes; why we get fat. 

The Gary guy has a physics study done at Harvard so I have to say that makes the information he is sharing a bit more reliable compared to weird people like here who are working for a semi-governmental institute like the Food Center where you have all those lunatics promoting eating bread. 

The Youtube video is 70 minutes long and likely that is above the attention span of a lot of readers, but it is not unwise that somewhere in your life you look at all those 70 minutes. 

Why We Get Fat 

I also would like to point towards a society where obesity it not much of a general problem; that society is Japan. 

Japanese folks are known to be huge consumers of green tea, but in the Western society green tea is associated with tree huggers and other forms of peacenic behavior.

Yet I know from personal experience that even if you are a bread eater, if you are severely overweight green tea helps you to burn fat. 
How it works I don't know, remark that chemistry is a difficult science especially when you talk about the large molecules that run bio stuff. 

But from the Gary video I would like to capture the next screenshot on how our fat cells regulate themselves; stuff goes in stuff goes out & indeed every fat cell is also a complicated dynamical system... 


To put it simple: 

If you eat the wrong foods, you body cannot retrieve energy from it's basin of body fat and you end up feeling hungry. So you eat another slice of bread...  


End of update number 30 on the wonderful food industry.
Till updates. 


 (26 Aug 2014) Humming with pleasure we have update number 29 on the food industry. Why am I humming with pleasure?
Well the more I learn about our daily bread that is given to us by The Lord, the more I hate it. 

The funny thing about food is that for every opinion that is out there, you can also find completely contradicting opinions. Even on something like olive oil the opinions vary widely from all fat is dangerous to embracement of non saturated fats... 

Two items today: 

 Item 1) Wow man, that is a hefty weight loss overnight. 
 Item 2) History talking; UK 1930 or so with a picture of celiac kids. 

 Item 1) Wow man, that is a hefty weight loss overnight.

Since I am off the bread every morning I weigh my own body.
In statistical terms that gives a so called time series. 

From experience I know that if you eat bread it is hard work to shed weight, but I am not like those lazy Americans and I am willing to work hard. But hard work only got me from 109 kilo to 88 and I could not dive below that... 

Ok, about 80 days ago I decided to cut more crap and that crap has the name bread on it. 

The last five data entries from my time series are: 


Needless to say that the morning weight of 82.3 to one day later 81.1 is huge. 

Losing 1.2 kilo overnight cannot be explained by a bit of food more or less or going to the toilet a bit more or less. 

It's as simple as it is; once you are off that fucking bread your body becomes the self regulating dynamical system that The Lord has given to you. 

 Item 2) History talking; UK 1930 or so with a picture of celiac kids. 

Here in the Western world we take care of ourselves, we only eat healthy foods and under the eye of government institutions that say 'unhealthy foods simply do not exist' we are getting older and happier and wiser by the year. 

Only in weird places like Africa you have all that famine and those kids with swollen stomachs... 

Now here is an old picture from the UK dating back to the 1930-ties or so. 

Don't they look just like those African malnutrition kids? 


Now if you go out and just ride a bit around, don't you observe an amazing lot of adults that have those disproportional big bellies?  

These people are obese by the standard of Body Mass Index, but they are just as malnutritioned as the kids as shown above.  


Source of the picture:
Spectrum of gluten related disorders (by Alessio Fasano)

Let's leave it with that & say hello to Unilever and all her wise food engineers. 

Till updates. 


 (25 Aug 2014) Two items today, ok when attacking the food industry you can easily cough up 20 items a day for a year long.  

The items of today is the shortest possible anti-wheat or anti-bread rap possible plus the Unilever problem. 

I am skipping the fact that the Russians are cracking down on McDonnalds, just beat the shit out of that weird food company my dear Russians... 

Item 1) In the three languages that I can speak: Bread rhymes on ... 
Item 2) Unilever brand Becel and that stream of lies.

 Item 1) In the three languages that I can speak: Bread rhymes on ...

In a conversation I can speak more or less three languages, namely my home language Dutch, furthermore I can speak English and the language of our neighbors the Germans. 

So in these three languages we ponder what bread rhymes on... 

English Bread rhymes on dead
Dutch Brood rijmt op dood
German Brot hört wie tot.

It makes me wonder; are our forefathers trying to tell us something or is this just a sheer coincidence? 

End of the shortest anti-bread rap possible. 

Item 2) Unilever brand Becel and that stream of lies. 

If here in the Dutch landscape you do a Google search for 'broodbuik', in the English language that is a bread belly, still the first advertisement link is from Becel. 

Becel is a brand from Unilever and lately I decided to do to Unilever what other organizations like the Pentagon have endured for a couple of years... 

Let's not do difficult about this; Unilever represents the power of the food industry so if I can take those weirdo's out of power guess what will happen?
You will live longer by at least five years. 

So before the slaughter is done to Unilever, the moral justification is not only the joy my brain will have but also making the population live at least five years longer... 

Now you Unilever fuckheads still promote the stuff that gave me the first serious skin sickness known as Lupus. And you still talk your dumb stuff when it comes to eating fat while in the products you promote we have all those funny E number ranging from E 621 through E 625 also known as the gluten salts. 

Why the fuck should you put gluten salts inside a so called 'healthy product'? 


Did you know that Becel Kitchen contains more omega 3 compared to the same amount of olive oil? 

It might be true, but it also contains a gigantic amount of gluten salts. 

Therefore my dear Unilever, you are the one that has to be slaughtered. Seeking dialog is not a viable option. 


End of this update, till updates. 


(24 Aug 2014) A picture of day six of the gluten fermentation experiment.  

Item 1) Day six; it starts to smell but it can stay in the kitchen until now.

 Item 1) Day six; it starts to smell but it can stay in the kitchen until now.

This is how the gluten with the beer yeast is looking after six days, it has clearly lost it's rubber like structure but it is still extremely sticky.
It is getting softer and softer but it is very obvious you absolutely cannot eat this stuff. 

Yet in all wheat based bread about 10% of the weight is this weird stuff that is not bio-degradable for the human body.  


From stuff like this they make the food taste multipliers that are based on fermented gluten; here in Europe these taste multipliers have the E numbers 621 through 625.  

And from the food industry you get all that bla bla bla that it makes tasting salt stronger, as such suggesting they can add less salt so that is good for you.
Yet in practice, most processed food simply contains too much salt so once more they talk bullshit. 

The two batches, one with the beer yeast and the other with the Camembert smell very different; so with fermentations like this you can make a wide variety of smells & tastes and as such these are not 'taste multipliers' at all. 

It is artificially making taste and after that it is added as a taste additive, not a multiplier on existing taste... 

And it is dirt cheap to make; this stuff must be a good cash cow for the food industry. 


Yet how come that with using only one product from the food industry, to be precise a 'health product' from the branch Becel from the food multinational Unilever I developed that funny skin sickness known as Lupus? 

Can only one percent of fermented gluten give you Lupus? 

Yes it can, furthermore the food industry and the food engineers simply do not give a shit if some additive is bio-degradable or not in your body.
Never ever in the history of 20-th century food that has been a consideration. 

These people, these food engineers, they are fucked up crazy. 

We must kill them before they kill us... 


End of this update, till updates. 


(23 Aug 2014) Oh oh my dear Ukrainian authorities, thanks for not attacking that humanitarian aid convoy, but please I beg you: Can You Stop Being Childish All Of The Time??? 

We constantly have this and that, for example the black box of flight 17 would definitely be tampered with. Of course it was not... 

Ok, from my side the stuff stays the same:
Swift in & swift out for the white trucks from Russia.  


We proceed with the food updates, this is update number 26 on that giant dynamical system known as the food industry. 

Item 1) A picture on the gluten fermentation experiment, day six. 
Item 2) More reasons why obese people always eat bread.  

 Item 1) A picture on the gluten fermentation experiment, day six.

The gluten experiment goes fine, after six days the stuff starts to break down a little bit in the sense it is not a hard rubber ball but slowly it gets softer and more stickier.  

I only have one problem:
My daughter has the memory card of my camera, and now I can not retrieve photo's from my camera.  

So let's replace the photo with a nice pic from our beloved internet: 


After six days of fermentation it starts to smell, but I can still let it be in the kitchen because the smell is not awful enough. 

It is hard to describe, but I understand as why gluten fermented taste multipliers are important to the food industry: It is a dirt cheap way to make strong smells.  

All that garbage that using taste multipliers makes using extra salt not needed, it is garbage... It is garbage because we all know that in processed food most of the time it is also loaded with too much salt. 

Fuck you my dear food industry; gluten based taste multipliers are a cheap way to produce smell & taste to the weird products you sell to us. 


 Item 2) More reasons why obese people always eat bread.  

This process of overeating does not fall from the sky but is deeply rooted into how the food industry works. It is important to emphasize that most workers in the food industry are not evil by definition; only the food engineers are all crazy as hell and should be confronted harsh & rough. 

The food engineers have the knowledge, but they use it only to suck in the profits by adding all those weird and strange food additives. 


Ok, why do we overeat? 

Difficult problems like overeating have many root sources, the damage done to the indigestive system is one of the greatest. Because that skews your capability to suck in what you need on a large scale. 

Our human bodies are rather complicated dynamical systems themselves, so could there be more reasons as why bread and all other wheat products make you obese? 

Yes there is, eating bread and pasta is very simple to understand because it is just like the heroin cycle. Heroin lives shortly in the body, after that the junkie needs another shot. You can fight a heroin addiction with methadone because methadone lasts about 48 hours in the human body.  

So a heroin addict, if he or she wants it, can fight the addiction by making it controllable using methadone. Because methadone stays so long in the body, you can use that to downsize your daily intake without the sickness from the withdrawal.   

You might think what heroin junkies have to do with the bread that is given to us by The Lord?  

It is the same cycle; bread eaters never eat bread only once a week.
No daily intake is the least and preferably a few times every day. 


Look at video number five where that USA medical doctor explains a bit more on how sugar blood levels influence your behavior... 

Key fundamentals of health

Basically eating bread ensures that you cannot burn fat, that is why we have all these fat people walking around and why the food industry promotes eating bread because of the fibers that are in it. 

Ok ok, the food industry is the food industry, so most fibers in bread simply are pig hairs, but that is another story...  

End of this update, till updates. 


 (22 Aug 2014) Two corrections, one small and one big.   

Item 1) Small stuff; this math Fields medal looks ok. 
Item 2) The leaking gut syndrome test does not look ok. 

 Item 1) Small stuff; this Fields medal looks ok.

Lately a chick named Maryam Mirzakhani won the Fields medal. 
Most of the time they go to Jews and stuff and very often it is completely incomprehensible as why this math should be important anyway.  

Think for example at the Langlands program; weird stuff from the beginning because many years later I do not have one clue at what it is about. 

Yesterday and today I read a few lines from Maryan, and I have to say I do not understand it either, but it looks a whole lot better compared to vague stuff like the Langlands program. 


Furthermore the Fields medal only goes to youngsters, so my advice to 
Maryam would be: 

Never feed your children American bread. 


 Item 2) The leaking gut syndrome test does not look ok. 

Oh oh a few days back I thought there was indeed a test that showed if you had leaky guts that make all that shit from the food industry leaking into your bloodstream. 

Such a test does not exist.  

The test only measures if you have anti-bodies against gluten in your blood. 

But you only have anti-bodies in your white blood cells if you just like me have the wrong genes for your white blood cells... 

All those people that have the 'good genes' will still have leaky gut syndrome from eating bread or other wheat related products. 

The gluten is so sticky, you should not eat that stuff. 

All those other grains have not the wide health related problems that wheat has, for example I am extremely allergic to rye since I was child. So I avoid rye automatically since I was child. But with wheat there is no escaping it; it is everywhere... 

A nice breakdown of what actually is inside our beloved wheat is like this: 


Ha ha ha, the 'gluten breakdown' is very interesting to talk about hours and hours but we are not going to that.  

We will hit the button named 'publish website' and pop another gluten free beer as I make them myself... 

Source of the picture: Understanding gluten - Part II

Till updates. 


 (21 Aug 2014) Lately the Fields medal has been rewarded again and since the Fields medal is the highest possible prize in mathematics it is needless to say that 'The empire strikes back'. 
But I also have these boundary conditions in place:
At most 10% of new results will be published... 

So I decided to write a nice thingeling about quantum states where the superposition of quantum states is written with three dimensional complex numbers. 

There is nothing new in that, it is just a simple application of the ocean of math that could be found in the higher dimensional complex numbers. 

So the embargo will still be in place while the empire strikes back...  


After having said that, weren't we on some food thing? 

Yes we are, today we have one item: 

Item 1) More on the gluten from wheat.

 Item 1) More on the gluten from wheat.

The second gluten experiment goes fine until now, after a few days all those fruit flies got interested in the fermenting gluten so I put it in a pan so the fruit flies could not release their air power... 

After four days the stuff starts to swell, another clear indication that for the human body the present day gluten is not bio-degradable... 

Ok ok there might be some bacteria inside your intestines that actually live on gluten, but only if you have done the washing out the dough you will understand these bacteria can only scratch the surface of the gluten that is formed in your intestines.   

So take your time, make that wheat dough & wash it out. 

Only when you have done the washing yourself you understand you should not eat that stuff, in particular you should not eat present day bread as sold in the supermarkets. 


The food industry is also making food additives from gluten. 

So I decided to make my own E numbers. 

After four days into the second experiment it starts to break down the gluten for the purpose of that particular fungus: Camembert fungus against my own beer yeast. 

This is how it looks, it is swelling nicely suggesting fermentation is taking hold:


Yeah yeah, we all love the food industry. 


But what has been done to the wheat is exactly the same as has been done the the bees: 

Hollowing out the genetic diversity makes it weak in the long run.  

End of this update.  


(19 Aug 2014) And constantly those people from  the food industry say that research has shown these food additives are safe to eat.
But if I look into the details, it is 50 year old worse executed research.  

Item 1) Let the science to the talking.

 Item 1) Let the science to the talking.

The five taste multipliers made from fermenting gluten are here in Europe known as E 621 through E 625, they are all different salts made with fermented gluten. 

My own experiment with fermenting gluten looks like this after two days (remark that two days in your body the gluten still is intact, it is not bio degradable for the human body). 

The Camanbert fungus is already spreading out a little bit while the beer yeast at first sight does not do much: 


Here in the Dutch landscape you have some agency named Voedingscentrum (the Feed Center) and they advice the public about food. 

They also have an encyclopedia with more information, so I looked up what they said about those taste multipliers. And on all those pro-food industry websites it is constantly the same: 

They all say it is made from natural products.
Why that should be important I don't know, the thing that counts is if your bady can digest it yes or no.
Mineral oil and iron ore are also natural products, yet we do not eat that... 

Another characteristic is that these five gluten salts are 'carefully investigated' on health effects. But when I try to find something all they cough up is sheer horror: 

Some lousy investigation only talks about 150 persons with asthma who were given a gluten salt versus a placebo. 


From the statistical point of view this is garbage science; for a binomial variable to measure effect sharp enough you need over a 1000 people.
Just like in the election polls; 150 people is just far to small to be reliable... 

This is pure & plain garbage science. 


So let me try to explain how you should put up a statistical reliable test that measures if these gluten salts have negative health effects: 

With what I know now, I would factor it against the gluten intake.
So I would randomly put each individual from a 1500 size group into six different groups like this. Let's call that factor I, that is the food intake before the experiment: 

Factor I:
Group 1) Three weeks long gluten in every meal, so bread & pasta. 
Group 2) Two weeks long gluten in every meal, so bread & pasta. 
Group 3) One weeks long gluten in every meal, so bread & pasta. 
Group 4) Three weeks long totally gluten free, so no bread & pasta. 
Group 5) Three weeks long totally gluten free, so no bread & pasta. 
Group 6) Three weeks long totally gluten free, so no bread & pasta.   

After that randomly having a strong gluten salt exposure yes or no. 


But it can easily done in another way because these days there seems to be a test for having the so called 'leaky gut syndrome'. This name is a bit misleading because your intestines do not leak into your stomach but into your bloodstream. 

It is a blood test as far as I know; they can see if there is garbage into your bloodstream.  

Well all 1500 volunteers for the experiment undergo this test but they are not told what the outcome is. 

So that is factor II: Separate the 1500 in two groups based upon that blood test. 

After that again randomly exposure to a lot of gluten salts yes or no. 


The two factors can even be combined... 


Now my dear assholes of the Voedingsinstituut; that is the way it should be done and not your stupid ways of coughing up some 50 year old garbage study into only 150 asthma patients. If you have only 150 people, no wonder the results will be inconclusive.  

But my criticism goes much deeper:
If it is inconclusive, that does not say it is safe to eat.  

Years and years ago I already explained how to conduct your statistical tests when measuring poison. In the years thereafter, just as an example, testing the poison dioxine here in the Dutch landscape was finally done the way it should have been done all those years.  

I published it here on 17 Oct 2008 in relation with the Chinese baby milk scandal, but years before that I was able to make that info more widespread. 

Hypothesis testing 


The locals might recognize a few of the Food Lunatics in the next picture: 


The guy in the middle is the CEO of the Food Center and he will be replaced by a shithole from the Unilever company. 

I mention him because he has weird things to say all the time, like 'There is no dangerous food'.
My response would be: Just go out in the city and look at all those people. 

The name of this worthless CEO is Felix Cohen, and he also says:
'All we are saying is let science do the talking'. 

Well ok you shithead Felix, that is why today's item has it's title:
It is your science versus mine. 


The chick in the picture is also extremely dangerous, but may I have to wait for her parents to develop that lovely thing known as the Alzheimers disease before she gets her act together. 


Links; in Dutch upon the gluten salts: 

Glutamaat / 

The second picture is from a food blog in the Dutch language: 

Felix Cohen is klaar bij het voedingscentrum / 

Till updates. 


 (17 Aug 2014) A short item on the Ukraine equation and the second item is that second experiment of fermentation of the gluten from wheat. 

 Item 1) The Ukrainian equation. 
 Item 2) Trying to ferment the gluten from wheat.


 Item 1) The Ukrainian equation.

Yesterday the Ukrainian prez came out stating a Russian military convoy has invaded the Ukraine and the the army had destroyed parts of the military convoy.
And I, with my dumb head, even believed it because I was operating from the point of view that Petro has his cognitive functions nicely on a straight line...
So I could not bake cake from that news and I was thinking that may be the humanitarian convoy was already in the Ukraine and that may be because it could get attacked some Russian military stuff was there.

But today again the almost 300 trucks were still not in the Ukraine so this all got a bit more weird. 

Well, as far as stuff is standing now, it was all a pipe dream; there simply was no Russian military convoy in the Ukraine... 


Well to make a long story short; 

It would be nice if on a very short notice at least 50 to 80 trucks could go there and deliver the help goods. The Ukrainian government and military forces have the right to respond when they come under attack.
Furthermore, things should go swift; 
Trucks in, deliver goods, trucks out. 

It is reasonable that if needed, some refugees can come back with those trucks, but again delivery should go swift and all in all this is Ukrainian territory so there is only one boss & that is the Ukrainian government... 


That was it, but as a last remark I would like to compliment the Ukrainian military that from an army on paper they have managed to be some real army in a relatively short time. 

That means my dear Ukrainians, that by far not all hope is lost. 

End of this item. 

 Item 2) Trying to ferment the gluten from wheat.

About two weeks ago I washed out the gluten from one kilo of standard bread dough and it was strange to hold into my hands the sticky rubber like stuff that likely killed my father. 

I tried to make the stuff rot and after 3 full days it's structure got weaker and after five days it smelled so foul I had to replace it from the kitchen to the back of my house. 

Two days later the foul smell, with a lot of cheese tones in it, came through all doors so I had to place it outside the house into the garden. 

Now it is very fluid like and still smells very strong, it constantly attracts the attention of flies...  

One thing is clear; if you get gluten in your body, it just does not dissolve fast enough. So it should not be in the food chain at all, but ha ha ha it is the skeleton of the bread and if you are young you do not drop dead from it but it gives you plenty of energy. 


Ok, I have not bought some battery acid but now I have a full kilo of pure gluten I can experiment on it as why we have all those weird taste multipliers that here in Europe go under the E number system as E 621 through E625.  

These are made from gluten but since the wheat gluten are simply not bio-degradable enough, they might actually be poison. 


Now I have a kilo of that stuff, here is the start of the second experiment: 

Now I am not trying desperately to make it rot, but I put a bit of French cheese with it and a depot of beer yeast.  

It is important to remark that I suspect the French cheese named Camembert to have successfully made it to gluten experiment number 1 because that has all that cheese tones in it's smell. 

Weird detail: If on the internet you search for 'fermenting gluten' it is hard to find anything meaningful. Oh oh my dear food industry, are you hiding some information? 

The start of the second gluten experiment looks like this: 


And if asphalt was an E number, without doubt the food industry would use it because it causes enough damage that if you put it in diluted, people will overeat without knowing why. 

It is time to hit the button named 'publish website' so till updates my dear reader. 


(16 Aug 2014) One item about the evolution of the food industry.  
This is attack/update number 21 on the food industry & the joys those shitholes bring... 

Item 1) The lifespan / foodintake equation.

 Item 1) The lifespan / foodintake equation.

Don't worry, we are not going to solve difficult equations but we will only be looking at a very simple example with a few easy numbers in it. 

As said many times, the food industry will constantly put all kinds of additives in food products in order to make you overeat. You might think that this defies logic because if you constantly overeat you will live shorter and as such the food industry will make less money from you. 

Over your entire lifespan you will have used a particular amount of money to buy food, ok ok we have always inflation so a dollar or a euro from when you were young should be recalculated to when you die. But that is standard financial calculations and for us it is not important exactly how much money the average person spends on food during his or her lifespan. 

Let's give it the letter F, so F = all money spend on food during your life. 

Suppose all my life I would have been healthy and always have a normal weight below all definitions of overweight/obesitas and so. For my length about 80 kilo would be considered a healthy weight. 

So for me, F is the standard money spend in my life when I would be healthy and normal weight all the time. 

In the USA there are plenty of folks with a body mass index of 35 or higher, for my length that would be something like 120 kilo, so that is about 50% above a healthy body weight.

In order to stay that fat you need to intake more calories, for simplicity lets assume you also need 50% calories more and that you actually spend 50% more on food than I do. 



If a person is 50% too heavy compared to healthy weight the situation is actually a bit more difficult because: 

1) If you are that fat you are also much more lazy and less active so you need lower than 50% extra calories to have stable overweight.
2) If you are that fat your body is much less efficient in using the food, therefore you need even higher than 50% extra calories to have stable weight. 

I assume these two things cancel each other out... 

End intermezzo. 


Furthermore, being so fat shortens your lifespan.
I have no idea about average premature death related to obesity, but for simplicity assume you live 10% shorter. 


Now we have two money spenders: 

1) Me being healthy all the time and I spend F money on food and stuff, versus 

2) The fat person from 120 kilo, spending 50% more but 10% shorter lifespan. 

How much will the food industry earn on the fat person? 


Spending 50% more over your lifespan means multiplying by 1.50
Living 10% shorter of your lifespan means multiplying by 0.90 

The result over your lifespan is F * 1.50 * 0.90 = 1.35 

The number 1.35 means the food industry will take in 35% extra turnover & profits from people that are about 50% overweight. 


You see on the scale of things the food industry has no interest at all in having you a healthy life with maximum lifespan. On the contrary, their interests are best served when everybody eats to much... 

Now take in your mind the average American street view: 

All these fat & dumb people do indeed their stinking best to make the food industry a good investment for guy like Warren Buffet who, as you might have noticed, is not obese when it comes to body fat... 

End of this update, till updates.  


(15 Aug 2014) Two items today, the first item is about teenagers that supposedly are reading this website. One would think have they no games to play or facebook pages to visit or so?   

The second item is not an attack on the food industry, but an advertisement for Mulder Pot in Kropswolde near Zuidlaren. There you can buy 100% wheat gluten... 

Item 1) Teenagers reading this website? 
Item 2) Advertisement for Mulder Pot in the village of Kropswolde.

 Item 1) Teenagers reading this website?

I absolutely do not track any website visitors in any way, but clearly when I am in the city the way folks react makes it clear to me that a whole lot of teenagers are also visiting this website. 

That is a compliment because the last time I looked young was from before the invention of the stone age... 

But I considered it cute so I mixed a bit of science in a blender; a bit of math, a bit of chemical thingelings, a bit of planet shaped things.
And the end result is a 3 page long pdf file under the title 

Water Planet 

The basic idea is very simple: 

Water molecules are very small, so we calculate how much water molecules go into 1 liter of water.
Let's name that number X.
After that we are going to calculate how much volume X liters is. 

So we compare X liter against X molecules that make up one liter of water. 

That's all, no hard core higher dimensional stuff. Just some large numbers. 

As usual, click on the pic for a download of the pdf file: 



 Item 2) Advertisement for Mulder Pot in the village of Kropswolde.

If you are one of those people that want to bake their own bread because the food industry is putting stuff like modified pig hair into the bread usually sold in the supermarkets, you need good ingredients. 

And if you are one of those people that like to experiment with the pure gluten that is inside the grain named wheat, locally you can buy pure gluten locally at Mulder Pot. 


Now suppose all those horror stories about wheat gluten are actually true, so that we now have a theoretical model that explains a lot of the obesity stuff but also a lot of the brain sickness of depression and even the elderly sickness of Alzheimer, it is important to emphasize that folks like Mulder Pot are not the enemy. 

The enemy is the gluten and all those weirdo's that refuse to take it out of the food chain. 

Is it that hard to change the food chain? 

Yes it is because every body in the food chain is sitting on a small island and what can they do? They can do only their best using their local knowledge. 

That is all they can do. 


But there is a lot that sticks to that gluten hypothesis, for myself speaking I do not know if indeed gluten can pass the blood-brain barrier in our elderly. 

Yet if stuff like that is confirmed, we would have a down to earth model for a wide range of weird things. For example why do people commit suicide while animals living in natural conditions almost never choose that path? 

If there is fucking gluten inside your brain, what can you do? 


In the next picture you see the yellow bag that has about 100% of pure gluten, it costs 5 € per kilo. In the back you see a 25 kilo bag of barley.
The axe is added for reasons of fun only. 


End of this update, but hey now we are approaching another 911 anniversary of the 2001 attacks in New York, once more I like to ask the Americans: 

Still going strong and getting fatter & more stupid by the day? 


Till updates.  


(14 Aug 2014) Update number 19 on those food industry shitholes; two items:  

Item 1) There is pighair in the bread. 
Item 2) When does Coca Cola fall apart? 

 Item 1) There is pighair in the bread.

On a local news channel today (RTL7 to be precise) there was the news that there is hair in the bread. 

Well I know this for many years because I did not buy a bread machine for nothing; the fact there is modified pig hair in the bread is known to me for a couple of years.
So I decided to make my own bread because that pighair detail is not on the list of ingredients. 

If you put a slice of bread from the supermarket in your bread toaster, you can smell there is something in it made of hair. 

The RTL7 news reporter, dumb and naive as she is, asked why all ingredients should be on the package because 'may be you need 3 or 4 A4 size of information'. 
But that is precise what we want and what we need; may be now almost nobody is allergic for pig hair but if the food industry goes on as she does decade in decade out, unavoidable food allergies will only rise more and more.  

Just like in our children allergic reactions on nuts like peanuts are rising year in year out; if we do not talk the language of the coffins against the food industry, they will talk that language to our kids... 

It is as simple as it is; let's kill and slaughter those weirdo's. 

 Item 2) When does Coca Cola fall apart? 

It seems that if you add a little bit of milk to a bottle of cola, after some time it falls apart into separate stuff like in the picture below. 

If on the website Youtube you search of cola and milk, the first two clips that pop up have an amazingly different time frame.
In the one clip it takes just one hour, in the other an amazing 6 hour time lapse is reported. 

I did not understand why the times were so different, but yesterday we observed that in the USA the cola also contains brominated vegetable oil. And that brome stuff is an additive that prevents the cola from falling apart... 

If the time lapses are indeed that different (I did not do the experiment myself) likely it is the brominated vegetable oil that explains the difference.  


The two Youtube clips with the different time lapses: 

Coke mixed with milk experiment /
Coke mixed with milk experiment /


At the end of this days update we ponder a philosophical question:  

How can we get the Americans towards a healthy lifestyle using vegetable oil? 


All you have to do is add brominated vegetable oil to the cola. 


End of this update on pighair and a metal named brome.  


(13 Aug 2014) In update number 18 on the shitholes from the food industry we take another look at the most worthless company in the world: Coca Cola.

Item 1) From phosphoric acid to brominated oil, it is all safe says Coca Cola...

Item 1) From phosphoric acid to brominated oil, it is all safe says Coca Cola...

On 10 Aug we looked at two engineered food products, bread and Coca Cola, and we observed how for example consuming the phosphoric acid in cola can lead to higher intake of other foods like bread that bring their own poison with them. 
The phosphoric acid washes out the calcium in your bones so one or two days later you suddenly have an appetite for food with calcium like bread and milk. After all you have to replenish your calcium stockpile otherwise your bones get too weak. 

Therefore it is so stupid that the food industry say that it is the responsibility of the consumer to fulfill the equation 

A calorie in = a calorie out 

because the consumer has just consumed some poison and the consumer has to overeat to repair the damage done. And the Coca Cola shitholes put the poison into their beverages themselves, so they are not only stupid but also utter hypocrites.  

All those different foods multiply on each other but one characteristic is very important: All these engineered foods are always more or less healthy apart for a few details. Like the gluten in bread, you can eat that for decades before your intestines are just too damaged that you have to stop eating bread... 

Here is that screenshot from the Dutch website from Coca Cola once more: 


So they put in phosphoric acid and after that tell stupid nonsense like it is in fish, meat and cheese... Holy Moses, there is no phosphoric acid in fish, meat or cheese. 

All living animals and plants have phosphor in their cells, that is the fundamental way cells transport energy and that is known as the ATP ADP cycle.
But that has nothing to do with phosphoric acid... 


But, as usual with the American food industry, there is also more. They use stuff that goes under the name brominated vegetable oil. Needless to say that brome is a metal that you should not consume at all.  

So why is it in American cola? (In Europe it is not allowed to add it in)
That is to prevent the cola from falling apart...   

Quote (source is theverge dot com): Coca-Cola and PepsiCo will both remove from all of their beverages a controversial ingredient that includes an element also found in flame retardants. Coca-Cola intends to have the ingredient, brominated vegetable oil (BVO), removed from its drinks by the end of the year; PepsiCo removed BVO from Gatorade last year and said yesterday— apparently following Coca-Cola's announcement — that the rest of its products would also be dropping it, though no timeframe was given.

Comment: If you look at the average American street view you have all those fat and extremely fat people. Therefore it is 100% obvious they have a lot of poison into their food chain. You cannot deny that because healthy people in general do not overeat even if there is an abundance of food supply.
People overeat because they have shortages or are slightly but substantially poisoned. 

It is as simple as it is. 


In order to understand how fucking stupid the Coca Cola people are with stating that 'phosphor is at the root of all life' and therefore you should drink phosphoric acid, lets first look at the 2-dimensional Lewis structure of phosphoric acid: 


Although 2-dimensional Lewis structures are important, they are only a projection of the real thing that lives in a 3-dimensional world. 

More on phosphoric acid

It is well known that phosphoric acid is great for rust removal for rusted iron, as such it is obvious that it should not be in the human food chain at all.
So the argument that in a diluted form it is non-toxic is nonsense: anything if diluted enough is non-toxic...

But if you consume enough of that supposedly 'non-toxic' anything, one day you will prematurely drop dead before you time.


After all that cognitive garbage that the food engineers from the food industry are feeding us, we need an antidote against all that nonsense. 

And that is the miracle of energy transport inside our cells, it is known at the ATP ADP cycle. 
ATP has 3 phosphor thingelings while
ADP has 2 phosphor thingelings. 

It is amazing to the bone, even vegetables and all other plants run on that energy cycle.
It is amazing and the cell biologists have done a far better job in finding the fundamental things compared to my fellow math folks... 

How cells obtain energy


End of this relatively long update, if you can help me slaughter the present food industry so that you and I can live a few more years longer, I would like that... 

Till updates. 


(12 Aug 2014) We proceed with update number 17 on our fantastic food industry.  

Item 1) Why do lions not get obese when there is plenty of prey to hunt?

 Item 1) Why do lions not get obese when there is plenty of prey to hunt?

When it comes to understanding the root causes of obesity a lot of people say that the constant stream of available food is the culprit.  

Suggesting that if you cut down on food availability simply will bring down obesity. 

Yet from nature we know that wild animals only very seldom get obese, as a matter of fact wild animals only get obese when they have access to the calories of the food as engineered by our lovely food engineers.  

Even if there is plenty of food around, wild animals do not have that tendency to eat themselves to premature death, yet when I am outside I constantly observe all those people with that unhealthy appearance. And they are fucking fat. 


The answer to the lion equation is very simple: 

Our food contains all kind of strange additives, like the phosphoric acid in Coca Cola or the weird forms of gluten in a standard Dutch bread. 


Russia & life expectancy. 

The latest rout of tit for tat economical sanctions indicate that about 40% of imported food is banned for about a year. 

That is a good idea to start with, after all if you look at the USA with all that weird stuff when it comes to food you better skip that path. 

When it comes to food imports from Europe I can say: 

As a rule of thumb: If a particular food engineered product has a long list of  E numbers on it, rather likely it is not a safe food product.


After all, if phosphoric acid is 'just another E number' and not something to avoid drinking, the population should be protected from that poisoned engineered food. 

All in all now we look at the scale of stuff; 

Russia can easily in the long run lift life expectancy of the population by at least five years. But they can only do that if the food thing is executed wisely. 

End of this update. Till updates. 


(10 Aug 2014) Today update number 16 on the utterly worthless food industry.

We have two items: 

(Item1) The results of the gluten rot experiment. 
Item 2) Why do we overeat? A thought experiment with bread & Coca Cola. 

  Item 1) The results of the gluten rot experiment.

About five days ago I washed out the dough of what is here a standard bread of 800 gram. The result was about 90 to 100 gram of wet gluten. 

A lot of people say that the human body cannot digest gluten and that is the reason why we have all those health problems related to bread and all things wheat related. 

I agree with that but I am well aware of the shit the food industry tells us, so I want to see a bit of rigid proof that indeed the human body cannot digest over 10% of the stuff that is in a standard bread. 

The gluten I washed out was constantly kept in a plastic sack, it was wet all the time so it could rot and constantly there was a small opening to the air because in the Summer time we have all those bacteria / yeast / fungus etc in the air.  
So the conditions for maximum exposure to rot were met... 

After three full days the gluten began to smell nasty and only after three days the structure had weakened significantly but I could still wash it out with water. 

On day four it lost it's internal coherence and now on day five it is more and more becoming a liquid so we can conclude that indeed there are severe digestion problems to be expected if you eat that gluten stuff. 

Since all our food leaves our bodies within that timeframe of four days it cannot be expected our digestive system is capable of handling this stuff. So from the health point of view, gluten is in the same category as natural rubber / synthetic rubber / asphalt / etc etc. We do not eat asphalt so why do we eat gluten?

Here is a picture of the rot experiment after five days: 


So that is a big difference from when you have just washed out your dough, the smell that comes off from this has some weird cheesy tones to it. 

But the food industry is the food industry so I will repeat this experiment a few times more while I first put the freshly made gluten in battery acid. Battery acid has a ph value of something like 2 while our stomach runs at an unbelievable ph acid value of about 1...   

So I hope that over about one week I can update of the battery acid gluten rot experiment. 

 Item 2) Why do we overeat? A thought experiment with bread & Coca Cola. 

Until now in these 16 updates on our worthless food industry we mainly focused on bread, for me that was a logical thing to do because my own father died from holes in his intestines. 

So for me it is rather sobering to know that my father died from that fucking bread we eat.  

Yet in order to understand why in the USA they also have those super-obese people, you know that condition that makes you one yard wide and so, it is not only one food source that can do that. 


Now why do we overeat after eating bread? 

Very simple: bread contains a biological non-reactive material named gluten and this gluten damages you intestines. 

And once your intestines are damaged you will enter a long array of health problems, you get leaking into your body of stuff that does not belong there while at the same time you do not get all of the nutriciants you need. 

The important detail is the damage; it is the damage that makes you overeat. 


Now what has this to do with the noble brand of Coca Cola (and Pepsi and Dr. Pepper etc etc)? 

These brands are all patriotic American brands, they would never want to poison their own home population...  

Well the website of Coca Cola says that Coca Cola contains phosphoric acid.
It is not much, on every 100 ml of Coca Cola it is about 55 mg of phosphoric acid. 

For the average person this is a weird detail; why should a reasonable food engineer put phosphoric acid into a food? After all phosphoric acid does not sound like 'citron acid' or the acid you can taste in oranges. 

As far as I know they use the phosphoric acid as a taste multiplier.  

Needless to say, drinking phosphoric acid is not a healthy habit. 
Just like drinking sulphuric acid is not a good idea.   


Here goes our thought experiment: 

You drink a lot of Coca Cola so you drink a lot of phosphoric acid.
Now this acid washes out your bones and stuff, so you need to replenish your calcium. 

So you get hungry for calcium and stuff of you eat a few slices more bread. 

The bread damages your intestines, more and more shortages of important stuff is observed by your body. 

So you eat more and more of the lovely stuff the food industry has baked for you. 

And in the end your body mass index is above 35. 


It is all so fucking simple; yet the food industry is a giant dynamical system that is not rules by only one person. So all these companies are only doing their best in making food that feeds the planet, but in the end they are only poisoning us with weird stuff like the gluten and the phosphoric acid... 


End of this update, till updates. 


(09 Aug 2014) We simply proceed with attack number 15 on the shit holes of our present food industry. We wonder why bread has that special status.   

Item 1) Why has bread this special status in society?

 Item 1) Why has bread this special status in society?

Let's start with a very simple thought experiment with city traffic: 

Suppose a person wants to go from place A to place B via car, bicycle or on foot. 

And I tell this person: You cannot go via the Tuthola street because of maintenance it is blocked.  

Well, nobody would ask me how the hell to get from place A to place B because they understand you only have to avoid the Tuthola street in order to make it to your destination named place B. 


How different it is with stopping eating bread. 

Until now 100% of people ask me how it is possible you can stop eating bread, they ask 'how can you do this'? 

Ok ok, I know a bit more about dangerous addictions compared to the average person I talk to. But I do not want to talk about difficult to prove facts about bread addiction. 

I want to highlight the sheer simplicity as why bread is that handy: 

It forms a perfect layer you can add other food to it.
Think for example a perfect pizza. 


But you do not need bread for a perfect layer. 

Let's not do difficult, at present time this is more or less what I eat.
You can make perfect layers from a whole lot of stuff... 


So zero people ask how to get from A to B if a particular street is blocked. 

Yet 100% of folks are doing difficult when I say you should not eat bread. 
By the way, the box cutter in the picture is added for fun reasons only. 
Hey New York Pizza: Still going strong and fatter by the day?  

End of attack number 15 on the food industry... Till updates.


(08 Aug 2014) As usual a lot has happened but to the USA I can say I completely support bombing the shit out of ISIS. Although given the special qualities of folks like Malawi & Assad it is logical something as ISIS comes into existence, all in all the ISIS folks are just too much on the apartheids site. Just like the Israelis are btw...    

Today a short list of bodyweight numbers & again we make chopped meat of the food industry that tells us obesity is simply the equation 

A calorie in = a calorie out 

Item 1) Weekly bodyweight measurements.

 Item 1) Weekly bodyweight measurements.

Three years ago I was 109 kilo and I decided to cut the crap.
Two years ago my minimum weight was 88 kilo and that was just after a 110 kilometer bicycle ride in the summer.
And no matter what I did, I just could go lower.
But my Body Mass Index, or the BMI, was still elevated.
I needed to go to something like 84 kilo to be on the safe side.

Whatever I did I just could not go below 88 kilo, everything I tried failed and I more or less accepted it as some natural barrier. 

Until this year when I decided to stop eating bread, now I know a little bit more of the content of bread I understand why all my life I had these weird things going round.
Like all that hunger in the middle of the night. 

Anyway, a long time ago I started keeping track of my daily weight because I did not understand why I could not go below 88 kilo.
From that list we select the Thursday weights. 

Here we go: 

88.0 (that was on the 29-th of May)

And this is with two fingers in my nose, there are even lots of days when I actively decide to eat more because weight loss has to go as slowly as possible... 

Now my intestines are more or less healed again, the body is far better in regulating it's own weight around that what is a healthy weight for your body. 


Why is the next equation often used by the food industry nonsense? 

 A calorie in = a calorie out

It is nonsense because your body is not a container of calories but a dynamical system that given normal food will perfectly regulate itself. 

For example it happens when I take all variables equal, like food intake and body exercise, day in day out I weigh the same.
And suddenly from one day to the next, I am half a kilo lighter... 

What has happened? 

Very simple: During sleep some deep repair work was done and that takes apparently a few hundred grams of body fat to do so.    


And if you go around and you see all those males with those big bellies, why are they so fucking fat and why do they often look not very healthy? 

Also simple to answer: They eat too much bread and the bread contains something that is completely biologically inactive. That is this stuff, it is called gluten from some ancient name for glue. The picture shows what is in a standard bread of 800 gram: 


So why do we overeat? 

If you eat bread you also eat the stuff shown in the picture.
That stuff kills your intestines slowly but surely. 
That skews your intake of the stuff you need and you have shortages of some things.
That creates all that hunger obese people routinely report. 

And what do obese people eat when they are hungry? 

Often something with bread or pasta & that keeps the food industry cycle round and rounder and rounder. Fat profits derived from fat people... 

Till updates. 


(07 Aug 2014) Oh oh my dear Russians, I still have some problem flying around with a number 17 on it. Or may be it is not flying around anymore and that is the problem.
Anyway, whoever did it, likely it was an accident.
A stupid accident, but for the majority of accidents later one says it was a stupid accident...  

Let's leave it with that for the time being. 

I welcome the Russian moves when it comes to economical sanctions against European and American food stuff. It is a great help and I hope more powers will jump in to kick ass at the food industry because there is actually no reason why those people poison us on such a deep basis... 


After having said that, this is one of the updates I feel a little bit unease about because it is about my skin sickness named Lupus, but now I have stopped eating bread that fucking Lupus is gone.  

So that is what this update is about: Lupus. 

And this is attack number 13 on the food industry; if they can make an extra buck by giving you the skin sickness named Lupus, they will not hesitate to do so. 

Item 1) Attack number 13; Lupus why did I have it, why is it gone?

 Item 1) Attack number 13; Lupus why did I have it, why is it gone?

Some time ago when I started that engineered food product from Unilever, Becel brand, named Meat & Jus (good for your heart and blood veins is the sub title) I got those skin problems and all that horrible itching.    

Since I lead an extremely steady life, I was able to trace my skin problems directly back to the use of that small change in my food intake: I stopped using Becel. 

Within 24 hours the itching became less and less, but weeks or months later I developed serious Lupus stuff on my legs. 


With my present knowledge I know that the Becel stuff destroyed my intestines locally and that part of my intestines are giving the blood to my legs. 

An important characteristic is the next: When you rub your skin there are these small sharp sandgrains that come out. 
You can best compare it to a sand particle, now sand comes in thousands of shades but I am talking about big sand grains and sharp sand grains.
What comes out of the skin is somewhat bigger that the largest of sand grains and it feels much sharper. 


Never heard of Lupus?
So did I, but it looks like this: 


Basically it is very simple: 

You eat bread.
The gluten in the bread destroys your intestines locally.
At the locally damaged intestines the gluten enters your bloodstream.
But gluten cannot be broken down, so it accumulates in for example your joints.
Your immune system understands it has to take away the gluten.
And your white bloodcells transport it to your skin.
Via the symptoms known as Lupus, the gluten is taken out of the body...


I had Lupus for a few months until I understood what could be happening. 

So I stopped eating bread. 

Of course I now no longer have any Lupus, about 10 days ago the last weird stuff came out of my skin. And the last grains of the stuff that came out of my skin did I place under the microscope. 

It had only one view on it, but under the microscope the stuff that came through my skin looked a lot like washing out the dough in the last minutes (see previous update about washing out the bread dough and again: DO IT YOURSELF).   

The Unilever shitholes even make taste multipliers like E 623 from gluten, these people need to be killed. The food engineers are so stupid only the language of the coffins will reign them in... 

A picture is not enough, but gluten looks like this: 


The above ball of rubber like substance is from the amount of one standard bread of 800 gram. (800 gram is the locally standard bread.) 

Till updates.  


(06 Aug 2014) This update is attack number 12 on the shitholes of the food industry.

We proceed with taking a closer look at pure gluten. 

Item 1) Separating the gluten from the dough.

 Item 1) Separating the gluten from the dough.

In the first link of the previous update I showed you a vid that in a simple way explained how you can separate the gluten from the dough of your bread.  

In the period I was still eating bread and having all those health issues I already made my own bread instead of buying pre-processed bread because a long time ago I already understood how the food industry works: 

If they succeed into making you fat and obese they have you in the corner where the fat profits are. 

It is important to remark that I do not view them all as evil people, ok ok the food engineers with all their knowledge about how food influences your body are in my view criminals. But most people only do their best in 'feeding the planet'. 

I view the food industry as a giant dynamical system that is trapped into a set of equilibrium points and it cannot get out of that equilibrium state. 
The fact they cannot get out of this present weird equilibrium state has a simple cause: there is not one person that had enough power to do that.
Everybody is sitting on their small island in food-industry-land and they all do their best to make locally the best decisions...  

As such the food industry hangs together from short comings, just like the financial industry was back in 2007. 


Yet my problem with the food industry is that I estimate that the entire European population will die prematurely at least five years on average. 
Beside shaving off of average lifespan, there is a wide array of health problems that go unsolved but for the population they cause a whole lot of suffering.
It is just not funny to see your parents die from stuff like Alzheimer (but that is for future updates).  


Now we are going to separate the gluten from the dough, and if you have a few hours spare the next weekend or so I strongly advice you to do it yourself. 

Because if you are holding the finished product in your own hands and you realize this stuff is from only one standard 800 gram bread, you understand the health issues related with it... 

So with my bread machine I made a dough, if you do not have a bread machine you will have to do the old fashioned kneading by hand. You let the dough rise, kneading for a second time, let it rise again for a full hour at least. 
And after that you wash it out. 

The washing takes about 50 minutes or so, I did not keep records exactly.
But one thing is very important:
About 5 minutes before the water comes out flushing clear, this gluten stuff has all kinds of holes in it. So that a good look at that detail because if gluten gets into the body in small clusters it will look more or less like that. 


I made it yesterday and I constantly keep the gluten in a wet environment inside a plastic bag. . 
But it does not rot at all and very likely week in week out it will not rot.  


From the viewpoint of natural selection, the wheat has hit the jackpot big time because a long long time ago wheat has found out how to store proteins in a safe way so that no bacteria / fungus / yeast or whatever what, could eat the gluten... 

And the wheat and for example the barley has enzymes that can break down all that energy that is stored inside the gluten, so that when summer comes the gluten ensures the grain can live another year... 

Let's leave it with that, till updates & don't forget to kill you average run of the mill food engineer... 


 (04 Aug 2014) We simply proceed with attack number 11 on the food industry because in my view it is not only they ensure the general population dies at least five years too  early, but somewhere in the back of my mind I know that a lot of food engineers know this for a long long time.  

So it is just like Goldman Sachs that went short of the very stuff they sold their own clients. And what did Goldman Sachs say?
They said there was a demand for that particular product, so they had to sell it... 

Item 1) More on gluten, how to isolate it from the dough?

 Item 1) More on gluten, how to isolate it from the dough?

Weirdly enough it is amazingly simple to isolate the gluten from the dough so you can see what it is. Remark that gluten cannot be digested by our bodies, so our bodies will do all kinds of weird stuff when it takes in too much gluten. 

In the next Youtubber you can observe how easy it is to separate the gluten from the dough:  

Science: A closer look at gluten

So pure gluten is much like rubber or so, do you feel a strong desire to eat rubber? 

And in this Youtubber you can see how gluten can enter your bloodstream:

Against the grain, why gluten is bad

Those modern grains are a disaster, just look around in the population where you live:
why are most of  all these fat people looking very unhealthy? 

That is because our food industry is basically poisoning them, but the people from the food industry are only doing their best to 'feed the planet'. 


End of this update, till updates.  


(03 Aug 2014) Because the food industry worked so hard to earn my ire, today we place attack number 10 on those weirdo's.  

Item 1) This Unilever product is what triggered a hefty skin decease in me.

 Item 1) This Unilever product is what triggered a hefty skin decease in me.

I still have the last unemptied bottle so I could have made a photograph of the stuff that triggered a severe skin decease in me, but instead I used the picture that is from the Becel website that is a part of the Unilever concern.  


This product shows perfectly all that is wrong with the present day food industry. 

For example the label says it contains a lot of so called 'omega 3' and indeed that is good for your heart and blood veins... I will not deny that because that was more or less the reason I decided to use this instead of my standard olive oil.  

So I used Becel meat & jus and guess what? 

I got that horrible eczema and all that terrible itching that makes you scratching your legs so hard it almost starts bleeding. The pain from the scratching is preferable to the intense itching...  


So I had a problem, but if you click on the picture above you land on the website of the Becel food engineers and you see: no grain gluten is used to make it. 

Yet if you dig deeper, you see it has those taste multipliers in it and that is the first clue as why this is a strange food product: If this is really better than olive oil, why are there taste multipliers in it?  

And if we check for the taste multipliers itself, what are they? 

Guess three times; it is a taste multiplier that is made from gluten.
In the Dutch language it is calciumglutamaat.  


Now why should a food company like Unilever advertise healthy food that supposedly is good for your heart and add a taste multiplier to it? 

Very simple: you will overeat if the taste multiplier is in that food... 

End of attack number 10 on our food industry. Till updates. 


-Food for thought:

Chained dollars! What the vuk are chained dollars?

Chained dollars are from a time chain and so you have to filter out inflation so you have a better estimate of price and quality and so. 

Therefore chained dollars are easy to understand. Hard to understand is what exactly a Gross Domestic Product, or a GDP is.

One way or the other; all nations will have their own flavor of GDP. 

Lately I just got so confused my dear reader. The Americans were able to spike up GDP growth by almost 0.5% because some stuff was now 'investment related' instead of the old thing.

Now that is very interesting because a dollar is a dollar, let it be a consumer good like bread or coffee or green tea or whatever what. Or a business invested dollar, GDP statistics should be like the temperature of the air outside the building and not inside the building. 

Everything on the 3D complex numbers from 2012 and 2013 is bundled together in one html file.  

A primer on the three dimensional complex numbers.

For 2014 there is page number two: Page 2   

In 2015 we proceed with page number three: Page 3 


23 Dec 2014: Back in the year 1748 or so, Leonhard Euler found the very first exponential circle.  

It is also known as the Euler identity, Euler's formulae etc etc. 


In the last 2.65 years I found 10 more of these circles & periodic curves in higher dimensional complex number systems. 
I made a 25 page pdf from it. 

An overview of 10 exponential circles & periodic curves.  

Please take your time and try to understand it page by page. If you do all 25 pages in one day, very likely you will go bonkers...  


29 Jan 2015: I made a new kind of so called Clifford algebras. As far as I can see it will have no practical value whatsoever. 
It is only six pages long, it contains no definition but only examples.
Clifford algebras cubic style


14 July 2014: Since a lot of young folks are also hanging around here I wrote a simple piece named the Water Planet.
We calculate as a start the number of water molecules in a liter of water; Here is the rest. 


19 June 2014; The noble are of product integration is a very seldom observed thing.
That is caused by the fact that in general math professors are relatively dumb people. Ok they are good in reproducing things from the past but a relative more advanced concept like a continuous product is met with a giant vacuum inside their brains.
So if those folks were talented they would use it and given the fact almost nobody uses it, the dire straits of average math departments is clear... 

Ten styles for product integration and product differentiation.  

09 Jan 2015: Later I rewrote the piece a little bit using the curly font from Richard Gill for writing the product integral. 

The content has not changed, the difference is only the curly symbol used... 

Ten styles for product integration and product differentiation with the curly notation


Some old math I wrote about 13 years ago, it is very simple to understand: you can differentiate and integrate all geometrical objects. And when you triangulate a landscape or a movie scene properly you can later in a computer change the position of the camera. Of course you need a new file format because the goody good mpg format won't work.
This might be of future interest for police or stuff like that (you can change the camera viewpoint to that of the victims or that of the criminals. Of course this is not a miracle; missing information can only be repaired at a certain level but anyway... The math is there and it is waiting to be used!
(Ok you also need geometrical integration but that's a cakewalk, some geometric projection theory, lots of self repairing codes and very very difficult: a good camera device. But if these conditions are met you can later change the camera viewpoint...)


(17 Oct 2008) This morning I finished a very simple and non technical article about statistical testing of poisons in food. It is so horrible non technical that even political leaders can understand it's content; only seldom I have sunken so low...

Here is the pdf file.


A pdf file explaining why we likely never ever will have nuclear fusion as a reliable source of unlimited energy...  



Sayings from famous and unknown people that shed light on their insights and their emotional daily running system:

Phrase nr one (from Dubya or the present lame duck president of the USA):

"The reason we start a war is to fight a war, win a war, thereby causing no more war!"
--The first Presidential debate

Phrase nr two, also from Dubya but I have to pump it up from my memory so there might be some little faults in it (it was some weeks after the 911 attacks on the USA):

The enemy is so evil that most people in the USA do not know what they do why they do!

Phrase nr three from the former USA secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld (if my memory is correct he spoke these words in the week from 16 to 21 October 2001, at that point in time we were on the height of the anthrax scares): 

And it makes you wonder; How does he do it? And we would like to ask this person to come on over to our side and together fight the war on terror.

Phrase nr four is from me myself & I:

To understand your own 'logical thinking' you must know that logical thinking is only the first derivate of emotion. That is why all attempts towards artificial intelligence have failed: computers do not have emotion build in but we humans, like all other animals,  do.
The above mentioned three phrases of my enemies only expose their emotional system, lets destroy that system...

Phrase nr five is from US celebrity Donald Trump. A few weeks before this the famous Lancet report was published calculating Iraqi civil death toll at 650 thousand (this with a relatively large but acceptable standard deviation):

For myself I use 400 thousand killed.

Phrase nr six is from CNN's Larry King (CNN is received in 200 countries so therefore the CNN management thinks it's wise that Larry King can parade every day one or more American celebrities). When King was asked why he did not use the internet he responded:

There are a billion things on the internet.

Phrase nr seven is one more from the former US secretary of defense. After a few years in the war on terror he was asked what it all boiled down to. He said:

Can we kill the terrorists in a faster rate than the massandra's spit them out?

Phrase nr eight is from Osama bin Laden. The phrase is very worthwhile mentioning because the US CIA folks were in the past very satisfied with 'Just a few weapon deliveries and we lured the Russians into Afghanistan'.

When America needed us to fight their proxy war against Russia they supported us. The moment the Russians left Afghanistan we were irrelevant. 

Phrase nr nine is from US four star general Peter Pace, he made it during a memorial speech on 11 Sept 2006 (exactly five years after the 9/11 attacks from 2001).
At that point in time total US military death toll already stood above the number of civilians killed on 9/11/2001.

Right now the total amount of killed US military members is approaching the civil death toll from nine September 2001.

Phrase nr 10 is again from me myself & I. It is around the rebuilding of the organization after the military campaign in Afghanistan.

Make sure to imitate the way the German army was organized after world war one; That is make sure that every member can function properly until up three hierarchical layers higher. If you do that you can grow with an enormous speed in the future when this is needed.

Phrase nr eleven is also from me myself & I. It is to proof that I can be stupid too. I do not know when I wrote it but it was a long time ago.
I asked the Iraqis the next:

Can you hold on one more year? After that things will get better, I promise.

You just don't imagine how much I have regretted those words, after that the US military came with bonuses of up to 70 thousand dollars for enlisting / reenlisting and how could I have been so stupid as to not have foreseen this?
I mean the Americans run their country on the greenback & why was I outside reality? Why?

Phrase number twelve is from a peace loving female neighbor of mine, her name is Geertruida.

We people we can speak, so we should not fight war but speak with each other until our differences are solved.

Of course I had to remark: Because we have speech we are much better in making war compared to other animal species. 

Phrase nr thirteen is from the present al Qaida leader in Iraq. I mention it because I think it was a very important detail, it was made in his first statement after he took over from Zarqawi.

We need help from scientists, let it be in the field of communications, chemistry, medics, biologicals or whatever what. You can live your dream and kill the Americans on a large scale inside their bases. You can fulfill your scientific dreams.

Phrase nr fourteen is from CNN's war whore Christiana Armanpour. Why do I call a whore where in fact she is a respected senior correspondent?
That is because she understands the difference between a 'commodity driven war' and one that is not driven by that.
In the entire Iraqi war no CNN reporter has emphasized that Iraq is very much 'commodity driven' (read stealing the oil) but when Tony Blair resigns she says:

He wanted military assistance in Bosnia although there are no commodities over there.

(Or words of similar phrasing, I do not recall her exact words but they boiled down to the above.)   


Not all my hobbies evolve around war, death and destruction, or financial markets. No, I also like to cook food and stuff. There will not be many recipes but here is the index to some food I made, it is just a small fraction of what I cook. A very small fraction but the goal is to come to a feast meal for the Iraqis and Afghanis. So it likely will take a few more years...














Title: A 2010 condolences card to the US dollar.