(27 July 2015) Those pictures and movies from
the Pluto mission are not only awesome, they are ultra
Therefore I have decided to unveil a new
class of new trigonometric identities and for one week this class
of infinitely many identities will have the name of 'NASA
After the next week the class of
trigonometric identities, I am so sorry, but they must have their
old name back and the old name is:
Determinants of exponential circles &
Item 1) For seven days on a row they are
named 'NASA equations'.
Item 1) For seven
days on a row they are named 'NASA equations'.
Now why only seven days on a row name it the
NASA equations or the NASA identities?
That is because far to often equations are
given the name of the human person that more or less discovered
those equations for the very first time.
That is a stupid way of labeling math
equations, paramount should be what these particular set of
equations do or try to describe.
And as such 'determinant of exponential
circles' is far more informing compared to 'NASA equations in
Let's leave it with that. Here is the teaser
picture for the NASA 3D equations:
Let's leave it with that. Till
(21 July 2015) The last days I wrote two
appendices to the 'screen shot update' on the higher dimensional
Appendix 1 is about how I found the modified Dirichlet kernels
Appendix 2 shows six different ways to find the exponential circle
in 3D space.
Here is the
link to the appendices.
But today we are using so called 'angular
momentum theory' for electrons to destroy once more the idea that
electrons are magnetic dipoles on their own.
Item 1) How to add magnetism.
Item 1) How to add
First we are going to do a thought experiment
with bar magnets (square shaped bar magnets so all four of the
long sided of the bar magnet have equal area).
But first you must know what magnetic dipole moment is.
Magnetic dipole moment is easy to understand;
it is the strength of the magnet multiplied by the height. Or,
more precise: multiplied by the distance between the north and
Now for a bar magnet this is easy to
calculate if you know the strength of a particular metal you can
make magnet from. For example iron; if the magnets are produced
properly the strength is proportional to the amount of iron
Magnets can have all kinds of shapes, for
example sphere shaped or egg shaped.
We will not go into that.
Now to the electron; here is the source file
Angular momentum operator
Now we do our thought experiment:
Take two bar magnets and put them together so
that the length doubles, of course you must attach north to south
in the middle.
It is 100% obvious that because the distance
between north and south is now double, the magnetic dipole moment
is now double. You can code this as NSNS.
Now you put the magnets together in such a
way that the thickness doubles, code it like
So you twist one magnet 180 degrees and put
What happens to the magnetic dipole
That has become less because where the
magnets touch all magnetism stays indide.
You can argue that since two sides are now packed together there
are only 6 remaining sides where with the long NSNS magnets you
still had 8 sides.
So total 'magnetic dipole moment' is roughly
1.5 times that of one bar magnet.
It is important to remark this construction
is a magnetic quadrapole and not longer a dipole so 'dippole
moment becomes a fuzzy notion...
You see that if you put two dipole magnets
together the way they are oriented in space becomes very important
because sometimes the dipole moments enforce each other but if you
turn one magnet total magnetism becomes less because they are
eating each others magnetic field instead of making it only
In this simple formulae the J stands for the
total and L stands for orbital magnetism and S is the so called
But nowhere there is talk about the
orientation of the magnetic dipole stuff L and S.
Now since L is orbital magnetism related to
the electrons going round the nucleus of the atom we can be 100%
sure that L is related to a magnetic dipole.
But if you can always add the S to it, the
logical conclusion is that spin cannot be a magnetic dipole
Now this is a very general thing: always when
there is talk about magnetic spin you can always add it up or subtract
it and never the orientation in space is mentioned.
Hence magnetic spin of electrons is not
dipole in nature but monopole, exactly like the electrical charge
of an electron...
You know there are days that I wonder how the
professors could get so retarded.
The math professors with their complex numbers, they have only the
2D version of it.
The physics professors with magnetic dipole electrons.
I mean this whole universe could not be the
way it is if the professional physics professors were telling the
Till updates my dear reader.
(14 July 2015) Ok 21 fresh pages on a subject
known as the missing equations.
It is on page 3 of the higher dimensional
complex numbers although in this long update I only used circular
Item 1) The missing equations.
Item 1) The missing
You can check all the given screen shots for
yourself using an applet named Animated drawing that you can find
On page 21 of the long update you find the
sum of 11 coordinate functions in 11D space; look for the explicit
function variant of Animated drawing and cut and past the next
text into it and observe you get the constant value 1.
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - pi/11))/sin(x - pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 2*pi/11))/sin(x - 2*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 3*pi/11))/sin(x - 3*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 4*pi/11))/sin(x - 4*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 5*pi/11))/sin(x - 5*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 6*pi/11))/sin(x - 6*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 7*pi/11))/sin(x - 7*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 8*pi/11))/sin(x - 8*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 9*pi/11))/sin(x - 9*pi/11)) +
((1/11)*sin(11*(x - 10*pi/11))/sin(x - 10*pi/11))
Click on the third teaser picture in order to land on the latest
math update about the missing equations:
Till updates my dear reader.
(13 July 2015) In one or two days I will hang
in the next math update; it is not really math but more like math
done physics style. I have all these missing equations so a math
approach is more or less impossible, so if a particular equation
passes a test this validates my theory of modified Dirichlet
kernels ruling the higher dimensional complex numbers...
Item 1) The second teaser picture for the
missing equations update.
Item 1) The second
teaser picture for the missing equations update.
The second teaser picture is a fragment from
the biggest collection of equations I have ever solved in my
Now it is not that I have to solve this
problem and arrive at a solution, no it is the other way around: I
have a perfect solution but I lack equations...
And the higher the dimensions get, the more
stuff that is missing but, ha ha ha, my solutions stays
If you want to see the largest system of
equations I ever solved, click on the above picture.
End of this update, till updates.
(10 July 2015) Since it is Greece week, why
not post that Google talk about that ancient Greek
After all in this Google talk we observe how
images can be modified to show deep detail and this is nicely in
line with something like two decades ago when I found the perfect
format for 3D imaging.
Of course Dutch universities, skilled as they
are, never picked up on the theory of geometric differentiation or
on geometric integration.
Once a retard, always a retard.
Item 1) The most perfect Google talk ever
Item 1) The most
perfect Google talk ever observed....
It is just a link to some good math
perfection, decades ago I envisioned this kind of math with
geometrical objects. And as usual nothing happened because the
Dutch universities are so full of shit.
It is very interesting to observe that the
Dutch academic folks are very full of shit;
If you weigh the amount of shit before & and after a toilet
visit, there is no significant difference.
Lets leave it with that and post one of the
most beautiful math insights on 3D imaging:
Imaging the Antikythera Mechanism
Till updates my dear
(09 July 2015) I thought I asked the people
from the science of physics to 'make some noise' so I wonder why I
do not hear anything... Why live like those math professor weasels
and non-performers? Get a life, make some noise!
Item 1) What if electrons were magnetic
dipoles? Part 2.
Item 1) What if
electrons were magnetic dipoles? Part 2.
If electrons would be magnetic dipoles as the
professional physics professors believe they are, how come that in
all chemical bonds it is the electron pair that rules the
If electrons were magnetic dipoles, all kind
of weird electron configurations would be observed to the degree
the science of chemistry would be so different it makes we wonder
if life could exist in the very first place...
Now the idea of electrons being magnetic
dipoles can be disproved in hundreds of ways, today I will show
you that magnetic dipoles can be stacked together in all kinds of
ways that electrons do not do.
In all chemical bonds it is the electron pair
that spans up our planet, but if the professional physics
professors were telling the truth we would also have electron
triples, quadruples, etc etc.
So the next picture with six magnetic dipole
macro world magnets says its all:
The professional physics professors should do
a little bit of rethinking:
As you see on inspection, magnetic dipoles
can be stacked up into any kind of number...
The prevalence for electron pairs is nowhere
observed, hence electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles. Till updates
my dear reader.
(08 July 2015) Today I more or less enjoyed
very much the sounds coming from the European parliament where the
Greek pm Tsipras hold a speech and weirdly enough a lot of
countries voiced precisely what they thought.
Well my position is clear, but I was glad to
see some democracy in action...
May be, very may be I will participate in future elections
Anyway today we will be looking at electrons
once more because it would be a true disaster if they really were
magnetic dipoles as they are in the belief system of the
professional physics professors on all universities around the
Once more: If you organize your science as a
substitute for religion you will run into the exact same problems
as the Catholic church with Galileo...
Item 1) What if electrons were magnetic
Item 1) What if
electrons were magnetic dipoles?
From the science of chemistry we know that
electron pairs are more or less the driving force in all chemical
bonds inside molecules. Only electron pairs have been observed,
there is plenty of electron pair theory around.
But if electrons were magnetic dipoles and
not magnetic monopoles, how can it be they only come in pairs and
not in more complicated structures???
Here is a wiki upon electron pair
Polyhedral skeletal electron pair theory
As far as I understand reality, it has to be
that the electron pair is the smallest magnetic dipole there is.
The particles known as neutrinos are much smaller that the
electron but neutrinos as so weak in interactions that I do not
think they have a magnetic charge or an electric charge at
Now the idea of electrons being magnetic
monopoles makes a lot of sense compared to what those professional
physics people talk, so we do a bit of 'though experiment' and we
buy for 1.50€ six dipole magnets in a shop.
How can we arrange them and we wonder if
electrons were magnetic dipoles how can it be we only observe
Here are the six magnets for 25 cents each, I
let them into the plastic shielding because that represents the
repelling force electrons have from having the same electrical
These are disk shaped macroscopic magnets, I
was lucky to buy a packet where the magnetic north or south was up
or down in 3 magnets. That explains why this cluster of 6 magnetic
dipoles sticks together...
Another way of arrangement goes like
Once more: the plastic layer represents the
repelling forces from equal electrical charges. The 1€ + 50 cent
coin represent the total costs of this physics experiment.
Let's leave it with that, till updates my
(05 July 2015) A short update on the outcome
of the Greece referendum; I will explain in very simple terms why
I am in favor of a debt reduction to 15 thousand per Greek capita
citizen. That would be a reduction of about 8 thousand € per
Item 1) One decade of economical havoc is
enough for Greece.
Item 1) One decade of
economical havoc is enough for Greece.
From the beginning our political leaders
constantly had other insights compared to me; for example when the
credit crisis broke out (by the way the political talking heads of
today did not see it coming, for me it was 100% it was coming) it
was a feature that private debt collapsed, clustered together and
taken over by the diverse governments.
In the case of Greece this was a bit mistake;
the private debt holders had some haircuts but the European
leaders should never have taken over this debt.
But they did because they were afraid that a
bankrupt Greece would spread out...
Anyway to make a long long story short; at
present the Greeks are supposed to pay all the debt back in a time
scale of 32 years, anyway that is what Jeroen Dijsselbloem said
The present deal with Greece is rooted in
emotions from the time we had only golden and silver coins; yet
modern money if fiat money and if handled carefully there is
unlimited supply of that stuff...
Why is one decade of misery for Greece
Ten years of misery is enough to burn it into
the collective memory that debt hugging is very unwise. Now the
Greek economy is in a state where fiat money cannot work...
For myself speaking, the Dutch government has
borrowed about 1000 € per Dutch citizen, a write off to the 15
thousand per Greek citizen would leave me at a loss of like 300 to
Now in Greece about 30% of all children live
under the so called poverty line and I have decided I don't need
those 300 to 400 €. I consider it blood money so I don't want
More fun stuff from Greece:
The 2000 Year-Old Computer - Decoding the Antikythera Mechanism (2012)
Till updates my dear reader & live well
in our system of fiat currency.
(02 July 2015) The last weeks I have been
working an a math update known as 'the missing equations'. That is
because those modified Dirichlet kernels might do a perfect job
but if we raise the dimension above 3 you already have the very
first missing equation.
I have tried to find the answer to this
problem of missing equations for about 18 months and I did not
make one millimeter of progress.
Item 1) The first teaser picture to the
update related to the missing equations.
Item 1) The first
teaser picture to the update related to the missing
It is just a teaser picture although it
contains rock hard math.
It is just a teaser picture but it contains
math that the general university math departments cannot explain
at all. Might that be a source of their weird weird
It is just a teaser picture, do not worry
that time lags rule the world.
You can check for yourself that these five
coordinate functions squared add up to 1 (so you can use them as
probability amplitudes like they do in quantum physics).
You must first search for a function graph plotter on this website
from the Leiden university, I cannot link directly for you because
it is an interactive server:
Here are the five squares, just cut and paste
it in the function graph plotter:
((1/5)*sin(5*x)/sin(x))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-pi/5))/sin(x-pi/5))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-2*pi/5))/sin(x-2*pi/5))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-3*pi/5))/sin(x-3*pi/5))^2 + ((1/5)*sin(5*(x-4*pi/5))/sin(x-4*pi/5))^2
If all goes well you get the constant
function with value 1. It must look like this:
All these new trigonometric identities are
(27 June 2015) A short update on Greece since
it is highly likely they will miss
the IMF payment that supposedly had to be paid this week.
So Greece will go bankrupt and leave the Euro as her currency...
Item 1) In the year 2009 I wrote: Let's kick
Greece out and let Poland in.
Item 2) A very short food update.
Item 1) In the year
2009 I wrote: Let's kick Greece out and let Poland in.
Of course all political leaders thought in
the year 2009 that they could hang out the math professor and just
ignore that weirdo from kinkytshirts.nl.
Now my own home country has lend money to
Greece in the order of about 1000 € per capita Dutch citizen. As
a comparison every citizen from Greece is about 23,000 € in the
Needless to say 23,000 € is just too high
so for myself speaking I am glad we have this present situation.
Europe should have lowered that amount far more to say something
like 15,000 € per Greek citizen.
But hey when I wrote that; guess three times
what our political elite did?
Once more the hang out the math professor;
ignore the insight, look away, talk about teleportation with
quantum computers & so on and so on.
Will there be market turmoil on the financial
I hope so because I have still about 5 to 10
thousand € to invest in my pension portfolio so with a bit of
luck I can buy a bit on the dips...
Item 2) A very short food
On a website named science 2.0 I found a
relative good article about weight loss.
It has a bit of a strange title namely
Why Fat People Don't Lose Weight. The Diet Delusion
Of course diet is not a delusion, after all a
diet that works perfectly goes as this:
No sugar, no grains, plenty of exercise and
you eat only when you are hungry.
Basically it is that simple. Till updates my
(24 June 2015) An update on food because now
in the USA the number of obese people have passed the number of
In the meantime the average lifespan in the
USA is still not declining but somewhere in the next years the
average lifespan will start declining because of the strange food
they eat over there.
Item 1) The number of obese above the number
of overweight US folks? Yeah yeah...
Item 1) The number of
obese above the number of overweight US folks? Yeah yeah...
It is no secret I was more or less slim my
entire life until 2005 when I started gaining weight. At some
point I was a staggering maximum of 108,9 kilo and I decided to
cut the crap.
At present day I am terribly stable at about
80 kilo, just as an example I still weigh myself in the morning
although there is no reason for it any longer.
The last 10 days, for example, say:
80.1 80.4 80.4 80.4
80.4 80.7 80.5 80.1 80.1 80.0
One of the problems is that people understand
next to nothing about the food they eat, that goes from poverty
stricken families to government institutions.
For example in my home country the
Netherlands the government still promotes the eating of bread. But
after eating bread your body simply refuses to burn body fat and
as such you grow hungry far too early and the process of
overeating sets in just by eating bread on a daily basis...
And if you eat bread on a daily basis you
take up too much meals a day or you start snacking in between
meals so you constantly have insulin running around in your
Now guess what? You develop slowly but surely
a nice nice nice insulin tolerance; your body cells do not react
to insulin any longer and as such your body cells are starved
while you load in food all the time...
I mean this is no higher math, any body can
understand how stuff works.
But nothing happens, in my home country they
will keep on promoting crazy food like bread and in the USA they
will keep on using a poison named high fructose syrup (sponsored
by the USA government).
It will take some time but more and more the
future will look like this:
Yeah yeah, if you do not understand the food
you eat rather likely your children will not understand that weird
Links that might be interesting:
5 Shocking Facts About Obesity in America
The basis of my thinking about food is that
you should not eat stuff your body cannot digest, for example
eating stones every day is not good for your health.
And beside the vegetables that contain the fibers that are
non-digestible, is it wise for humans to eat wood on a daily
Actually the food industry uses plenty of
wood, they think you are not human but a wood worm and they name
Is common food additive to blame for rising rates of bowel disease?
So unless you have a strong desire to breed
very fat babies, one should avoid the things your human body
cannot digest. And eating wood is not a wise thing if you would
End of this food update, till
(21 June 2015) Correction on my previous
update from 15 June; I made an interpretation fault and that has
to be corrected of course.
Item 1) Correction and addendum to the
Item 1) Correction
and addendum to the previous update.
It was only this weekend that I found the
time to read the publication they talk about in the vids of the
previous update and I was totally wrong.
They were not trying to exploit the magnetic
dipole stuff of an electron but weirdly enough the electric dipole
stuff of an electron?
Electrons as electric dipoles??????????
Yes, it is a bit strange but you need that
for stuff like super symmetry to be true.
Now super symmetry is one of those things I
do not even try to understand because just like with string theory
you have these people that say:
But the math is so beautiful, it just has to
Always when I hear such words I run for
cover; the people are not capable of understanding 3D complex
numbers but their math is 'so beautiful it has to be true'.
Of course an electron is an electric monopole
and very very likely it is also a magnetic monopole. These physics
people have been wrong for decades on a row so likely their
condition of not understanding the electron will last a few
Some links related to the spherical
Electron Appears Spherical, Squashing Hopes for New Physics Theories
And, highly technical but only five pages
long on the pre-print archive:
Order of Magnitude Smaller Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Electron
For me it is 100% weird to observe that there
is a group of physics people that hunt down the electric dipole
character of the electron while there is no experimental evidence
for the electron being a magnetic dipole at all.
Ok ok, when electrons truly go around the
nucleus that gives some magnetic dipole stuff on their own they
must be magnetic monopoles. You know I have two lists:
List 1 contains reasons as why they are
List 2 contains reasons as why they are magnetic dipoles.
In over a year time list number 2 is still
The only time electrons create a dipole magnetic field is when
they are in those s-orbitals going around the nucleus of an atom.
(An s-orbital is a spherical orbit.) Bbut that is the same as an
electrical current in the wires of a coil; it creates a magnetic
field but this does not stick to the electron itself... So list 2
stays empty for the time being.
This is the end of this correction &
addendum stuff. Let me close with that nice teaser picture once
more since after my view this is the way math should be done; keep
it simple like a fist in you face.
(15 June 2015) A short update with two links
where it is explained UK physics people cannot find the dipole
magnetic moment of an electron...
Of course they are not going to find that,
after all there are no experiments that validate that electrons
are magnetic dipoles. Anyway I have never seen them.
Item 1) Two vids from Sixty Symbols.
Item 1) Two vids from
Spherical Electron - Sixty Symbols
Spherical electron (extra footage)
The actual experiment is explained a bit in
minute 8.00 in the first vid; an electric field is reversed but
the electrons refuse to show any dipole magnetic behavior.
Well this all is nicely 100% in line with
what I was thinking after the Stern-Gerlach experiment. But hey,
this is strange: the S-G experiment was done in 1922, almost one
Why the hell was there never ever a physics
guy stating it had to be done by magnetic monopoles? Well, physicists
are university people and they only think 'What will the colleagues
think of it'. And as such instead of hunting down big results, the
emotional basis of their ways of thinking ensure they are only
But hey, much more important: don't forget
the latest update of 15 pages on a very simple model for the
strong interaction. After all the strong force is the strongest of
the fundamental forces and if you have good math with that; that
is the stuff that counts. And not like the local retards do with
their flies catching behaviour...
(14 June 2015) Fifteen fresh pages on the
strong interaction making a very simple model for how nuclear
particles like the proton and the neutron are hold together.
And, ha ha ha, yesterday I was viewing a
historical oversight of string theory. Now guess what? Originally
they tried to explain the strong interaction with it but they
failed. Of course if you use the wrong math it all will fail
completely, just like all those weirdo's that want to make quantum
computers using only 2D complex numbers.
The item for today:
Item 1) Strong Interaction, a simple math
Item 1) Strong
Interaction, a simple math model.
For me it is a great honor to publish this
update because what I consider myself as my greatest math
findings, the exponential circle and exponential curves, are a one
to one match when it comes down how protons and neutrons are
That goes for here on earth but also one
billion light years from here and not only now but also a billion
years in the future.
So I am very satisfied with 'just another day
at the office', now how will the people from the academic world
react on this math?
My guess is it will be the usual reaction:
Neglect, look away, never mention that guy, we need more money, we
need more money and we will build quantum computers for the future
of humanity & so on and so on.
The math professors here in Groningen will
not like it I am publishing the math only here. Now they cannot do
the plagiarism play like they did in the 1990-ties.
But let's not nag at the local retards. Again
for me it is a great honor to hit the button 'publish website' and
are the 15 pages of Strong Interaction.
I also activated the three teaser pictures
from previous updates to this homepage.
End of this update, till updates.
(10 June 2015) I will not deny this update is
a small attack on the suckers that suck in tax payer money in
order to study 'vibrating strings' from so called 'string
If you give me only one working vibrating
string, I will bow for your insights.
This is not the case in the year 2015,
so we craft a bit of 'string theory' ourselves using modified
Dirichclet kernels for ourselves.
Item 1) Teaser picture number 3 using
Dirichclet modified kernels.
Item 1) Teaser
picture number 3 using Dirichclet modified kernels.
Let me not do difficult on the math details because
if you need to publish 3 teaser pictures before there is an good
reaction you know:
These people are dumb and stupid for a good
After having said that, here the third
Now for the time lag g(t).
See you in about 300 years when finally the
human universities wanted to act as humans...
08 June 2015) Why not a second teaser
picture for that strange branch of physics known as 'string
theory'. Call me old fashioned but if you cannot verify your
theoretical results via experiment, why would you pursue a career
as a string physics professional???
Item 1) Second teaser picture for the
impending math update.
Item 1) Second teaser
picture for the impending math update.
Yes why would people enter a career as a
string theory professional when you never ever can check your
stuff via experiment?
That would be an odd thing to do.
Now one can argue that since string theory is
so beautiful when it comes to the math involved, it must have some
kernel of truth...
That all remains to be seen and that all is
about what is 'beautiful math' anyway.
Because retarded people if they find out that
3 + 7 = 10, they will say 'that is a beautiful
So here is the second teaser picture while
the first teaser picture is found scrolling down only to 04 June
Yes my dear physics professors; why is
I could give you mathematical answers but in
practice the coordinate function values are simply amplitudes of
11-dimensional probability distributions...
Just like it is in the 2-dimensional complex
End of the second teaser update, till
(04 June 2015) I am working on a relatively
long and detailed update on particle physics using 3D circular
numbers for making models for the proton and the neutron.
But in the science of physics there is also
that strange brand known as string theory.
I am not a big fan of string theory because you cannot validate
via experiment if the theoretical results are actually
Now those string theory folks always talk
about vibrating strings and that it is all 'mathematically
perfect' so it must have some kernel of truth...
And always you have that 11 dimensional space
popping up; in order for string theory to make sense they need 11
dimensions where there are 3 dimensions for our space and 8 more
that are bounded and very small...
So I am making a challenge out out of it,
that is the item of this update:
Item 1) People of string theory: give me your
11 dimensional coordinate functions.
Item 1) People of
string theory: give me your 11 dimensional coordinate functions.
If indeed our universe is build from
vibrating strings on an extremely small scale, one way or the
other the concept of time also plays some role. So for example of
the proton and the neutron; what is exactly vibrating in 11
dimensions and please give me the coordinate functions for all
these 11 dimensions.
In about one week my detailed update on
particle physics related to the proton and the neutron will be
ready and in a small appendix I will give you the details of
crafting a curve that is periodic in 11 dimensions.
That is the end of this update; show me the
money, what is the math behind the vibrating strings
Till updates. Update from 05 June;
teaser picture for the string theory folks:
This graph from a modified Dirichlet kernel
is the very first coordinate function x(t), the other 10
coordinate functions are time delays of this very first coordinate
If you put it together in an 11-dimensional
space you end up with a periodic curve, the only problem is: it is
not vibrating at all...
So once more: show me the money.
Or better: show me the math.
(02 June 2015) Very interesting is the BUK
news of today; the Russian manufacturer Almaz Antey that produces
the BUK systems claims it cannot be a Russian BUK but one from the
Ukrainian forces because it was an older type that was
That was what I was thinking in the very
first place, the idea that lives in the Western world that the
Russian government did send advanced weaponry to the Ukraine and
shot our Dutch folks from the sky was a pipedream in the first
A very important detail that is missing: Was
the crew that operated the BUK system from Russia yes or no? From
the very first beginning I always thought they were
Can we blame the Russian government for that?
No, they are not dictators like in that weird nation North Korea
so when volunteers go to the Ukraine that is more or less
That is today's item:
Item 1) Almaz Antey is willing to explain
technical details on filght MH17.
Item 1) Almaz Antey
is willing to explain technical details on filght MH17.
Almaz Antey is willing to detonate a modern
version of the BUK system attack rockets, of course there is no
reason to do this on high altitude. I hope my fellow Dutch folks
react a little bit enthusiastic on this news.
But once we have the warhead, we can also let
it explode our selves. Basically what we need are a few old
warheads and one of the more advanced versions from now.
Like I wrote before: we need the metal
shrapnel after the explosion of the warhead, fragments of that
must be buried inside the wreckage of flight MH17.
Now the company Almaz Antey also has proof
that the BUK was actually fired from a position controlled by the
That is a very interesting position to take
but it raises questions about why the Ukrainians would like to
down this particular flight.
I am sorry but from day one the most likely
scenario was a BUK system stolen from the Ukrainian forces
operated by voluntary Russians with no knowledge of the air space
being used by commercial flight.
The war tribunal has spoken: I do not blame
the Russian government for this.
It was all more or less a freak accident.
Missile-maker could blow up passenger jet to ‘prove MH17 not downed by Russian weapon’
Let's leave it with that, till updates my
(31 May 2015) On 15
Sept 2014 I made a math update on how you could use 3D numbers
to make a superposition of three quantum states.
Although I cannot find it back I also gave an example where you
can rotate three quantum states into each other.
Yesterday I found it turns out this is the
way protons and neutrons work; that is what this small update is
Item 1) Strong interaction.
Item 1) Strong
Yesterday like an innocent lamb I was just
Youtubbing around with a bit of weak force vids and a few strong
force vids and I came along a vid with the title Strong
I had absolutely no clue what strong
interaction was; only some vague notion it could be related to the
strong force that binds the quarks into protons and neutrons and
holds the nucleus of atoms together.
This is what I viewed:
Strong Interaction: The Four Fundamental Forces of Physics #1a
Strong Interaction: The Four Fundamental Forces of Physics
To my surprise what I did last September with
rotating the three colors of quarks into each other, it happens
all the time. With present day knowledge we understand it are the
gluons that constantly transport the so called 'color charge' of
the quarks around.
It is truly amazing; this math of 3D complex
and circular numbers have in their very heart the behavior of all
protons and neutrons in our universe.
So will the physics professors make some
noise or will they do weasel stuff like all math departments
Let's hope for the best but we must never
forget that physics people are university people too so they are
basically only interested about what their colleagues will think
of their contributions... (That is the way 21-th century science
works by the way, all these scientists are only pre-occupied about
what the colleagues will think of it.)
This is a small screen shot from the #1b
So I wish every body good luck in trying to
understand the higher dimensional exponential circles and what you
can do with them.
Of course that does not go for the math professors of this world;
as far as I am concerned they can get any cancer there is around
(29 May 2015) A small thought experiment on
electrical charges, in it I will make the same fault that physicists
have made with magnetism (I mean they think that electrons are
magnetic dipoles but they have no experimental proof
Item 1) A small thought experiment on
Item 1) A small
thought experiment on electrical charges.
Take any piece of matter that is
electronically neutral, so to say it has no net charge.
For example one kilo of iron.
Now cut it in half, you will see that both
half kilo's are electrically neutral; there is no charge in any of
the two parts.
Keep on chopping the stuff into smaller and
Every time you will observe no overall
Finally you come down to one atom of iron, if
it is not ionized the iron atom is electrically speaking
Now you separate the electrons from the iron
atom; the collection of electrons is electrically neutral just as
the nucleus of the iron atom.
Here we stop our thought experiment because
it has run off the rails of common knowledge: at present day we
believe strongly that electrons are negative and protons
positively charged particles.
But with magnetism we are always told by
professional physics professors that electrons are magnetic
dipoles because of a vague property known as spin.
And the professional professors speak words
In the Stern-Gerlach experiment the bipolar
electron anti-aligns itself with the inhomogenous magnetic field.
So half of them align and the other half anti-aligns itself.
After that they often wave their hands a bit
and tell you that quantum mechanics is so weird and so different
from our macroscopic world that it all behaves like no sane human
Well for myself speaking I have drawn my
conclusion and I make the following statement:
For the time being I consider the Stern-Gerlach
experiment the fundamental proof of electrons being magnetic
monopoles simply because a bipolar magnet of the size of an
electron cannot go 'anti-align' itself.
I have spoken, let's listen if their will be
(Or will it be just like the faggots and cowards from the math
Silence year in year out?
I hope it not but you never know with these people from the
After all they are some kind of perfumed princes living in a world
In the next picture the words 'ga terug' mean
like you have guessed go back.
Of course that symbolizes physics should hunt down the magnetic
monopole once more but now properly until you have it clear cut in
End of this update.
(26 May 2015) Stuff that goes under the name
tetraneutron is a configuration of 4 neutrons and this
configuration cannot be explained by the present theory on nuclear
forces. So let's do it 'magnetic monopole style'.
Item 1) Tetraneutron explained as four
Item 1) Tetraneutron
explained as four magnetic monopoles.
There is only one observation of tetraneutron
and even that one observation is disputed. From a distance I
cannot judge if this disputing makes sense, we must also take into
account since the standard model of particle physics cannot
explain such stuff, automatically it will come under attack.
Or, what I am having with the higher
dimensional complex numbers; the so called 'professional
professors' are trying to silence me to death. But I have declared
these people as pseudo scientists a long time ago and as such the
universities are all ngelectable quantities...
The next wiki gives the details: Tetraneutron
The French team in Caen used a highly
instable isotope where the nucleus has a so called halo of the
four neutrons together.
Under the hypothesis that all spin half
particles are magnetic monopoles, we already understood that this
gives rise to the existence of electron pairs. Because electrons
are electrically charged they cannot form structures that are
beyond the pair.
A neutron is not charged, anyway the total
charge is zero according to the standard accepted theory of
quarks, so if neutrons are also magnetic monopoles they can also
come in numbers like 2, 4, 6, 8 etc. As even numbers.
But it could also come are a cube shape with
8 neutrons where on every corner a north pole magnetic monopole
neutron is connected with 3 south pole neutrons (and vice versa;
it has to be an alternating structure where no two equal magnetic
monopoles touch each other).
Recall there are also neutron stars; likely
they are build in a similar fashion.
It was over one year ago that I realized
electrons could very well be magnetic monopoles and until now I
have not found one detail that points into another direction. Ok
ok, you have all those physics professors that say electrons are
magnetic dipoles, but they have no theoretical or experimental
proof for that.
It is just an assumption they believe in,
they have no proof whatsoever.
A nuclear halo? Nature has amazing strange
ways, but for this halo stuff there is indeed experimental
confidence because such nuclear structures with a loose halo are
far bigger compared to a nicely packed compact nucleus from a
This is the wiki: Halo nucleus
This is a screenshot from that very wiki
suggesting strongly that neutrons and protons can indeed form
pairs while neutrons can also come in a quadruplet.
Ok, that's it for this update. Till
(22 May 2015) On a wiki on electrons I found
a perfect photo that could show that electrons are magnetic
monopoles. Wikipedia wants me to 'attribute the author'.
Ok, but is the 'author' also the person that
took the photo in the first place?
Anyway, the attribution goes to:
"Cyclotron motion wider view" by Marcin Białek - Own work.
Ok, it says 'own work' so thanks for the
wonderful photo Marcin!
Item 1) From old television tubes to this
Item 1) From old
television tubes to this cyclotron photo.
Old black & white televisions needed
about 10 to 12 thousand Volts in their electron canon to work
properly, the color televisions (if memory serves) needed about 50
to 60 thousand Volt. Anyway the voltage is not important, the
relevant fact is that although beam of electrons are intrinsically
unstable because due to the equal electrical charge the beam will
widen over time, it was possible to write about 600 lines with
those electrical canons.
These tubes were marvelous creations of
electrical engineering, at the back of the television was a manual
regulator and with that you could control the so called 'synchronization'
that ensured the electron cannon was at the right point for every
new batch of 600 fresh lines to be written on the
The fact sync worked in the first place is a
true miracle; there is a small island of stability and the
engineers were capable of hunting it down...
Ok, lets return to our present year 2015
updates on electrons being magnetic monopoles, look at the picture
The electrons make only one round but this is
done in a homogeneous magnetic field.
The electron cannon spits out electrons at the cathode and they
are absorbed by the positive anode.
As you see in inspection, halfway into the
loop the electrons are widely dispersed. Ok ok, this could be
related to having a lousy electron cannon but it could also be
caused by electrons being magnetic monopoles.
After all these electrons are exposed to a
magnetic field perpendicular toward the curve they are forced to
take. And the magnetic monopole nature of the electrons make them
Nice picture isn't it?
Dutch learning's on the 'little donkey
bridge' or as we say it:
A donkey bridge is a simple way to memorize
stuff in such a way that minimizes future faults.
An example is cnap.
All you have to do is memorize the word cnap.
And after that for the rest of your life you will know that:
Cathode = negative while
Anode = positive.
After this Dutch learning, please observe in
the above picture that even applying a large anode, the electrons
still have a strong tendency to spread out.
Do not believe the bla bla talk of physics
professors; they talk about 'align with the magnetic field' and
'anti-align with the magnetic field'.
In the world physics professors live in, you
are not allowed to say what it is:
End of this update, till updates.
(20 May 2015) A short update on the Gauss
insights on magnetic monopoles, he thought magnetic monopoles do
Yet our little though experiment as electrons
being magnetic dipoles showed life on earth could not exist if
electrons were magnetic dipoles.
And you cannot argue with that; after all life on land exists...
Item 1) How Gauss viewed the stuff.
Item 1) How Gauss
viewed the stuff.
During the time Gauss lived electrons were
still not discovered so Gauss had no idea of their properties. The
ideas of Gauss boil down to the simple insight that magnetic field
lines are always closed, they are continuous loops contrary to
electrical fields that can go from plus to minus.
Now for a standard bar magnet or magnetism
from electricity, the Gauss ideas are about one hundred percent
correct. But if electrons are magnetic monopoles, in practice all
our permanent magnets would not behave exactly like Gauss
Since I like Gauss a lot, for me it is a
great honor to put forward one of his formulations of the
magnetical stuff. It is the version where all flux that goes in
also should go out; and mark my words; the mathematical
representation is perfect.
(Only those pesky electrons spoil all this
perfection in math...)
law for magnetism.
Now if indeed electrons are magnetic
monopoles, the picture changes dramatically and we have to rewrite
the basic laws of magnetism in a way that looks very similar to
I am not going to do that because I am a math
End of this short update, till updates.
Added 21 May: The electron was discovered in 1897. The next link
is about that discovery and these pages are definitely from the
stone age of the internet but anyway; it is a perfect read and not
Electron, J J Thomson 1897.
End of the extra update. Till
(17 May 2015) Ha ha ha, the well known 21 cm
wavelength from hydrogen explained via electrons being magnetic
monopoles + the ultrafine spectrum ideas.
Item 1) What causes the well known 21 cm
Item 1) What causes
the well known 21 cm wavelength radiation?
In the science of astronomy the
electro-magnetic wavelength of 21 cm are studied because this is a
very common wavelength observed throughout the universe and, for
example, you can use it to validate the so called 'red shift' that
says our universe is expanding everywhere.
Except for black holes, according to the
Einstein stuff black holes suck in space at the speed of light...
So black holes more or less act as the vacuum cleaners of all that
interstellar space that only produces more space.
Anyway, as I view the stuff with electron
spin there is nothing spinning at all since the observe magnetic
forces are so high the electron would be spinning at speeds far
beyond the speed of light.
Since an electron still has a tiny mass, this
cannot happen so why we are still talking about the spin of an
electron in the year 2015 beats me.
Electrons are basically magnetic monopoles,
electrons have only two possible quantum states when it comes to
magnetism: it is either north or south.
In that regard electrons are very different
from all macroscopic structures where there always are bipolar
Now below you see a nice picture about the 21
cm wavelength radiation, this wavelength is not only a fingerprint
of the expanding universe but also a fingerprint to the smallest
possible magnetic monopoles.
In the above picture you see the so called
'hyperfine structure' but what is ultrafine structure? Very
simple: although the magnetic monopole of a proton is nothing
compared to those of the electrons, nuclear spin of the proton
could also point down and while the hyperfine structure gives two
values for the hydrogen thing, the ultrafine spectrum would give
four different jumps in energy levels when ionization takes place...
Source of the picture: http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/h21.html
End of this update, till updates.
(15 May 2015) A short update on the earth
magnetic field and a giant breach of that magnetic field that
reportedly by NASA was ten times as big as present day science
Of course 'present day science' thinks that
electrons are magnetic dipoles; of course this is not forbidden
but if that leads to all kinds of completely bizarre results or
theories you can also ponder the question as why electrons have to
be magnetic dipoles.
Item 1) NASA reports giant breach of the
earth magnetic field (in 2008)
Item 1) NASA reports
giant breach of the earth magnetic field (in 2008)
If your mind is open to electrons being
magnetic monopoles, in that case you would be able to understand
what happens during solar storms.
Yet if we believe the science of physics, for
some strange reason that nobody can explain properly or in some transparent
fashion, electrons have to be magnetic dipoles.
Now why do all those physics professors tell
you that electrons are magnetic dipoles while if that were true
life on earth could not exist?
That is because sciences like physics and
math are crafted just like they are one of the main religions
going round. When it comes to math & physics it looks mostly
like the religion of Christianity and the Muslim faith.
There are a few 'founders of that religion'
like Jesus or Mohammed and after that believers think those
prophets had 'eternal wisdom'. In science we also have prophets,
they have names like Einstein or Dirac or whatever what.
If you free yourself from the way your mind
works, you can do so called 'thought experiments'. And if the
thought experiment is solar wind or solar storm you have a better
understanding of what is happening in the first place.
Let me end the bla bla bla and post only one
link to my bla bla bla:
Giant Breach in Earth's Magnetic Field Discovered
End of this small update, till updates.
(11 May 2015, updated with isospin on 12 May) Yesterday I added six links to
the latest update in the math files that explores the possibility
that all spin half particles are magnetic monopoles.
And until yesterday I lived in a world where
protons would always have spin +1/2 and neutrons always -1/2.
Today I observed all kinds of weird information that shakes my
simple view on the neutron; that is the small update for
Item 1) Things I don't understand about
Item 1) Things I
don't understand about neutrons.
Inside the science of chemistry the basic
view is the period table of elements, but elements like magnesium
or whatever what can also have isotopes. These isotopes can be
stable or radioactive and decay over time in other stuff.
The only difference between isotopes is the
number of neutrons.
So basically the picture should be very simple: one more neutron
should lower the total spin of a nucleus while one less neutron
would raise the total spin.
Remark once more that I think there is
nothing spinning, it's all magnetic monopoles. And the sole fact
that neutrons can alter the magnetic spin of an atomic nucleus
also says all those physics professors are totally wrong with
relating the magnetic properties of small particles to rotation
& spinning stuff.
To make a long story short; adding or
subtracting only one neutron can alter the magnetic properties of
an atomic nucleus beyond belief.
In the next picture you see a bunch of
isotopes from magnesium and at the bottom you see a very weird
picture that supposedly contains the present day insights in
proton & neutron spin.
I would like to remark that I have no means
to check of this information is actually true, so for the time
being we suppose it is all correct...
Let me first give you the source files;
The table is from a website named webelements dot com, there for
all atomic elements you can find lots of properties of them. The
table is from the next page:
And the mind blowing picture on the proton
comes from the High Energy Physics information system.
If the https link does not work, try
In the table you observe adding one neutron
does weird things to the overall spin of a particular nucleus; are
there more spin half particles that are changing sign and if so,
WTF is going on???
Now I do not want to be left in all kinds of
details, but the word 'spin' for talking about magnetic properties
of small particles is a disaster in the first place. Ok, I will
not deny that a spinning electrical charge creates a magnetic
After all that is the way these very words
are written down; via electricity I can download it to my website
and those kinds of transports are always based on dipole
Let's leave it with that, but don't forget to
check out a few of those six links I posted yesterday:
The Aurora Borealis and magnetic
Till updates. One
day later; problem solved! Quarks that form protons and
neutrons are called up and down, but this does not mean their
magnetic spin is also up or down!
The names up and down are related to something completely else: isospin.
I was thinking that magnetic spin in quarks was related to their
electrical charge; so I am glad I figured out my fault...
So it is perfectly possible that adding one neutron to an isotope
completely changes the magnetic properties of the nucleus in
(Well I am not a particle physicists of course...)
(09 May 2015) A few day back in the math
files on higher dimensional complex numbers I posted an update
about the polar lights being caused by the fact that spin half
particles could be magnetic monopoles.
So that is the item for this update:
Item 1) Are all spin half particle actually
Item 1) Are all spin
half particle actually magnetic monopoles?
Electrons, protons and neutrons are all so
called spin half particles. But even the more basic building
blocks of nuclear particles like proton and neutron are supposed
to be of the spin half type of particles.
For electrons it is very simple to create an
experiment that will make the case for being magnetic monopoles.
As a matter of fact it already has been done; it is the famous
Stern Gerlach experiment.
But the original Stern Gerlach experiment
does not prove at all that electrons are magnetic monopoles; for
that you need the present day techno known as the MRI scanning
device as it is found in every big hospital in our Western
If the results of the Stern Gernlach
experiment can be done inside the working of a modern MRI scanning
device, that will prove electrons are magnetic monopoles...
But hey, I am spinning off from my direction
of posting a so called 'teaser picture' for the latest math
It has to be remarked that it is five pages
long and from the onset I tried to prevent writing down any
calculation whatsoever; but after a few days the blood creeps
where it cannot go and without thinking I wrote down example
So that explains the content of the teaser
picture; Even if I try to write only in words, one way or the
other the math will set in...
Ha ha, I never thought I would write on
Let me pop another beer to make the walk of
my life a bit more random!
Anyway, till updates.
(03 May 2015) This update is a small so
called 'thought experiment' on electrons being magnetic dipoles.
As a matter of fact it turns out that life on earth is not
possible if electrons were not magnetic monopoles...
Item 1) Hello physics professors; what
happens if electrons are magnetic dipoles?
Item 1) Hello
physics professors; what happens if electrons are magnetic
Hello physics professors from the noble
science of physics; since you are a strong believer in the
evolution of theory via experimental results that speak for
themselves, you are on the side of the reasonable sciences.
So that is completely unlike my own science,
in the science of math we only have lunatics and cowards; may be
that is caused by the fact inside math you cannot do experiments
in some kind of 'real world'.
Anyway, this is a short update. The thought
experiment is very simple:
You are an electron going via solar wind or
solar storm towards planet earth and we suppose you are a bipolar
magnet because of supposed 'intrinsic spin' or other 'bla bla bla
You are an evil electron, you have magnetic
bipolar disorder and you are approaching planet earth. What will
That is very simple: the bipolar electron has
a magnetic north and a south.
From the viewpoint of the impending electron,
all forces cancel out:
The earth has a magnetic North and a magnetic
South; what forces will the earth North pole do on the
Again very simple: The earth North will repel
the electron north and attract the electron south by the same
amount. Hence the result is a zero force.
The earth South pole will repel the electron
south and attract the electron north by the same amount. Hence the
result is zero force.
Since both magnetic poles of the earth
contribute to nothing at all on the impending electron, the only
thing the impending electron has to do is to align itself with the
earth magnetic field and after that it can penetrate the earth
magnetic field perpendicular.
That spells trouble, the electron will land
in the ozone layer that protects the earth for billions of
Now loose electrons and loose protons are
highly ionizing particles, so they will destroy the ozone layer
and life on this planet as we know it has never been there in the
End of this very simple to understand thought
experiment, I would like to remark a more 'professional reaction'
is expected by me from the physics professors and not act like
those sleaze balls and douche bags that run the scene in the
science of math...
Till updates. (One day later on 04
May I corrected the word 'slease' into 'sleaze' and I corrected
the start before item 1 and now it says life one earth can only
exist because electrons are magnetic monopoles...)
(27 April 2015) Polar light is a mysterious phenomenon,
the theory says it is solar wind from the sun going to the North
and South pole. The solar wind itself is plasma so loose electrons
and protons and may be the occasional helium nucleus.
But why do they go to the magnetic poles of
After all if the physicists are right and electrons are really
magnetic dipoles, in that case they could not be attracted by
either the North pole or the South pole.
After all in an electron the magnetic poles are so close that the
attraction delivered on the one pole is compensated by the
repelling of the other magnetic pole of the electron.
That is our item for today:
Item 1) Polar lights and the electron as
Item 1) Polar lights
and the electron as magnetic monopoles.
I am still amazed that I just cannot succeed
into finding just one example where electrons are truly dipoles
(ok ok, one electron circling one proton must be one, but that is
viewed as an electrical current).
It explains why electrons come in pairs in
the chemical sciences, that last fact explains as why molecule
orbits can only be full with an even number of electrons. So the
electrons being magnetic monopoles lies at the very heart of how
chemical reactions take place and at the very heart of how
molecules are build up.
Now it has been found in the last century
that the polar light is incoming solar wind along magnetic lines
from the earth magnetic field. But my dear professional
physicists; does a small magnetic dipole do such a thing?
No that does not work, if you use a difficult
line of reasoning like 'the one magnetic pole is a tiny closer to
earth compared to the other, so the dipole closes to earth wins it
and it gets attracted to earth' is rubbis:
If that were true the electrons (and protons) would come in at
such a slow speed we would not see any light at all...
That amazing thing that we see light is just
one of the many reasons that electrons must be magnetic
Very likely the professional physics
professors will react exactly the same as the cowards from
mathematics; They will stay silent.
So let's not waste time on a collection of
cowards with severe cognitive malfunction. Let's look at a nice
video of the polar light itself and in the meantime wonder if
electrons could be magnetic dipoles via another line of
Title Youtuve video: Het
Noorderlicht (The Polar light).
From the social point of view I expect
physics professors to react the same as the non reacting math
professors on the higher dimensional complex numbers.
But where my own kind of math folks are just
too fucking stupid combined with cowardice, the physics professors
will over time understand that electrons being magnetic monopoles
is not the most crazy idea in the world.
So only cowardice will be the main source of
their non reacting, whereas with math professors you have this
wall to wall & floor to ceiling stupidity. And there is no
cure for stupidity...
End of this update, till
(25 April 2015) On 08 Sept 2014 I started the
third gluten experiment about how the gluten in your daily bread
is completely non bio-degradable and as such eating bread gives a
wide spectrum of health issues in humans.
After over 6 months the final results are in
and they are very interesting.
That is today's item, a food item about that poison named
Item 1) Final photo result of the third
Item 1) Final photo
result of the third gluten experiment.
Gluten is one of the set of molecules that
are hard to digest, just like drinking mineral oil is bad for your
health, eating gluten erodes your long term health.
For the wheat gluten is God's gift to wheat;
without the gluten all grains would rot away during the winter
season and as such wheat has adapted itself to grow in places with
greater seasonal changes. (Read spread out to the colder
It is no secret that I am allergic to gluten,
therefore it has my interest in the first place...
If you do your daily shopping I always have a
strong interest in what unhealthy looking people buy for their
daily food. So often it is a bread that they are buying, it is
amazing once you realize this that so often bread consumption is
tied to bad health.
Young people have no problem with it, they
are like a 'boss' in video games; they can eat all the bread they
want until, ha ha ha, if you shoot long enough in a video game all
bosses can be killed.
For myself speaking; in the first 50 years of
my life I was not allergic to the grain named wheat but when I
started consuming a so called 'health product' from the company
Unilever my health spiraled down rapidly.
Checking the details, it was one of the food
additives known as the 'taste enhancers' that changed my food
intolerance towards a deadly allergy.
Therefore in the future I will destroy the
market value of the company named Unilever; do you think I am
bluffing??? Better think twice.
The third gluten experiment is also is way of
understanding how the food industry makes consumers to overeat,
and there are many legal ways to make consumers food
In the third gluten experiment I added a lot
of Camembert fungus to the gluten in order to observe how the
gluten would bread down. How 'dio degradable' is it?
After all, when I am brewing beer the gluten
is killed in about 75 minutes during the mashing process, but for
that you need the enzymes inside your malts and wheat just has
none of those enzymes.
To make a long story short: You should not
eat stuff your body cannot digest. Just like you do not drink
petroleum or gasoline or breath natural gas, you should not eat
the biggest money maker in the food industry: Wheat & all
things related to wheat.
After 7 months of waiting, the latest non
digestible parts of pure gluten are finally under the
It took a long time to degrade, but now it
looks like a liquid. Yet just below the surface their are still
blocks of gluten.
In the next gluten experiment I will add the
enzymes from barley. My expectation is that the enzymes from
barley kill all the attitudes the wheat gluten has.
End of this update, till updates.
(18 April 2015) This day I hang the 16 pages
on the curves of grace into this website. It is 3D stuff only, in
higher dimensions like 5D or so you have much much more of
Item 1) The curves of grace (3D version only)
Item 1) The curves of
grace (3D version only)
Ok, I will explain as why I breach my own
embargo of publishing at most 10% of new results found. It is very
simple: may be with cracking the Riemann hypothesis in dimensions
above 2 (the complex plane) you need knowledge upon these curves
I think that zero's of the Riemann zeta
function are found in the direction of the tau number (just like
in the complex plane where they are on the so called critical line
inside the critical strip).
Previously I said: Look in the direction of the 'imitators of i'.
The imitators of i and their time evolution are always factored by
curves of grace.
Well enough of the bla bla bla, I composed
the 16 pages long update such that even so called 'professional
professors' in math could understand it (if they wanted it).
But given their fundamental love for being
incompetent, likely they even do not want it...
Let it be, click on the teaser picture to
land on the latest update:
End of this update, till updates.
(17 April 2015) Wow wow wow, I just finished
the impending 16 page long math update upon the curves of grace.
Therefore while drinking another home brew of beer, lets look at
For a few weeks I am roasting coffee beans
for myself and I have to say:
This is so much better compared to what you can buy as pre-roasted
coffee that I will keep on roasting my unroasted coffee beans for
a few more years...
Roasting coffee is very simple; compared to
roasting malts for beer brewing it is a plane cake walk.
Only one item for today, I am a big fan of
the company named SpaceX.
And today SpaceX delivered a coffee machine to the international
Item 1) Coffee in space.
Item 1) Coffee in
I am completely unfamiliar with coffee in
space, so the intellectuals from the British Telegraph will do the
talking for me:
SpaceX Dragon delivers espresso maker to International Space Station.
End of this important update upon coffee in
(15 April 2015) Oh oh, how could I make a
teaser picture riddled with so many faults?
The answer is simple: Never update math stuff while drinking too
much home brew beer.
So this small update is only showing the more
or less correct teaser picture as it should have been in the first
Item 1) Teaser picture without all those
drunk from beer faults.
Item 1) Teaser
picture without all those drunk from beer faults.
Anyway to make a long story short: After
thinking a few days upon the way black holes work using my simple
math model of time evolution like e^jt, I think I have made good
understanding in the geometry of a black hole sucking in all that
matter from a so called accretion disk.
Of course I cannot expose it in detail
because that costs so many hours of work while the so called
'academic professionals' show 0.0 interest.
Why should I waste my time on garbage people?
Why should I waste my time on pseudo scientists?
After having said that, here is the teaser
picture as it was supposed to be:
(12 April 2015) A small update on so called
'curves of grace'.
Item 1) Impending math update: The curves of
Item 1) Impending
math update: The curves of grace.
About 25 years ago I studied the properties
of the 3 Taylor series as you see on the bottom of the teaser
picture. These are extensions of the sin, cos, sinh and the
But that was before I found the higher
dimensional complex numbers and if you only have Taylor series in
you mathematical toolbox, you will make some progress but not
Yet let me not do negative on Taylor series,
if you see them for the first time they are magical, or aren't
Anyway, I just finished a relatively long
investigation into the 3D curves of grace and like I expected they
could be the perfect starting point of making a math model of how
matter behaves around black holes.
Ok ok, the model needs some perfection
because with e^jt the matter goes from outside of the accretion
disk to the outside of the alpha line. But it keeps accelerating
So I have to temper the speed of time a
May be in the future I will try to temper
time with the way time slows down using the ideas of the Einstein
But the extremely simple model e^jt works
perfect in the sense that matter inside the accretion disk goes
indeed into the black hole.
Like said before: The way black holes behave
is the shortest possible advertisement for 3D complex numbers. Of
course that will fall on deaf ears because for the professional
professors being incompetent is a choice they make day in day out
Enough of the bla bla bla, here is a teaser
picture and it is important to remark I did not use any theory of
differential equations but only a mixture of 2D numbers from the
complex plane together with my own 3D complex numbers.
(Ha ha, yesterday I forgot the division by 3
in the coordinate functions; may be I should not update after a
few liters of home brew...;)
The update will be rather long so in a week
or so it will be published; in the meantime the professional math
professors could prove they are actually worth all those boatloads
of tax payer money by finding the solutions to the non-alternating
Taylor series in the above picture.
(09 April 2015) A few days back I posted a
short update on my views as electrons being magnetic monopoles. I
think electrons are magnetic monopoles and that the transition
from the north state to the south state can be calculated
So in this update I show you one of those
weirdo's that try to build quantum computers based upon the idea
that electrons on their own are magnetic dipoles...
Item 1) With scientists like that, when will
the first quantum computer be there?
Item 1) With
scientists like that, when will the first quantum computer be
If you keep on thinking electrons are dipole
magnets whatsoever, you will never be able to harness the power of
a quantum computer. If you for vague emotional reasons keep on
hanging to a belief system that just does not work, all your ideas
about quantum computers will fade into insignificance.
I have selected for you a moment in time
where so called 'leading scientists' expose their emotional bounds
to electrons being magnetic dipoles all of the time.
I think it is a bag of rubbish and because it
is a bag of rubbish all those so called quantum computers that
they build at for example the D-wave factories, they will not
That's what I think; the 'moment of time' is
one minute and ten seconds, or 1:10 in the next Youtubber:
Does a Quantum Computer Work?
Electrons cannot be magnetic dipoles, if they
were dipoles only a very small fraction would go against the
inhomogenous magnetic field. But if about half of the electrons
are capable of fighting the stronger part of the magnetic field,
this can only mean they are magnetic monopoles...
About 3 days back I posted this monopole
stuff on electrons.
End of this update, till updates.
(02 April 2015) An update in Dutch because
our minister of economical affairs made a few comments lately
about stopping the gas production in a fundamental way.
For the first time I agree with him and I would like to explain
why this is good over a long long time haul (centuries so to say).
Item 1) Voordelen van aardwarmte.
Item 1) Voordelen
Meer restwarmte en aardwarmte gebruiken is een goed idee,
men probeert nog veel meer zoals bijv biobrandstoffen. Maar bio
brandstoffen lossen het probleem van te hoge concentraties
broeikas gassen helemaal niet op; je ziet al die maffe auto's
rondrijden met daarop 'Wij rijden duurzaam op aardgas'.
Nou nee dus, bio brandstoffen zijn misschien minder idioot
dan zo snel mogelijk de voorraad aardolie & gas opmaken, maar
het probleem van te hoge concentraties broeikas gassen blijft
De planeet aarde is, net als de zon, een enorme zak warmte.
Heel langzaam komt die warmte naar buiten, bijv de ijzeren kern
van de aarde groeit elke 1000 jaar ongeveer 1 contimeter. Per
miljoen jaar dus ongeveer 10 meter; dat komt omdat de radioactieve
processen die de kern van de aarde warm houden natuurlijk ook eens
opraken. Maar dat duurt enorm lang gelukkig.
Nou wat is het grote voordeel van aardwarmte gebruiken?
Eenvoudig: Je verstookt veel minder fossiele brandstoffen en
het is de enigste manier om het overschot aan warmte hier op aarde
simpelweg het heelal in te stralen.
Elke keer als het helder weer is dan straalt elke huis warmte
het heelal in.
Technische kanttekeningen; Als je warmte oppomt dan is dat
equivalent met het koelen van de bodem op grote diepte; echter
transport van warmte gaat enorm langzaam. Ik weet niet hoe snel
maar als je teveel warmte oppompt dan werkt zo'n plek na een
aantal jaren niet meer.
Maar als wij voor hele stadswijken warmte gaan oppompen dan
hebben we heel veel nodig want bijv in het jaar 2199 wil men ook
graag elke dag een warme douce nemen.
Het is daarom waarschijnlijk verstandig om bij het boren
direct drie of vier verschillende aftappunten te hebben. Als je
dan één jaar zo'n aftappunt gebruikt hebt, dan ga je naar de
volgende die bijv een aantal honderden meters dieper ligt. Na vier
jaar kom je dan weer bij je eerste aftappunt uit.
En al dat boren in de grond dan?
Nou hebben we al niet een club die dat goed kan?
Dat is de NAM enzo...
Kijk dit is enorm duur natuurlijk; aan de
andere kant de gewonnen warmte is gratis. En als het zo gemaakt
kan worden dat één boorput makkelijk 50 jaar meegaat dan zullen
de kosten op termijn best meevallen.
Maar dit is echt zo'n geval van 'De kost gaet
voor de baet uit'.
Dat was het, tot opdatums.
(29 March 2015) A short food update upon the
Alzheimer disease that is now declared diabetes type 3. For myself
speaking I was more or less totally surprised by the fact our own
brains also make insulin. So I was chewing on that a few
Item 1) I think type 3 diabetes is for real,
but lots of stuff is still unknown.
Item 1) I think type
3 diabetes is for real, but lots of stuff is still unknown.
A relatively good starting link is the next:
Alzheimer's Is Type 3 Diabetes
In the above link there are many good links
to other pages.
Another link contains the name of a chick
named Suzanne de la Monte. I don't know much about her but it
seems she can do animal experiments in such a way they develop
If true, Suzanne is at least worth her weight
Alzheimer's Disease Is Type 3 Diabetes–Evidence
Last December it came out the Unilever is
separating her spread division from the core kernel of her other
commercial activities. Investors applaud this for reasons of
'declining returns' and so.
After my humble opnion; these investor folks
do not understand what Unilever knows about food and future
judicial stuff. If indeed the dangers of transfats are understood
by Unilever food experts for decades, it is indeed very wise to
separate the spread division...
Here in one of the separated products:
Let's leave it with that.
(26 March 2015) Today I finished the nine
page update on the Riemann zeta function in 3D complex number
space. It is nine pages of what is supposed to look as numerical
mathematics, I have to say it was a pleasure to write
Item 1) Zeta on the critical strip (3D
Item 1) Zeta on the
critical strip (3D version only).
Let me repeat the teaser picture, if you
click on it you are supposed to land on the latest math
End of this update, till updates.
(23 March 2015) Because I am a very lousy
computer programmer I wrote a 9 pages piece that might help
skilled computer programmers to find the zero's of the most famous
math problem that is standing open into higher dimensions.
At the same time I am trying to learn one of
those modern computer programming languages, namely C sharp. And
that is the item of today:
Item 1) C# or C sharp? For me it is C
Item 1) C# or C
sharp? For me it is C stupid.
Let me be clear: This is not an attack on the
software company Microsoft because after all they have their
customer base and as such it is highly logical that even modern
computer programming languages do not suit the math mind.
But I do not complain, yet it has to be in
these files that when I execute the command
Xcoord[k] = Xcoord[k]/3
I get the correct answers inside C
But if I do
Xcoord[k] = Xcoord[k]*(1/3)
the whole thing reacts very differently and I
only get zero's...
My dear Microsoft, how can this be?
Anyway, lately I am hunting down the zero's
of the Riemann zeta function in higher dimensional number systems.
And although there is some progress on my side of the story, for
me it is frustrating that even modern computer languages are so
bad at math.
But the hunt itself is very beautiful; If the
zero's of the Riemann zeta function fall outside any exponential
circle or higher dimensional exponential curve; rather likely the universe
will collapse instantly.
End of the bla bla bla, here is a nice picture
with the explicit formulas included for the Riemann zeta function
zero's in 3D.
In the picture you see that 14, 1347 etc.
Well that is the first non-trivial zero of the Riemann thing. As
far as I understand reality, this stuff can be used for all zero's
as they are found inside the complex plane.
I crafted these three coordinate functions in
such a way you can fill in the values as they go around for the
Riemann stuff in the complex plane...
Updated on 24 March: With every update I
forgot to correct what I said in previous updates; If there are
zero's of the Riemann zeta function in 3D and you use the
Dirichlet eta function, in that case you will not get a zero but a
multiple of the number alpha.
So a multiple of a
= (1, -1, 1)/3.
The reason is the same as discussed in the 05
Jan 2014 update:
Adding stuff up from the exponential circle
gives an extra alpha, for example the geometric series for the
roots of unity in 3D.
See the old update:
Song of Omega Reloaded,
The 3-dimensional roots of unity omega.
(19 March 2015) A food & celebrities
update; Reinko goes show news gossip
Item 1) Has Amy Macdonald stopped eating
Item 1) Has Amy
Macdonald stopped eating bread?
Amy Macdonald is a Scottish singer and by
sheer accident the Youtube channel started beaming the
registration of a concert from 2014 to my flatsceen monitor.
Anyway, I was struck by the change in
This is how a female like Amy is supposed to look when not eating
all that weird food:
Amy Macdonald - Baloise Session 2014 - Full Concert
Now compare that to the way she looked during
their first hit 'This is the life'
Amy Macdonald - This Is The Life
Here you see the striking difference; females
that eat bread every day often have those weird deposits of fat
that aren't supposed to be there. Bread is just one of those
examples: after eating bread your body refuses to burn fat so you
get that strange accumulation of fat while feeling hungry at the
Yeah yeah, it is not much of a miracle as why
the food industry promotes bread: if you cannot burn your body fat
you will get hungry much faster.
And that my dear reader is the way it works
in a capitalist system. Not that I am against the principle of capitalist
economies, but people often think the food industry will never
sell poison if they get an extra profit from that.
These people are dumb & deserve to die
before their time.
By the way; the gossip is: Has Amy stopped
End of this update.
(16 March 2015) Two items today; the first
about a remark the Russian prez Vladimir Putin made & the
second item is a teaser picture related to the most famous math
problem around: the zeta function hypothesis.
Item 1) Russia was willing to go nuclear over
Item 2) Teaser picture on the Riemann conjecture.
Item 1) Russia was
willing to go nuclear over Crimea.
The last days it was more or less in the
media that Vladimir Putin had said that in the end the Russians
would be willing to go nuclear over the Crimea thing.
That looks a bit over the top, but now one
year later what is the outcome of this all?
Only 5000 to 6000 casualties while at present
date we can hope the truce will stand.
As a comparison, 5000 is only 2% of, for
example, the Syrian equation.
So can we learn a lesson from this?
Yes we can; it shows that symmetric warfare
is better compared to asymmetric warfare. My original estimations
from the day the Ukrainian prez Viktor disappeared were about 100
times as high.
From the War Tribunal point of view: I thank
the Russians for their efforts.
Despite all that weird international sanction stuff, facts are
that when push comes to shove, the Russians act clever. So
Item 2) Teaser
picture on the Riemann conjecture.
A very different item compared to item number
one; lately I have been working on stuff that could help computer
programmers to find the zero's of the zeta function in higher
For the last 100+ years finding proof that
the zero's of the Riemann zeta function are on some critical line
seems to be the most famous math problem around.
And I have to admit; it is very hard to
I too cannot do this; for example I have no
clue whatsoever about how to give pure analytical expressions for
those zero's. All we can do is the computer dance, but oh oh I am
the most worse computer programmer in the world.
Anyway, over the centuries this problem will
be cracked further and with that in mind it would not be a bad
thing if this problem would be looked upon in higher dimensions
and not only the the two dimensions of the complex plane...
Let's leave it with that, in this teaser
picture I try to show the similarity between calculations inside
the complex plane and the same calculation in 3D.
Here is the teaser picture:
The above calculation is only related to the
alternating sums of Riemann zeta stuff, that is known as the
Dirichlet eta function. More info on that via:
(14 March 2015) I am humming with
satisfaction because all the time I thought that you can only
develop Alzheimer disease if you eat bread on a daily
Well now there are some folks that say
Alzheimer disease, or dementia, is just another type of diabetes
and now it has number 3.
Item 1) Is Alzheimer disease really diabetes
Item 1) Is Alzheimer
disease really diabetes 3?
Alzheimer disease is a horrible way to die.
Only humans have it, in the animal kingdom no other species have
this disease. Therefore it is logical that Alzheimer disease is
related to food because animals don't eat processed foods and we
humans do eat processed foods.
Why do I think bread is the main
Very simple: most of our elderly do not eat
snickers or other forms of candy all day long, but they strongly
believe in the health of bread. Preferably whole wheat bread is
healthy is what the average elderly thinks...
That is one 100% nonsense; bread kills in
more ways than you can imagine.
Over twenty years back I had an accident in
traffic and one of my arms got out of the armpit. It never healed,
my arm always stayed weak year in year out.
Only now when I stopped eating weird stuff
like bread, the joints are finally as what they were supposed to
Back to Alzheimers:
I am to lazy to explain in detail why bread
is the main culprit, but everybody can do the google thing and
search for "diabetes type 3".
End of this update, do the google thing or
eat more bread. It is your life and not mine...
For the Dutch: Op npowetenschap.nl is wel een
leuke documentaire te vinden van 35 minuten over dit onderwerp.
Het is belangrijk op te merken dat de samenstellers van deze
documentaire niet veel van voedsel begrijpen omdat ze steeds weer
praten over 'suiker samen met vet'. Maar goed, geen gemopper meer,
hier is de link
type 3: Alzheimer
(11 March 2015) Today I posted an appendix in
both versions of the pdf file under the name 'Ten styles for
After all that Raabe formulae is to good to be neglected; in a
fundamental way the gamma function is all about multiplication and
that is why it fits so perfectly into the theory of product
Item 1) The two versions of the 'Ten styles
of product integration'.
Item 1) The two
versions of the 'Ten styles of product integration'.
The old version is Product_integrals.pdf
and later when I finally could import additional packages for my
math typing program I could use the curly product symbol as made
by Richard Gill.
That is Product_integrals_curly.pdf.
For the reminder of this update I only would
like to repeat the shortest possible advertisement for 3D complex
numbers. One way or the other it is fantastic to observe the most
weird things in our universe behave like the set of not-invertible
Professional math people always avoid such
stuff and always instantly go to things they call 'fields'. In a
finite dimensional field there is only one element (or number)
that is not invertible and that is the zero.
Why they do that is unknown to me, after all
if you need some math for example for quantum physics, all that
field stuff is rather weird math to apply.
It is like making a car with only square parts while everybody
knows square wheels give a bad ride all of the time...
This is amazing but the accretion disk is the
tau calculus and those two beams that shoot our perpendicular is
the number alpha. Furthermore with 3D complex numbers you can
craft super-position of 3 independent quantum states.
So from the very small to the largest objects in the universe; the
3D numbers are a perfect fit.
That also explains as why professional math
professors do not talk about it; progress in science without big
bucks is a taboo. Or am I now to negative on those sleaze
Till updates my dear reader.
(10 March 2015) Ha, this is funny; yesterday
a few political shuffles were done. The minister of justice lost
his job because he had told untrue facts to the Dutch parliament
and with that also the deputy of our minister of justice had to
Both are from a political party under the
local name of VVD; in our political landscape these are rightwing
liberals. But I do not care one second about minister Opstelten
that has lost his job; like a lion I will chase minister Kamp from
the economical department because that guy is a total retard when
it comes to our local gas mining problems....
After having said that, the positive news of
today is that after about 175 years of wall to wall stupidity by
math professors I can repair a bit of the damage done by worthless
math professors. That is the item for today.
Item 1) Finally after about 175 years the
result is used as it should be.
Item 1) Finally after
about 175 years the result is used as it should be.
Oh oh, product integration once more but what
If you are a student of math or physics or
chemistry or whatever exact science, you can always ask your math
professor the next simple question:
"Dear professor, you always talk about
those integrals but these integrals only add stuff up. They only
Now is there a way to replace addition with multiplication my dear
Of course the average math professor will
deny in a loud voice that this is not possible except using math techniques
that dumb students will not understand in a thousand
But, ha ha ha, when I found the result of Mr.
Raabe from about 175 years ago (Raabe was a math professor in
those long lost years) I decided to honor his magnificent result.
This 'honor' is the small formulae in the right-down corner of the
Source of the Raabe formulae:
End of this update (but do not forget to slaughter
the career of minister Kamp from the department of economical
affairs, the story simply needs another
(05 March 2015) I finished the update on the
gamma function in 3D. Here
it is or click on the teaser picture from 27 Feb below. Till
(04 March 2015) A short update in Dutch about
our weak and dumb minister of economical affairs Henk Kamp. Here
Item 1) Ja hoor, daar is meneertje slap gelul
Item 1) Ja hoor, daar
is meneertje slap gelul weer.
Eeuwig en altijd moet meneertje slap gelul
weer advies hebben van 'experts'.
Nou ja, eigenlijk ben ik blij dat Henk het zelf nog eens een
keertje zegt want daarmee hebben we direct een fundamenteel bewijs
dat meneertje slap gelul echt helemaal niets van de gaswinning
Anderhalf jaar terug heb ik voorgerekend dat
de Groninger bodem over de volle breedte van ongeveer 900
vierkante kilometer minstens 3 meter zal dalen.
Echter, ik baseerde mijn berekenig op gas dat
dan van 5 kilometer diep zou komen, in werkelijkheid komt het
meeste gas van ongeveer 2600 meter diep en omdat de druk daar maar
de helft is zal het gas veel meer volume innemen.
Dientengevolge zal de totale bodem daling uitkomen op ongeveer 6
meter, maar dat is een gemiddelde omdat het gasveld niet helemaal
Als we rekening houden met de hogere temperatuur op 2600 meter
diepte dan is 6 meter nog te laag geschat...
Nou en als je dan bedenkt wat dat voor
gevolgen heeft voor de dijken, de kanalen, de sluizen etc etc dan
ben ik benieuwd wat de regering zal gaan doen.
Nou ja, helemaal niets; dit jaar nog steeds
ongeveer 40 kubieke kilometer gas en Henk Kamp, randdebiel als hij
blijkbaar is, heeft steeds meer adviezen nodig van steeds meer
Het beste zou zijn, en dat meen ik, dat
iemand Henk gewoon een doodschop geeft zodat wij met een nieuwe
minister van economisch zaken verder kunnen.
Zijn we ook eens van dat slap gelul af...
Kijk in het landschap hier duiken er steeds
meer huizen op die er zo uitzien. En dit is in wezen nog maar het
begin. Maar er zijn meer minkukels dan Kamp; ook het KNMI dat
altijd zegt hoeveel het deze keer weer was op de schaal van
Richter zegt niets over schattingen over de totale bodemdaling.
Waarom dat is weet ik niet; blijkbaar wil
iedereen graag de wiskunde prof uithangen:
laf en zwijgzaam.
Einde van deze update; till updates.
(27 Feb 2015) Oh oh, why did I do that?
Item 1) Oops I broke the math embargo!
Item 1) Oops I broke
the math embargo!
A few days back I finished a nine page long
update under the title Punishment
for funny math professors but on page 10 I more or less
started bragging that I think that a particular set of zero's is
also found in 3D.
May be you have never heard of it; but it is
more or less the most famous problem in mathematics. It is easy to
understand and hopeless to prove.
It is called the Riemann conjecture (things that are unproven are
often called conjectures).
Well I did it myself, just like a few weeks
back I accidentally broke the beer glass I have been using on a
daily basis for over 35 years...
Anyway one thing leads to another and I had
to post even two appendices to comment on why I think that stuff
on the Riemann hypothesis.
But ok, I did it myself so I won't complain;
I should have thought twice because of course I want to keep my
advantage at the worldwide mathematical community as large as
This week I finished a short piece on the so
called gamma function in 3D.
Never heard of the gamma function? Here is a
good starter (and take at least one week to let it sink in):
And completely unrelated to the gamma
function but more to math updates before that, a wiki upon Hermann
Günther Grassmann who got his math work completely neglected for
over two decades by incompetent so called 'professional math
Sounds pretty familiar over here. The
difference between Hermann and I is that Hermann lost all interest
in math while I already 25 years back understood I was surrounded
But once you have a good math idea,
regardless of the incompetent math professors, these days we still
have Hermann's optical law:
Ok, end of this update & as usual: till
(21 Feb 2015) According to the theory of
quantum physics, for a short time nature can borrow a bit of
energy and create a particle with that. The heavier the particle,
the more energy has to be borrowed and the shorter the particle
Item 1) Punishment for funny math
Punishment for funny math professors.
That process of particles jumping in and out
of existence bears a great similarity with how the brains of math
professors work; but instead of borrowing energy the brains of
math professors borrow consciousness and they use that to craft
So inside the brain of math professors, all
the time mathematical ideas pop in and out of existence. If a
mathematical idea is relatively complicated, it will survive only
a very short time.
Sometimes, and this is a very seldom thing, the mathematical idea
get stored into the memory of the brain of a math professor;
although the original idea has popped out of existence, a copy of
that idea is stored in the memory.
A lot is known about the brains of math
professors; for example it is flat and squared and very small;
just a few millimeters across. Biologists have a theory that says
the brain of math professors is flat because of the use of 2D
complex numbers and that the use of 2D complex numbers also
explains as why the brains of math professors have stopped
evolving so very long ago.
If you cut the skull of a math professor open
with an axe, precisely in the middle of the head you can find that
tiny tiny brain. Under the microscope it looks something like
The white parts is where a math idea has
popped out of existence and the shadowy parts is where with the
help of borrowed conscience a mathematical idea has popped into
Sometimes an idea gets stored in the memory
of the brains of that particular math professor; for example the
idea that you can take the cross product of a scalar and a 3D
vector could, in theory anyway, get stored into the memory.
If that happens, the brain of the math
professor will look like this:
It is well known that math professors always
write publications but why they do that is less well understood.
Ok, we can infer from this activity that math professors can
actually read and write, but why they write stuff nobody else
wants to read is unknown.
Biologists think that writing so called
publications has to do with territorial instincts and that writing
publications is a way of marking off the particular
But the problem with that is just like dogs that when they take a
shit, they align themselves with the earth magnetic field. From
that we can infer that dogs have a biological compass but we do
not know why dogs align to the earth magnetic field while taking a
Anyway to make a long story short: If a
professional professor in math publishes something that was stored
in the memory, it looks something like this:
Now serious: What is the punishment for the
Nottingham math professors?
In a few days time I will update about 10 new
pages with more or less the net content:
1) The cross product in 3D and 4D.
2) In 3D and 5D we form pairs of imaginary
numbers that imitate the number i from the complex plane.
The punishment is as next:
The Nottingham professors must investigate if in 3D there are
non-trivial zero's of the famous Riemann zeta function.
And the Youtube video from the channel
Numberphile that started it all (once more):
End of this update. Till updates.
(13 Feb 2015) Today I finished updating the
electricity update and because it is now the year 2015 I opened page
3 from the primer on three dimensional complex numbers.
Item 1) Three phase electricity and three
dimensional circular numbers.
Item 1) Three phase
electricity and three dimensional circular numbers.
This update contains no new math, on the
contrary: the goal is to illustrate that you can use higher
dimensional complex & circular in any way you like.
For example the most difficult math I used
was only this:
In another development today when I rode my
bicycle a bit around the local landscape, I suddenly realized that
these math professors from Nottingham are completely wrong.
Look in the previous update from yesterday
for the details, but you can easily in three dimensions cross a
scalar with a vector.
Once more we observe how dumb all those math
professors become when they year in year out refuse to study
higher dimensional complex numbers. In a few months time I have
published about the stuff for 3 full years.
From that relatively long timespan you can
deduce how smart those people from the universities really
(12 Feb 2015) The UK based university of
Nottingham has a nice channel named Numberphile on Youtube; on a
regular basis they post videos for a wider audience. \\
In general it is very nice but lately I came
across a horrible video where these evil monsters poked fun at my
3D number systems...
This cannot be, I will protect my little baby numbers with all my
Item 1) Punishment for funny math professors.
Item 1) Punishment
for funny math professors.
First look at the root source of all evil in
The accumulation of pure evil is at about 5
mins into the video.
Ok ok, may be it is not pure evil but total ignorance.
And we must never forget what Jesus said:
Blessed are those with the simple minds.
So the Nottingham university professors are,
just like the professors here in Groningen, extremely blessed!
What more could they wish for?
Ok ok, let me give the Nottingham people a
In the first problem, one of the factors is (x + y + z) so if you
factor that out from
x^3 + y^3 + z^3 - 3xyz you can prove it is zero.
For the second problem I do not know any
method that does not use 3D numbers...
Or, may be it is just the same as (x + y + z)^3.
(Yes, that is true but the expression itself comes from the third
power of a 3D number.)
That's it for this update, till
(09 Feb 2015) Today I finished a small 6 to 7
page long piece on 3 phase electricity using 3D complex or
circular numbers. And I am considering publishing it because:
1) It contains no new math &
2) It is important to show you can use these higher dimensional
numbers in all sciences that use advanced mathematics.
There is absolutely no reason to stick to the
complex plane only (like the weird behaving professional math
Yet today's update is the smallest
advertisement possible for 3D complex numbers:
Item 1) A math model for black holes.
Item 1) A math model
for black holes.
The 'math model' is as simple as possible:
Take the 3D complex or the circular numbers, use the set of
non-invertible numbers to mimic the accreditation disk and the
beams going out.
It looks like this:
End of the advertisement.
Yeah yeah, there will be no mercy for the
incompetent so called 'professional' professors from the science
The way black holes are structured is exactly
the same as non-invertible numbers in three dimensions...
The similarities are striking: mass that gets
sucked in to the accreditation disk is indeed 'no longer
invertible' and the other way around:
Once you are on the main axis of invertible numbers (the multiples
of the number alpha), you will never leave that axis.
(The last statement is not true when you can
use addition, for example 1 + alpha is perfectly invertible. But
let me spare you the technical side of stuff; all in all these
black holes look just like the space of non-invertibles...)
End of this update, till updates.
(08 Feb 2015) A small update on quantum
mechanics because after all those people from the overpaid math
professors at the universities can only add up two quantum states
into a so called superposition of independent quantum
Once more I say that for three quantum states
you need 3D complex numbers...
Item 1) Roger Penrose on Schrödingers cat
and stuff like that.
Item 1) Roger Penrose
on Schrödingers cat and stuff like that.
In a relatively old Youtube vid from the year
2003 I found Roger Penrose using a so called overhead projector.
Teens very likely have not seen much overhead projectors but the
origin goes back to the cave people who sitting in their cave at
night used the light from the wood fire to project shadows on the
Ok, when it comes to the so called
superposition of quantum states, the math is hard.
With 2D numbers from the complex plane you can only add two of
such quantum states.
And there is that stuff known as 'phase
shift' that says you can in a continuous way shift from one state
into the other (as long as there is no observer from the
macroscopic world watching).
But Roger knows his stuff, here is a
screenshot from that 2003 video, at about 11 min 36 seconds Roger
shows this overhead projection to the audience:
Do you see the w and z?
You see Roger has put them perpendicular
because the two quantum states are independent. And that is where
the present day science of quantum mechanics run into serious
They cannot superposition more than two
quantum states because they only use 2D complex numbers...
Roger Penrose on Quantum Mechanics and Schrodinger's cat
End of this update, till updates.
(04 Feb 2015) A small food update that might
explain a little bit why the brains of humans are so large
compared to the other apes.
Item 1) What happened to gene MYH16?
Item 1) What happened
to gene MYH16?
Often it is stated that chimpanzees are our
closest relative in the animal kingdom; and indeed we share a very
large pool of identical genes. But why are the brains of chimps so
small compared to the apes named humans?
Is that because our jaw muscles are so weak
that for example your brain can grow and grow until you are an
adult? (The weak jaw muscles allow your skull to be much more
loose, this in contrast to chimps that do not have this
Brain size of a chimp is at most something
like half a liter while human brains are about three times as
large. That's a big time difference...
(But sperm whales seem to have the largest brains, about 8 kg or
five times the human brain. Beside actual brain size you also have
to take into account the ratio between brain size and body size
because a large body needs more brain to control it.)
Now a long long time ago people started
cooking their food to the extent that at present day people can no
longer eat raw meat like the meat from cows or so.
And that seems to be related to gene
In addition, the scientists discovered that mutations deactivated the gene MYH16, which is linked to jaw muscles, after the ancestors of chimpanzees and hominins diverged, but before the ancestors of modern humans split from those of Neanderthals and Denisovans. This may explain why modern and extinct human lineages have relatively weak jaw muscles compared with ape relatives such as chimpanzees. The researchers suggested that this gene loss may have occurred after the development of cooking, which can make food easier to eat, lessening the need for stronger jaw muscles.
Comment: If true, cooking food allows for the
gene MYH16 to get razed from the gene pool allowing for bigger
brains while at the same time you need some brains to get the fire
going... If you look at humanity today, I think it is all
Source: Different Tastes: How Our Human Ancestors' Diets Evolved
So that explains a little bit why we eat the
food we do, only that bread keeps on going to be a strange thing.
But all animal species will have their own blind spot when it
comes to food, after all nature wants you to die as soon as
possible so nature can proceed with her experiments on
End of this update.
(30 Jan 2015) Yesterday I hang a short pdf
file in this website about so called Clifford algebras. Clifford
algebras are famous because of their role in the science of
Embargo considerations: I have done a lot of
work lately, so you can be assured that these new Clifford
algebras fall deep behind the 10% threshold of new stuff
Item 1) A teaser picture for some cheap math
with two fingers in the nose written.
Item 1) A teaser
picture for some cheap math with two fingers in the nose
Yes, let's not do difficult: Any mathematical
lightweight human could write cheap stuff like this. So for me it
was important to show that I can be just a non-performer of math
just like the professional math professors are.
All these precious professional professors do
is producing pseudo science, and miracle miracle they get
boatloads of money for that pseudo science.
Now, I can make pseudo science too...
Don't believe me?
Just click on the next picture and you will
know that whatever the future of humans will bring, it is
End of this update, but once more I am glad I
can write useless knowledge too...
(23 Jan 2015) A short update on the European
Central Bank new policy of buying 60 billion € a month in
Item 1) Has the ECB gone bonkers?
Item 1) Has the ECB
I did not see the press conference today but
in the intro ECB prez Mario Draghi clearly stated that as far as
the ECB is concerned, they will lay the foundation for future
Mario clearly stated that without political
help like transforming your economy this massive bond buying
program will not work.
Furthermore, and that is very important, if
government bonds are bought, 80% of the risk goes to the local
Central Bank of that country and 20% will rest on the shoulders of
What can I say?
Not much; I think that this all is not going
to work because the problem countries like France and Italy will
never ever make the changes needed.
Politics in countries is never driven by
economical or mathematical insights, most of it is only local
As we observe on inspection; an unemployment
rate of 25% in Spain does not trigger any political reform at
But as a mathematical dynamic system it will
be funny to observe local Central Bank pump up their balances with
local government bonds.... What will happen to future losses on
those local Central Bank balances?
The USA & the Japs are already in dire straits...
When will debt huggers learn the math?
End of this update, till updates.
(17 Jan 2015) A small math update with one of
those 'numerical proofs'.
Of course these are not real proofs, but anyway.
I respect the embargo because time in and again I have stated the
determinants of exponential circles & curves is 1. So there is
nothing new under the sun...
Item 1) Don't worry; there is nothing new
under the sun.
Item 1) Don't worry;
there is nothing new under the sun.
One picture with some words in it:
The 'animated drawing' applet can be found
End of this update, till updates.
(14 Jan 2015) Finally I printed it all out;
225 pages printed while on this website only about 140 pages of
math around higher dimensional complex numbers are found...
So the embargo is gathering some beef; a lot
of stuff will never get published.
Item 1) The publication embargo is gathering
Item 1) The
publication embargo is gathering beef.
Finally on the last day of the year 2014 I
went to the printing shop and printed it all out.
And for only 12 € I had the very first version in my hands,
although I had written it all myself even for me it was more or
less impressing what is inside it.
The 225 page long pdf print contains only one
picture, in the 140 pages on this website a whole lot of pictures
from outside sources are included. So I am very satisfied with how
the boycott of new results is going.
This is how it looks in print, just 12 €
and it will be the only copy forever.
Yeah, only one copy forever.
After all the professional math professors do
their thing and I know from experience that if you want to find
better math you avoid these people like they have the pest.
And they have the pest, they can only do 2D
End of this update, till
(12 Jan 2015) This is a small math update in
the Dutch language; the accountancy firm Deloitte is arguing for
more investments into the math departments of the Dutch universities.
Needless to say I am against giving more money to people that have
a solid track record of being incompetent to the bone.
Even if you give them boatloads of math for
free, they do not respond.
So will giving them much more money be good for the Dutch economy
in the long run?
Here is the item in the Dutch language:
Item 1) Volgens Deloitte is wiskunde goed
voor 160 miljard per jaar.
Item 1) Volgens
Deloitte is wiskunde goed voor 160 miljard per jaar.
Om de gedachten even scherp te zetten is het
verstandig om eerst de advertentie van Deloitte lezen want alle
details die erin zitten lijken op het eerste gezicht logisch.
Dus hier is de link naar de advertentie van
Wiskunde nodig om arbeidsmarkt te redden
Wiskunde verdient jaarlijks 160 miljard voor Nederland BV
Ik zal niet ontkennen dat met het juiste
gebruik van wiskund de economishe groei voor vele decennia
gewaarbgorgd is, maar dan moet je wel een zootje competente
wiskundigen klaar hebben staan natuurlijk.
Vergelijk het met een pan perfecte soep: Als
in die pan soep ongeveer 10 gram zout nodig is om de smaak en
voedingswaarde perfect te krijgen, kun je dan zeggen
"Tien gram zout geeft een pan gezonde
Dat is onzin omdat behalve het zout je
allerlei andere grondstoffen nodig hebt.
Laat ik een ander voorbeeld geven:
Een belangrijk deel van de huidige wiskunde
is gebaseerd op het gebruik van complexe getallen uit het complexe
vlak. En een belangrijk deel van onze economie is gebaseerd op
inzichten daaruit, bijv electriciteit.
Nou komt er een wiskunde student voorbij die
vertelt hoe je vanuit dat complexe vlak naar de hogere dimensies
kunt gaan en wat denk je dat die professor mafketels doen?
Nul komma niks.
En deze wiskunde is op termijn veel meer
waard dan 160 miljard per jaar.
Conclusie: Omdat in de jaren 1990 - 1992 de
wiskunde professoren al veel te veel geld kregen voor hun
prestaties waren ze veel te veel met geld bezig.
Laat je ze wiskunde zien dat echt een beetje
helpt, dan zien ze de lange termijn waarde niet want ze zijn bezig
met hun geldje enzo.
Daarom is mijn advies veel minder geld naar
die mafketels van die belastinggeld betaalde wiskunde professoren...
End of this update & till
(09 Jan 2015) Ha ha, do you think I would
comment on the terror attack in Paris?
Come on, only twelve people dead. No time
will be wasted on that.
This is a food update and I would like to
give my well meant compliments to the USA based Food & Drug
Item 1) The FDA bans all use of trans fats in
Item 1) The FDA bans
all use of trans fats in food products.
Now what are trans fats? That is very simple:
to normal fats there are extra hydrogen added in the 'trans way'.
That makes these fats much more stable and prolongs the shelf life
of food products where trans fats are added to.
But very likely, because the shelf live is
larger, your body has all kinds of troubles with digesting
Just a few examples: Doritos potato chips or
the halverine spread for your bread contains a lot of trans fats.
Therefore after five years if you open your healthy halverine
spread or after 50 years you open your healthy Dorito potato
chips, it is still perfectly edible.
Since it is my opinion that you should avoid
eating stuff your body cannot digest, it is not unwise to avoid
processed food that contains trans fats.
So I was flabbergasted to observe the USA
based FDA banning all use of trans fats anyway.
In the meantime we have about 30 million
Americans that have diabetes type two, that is about 10% of the
entire population. And that relates to hundreds of extra amputees
for the lower of the patients legs day in day out.
If you compare that to the weird stuff
related to the Paris attack, who is the crazy one?
Day in day out the food kills, it starts at
End of this update.
07 Jan 2015) A short food update upon
havermout or as it is known in the English language, the
Item 1) Feed the kids oatmeal, not bread, and
they will live longer.
Item 1) Feed the kids
oatmeal, not bread, and they will live longer.
This is a very simplistic title because our
bodies have thousands of genes containing the information for
producing specific proteins to build your body. So in theory there
can be many food allergies because of your genetic constellation
but in practice a lot of food allergies and/or food intolerances
are related to dangerous grains like wheat.
Oatmeal does not fall in the category that
shortens your lifespan without reason.
The other grains always interfere with your
blood sugar levels in a way that only makes your body gain more
and more fat while you cannot burn your fat away even if you
The grains are unwise food, but when you are young you don't drop
dead from it.
For myself speaking I classify oatmeal as a
fast food because I consume it with milk and a little bit of
sugar. And indeed since it is a fast food you can run faster or
get a higher average speed on your bicycle.
But oatmeal is much more safe because you do not gain weight from
eating it, contrary to bread, wheat, corn & the likes, the
fast food dimension is much more related to the milk and the five
grams of refined sugar that comes with it.
What about milk?
My body processes milk perfectly, but for most of humanity this is
not the case.
Now why should oatmeal be an allowed food?
Make up your own mind, I did not read the fine details but the
Bowl of Oatmeal a Day May Be Key to a Longer Life, Major Study Finds
In case you want to know why oatmeal is not a
Very simple: It does not break down into sugars within a few
minutes after passing your stomach & entering your
(28 Dec 2014) A short math update in the so
called 'Gauss style'.
Item 1) A short math update in the so called
Item 1) A short math
update in the so called 'Gauss style'.
After Euler the Gauss guy is definitely on my
shortlist of good guys.
A major reason for this is that it is estimated that because Gauss
never published a lot of work the whole of science was set back by
something like 50 years.
I think that is a rubbish estimate, would
Gauss have published in time because of the sheer incompetence of
other professional math professors, science would also be set back
for 50 years.
So Gauss was completely in the right with his
'few but ripe' policy of publicizing things.
After having said that, there are also strong
differences between me and Gauss. For example I usually think that
transparency is very important and that costs me an awful lot of
time to get it right.
For example the proof that in 3D the
exponential circles are indeed flat circles; outlining the proof
was about 25 to 30 seconds. Writing it all down and hitting the
button named 'publish website' is like 6 to 8 hours of work.
People often complained that Gauss lacked
transparency, he just stated results.
Gauss compared it to for example the restoration of a building;
all the time there is all that scaffolding around and when it is
finished the scaffolding is removed.
So today, with a little smile on my face, the
embargo forces me to not publish the 100% transparent pages and
only the end result.
It is a bit like going 'Gauss style'. Here is
the end result:
So my dear professional professors, can you
prove with your own theories if this is true or not?
Let's leave it with this, till updates. Updated
on 05 Jan 2015:
Ok, let's hope that at least a few amongst
you have wondered what the hell the 'A' is in
A = B and A = C implies B = C.
Well that is in the picture below: It is the first coordinate
function from the exponential circle, but it is run at 3 times the
You can break down the formulae with the
sin(9x)/(3sin(3x)) using the de Moivre formulae in the complex
plane, that gives the B.
You can also do this in the three dimensional complex numbers,
that gives the C.
Because it does not matter what kind of
complex numbers you use (the 2D complex plane or the 3D complex
space) this indicates that my way of generalizing the complex
plane to all higher dimensions is indeed valid.
Not that the mathematical 'professionals' are
interested, those people are so incompetent they cannot even
distinguish between a left and a right shoe or so...
But for me this is important because the higher dimensional number
systems are not some freak show but the only way to generalize the
And what the professional professors think or
say is 100% irrelevant.
By the way; I wish you a happy new year &
(26 Dec 2014) This is a short food update in
the Dutch language.
Item 1) Daar zijn die imbicielen weer van het
Item 1) Daar zijn die
imbicielen weer van het Voedingscentrum.
Ach tja 'eerlijk over voedsel' en dan zo'n
dike laag aan nonsense gaat mij te ver.
Het kan dus wel tweede kerstdag zijn maar ik wil even kort ageren
tegen die idioten genaamd Eddy Zoëy en een snol genaamd Jenneke
Zij geven voorlichting over het gluten in
brood op de website van het Voedingscentrum.
Nou ik wil kort zijn maar ze hebben in hun
update bij het voedingscentrum maar één detail echt goed:
Als er meer gluten in het brooddeeg zit dan
is het soepeler en meer elastisch.
Al het andere, daar klopt nul komma niets
Lees die rotzooi eerst maar eens door:
zijn slecht voor me denk ik
Niks maar dan ook niks klopt van deze vreemde
bizarre denkwereld; hooguit 1% gaat extra vroeg dood als ze brood
blijven eten vanwege koeliakki?
Snapt snol Jenneke & pooier Eddy wel
waarom zoveel mensen rugklachten hebben?
Ok ok, van een auto ongeluk kan je ook
Maar alleen als je dat gezonde brood eet dag
in dag uit blijven die rugklachten bij je voor de rest van je
En al die omatjes die een nieuwe heup moeten
hebben? Allemaal broodeters.
Ga je naar de dokter met gewrichts klachten
en je vraagt: Heb ik misschien reuma?
Dokter zegt: Nee hoor, reuma begint bij je handen en polsen.
Maar waarom kan ik mijn teen niet meer bewegen dokter? Het
gewricht is stuk!
Dokter zegt: Geen idee.
Laten we het daarbij houden, maar heb je
regelmatig last van je gewrichten dan zal alleen een wiskunde
professor niet proberen om gewoon eens een tijdje te stoppen met
brood en al die andere tarwe producten...
Tot opdatums, till updates.
(21 Dec 2014) Because in a few days time I
will have a new computer I thought why not upgrade my math type
setting stuff to the present Miktex2.9?
Of course I had to prove it once more:
On my computer it is impossible to include pictures in your math
To my surprise a true miracle happened: Not
only after a few faults I was able to get one picture on a correct
spot, on top of that even after making a pdf from it the output
still looked the same!
That sure was a miracle & that is item
number one for today:
Item 1) The Christmas miracle is there!
Item 1) The Christmas
miracle is there!
It is unbelievable but all those years in the
past it was always the so called 'encapsulated postscript' or the
eps extension that never worked. Jpg pictures worked better but
also too unreliable.
And now suddenly at least one picture is in
the correct place, in the meantime I also discovered a new species
of math professors:
It is a true miracle; not only is the picture
placed there where it is supposed to be (at the top of my 222 page
long main article). But also this new species of math professors
are looking very high IQ compared to the human variant that is
only wasting tax payer money.
I am humming with satisfaction...
Now why did I go to that website
That is because I was looking at one of those
video's that try to popularize quantum mechanics and I stumbled on
a nice vid from the Imperial College London where they use alcohol
to visualize muons in public places. And that too is a
Quantum theory: it's unreal
Many aspect of quantum physics look unreal,
for example that entanglement stuff where is there is large
spatial separation between entangled particles a measurement of
the one rams the other particle into the same quantum state.
Anyway, that is what they claim that happens
over and over again but I have never done such experiments
End of this update.
(16 Dec 2014) What did Hamilton do wrong when crafting the four dimensional
After all he tried to find 3D complex
Hamilton did about everything fault in trying to find 3D complex
numbers, in this short update of 3 pages we analyze from what
wrong assumptions he reasoned.
Click on the next picture to land on those 3
Further reading: Quaternion
End of this update.
(15 Dec 2014) This is a food update, we are
pondering the question if all calories are born equal. So the zero
hypothesis is that all calories are equal and it does not matter
what food you eat against the alternative that some kinds of food
are so that you will overeat & that you will die far to
Item 1) Are all food calories born
Item 1) Are all food
calories born equal?
Of course not all food calories are born
equal, after all my own father died when he was only 67 years of
age and with what I know now it was the bread and the wheat that
killed him prematurely.
I will not repeat the faults my parents made
so for me it is simple: If I die beyond the age of about 72 years,
in that case I stopped eating bread in time.
And compared to my previous generation, I
will have lived about five years longer.
Now are all food calories born equal?
Suppose there is food out that if you eat it,
your body will refuse to burn fat but you are not aware of
Does such food exist?
Yes, your puffy fluffy bread is such a
If you eat bread (or other food with all that high sugar index
stuff), after getting satisfaction for your calorie need, your
body refuses to burn fat.
Don't believe me?
Here is a simple graph of my own body weight,
all the time when I was eating bread I could not go below 88 kilo
of body mass. Even if on my bicycle I ride 500 kilometers week in
week out, my body refused to go below 88 kilo of body
Are all food calories born equal?
No they are not; in the next picture you see
my own body weight and you must know I came down from weighing an
amazing 109 kilo.
But I was not able to go below 88 kilo, still
staying in dangerous BMI index ranges.
Only with simply skipping bread I was able to
make it to what my goals actually were.
And now, every week again and again I have to
buy a few bags of nuts and overeat on my own terms.
And not on the terms of the food
End of this update, till updates.
(09 Dec 2014) A few updates back I joked a
bit like the entire of humanity need at least 265 years to find
only one exponential circle while I, Reinko, now publishes 10
So on my own I did about 2600 years of average mathematical
Now can I improve on those 2600 years?
Yes I can; there is a formulae from Abraham de Moivre that even
predates the first exponential circle as found by Leonhard Euler.
But during the last centuries professional math professors have
found two more, so until now they had only 3 of them.
Well, with every exponential circle/curve you
also have these Moivre formulaes.
I won't write them all out.
It is reasonable to add about 900 years improvement to the 2600
years, that gives a total of about 3500 years... ;)
Item 1) Abraham de Moivre formulae, 3D
Item 1) Abraham de
Moivre formulae, 3D version.
In case you do not know what the Moivre
formulae is, please study the next page first:
De Moivre's formula
From the historical point of view this Moivre
formulae is very important, for us living in the century number 21
it is hard to judge if Euler would have found the very first
exponential circle if he would have no knowledge at all about the
But history is not a repeatable process, we
can only guess and that's it.
In three dimensions I took the circular
multiplication and looked for the most simple Abraham de Moivre
formulae I could think of. Of course that would be the square of
the three coordinate functions of the exponential circle in 3D.
I made two versions of it, this is not an
official publication or so nor are they 'teaser pictures' for
impending publications. One way or the other; I have to obey the
embargo years until the university people finally start acting
And that my dear reader, could take a long
The two versions are precisely the same in
mathematical content, only the background is different. The first
one is named kitsch & the second has the name normal.
Here they are, this is the kitsch version
And precisely the same without any kitsch
parquet in it:
Don't forget: This is the most simple version
of de Moivre formulas it you leave the two dimensional complex
Let's leave it with that.
(05 Dec 2014) Another detail of the Direchlet
kernel in five dimensions, a small numerical proof from a detail
of the sphere-cone equation in 5D.
Item 1) Diving in 5D with help of the
Item 1) Diving in 5D
with help of the Dirichlet kernel.
Ha ha, never in my life I would have thought
this Dirichlet kernel would carry so much importance, but for the
time being I am humming with satisfaction because it looks like
this particular kernel fits a lot of exponential circles &
To be a bit more precise: They give me the
actual coordinate functions & and together with a little bit
of Floris Takens time delay musings it looks like I have found a
very good yet partial description of at least my theory
until dimension number five...
Today only a small numerical detail, of
course the math embargo is still out and until those weirdo's from
the local university here in Groningen act starting doing normal
the math embargo will be lifted.
Anyway, here is the numerical detail:
Never ever in my life I wrote an expression
so long that only says it is zero all of the time. All that sinus
stuff is only implementing the time delay from Floris while Reinko
says it should be zero.
Here is the numerical expression:
f_0 * f_1 + f_1 * f_2 + f_2 * f_3 + f_3
* f_4 + f_4 * f_0 =
Ha ha, anybody sees instantly this has to be
zero... Or not?
(03 Dec 2014) Correction: I wrote Diriclet in
the previous update where it should have been Dirichlet... Sorry
Now we have only one day of lifting the math
publication embargo with this Dirichlet stuff, why not dive in a
Item 1) Diving in 5D with the Dirichlet
Item 1) Diving in 5D
with the Dirichlet kernel.
To put it simple:
Now I understand the usage of the modified
Dirichlet kernel a little bit, computer proof that the sum of
squares of the coordinate functions equals 1 is easy
Just like the fact that the sum of the coordinates is also
Ha ha ha, this time around there is no mercy
for the weird behavior of the local math professors here in
Groningen: I applied just a little bit of Florens Takens time
delay & as usual year in year out you will act like the
weirdo's you are.
But let's skip the emotional parts of my
brain & dive into the good cognitive parts.
The numerical parts of my insights are
easy to harvest, this picture clearly says the sum of squares of
the coordinates equals 1, just like the sum of the coordinates
How to turn this into good math? So not that
stupid computer proof math?
End of this update, till updates.
(29 Nov 2014) Ok ok, today I am in a good
mood so for one day the math embargo & boycott is
neglected. But it is only for one day...
Item 1) Holy shit; are coordinate functions
actually Dirichlet kernels? Why?
Item 1) Holy shit;
are coordinate functions actually Dirichlet kernels? Why?
Today I am in a good mood so I throw in an
open problem I cannot solve myself.
I do not have any kind of proof for it, but lots of times the
coordinate functions of exponential curves and stuff are a simple
transformation of the so called Diriclet kernel from Fourier
Why this is, I do not know.
Takens' theorem in action for the Lorenz chaotic attractor
Let's leave it with that, till updates.
(26 Nov 2014) I finished turning the math
text into 19 jpg pictures, so today the stuff can be published.
Take your time, do not try to understand all 19 pages in one
Item 1) Ten exponential circles and curves.
Item 1) Ten
exponential circles and curves.
Again, do absolutely not try to grasp
After all, it took me about one and a half year...
(25 Nov 2014) Today I finished turning the
impending update on exponential circles & curves into
internet-digestible jpg pictures; 19 of them.
So before I hang these 19 pictures in this
website, the last teaser picture is there.
And that is the only item of today:
Item 1) The last teaser picture.
Item 1) The last
This is the last teaser picture and in it I challenge
all those dumb so called 'professional math professors' that think
higher dimensional complex numbers do not exist.
How much more fundamental proof do you need
to understand humans are only a branch of primates, always having
a bad brain day and never ever we are echo's of God.
By the way, that goes for me too...
But here is the last teaser
before the hard math will strike in a few days of time.
End of this update, till updates.
(22 Nov 2014) The last years I always have
problems with the telephone; people who are supposed to contact me
cannot get through.
I have accepted that as a fact of life; you
might know I am not satisfied with math professors, but believe
me: compared to math professors the real utter slime is police
forces and stuff. Lately there are also more and more internet connection
problems, for example I cannot even download a small 3,1 MB
file from a company named Microsoft.
And that is where I draw a line in the sand,
the rest of this update is in the Dutch language.
Item 1) Waarom doet dat internet zo gek?
Item 1) Waarom doet dat
internet zo gek?
Kijk dat mijn telefoon afgetapt wordt door
die achterlijke politie, dat is iets waar ik al vele jaren mee
weet te leven. Bovendien is er ook nog zoiets als fiets en met
fiets kan je gewoon een handgeschrven briefje ergens heen brengen
als dat nodig is zonder telefoon te gebruiken.
Telefoon aftap is altijd makkelijk te
begrijpen; er zijn altijd veel te veel van die enorm rare fouten.
Bijv: Familielid maakt telefoontje, gesprek
is afgelopen en familielid hangt op.
Daarna gaat de telefoon dan 1 keer over.
Maak ik zelf telefoon gesprek en ik hang op,
dan nooit gaat ie nog 1 keer over.
En dat gaat dan rustig een maand of drie door
totdat ik er iets van zeg op deze webpagina... En verhelpen ze de
Conclusie: Achterlijke politie die op 21
oktober 2001 begon met mij te stalken is mijn telefoonlijn aan het
Recent in het jaar 2014 zijn er weer allerlei
telefoon problemen en omdat de laatste jaren onze minister Ronald
Plasterk constant staat te beweren in het parlement dat zoiets
altijd gaat met een ministeriële handtekening, heb ik een
probleem met Ronald.
Maar ook met Opstelten want die gaat over de politie enzo.
Kan dit soort van onzin eindelijk eens
Als je wat wilt weten gebruik dan de methode
genaamd 'deurbel' ipv altijd dat laffe gedoe als telefoon taps en
aanverwant laf gedrag...
Geloof je me niet dat het internet enorm raar
Hier is een eenvoudig screenshot bewijs dat ik niet eens 3 MB van
Microsoft kan downloaden:
Omdat onze mooie Ronald altijd van die mooie
kletspraatjes heeft in het parlement en omdat de AIVD onder zijn
bevoegdheid valt kan ik maar één ding zeggen tegen deze
Sterf Ronald Plasterk, STERF!!!
Maar goed, het kan ook een Opstelten probleem
Laten we het daarbij houden. Tot opdatums.
(19 Nov 2014) Today I finally finished my oversight
of exponential circles and curves. I restricted it to 10 because
otherwise I would clearly break my own embargo that
Only 10 to 20% of new results will be
published until those crazy math professors finally will act in an
adult way and not like inside the sandpit where small children
Item 1) The last teaser picture for the
exponential circles & curves.
Item 1) The last
teaser picture for the exponential circles & curves.
End of this update, till updates.
(16 Nov 2014) About one year ago on 08 Nov
2013 I wrote an update on 17-dimensional exponential circles. Now
ha ha ha , they do not exist at all.
So I crafted a small correction on that
particular update from about one year ago & that is the item
Item 1) Naming and shaming incompetent math
Item 1) Naming and
shaming incompetent math professors.
Yeah yeah Marius, you said it yourself:
Equations of Diophantus are more
So bye bye professor number one...
End of the start of the slaughter of math
(12 Nov 2014) From the previous update we had
an open problem; the solution to that open problem will be given
and a new open problem emerges.
Ha ha ha, that new problem is not easy to solve in six days or
Item 1) Leonhard Euler saves the day.
Item 1) Leonhard
Euler saves the day.
Ok, I did not set this up because when
writing an oversight of all inns and outs of exponential circles
and curves in low dimensions I finally had to tackle this
Let's not do difficult, the solution to the
open math problem lies in understanding projections & also
understanding as why in quantum mechanics all measurements are
So here is my solution to my open problem
from six days ago:
The last question is very philosophical.
(06 Nov 2014) One item with a mathematical
challenge to the entire global math community. I want a brain
proof done by a human brain without the use of a
Item 1) Musings on an open problem.
Item 1) Musings on
an open problem.
It has to be true because if not all my other
math work on higher dimensional complex numbers will come crashing
down hard and after that I would feel the need to commit suicide
or start eating bread again.
But leaving jokes aside, why is the next
problem that you see in the jpg picture below so hard to crack? My
brain cannot prove it with just my brain & a bit of old
fashioned paper & pencil.
An internet applet for the exponential matrix
gives (of course) the correct answer, but I refuse to bow for the
wisdom of machines. I just want to understand the math with my own
few pounds of human brain tissue...
The number 1.047198 you see is of course pi
divided by 3.
So this is the open problem:
How do you, as a human with only paper &
pencil, go from the 'entered square matrix' to the result?
Ok, every day I am making a little bit of
progress into my oversight of exponential curves and exponential
But this detail is still not solved in full
order for a human mind...
End of this update, till updates.
(04 Nov 2014) A small food item that has some
statistical clues that it is indeed the wrong food that makes you
fat, food like bread that prevents your body from burning fat
Item 1) A trap door function named bread.
Item 1) A trap door
function named bread.
First a small anti bread rant; Why does bread
score so enormously high on the sugar index (the glycemic index)?
Where glucose is indexed at 100 whole wheat bread often scores
ranges like 71 to 74. After all starch is starch isn't it?
Modern bread as baked by the food industry
not only contains elevated levels of gluten that ensures also
whole wheat bread are those puffy sponge like things; the added
amino acid L cystine acts as a gluten enhancer making the gluten
properties even more dominant.
Your bread contains all kinds of small
bubbles, that is the gluten, the starch is (mostly) on the outside
of all these miniscule small bubbles. That means the starch is
smeared out over a large area. Just like your lungs and intestines
have a large area, bread has the same.
So there is also a down to earth simple
mathematical reason why bread is so dangerous for the fluctuations
in blood sugar; a slice of bread has a very large area of chemical
interactions. On top of that the starch in bread breaks very
easily down into sugars.
That's why if you want to eat bread you
better not eat bread at your breakfast but also bake your own
bread. Add some onions and garlic (mix them with a blender with
the water or the milk) and your bread will be much more compact
and the glycemic load will be the same but it's glycemic index
value will be much lower.
To put it simple: bread is a crazy food that
you should not be eating on a daily basis...
Ok, now for those obese females. In an
article in National Geographic they claim obese females have a
lower income compared to thin females and obese males. Now I don't
want to go into any sex oriented discussion, but only quote a very
interesting statistical observation, quote (Nat Geo link):
Shinall’s analysis found, somewhat counter-intuitively, that obese women are more likely to work in physical jobs than other jobs. In fact, the heavier a woman is, the more likely it is that she’ll work in a physical job. (Obese men are also more likely to have physical jobs, but that’s not true for morbidly obese men.)
Comment: There is absolutely nothing 'counter
intuitively' about this; if you eat the wrong kinds of food like
bread or you are even that stupid to drink the Coca Cola, after
that your body refuses to burn fat.
So if you eat the wrong kind of food, this is
how you will look with all those fat rolls that no animal in
nature has. This is the appearance of a typical bread eating
Yet in practice there are huge differences,
my sister grew bigger when she was in her teenage years. I started
gaining weight when I was about 43 or 44 years of age.
The principle of your body not capable of
burning fat is just so important, if you can't burn fat you get
all that hunger and all that hunger makes you eat more, collect more fat etc
In mathematics we call that a trap door
function; it is easy to proceed but extremely hard to get back
where you started from...
Let's leave it with that.
(02 Nov 2014) One math item about a possible
oversight of all exponential circles & exponential curves
found until now.
Item) This oversight might, or might not, be
Item) This oversight
might, or might not, be published here.
Of course I have to take into account these
are the embargo years so only a tiny fraction of valuable results
can be published because of lack of interest from the academia's
One can honestly say: The more money they
have, the more stupid they are.
Let's leave those non-performing people with
that and let's look at a long teaser picture I crafted yesterday.
The only new result is the second five-dimensional exponential
curve that you find at the end of the teaser picture. That is the
only detail from the previous 15 pages that fall under the
Once the university people finally after 23
or 24 years will start behaving normally, the embargo could be
lifted. But say for yourself: If it is incompetent 23 years on a
row, how likely is it they will do something about it?
It is also important to emphasize that it is
irritating the people from the universities act so cowardly but
the other side of that coin is rather pleasant:
The university people only have their two dimensional complex
numbers & all the higher dimensions are for me.
That is not a situation one should have
fundamental complaints about...
So my dear math professors from the local
university in Groningen, why don't you eat a bit more of that
healthy whole wheat bread? It's good for the brain isn't it?
Till updates. Updated 03 Nov with an
example that the sixth exponential curve indeed produces the basis
vectors in five dimensional space, this was done with the circular
multiplication so j^5 = 1 and basically the basis vectors are also
the roots of unity with respect to five dimensions...
The applet we use is for calculating the
exponential matrix, you can find it on
Ok, let's hope this brings some clarity
inside the strange and weird heads of all those incompetent math
professors that absolutely understand nothing about the higher
dimensional complex numbers...
End of this update within an update.
(31 Oct 2014) Food awareness is still on the
climb here in my home country and that is logical because we want
to avoid all those fatbags rolling around like we have in the USA.
And although it is pretty common knowledge, I want to talk about
the sugar index.
So this is today's food item: The glycemic
index for your blood sugar level.
Item 1) The glycemic index or the sugar
Item 1) The glycemic
index or the sugar index.
The problem with a food named bread is that
your blood sugar index gets so high that if you eat bread your
body cannot burn fat later on. If you are hungry and you beat your
hunger via eating bread, your blood sugar goes from very low to
And your body simply decides to stop burning
Look at all these fat people; even if they do
hard work like a farmer or a brick layer in house building, how
come they are fat while they have all that hard labor going
Very simple: Look at what they eat, they
always eat bread.
And after eating bread and going from hungry
to saturated from bread, your body refuses to burn fat. And if you
cannot burn fat you have to eat more and guess what they eat? More
bread and wheat related products.
If your body cannot burn fat, you might end
up with all kinds of problems.
Like I had for about 30 years: In the middle of the night you wake
up and you have to eat because you are so hungry.
Ok ok, now I have stopped eating bread
sometimes I wake up because I need something to eat. But it is no
longer almost every night...
When I stopped eating bread my nightly eating disorder fades
The glycemic index tries to compare food to
the most sugary stuff around.
The most sugary is of course a difficult
concept because there are so many sugars chemically speaking, but
as far as I known it is measured against the effect of
I do not know if it is actually true, but if
your blood measures one 100 that means one hundred mircrograms of
sugar in 100 ml of blood. Well that is very interesting and it
shows that medical doctors are math non-performers too because
that would amount to 1 gram of glucose for every liter of blood
Again, I do not know if it is true because if
I taste my own blood out of a wound or a cut, it always tastes
In a reasonable world it might be expected
that bread producing industries try to protect their stuff and
launch propaganda affords.
Indeed this is observed, here in my home
country we have brood.net and indeed at brood.net they
explain why such measured of blood sugar reactions on bread are
completely useless and not do-able.
They say: You have to eat four slices of
bread without anything else.
So they cannot perform the test.
This is a lie, but ha ha ha it comes from the
Eggs and butter score extremely low on the
sugar index, so with just some eggs and butter you could get a
reliable score. But my home country bread industry does not want
to know it.
The above link is in the Dutch language, I
love it that the bread industry does not like the sugar
Just like those filthy math professors do not
like my math stuff.
Idiots run the place until they no longer
(30 Oct 2014) This day I stumbled on a French
music composer under the name Yann Tiersen. If beside music sung
by sexy chicks every now and then you are also into classical
music, I strongly advise you to Youtube the Yann Tiersen
For the remainder of this update, a small
anti math-establishment rant.
Here we go with just one item:
Item 1) After 23 years we still do not have
the 3D version of the Mandelbrot fractal.
Item 1) After 23 years we still do
not have the 3D version of the Mandelbrot fractal.
Yes, how come that after 23 years there still
is no three dimensional version of the Mandelbrot fractal?
Well that is very simple to understand: when
23 or 24 years ago I discovered the three dimensional complex
numbers all of the math professors here in Groningen were just too
fucking stupid to understand just one iota from that.
Now it is well known that stupidity is a
choice of nature:
If with your level of stupidity you can
survive, nature ensures that you will stay on that level of
stupidity. So the Groninger math professors cannot help it: nature
But as time goes by, for example over two
decades, you might think the professional math professors might
think twice and declare we made some faults back then but higher
dimensional complex numbers are here to stay now they have been
found for real.
Nothing is far more from the present reality:
Sheer incompetence still rules at the math department of the
university here in Groningen. Always that bla bla bla as 'Working
on the borders of human knowledge' but when push comes to shove
the academic society here in Groningen is just another bunch of
Now why do we still not have a 3D Mandelbrot
Do not blame me but put the blame on the math
department of the University of Groningen; They are the ones to
Let's leave it with that.
Source of this update is a person wondering
why we do not have a 3D Mandelbrot set:
(25 Oct 2014) Is our whole-wheat bread
illegal according to our Dutch laws?
This update is in the Dutch language because
the local law is written in Dutch.
Item 1) Voldoet volkorenbrood wel aan de
wettelijke eisen mbt gluten?
Item 1) Voldoet
volkorenbrood wel aan de wettelijke eisen mbt gluten?
Kijk iedereen die wel eens een broodje bakt weet uit ervaring dat als je er allerlei extra spul in gooit zoals bijv tomaten en ui dat het brood dan slechter rijst.
Om toch veel extra ingredienten in je brood te krijgen zodat het iewat gezonder is moet je toch echt je hersens gebruiken om het brood goed te laten rijzen.
Bijv tikkeltje minder zout, beetje meer suiker, iets langer laten rijzen etc etc.
Nou hoe zit dat nu met ons volkorenbrood dat volgens de advertenties zo ontzettend gezond is?
Nou ja, een naief persoon zoals ik gaat gewoon het deeg eens uitwassen om te kijken wat je zoal aan dat gezonde gluten verkrijgt.
En, ha ha ha, er zit veel meer gluten in volkoren deeg.
Waarom is dat? Nou ja, als je wel eens een brood bakt dan weet je dat al die extra dingen in je brood ervoor zorgen dat het slechter rijst.
Maar met meer gluten erin kan je dat compenseren. Het is verboden maar de voedsel inspecteurs in ons land zijn onderdeel van het Ministerie van Landbouw. Dus de voedsel inspecteurs gaan echt niet moeilijk doen over wat gluten gezeik.
In wezen is het probleem veel breder; Geen enkele overheids organisatie controleerd of de ingredienten op de verpakking daadwerkelijk terug gevonden kunnen worden in het voedsel.
En of er missende vermeldingen zijn? Niemand weet het, alleen de fabrikant.
Nou waarom is al ons volkorenbrood illegaal?
Dat staat eenvoudigweg in het Warenwetbesluit Meel en Brood, artikel 16 om precies te zijn,
Het woord 'volkoren' mag onderdeel uitmaken van de aanduiding van een in dit besluit bedoelde waar, voor zover in de aldus aangeduide waar [lees bijvoorbeeld volkorenmeel of volkorenbrood] alle van nature voorkomende bestanddelen van de desbetreffende graansoort in hun natuurlijke verhouding, al dan niet na een bewerking te hebben ondergaan, aanwezig zijn.
Commentaar: Als er echt meer gluten in volkoren brood zit dan in wit brood, dan is dat illegaal. En tja, jaar in jaar uit is volkoren meel altijd veel duurder dan gewone bloem dus de economisch wetten zeggen dat er iets aan het volkoren meel is toegevoegd dat het zoveel duurder maakt...
Bron van het citaat:
Wat staat er over volkoren in de wet?
For the English speaking community:
Rather likely the Dutch whole wheat bread is
illegal by definition of our own Dutch laws. I do not have any
problem with that.
It is like Charles Darwin said:
Nature will separate the idiots from the
slightly less idiots & the slightly less idiots might eat less
bread but will die anyway...
(23 Oct 2014) A small math item and a small
Item 1) 15 pages of five-dimensional complex
numbers that do not get out.
Item 2) The scientific journal Nature believes in 'beer bellies'.
Item 1) 15 pages of
five-dimensional complex numbers that do not get out.
There is good news & there is bad news on
the higher dimensional complex numbers.
The good news is that if for example you make
a Google search on 'three dimensional complex numbers' inside the
'picture search', a picture + a link show up on page number one of the search results.
That is good news because the bad news is
that at all universities on a global scale they still stay numb.
Ok ok, it is not very surprising all those universities stay numb.
Like I said so often: all these professional math professors are
A very important characteristic of an
incompetent person doing a job above his or her capabilities is
that when confronted with the setbacks of their incompetence, they
always blame outside forces for the problems.
In the last 2 to 3 weeks I went on with the
five dimensional complex numbers, I have to say I solved a problem
that I thought would take years and years and years.
But I cannot publish it because that would break my embargo
So unless the math professors change their
weird weird attitude, there will be only void void void & more
On 30 Jan of this year I published the first
stuff on 5D complex numbers, if the incompetent professional math
professors keep on with their routine it will also be the
is page 2 where the 30 Jan update is found.
Item 2) The
scientific journal Nature believes in 'beer bellies'.
On the food front it is amazing how little
people understand about food.
It has to be remarked however that understanding food is the same
as understanding all proteins and all the possible interactions
and compared to higher dimensional stuff of math, the latter is
But beer bellies do not exist.
If a bread eater also consumes beer, most
people contribute the body fat to the beer while it is the bread
that causes all these fatty problems.
Every day you can do the simple statistic testing for yourself in
your local supermarket:
What do fat people buy in your local
On statistical inspection, it is always those
sugar stuff included the wheat sugars.
Let's leave it with that.
Nature.com says in an article:
reveal 'beer-bellied dinosaur'
In general, when a beer is brewed properly,
your body cannot get fat from it.
But if you also eat bread, the story is very
(12 Oct 2014) Two food items:
The first item in Dutch about food; the scientific council for
long term government policy has written a piece about food. As you
might know we the Dutch produce and export enormous amounts of
food and as such the food industry is a large part of the economy.
The scientific council proposes that beside production of food it
should also be safe to eat... I agree with that.
The second item about the tremendous amount of food additives in
Item 1) Van landbouw naar voedselbeleid.
Item 2) PEW on the 10.000+ food additives in the USA.
Item 1) Van landbouw naar
Historisch gezien is landbouw natuurlijk een belangrijke pijler van onze economie, maar de laatste 50 jaar heeft de rest van de voedsel industrie steeds meer terrein gewonnen.
Met als resultaat dat bijv in bijna alle bouillion blokjes van die vreemde smaakversterkers zitten die absoluut niet in het originele bouillion zaten...
Het is maar een voorbeeld, maar in een verbazing wekkende hoeveelheid 'levensmiddelen' zitten allerlei stoffen die je lichaam niet kan verteren.
Mijn inschatting is dat we minstens vijf jaar te vroeg sterven, gemiddeld genomen natuurlijk, alleen omdat we al die rare voedsel producten hebben.
In wezen is het vrij eenvoudig om op termijn de voedsel situatie weer normaal te laten zijn. We moeten dan, net als bijv bij de BTW, onderscheid maken tussen het dagelijks voedsel en de luxe producten.
In het dagelijks voedsel mogen gewoon geen producten zitten die je lichaam niet kan verteren. In luxe eten mag alle rare spullen zitten die je niet direct dood doen vallen.
Natuurlijk zijn daar direct al weer allerlei uitzonderingen op; groente en fruit is gezond omdat er oa vezels in zitten, die vezels zijn niet verteerbaar maar dat is juist één van de gezonde aspecten. En bijv dat conserverende spul dat botulisme voorkomt is niet echt gezond te noemen, maar dat botulisme gif is het sterkste gif dat bekend is. Met een kilotje kan je de hele mensheid uitroeien... Nou ok, dat E nummer mag er dus in.
Dus de regel is er mogen geen spullen in die je niet kunt verteren en daarna ga je kijken wat er dan toch aan niet verteerbaar spul in moet.
Voor de luxe spullen, zoals bijv brood met al dat onverteerbare gluten erin, kan de situatie min of meer blijven zoals zij is; wil je dat soort rotzooi eten, ga dan vooral je gang.
Maar goed even een quote uit het WRR rapport:
Van landbouw- naar voedselbeleid.
Een voedselbeleid houdt rekening met de uiteenlopende waarden rond voedsel,
met de samenhang tussen productie en consumptie en met de veranderde machtsverhoudingen.
Het overgaan van landbouw- naar voedselbeleid betekent niet dat aan de landbouw
minder waarde moet worden gehecht: de primaire sector blijft een cruciaal onderdeel
van het voedselnet. Het betekent wel dat de huidige en toekomstige
maatschappelijke opgaven op het gebied van ecologie, volksgezondheid
en robuustheid beleid vergen dat zich behalve op de landbouw ook op andere
belangrijke spelers en vergen in het voedselnet richt.
Commentaar: Geen commentaar.
In wezen is het dus extreem simpel:
Maak onderscheid tussen het dagelijks voedsel en de luxe producten.
Filosofische vraag: Zal dat gebeuren?
Praktisch antwoord: Natuurlijk niet, politici zijn achterlijk en dat zal niet veranderen.
Tegenvoorbeeld: Additieven in tabak.
Het is allang bekend dat er in tabak allerlei additieven zitten die er op lange termijn voor zorgen dat je meer en meer gaat roken.
Nou vele landen hebben een rookbeleid, maar de laatste 50 jaar heeft nul komma nul procent van al die politici en beleidsmakers ook maar iets gedaan aan de additieven in tabak.
En al die jaren was het zo simpel: Je mag in mijn land alleen tabak verkopen als er geen additieven in zitten. Echter in een halve eeuw tijd heeft geen land dit gedaan.
Mijn inschatting is dat het met voedsel net zo zal gaan...
Meer over additieven in tabak:
Slotopmerking: Door de basis
voedsel producten 'dagelijks voedsel' te noemen suggereer je
meteen dat je die luxe producten niet dagelijks moet eten...
Item 2) PEW on
the 10000+ food additives in the USA.
The best argument against a totally united
Europe is not only the financial situation with a Federal Reserve
that in fact is broken to the bone (try to sell 2 trillion of
garbage bonds on the free markets) but also the food situation
The weirdo's over there have over 10 thousand
strange food additives in their food chain. Needless to say when
you have come to the point there are over 10 thousand weird things
in you food chain that nobody understands, you will run into
How stupid can you be?
Thousands and thousands of poison in your food & not expect
We close this update with a picture of
(08 Oct 2014) After 50 days I close the
second gluten experiment.
So only one item:
Item 1) After 50 days we close the second
Item 1) After 50 days
we close the second gluten experiment.
After about 50 days I close the second gluten
experiment because there are constantly those small white worms
coming out and I think they are from the eggs of those metallic
And after all, the most important goal of the
gluten experiments are to give solid prove that your body simply
cannot digest the gluten that is in the wheat and the wheat
related products like bread, pizza & all those other wheat
The last four weeks the gluten experiment
stuff was standing outside in the garden and guess what: Even
nature cannot break the gluten down if it is in a fermentation
But if nature cannot break it down, why do we
eat stuff like this?
Gluten is in all bread, pasta, pizza & a
whole lot of other things.
Why do you eat that stuff because it is more
or less like rubber & as we all know if you eat rubber you
will die prematurely from horrible illnesses.
The food industry, they have their big big
I do not have big marketing money, but I have
my brain and that is what I usually like to protect. Therefore
just a picture of the second gluten experiment after 50 days of
fermenting it with Camembert and beer yeast.
Click on the picture for a larger version of
50 days waiting:
After 50 days the gluten still does not rot
and the food industry is using this in your daily bread. So take a
nice bite tomorrow when you have your breakfast...
(02 Oct 2014) Correction and addendum.
Yesterday I made a terrible mistake:
I wrote 'specis' where it should have been
I don't know why I made that typo, it might
be my mind was a bit more busy about completely destroying that
Or it was something else that drove me
towards self destruction via stupid mistakes.
So that is the item for today: Correction
Item 1) Correction & addendum.
Item 1) Correction
Correction: It should have been 'species' and
Again I am so sorry for making a typo, so I
felt the heart strong desire to make the next
(01 Oct 2014) Let's keep on bombing that
'Islamic state' for a few decades my dear readers, only a few
decades more will bring the lessons to those weirdo's that always
say 'We love death while the enemy loves life'.
After having said that, just a small food
item about the strange prices of whole wheat flower for you whole
Item 1) Why is whole wheat flower always so
Item 1) Why is whole
wheat flower always so expensive?
Ok, the wheat is milled layer by layer.
The outer parts are sold as cattle feed, the inner core is for the
Economics say: Human food is more expensive
compared to the food for the cattle.
Observation says: Over the years one kilo of
white wheat flower is 35 cents while whole wheat flower is always
85 cents, so whole wheat is about 2.5 times more expensive
compared to white wheat...
Since I did buy my first bread machine over
five years ago, I never understood why whole wheat was so
expensive. It looked like the normal laws of capitalism did break
down; why is it so much more expensive?
A naive person might argue: since cattle feed
is cheaper and since the milling of the 'whole grain' is cheaper
compared to white wheat flower, all in all whole wheat flower
should be the cheaper thing.
Yes, in theory whole wheat should be cheaper,
so what explains the extreme price differences over all the wheat
brands over all the different supermarkets?
The answer is found when you wash out the
dough of a whole wheat bread; it contains much more gluten.
And gluten is much more expensive.
Why do they add more gluten to whole
Very simple: Without the extra added gluten
the whole wheat bread will not rise as nicely as your white wheat
bread does. And if you buy that marketing trick that whole bread
is more healthy compared to white bread, the food industry has you
in the corner where they want you to be:
Paying more for things that you think are
healthy but in fact make you overeat.
If you have a better explanation as why whole
wheat is 2.5 times more expensive compared to standard white wheat
over all these years, be my guest...
(27 Sept 2014) Two food items today, the
first about the third gluten experiment and the second item is in
the Dutch language about the lies of the government subsidized
Item 1) How to make cheese pizza without that
Item 2) Een paar leugens van het voedingscentrum.
Item 1) How to make
cheese pizza without that expensive cheese.
Some time ago it was suddenly in the news
that the food industry on a large scale made pizza's without
actually using cheese. So you might wonder; how do they do
Three weeks ago I started the third gluten
experiment with the gluten from 1.1 kilo of whole wheat bread
dough. I put it in a fertilizer bottle and put a piece of
camembert on top of it plus a little bit of water.
After some time it starts smelling strongly
to cheese, actually it is very pleasant to smell. Anyway, below
the gluten something started to grow and now after waiting three
weeks I decided to turn it over.
The stuff that has grown is now on top, the
gluten is below that.
Click on the picture if you want to see a larger version:
If you mix this strongly tasting stuff with
hardened fat, color it yellow and grind it down into what looks
like grinded cheese, you have an ultra cheap replacement for that
By the way, did you know that they make those
stable food colorings and dyes from coal and petroleum? And did
you know those food colorings are ultra-mega-über-safe because
the governments allow them in the food...
Item 2) Een paar
leugens van het voedingscentrum.
Kijk iedereen heeft recht op het spuiten van
zijn of haar mening, maar het voedingscentrum zegt zelf
uitsluitend wetenschappelijk bewezen feiten te gebruiken.
Doen ze dat echt?
Welnee, ze zijn echt achterlijk daar.
Bijv over gluten denken ze dat gluten normaal verteerd worden in
Nou ja, ik laat toch al weken en maanden lang zien dat dit niet zo
Je lichaam maakt zelf ook allerlei stoffen
die biologisch niet afbreekbaar zijn, bijv je gewrichten, je haar,
je tanden en je huid om maar een paar to noemen.
Het is namelijk reuze handig als je huid niet elke week wegrot...
Die voedingscentrum gasten snappen echt niets
van voedsel, kijk maar naar de volgende quote:
Niet waar. Gluten zijn eiwitten die normaal gesproken
gewoon worden verteerd in je maagdarmstelsel. Een klein deel van de mensen is overgevoelig voor gluten.
Zij moeten producten met gluten, zoals tarwebrood of speltbrood
Commentaar: Veel meer bewijs dat ze bij het
voedingscentrum echt helemaal niets over gluten weten is niet
nodig. Maar, ik moet wel opmerking dat er in je darmflora wel
degelijk afbraak van gluten plaatsvind. Echter dat is minimaal en
ha ha ha, dat geeft juist die gluten morfines die er ook voor
zorgen dat je elke dag brood wilt eten...
Bron van bovenstaande quote: Gluten
zijn slecht voor me denk ik.
Ook interessant is hun gezwets en gezwam over
jodium in het brood.
denk dat ik veel gezonder eet als ik helemaal geen brood eet.
Kijk, dit is toch achterlijk? In zes sneetjes
volkorenbood zit hooguit een kwart theelepel zout, in Nederland is
al het zout allang gejodeerd. Je grbuikt toch ook zout bij het
koken van aardappelen of op je eitje?
Zie je hoe totaal achterlijk ze daar zijn bij dat voedingscentrum?
Hoe krijg je genoeg jodium binnen als je geen brood eet?
6 sneetjes volkorenbrood bevatten 145 microgram jodium. Dat is bijna de dagelijkse aanbeveling. Dat kun je ook zo binnenkrijgen:
220 gram vette vis
of 5 kilo runderlappen
of 11 glazen halfvolle melk
of 7 kilo groenten
of 8 gekookte eieren
Dat bovenop de dagelijkse aanbevolen hoeveelheden die er al zijn.
Commentaar: Dit is zo stom dat ik er gewoon
geen commentaar op kan geven.
Ik noem het voedingscentrum alleen maar omdat
die met overheidsgeld overeind gehouden worden. Als al hun
financiering van de voedsel industrie zou komen had ik ze nooit
Laten we het daarbij houden, tot opdatums.
(26 Sept 2014) Oh oh, everybody is nervous
about the Islamic state but they forget our own food industry like
the shitholes from Unilever kill much more people compared to what
those weirdo's can cough up...
So we neglect the weirdo's and dive in the
third gluten experiment.
Item 1) How whole is our whole wheat flower?
Item 1) How whole is
our whole wheat flower?
On 08 September I washed out 1.1 kilo dough
made with whole wheat in order to check about the gluten in it.
Why whole wheat?
That is because most people think that whole bread is a healthy
choice compared to white bread.
After baking 1.1 kilo dough gives more or
less one kilo bread.
How much wet gluten is in it?
The results are very sobering, after washing
out the dough I was left with 170 grams of wet gluten. That means
whole bread even has more gluten in it that white
Now what about fibers and bran?
The food industry always advertises about the extreme high amount
of fibers and bran in whole grain products.
Well that is also very sobering; yes there is
bran in it but it is all extremely short in length. Fibers need to
have some length in order to help the stuff passing your
intestines, this whole wheat bran is more like dust.
Ok ok, if it is not digestible it is not
unhealthy. But if you would ask me I would think a small bowl of
pumpkin soup contains far more fibers and most of these fibers are
much longer compared to the bran as found in the Albert Heijn
whole wheat flower.
If you know a big more about milling wheat
you know that all ingredients from the wheat get separated because
if you simply mill the whole grains the shelf life is a
And if you check a lot of Youtube video's
about milling whole flower you always see the same:
They separate the ingredients and for making 'whole flower' they
add a bit of bran back into it.
To put it simple: They fool you and you are
not even aware that they fool you.
If the whole flower would truly be whole
flower the shelf life would be different, so what do I have in my
kitchen and what is the maturity date?
I have Albert Heijn Basic wheat flour (white)
that expires on 5 Oct 2015 &
I have Albert Heijn Whole wheat flour that expires on 2 July
Not that I eat that shit any longer, but you
see the whole wheat also has a long long shelf life... (That means
it isn't whole wheat flower, it is just another product that makes
Here is how the first day of the third gluten
experiment looks, this time I tried to prevent all kinds of
infection via using my standard beer brewing & wine crafting
knowledge. So the gluten was sterilized before the Camembert
cheese was added...
I heated the 170 grams of gluten in the
magnetron, that made it less stiff and that is why you see that
layer of brown gluten below the white Camembert.
Now how 'whole' is our whole wheat
It is garbage just like the white wheat
flower, some stuff is added back but that what is known as 'whole
bread' is not a healthy food choice over white bread.
It is all garbage.
(25 Sept 2014) We love death and we seek martyrship...
Item 1) The problem with ISIS, ISIL and Is
stuff; lunatics to the bone.
Item 1) The problem
with ISIS, ISIL and Is stuff; lunatics to the bone.
The problem of a lot of those ISIS, ISIL
& other Islamic state weirdo's is very simple to
Year in year out they say that they love
death while the enemy loves life and year in year out they declare
that they are actively seeking for being a martyr...
And now, after only a tiny bit of air power
done in Syria and Iraq, they complain that they do get
My dear mujahedin; Why do you complain about
what you were seeking in the first place?
End of this update, till updates.
(24 Sept 2014) Oh oh those ISIS people, they
want an Islamic state but at the same time they are scrapping math
from the things children should learn...
So there will be no Islamic state related to ISIS or ISIL.
Anyway not in 500 years or so...
Those lunatics will never understand it;
memorizing the Koran is only for idiots with empty
Therefore in this update we only look at a
nice gluten picture because the food of future generations is far
more important compared to the ISIS stuff...
Item 1) The gluten experiment as it looked on
Item 1) The gluten
experiment as it looked on 15 September.
If you are young you can eat bread as a
source of energy. The bread gives you an enormous amount of
energy, look for example at those Tour the France bicycle runners
that eat a lot of pasta made from wheat for
If you get older the disadvantages of
industrial bread become more prevalent, and when the gluten comes
leaking through your skin you might think it is about time to stop
The second gluten experiment was made from
gluten as you can buy it in the bakery industry, the next photo
once more explains that your body just cannot digest it.
Your body, just like the rest of nature,
cannot digest this.
So why do you eat bread?
But what about fibers in vegetables?
You cannot digest the fibers in fruits &
That is true, but the fibers in fruits &
vegetables do not come out leaking through your skin.
End of this
(18 Sept 2014) Only a food item; what food is
the most dangerous?
Item 1) What do obese people buy? What is the
most dangerous food?
Item 2) What happens to your blood if you eat American &
Item 1) What do obese
people buy? What is the most dangerous food?
A long time ago my maximum weight was 109
kilo. So for me now I have lost all that weird fat and
understanding a little bit more about the food we eat, it is
always great to observe what those ultra fat people like 150+ kilo
A few weeks back I observed one of the ultra
fat throwing his stuff on the cash conveyer belt in the
supermarket and it went like
1) Four bottles of Coca Cola or six liters of
2) Three loaves of white bread, about 2.5 kilo around here.
3) Two pounds of diet margarine.
What are the dangers lurking within these
1) Coca Cola; six liters of Coca Cola contain
over 3 grams of Phosphoric acid, anyway that is what the Coca Cola
company claims but there is no way of checking if indeed that
level is there.
Phosphoric acid is great stuff, it can easily get as low as 1.5 on
the pH scale of acid thingelings... So what is 3 grams?
2) Bread, it is loaded with that nice stuff
named gluten and if you are young and have healthy intestines, you
can retrieve a lot of energy from it. The energy you get is a huge
amount because bread is basically sugars & water.
All that talk of vitamins & minerals is nonsense.
Well gluten is discussed enough around here; if eating bread can
give you Alzheimer, why not eat a bit more of that because every
body is seeking Alzheimer...
3) The diet margarine is a so called 'health
product' as crafted by the food industry. Nobody checks if what is
on the list of ingredients is actually inside the product. (Anyway
in my country never ever it is the government agencies that
discover the crimes done, in my country the food inspectors work
for the Agriculture ministry.)
My dear reader, please use your own
What food is the most dangerous?
I would go for number 3, for about 50 years I
knew what to eat but when I chanced diet and used a so called
'health product' crafted by Becel (from the Unilever conglomerate)
I developed much deeper health problems related to the gluten from
So I would say the so called 'health food'
from weirdo's like Becel are just as dangerous as Coca Cola or the
Item 2) What happens
to your blood if you eat American & European food?
For myself speaking, I stopped using all
refined sugar decades ago.
But decades ago I did not understand that bread is just pure sugar
and a bit of water.
At present day we can observe what the sugar
does to our blood, it is fascinating how our bodies easily can
withstand such attacks.
Your red blood cells should be separated in
order to transport as much oxygen as needed, so what happens if
you eat your ordinary American or European meal???
(15 Sept 2014) A math update and lately these
have to obey the embargo:
Only 10 to at most 20% of new results will be
Item 1) Using 3D numbers to describe the
superposition of 3 quantum states.
Item 1) Using 3D
numbers to describe the superposition of 3 quantum states.
I will not deny it is a bit weird to publish
only about 10% of new results, but the present day universities
are filled with people that are not capable of finding higher
dimension complex numbers for themselves.
And at the same time, they think their research is important &
they publish 80 to 90% of new results found.
Publish or perish they say.
It is just like all those bread eaters that
guess what, after eating bread just a few hours later they are
hungry again. Those bread eaters cannot go without a meal for 18
hours and still feel no hunger, those people are the lunatics of
After having said that, the superposition
stuff is found in the link if you click on the next picture:
(14 Sept 2014) Today an item on flight number
Item 1) Russian foreign minister Sergei
Lavrov wonders why this and why that.
Item 1) Russian
foreign minister Sergei Lavrov wonders why this and why that.
With interest I did read the comments of
Sergei about our Dutch folks having lack of interest to aggressively
do research on the site where flight number 17 ended.
Well those comments are all very interesting,
but what more can be found over there?
The stuff is spread over a 9 kilometer range,
we have good pictures of penetrated skin of the aircraft. Also
nice; inside the bodies of the pilots metal pieces have been
So if Russia would like to be helpful, please
share the technical details of the metals the BUK system spreads
If the Russians are not willing to share
those important details, please Sergei, can you shut up your
Russian Times reporting Sergei wondering the
lack of Dutch enthusiasm:
No haste in MH17 tragedy probe, despite media hype.
Let's leave it with that, till
(11 Sept 2014) Ha ha, originally I planned an
extremely insulting update for New York Pizza on this lovely day;
for example the promotion of a food additive made from air plane
fuselage in order to make people even eat more more and
But since it looks like the Ukrainians can
act like adults I decided to change course.
Hard to say how the Ukrainian equation will evolve, but I want to
stress an extremely important point:
Until now we only have a few thousands of deaths, given the start
of this all with the ouster of prez Viktor this is a miracle.
Normally spoken we would have at least 20 to 30 thousands of
So whatever happens and whatever the emotions
are, do not forget that my dear Ukrainians...
Ok, since the Ukrainians behave a bit like
they are adults, why not a tiny bit of math flown in?
Item 1) Teaser picture for the update on
superposition of quantum states.
Item 1) Teaser
picture for the update on superposition of quantum states.
Later this week I will finish the stuff.
I already crafted a teaser picture in order to draw a bit of
attention from the math community, not that the professional math
professors will understand it, but anyway here is the teaser
Later this week I will finish the
(10 Sept 2014) There is an old love of mine
where I compare total financial debt growth to real economical
growth, before the so called 'credit crises' broke out I
understood it would be there.
So after the credit crisis has waned and the
USA is showing strong economical growth while Europe still licks
it's wounds, have we learned anything?
Item 1) Credit crises update; have we learned
Item 1) Credit crises
update; have we learned anything?
If inside any economy the debt levels are
always rising faster than the underlying economy, at one point in
time there will be problems observed when it comes to paying back
the debt owned.
You can argue that one dollar of debt is one
dollar of ownership for another party, but that is just a dumb as
stating one calorie in = one calorie out.
To put it simple; a fish hook in = a fish
hook out? You cannot eat fish hooks because they have a strong
capacity of never leaving your body.
One of the best internet links that still
lives today is from the USA Federal Reserve, for me it took some
time to understand the dimensions of the information that is
But basically if debt growth gets to large some shaving will be
done, so how is the USA doing from the year 1979 until 2014 when
it comes to total debt of only 42.5582 trillion US$?
Understanding long term growth is simple;
back in 1979 the same statistic was 3.5965 trillion so over the
decades total debt levels are about 12 times as high.
Now 2014 - 1979 = 35 years of timespan, so
average debt growth would be about 12^(1/35) = 7.35% of debt
growth a year.
Needless to say, USA economic growth is not
7% year on year.
So the USA is still living in fantasy land
when it comes to debt and credit stuff.
Source file: D.3 Credit Market Debt Outstanding by Sector
Let's leave it with that because the folks
will only learn stuff via crashes that 'nobody has ever
(08 Sept 2014) Will the cease fire in the
Ukrainian landscape last?
Or is there a strong emotional reason for longer war activities?
So that is what we ponder today;
Item 1) Will the Ukrainian cease fire last?
Item 1) Will the
Ukrainian cease fire last?
Let's not do difficult; the last time I gave
some advice to Kiev about a new 10 day cease fire it was not
followed up and in that 10 day time frame some Dutch plane was
shot from the skies...
From Kiev came sounds like 'never ever a new
temporary cease fire'.
So let it be.
Well now a few weeks later, a new cease fire
is in place.
Will it work?
That depends on the nice thing known as
'rigid battlefield discipline', are the Ukrainian military forces
just another bunch of Vodka drinkers or do they use their brain
also for other activities?
Until now, as the weeks pass and pass, it
looks like the separatists have more of that vague stuff known as
the rigid battlefield discipline.
Let's leave it with that.
But the flag looks nice, it symbolizes blue
skies over yellow wheat fields...
(07 Sept 2014) Gluten fermentation
Item 1) After 20 days the gluten is still
Item 1) After 20 days
the gluten is still going strong.
Although the gluten has been compromised by
flies that have laid their eggs in it, the gluten still refuses to
rot. On the contrary, there is a lovely smell coming off with lots
of cheesy flavors in the air.
This second gluten experiment is a success
because even when flies have laid their eggs in it, the gluten
still refuses to surrender it's molecular buildup. It still does
not rot, on the contrary it is definitely weakening but it still
So I can understand why the food industry
makes all those taste multipliers with this stuff, yet the human
body cannot digest this so it is the same as eating plastic or
This is how it looks after 20 days:
On the left you see the Camembert version and
on the right the beer yeast version.
A standard bread contains about 10% of it's
weight in gluten, furthermore a standard bread as baked by the
food industry also contains food additives that enforce the
properties of the gluten.
These people from the food industry, they are
crazy beyond belief.
Why do they do this? And you, why do you eat this?
(06 Sept 2014) Musings on human suicides; we
compare global figures against USA military veterans.
Item 1) US military suicides versus the
Item 1) US military
suicides versus the global population.
According to some United Nations outlet there
are about 800.000 suicides a year globally speaking. To be honest,
I do not have a clue if this figure is a good estimation of total
If for simplicity we take total humanity as 7
billion people, that would amount to 1 in every 8750 persons that
kill themselves each year.
From the US military veterans we know that
about 22 military vets kill themselves on a daily basis, that
would be about 8000 a year.
If all figures are correct (once more: I know
absolutely nothing about suicide statistics) the US military vets
are about 1% of global human suicides.
Is this an elevated number?
That depends on how large the pool of US
military veterans is, if the suicide rate among US military vets
is the same as for the whole human population, the size of the
military vets would be about 70 million.
(70 million = 1% of 7 billion.)
Of course there are no 70 million US military
veterans, how much have served over the decades I do not know but
any fool can see that indeed suicide rates are very high.
So we wonder as why the US military veterans
are so depressed that the only way out they see is killing
themselves because that is the only thing that will make the
Two very different explanations:
Explanation 1: USA military veterans are
extremely highly standing humans and once they understand that the
War on Terror is not precisely what Fox News tells them, they feel
remorse for what they have done and the only way out is to kill
Explanation 2: They all eat weird food, right
now there are about 10.000 different food additives in the USA
food chain so there is no avoiding it. So their brains got literally
sick from the weird food they eat, and that explains the high
level of not only military veteran suicides but also overall
murder rates in the USA.
For me it is clear; if you eat the wrong food
and it passes the brain-blood barrier, not much of a miracle that
both murder rates and suicide rates will be elevated big
If you think otherwise, go visit the USA and
eat their food for just a few weeks...
Source of the picture: A CNN file about daily
average suicide of vets;
suicide rate among military vets may be more than 22 a day
And the ridiculous number of weird food
additives is found on the Washington Post;
additives on the rise as FDA scrutiny wanes
End of this update. Till updates.
(05 Sept 2014) A short update on why
antibiotics are used in cattle food.
Item 1) A strong paradox observed, grass fed
versus grain fed cattle.
Item 1) A strong paradox
observed, grass fed versus grain fed cattle.
Most people are aware of the fact that
antibiotics are mixed with the feed that is given to the cattle.
Of course that is a reason for concern because once a new superbug
is there, it cannot be killed by existing antibiotics.
But what I did not know was the little fact
that antibiotics are mixed in when the animals start eating
grains... Most of the time the rationale that is given goes like:
Well these animals are kept in crowed conditions and if one animal
gets sick the entire herd goes to death and since we love our
cattle we give them a tiny bit antibiotics.
That might all be true, but I was unaware
that it was so strong related with dietary changes towards being
grain fed cattle...
And if you think about it, do cows eat grains
in the wild?
No, they eat grass, grass and more grass.
And what about pigs and chickens?
In the wild, do they eat grains at all?
And if you compare fruits to grains; for a
lot of fruits the seeds can only shoot root if they have passed
the digestive system of an animal. For example wild apples cannot
shoot root if they have not been eaten.
Yet grains do not need animals, hence there is no evolutionary
reason as why grains should be healthy. All grains have their form
of gluten and that is their stockpile of energy to grow a new
generation of that particular grain.
So the paradox is simple:
If cattle goes on a grain based diet, they
If we humans eat grains, it is always supposed to be
Yet not all grains are pure poison of course,
I cannot stand rye but I love rice.
Not that it has much nutrition value, but I like it a lot.
By the way; Why do they feed cattle grain?
Answer: It makes them gain weight fast.
But in humans, the bread does not make you
Anyway, that is what those weirdo's from the food
Just a dumb as Coca Cola stating you should drink the phosphoric
acid in their product because phosphor plays an important role in
the energy transport inside all living stuff... Idiots is what
Food for thought:
(03 Sept 2014) Another fantastic food product
observed: Meat glue.
In item 3 the latest pictures of the second gluten experiment.
Item 1) Transglutaminase: Safe to use food
product for gluing meat and fish...
Item 2) Transglutaminase: When it comes out through your
Item 3) Finally after 16 days the gluten starts to rot...
Transglutaminate: Safe to use food product for gluing meat and
The 'trans' in transglutaminase is not so
important; it is a chemical thing.
It means that in the Lewis representation of a molecule all
hydrogen atoms are also found on the other side; the lewis
representation is symmetrical.
You can buy this stuff for use in the
kitchen, you can use it to glue together different kinds of meat.
For example an expensive thin slice of beef on the outside and on
the inside cheap pork, and voila there is a brand new meat
You also use it to glue fish to bones from
land animals or the other way around.
In the USA the stuff is approved by the Food
& Drug Agency.
In the history of humanity the FDA is surely one of the most
retarded health agencies, just look at the average street view in
the USA with all those one yard wide people; they all eat healthy
food approved by the FDA...
This is how the products look that you can
make of it, it might look cute but all gluten related products are
pure poison so you better not eat this kind of stuff.
So far for this weird gluten products that
once more states where the name gluten comes from: it comes from
Transglutaminate: When it comes out through your skin.
A few times I have told you that when I had
that nasty skin condition related to health products from a
company named Unilever, the gluten came out of my skin.
But that was based on only one observation
when I put one of the last gluten grains that came out of my skin
under the microscope. So I was a bit unsure as to write it down
because I could not repeat the experiment.
For me, since the gluten is not bio
degradable by our bodies, those skin diseases are only a manner of
the body to get rid of the excess gluten that enters you
But it is hard to find confirmation of that in medical related
Yet it has been found before, just a small
found in celiac
may play a role in the small
in response to dietary gliadin that
characterises this condition. In
the related conditiondermatitis
in which small bowel changes are often found and which responds to
dietary exclusion of gliadin-containing wheat products, epidermal
transglutaminase is the predominant autoantigen.
Comment: The words 'epidermal
transglutaminase' means the stuff coming out through your skin.
Why does it come out through your skin?
Well your body cannot process all that is in the wheat and bread,
so if you live long enough the damage will accumulate so that
finally the food industry can kill you.
Item 3) Finally after
16 days the gluten starts to rot...
In the first gluten rot experiment after
about 10 days the rot did set in.
In the second gluten experiment where I try to ferment it with
beer yeast and Camembert fungus it takes a lot longer for the rot
to set in.
Now if you are a bread eater, about 10% of
the weight of the bread is the gluten.
After 16 days the Camembert version looks like this (click on the
picture for a larger version):
So the next time you are eating bread or
pasta, try to use your brain and do not forget the food industry
is just another gigantic dynamical system that is controlled by
nobody and only expands and expands and expands...
(01 Sept 2014) It would be easy to craft
another anti food industry update, but you cannot live on food
alone. So a tiny tiny math update about whole numbers.
And, ok ok, a small update on another Fields winner.
Item 1) The Tuthola of a natural
Item 2) How far can you break down computer programs?
Item 1) The Tuthola
of a natural number.
What gluten is in the bakery industry (a
product you cannot digest) is the Tuthola for natural numbers. A
very important mathematical fact is that all numbers have a unique
prime factor representation, for example 15 = 3*5 and no other set
of prime numbers can make up 15.
Now what is the Tuthola of a number?
For that we need a minor change what a prime
number is, as you all know the first prime numbers are given by 2,
3, 5, 7, 11, 13 and so on.
So in that language 5 is the third prime numbers.
Now for the Tuthola to be meaningful, 1
should also be counted as a prime number and if you do not like
that you have to take a different technical path.
1 = prime number 1
2 = prime number 2
3 = prime number 3
5 = prime number 4
7 = prime number 5
11 = prime number 6
13 = prime number 7 and so on and so on.
We place all prime numbers on a long long
list and we number that list...
Let us calculate, as an example, the Tuthola
of the number 2310.
Well the product of the first six primes is 1*2*3*5*7*11 =
The first Tuthola layer is therefore given by
1*2*3*4*5*6 = 720.
Now 720 also has a prime factorization and
that is easy to find if you have the first Tuthola layer:
720 = 2*2*2*2*3*3*5.
From this prime factorization we make a new
Tuthola layer, that is the second Tuthola layer. Now the factors 2
and 3 are Tuthola 2 and 3 but 5 is Tuthola 4.
So the Tuthola of 720 becomes 576
576 = 2*2*2*2*2*2*3*3.
Therefore the Tuthola of 2310 is 576 and the
Tuthola process is two layers deep.
All other layers of Tuthola for 576 stay at
576 because for all the factors we have
Tut (2) = 2 and
Tut (3) = 3
And inevitably whatever big prime
factorization you start with, all natural numbers have their
Item 2) How far can
you break down computer programs?
Oops, that is a difficult question because
present day computer programs do not allow for prime decomposition
of building factors.
But beside that Iranian chick that received a
Fields medal did a guy named Subhash Knot also get one?
If so, congratulations, but do not think you
are anything special.
grand vision for the impossible.
End of this update.
(31 Aug 2014) Two items, the second one is in
Item 1) Gluten fermentation after 14 days; it
Item 2) Goedkope leugens van het Voorlichtingsbureau Brood.
Item 1) Gluten
fermentation after 14 days; it smells strong.
You know there are all those websites and all
those articles about the gluten from wheat, but nobody does
conduct any kind of experiment with it anyway.
My dear reader, if you are a bread eater you
should at least once in your lifetime wash out the dough until you
have a nice ball of pure gluten.
The washing out is a very primitive way of how your body processes
bread, and since we live in a free world, after that you can
decide for yourself if you want to eat that stuff.
The food industry is making the five gluten
salts (they are all taste multipliers, or taste enhancers as they
say) from fermented gluten.
So I decided to ferment a bit of gluten for myself and in the
picture below you can see how 125 gram of gluten looks after 14
Needless to say; your body cannot digest it
but I still have to carry out the gluten experiment with dipping
it in battery acid for more ridged validation of this.
The reason I have not carried out the battery
acid experiment is simple:
Almost all companies that sell car parts do not sell battery acid
and those that do do not sell it to consumers.
The smell of the fermenting gluten is strong,
but it is not so strong I have to remove it from the kitchen.
After 14 days the Camembert gluten is even a little bit pleasant,
of course you cannot eat it but from a distance of about one meter
it is not a bad smell.
Item 2) Goedkope
leugens van het Voorlichtingsbureau Brood.
Die vieze vuile kaffers van het
Voorlichtingsbureau Brood spuiten hun vieze vuile leugens weer
Zo zou brood je bijvoorbeeld niet dik maken.
Die vieze vuile namaak Joden weten het weer leuk te brengen:
Gebruik niet meer dan de Dagelijks Aanbevolen Hoeveelheid &
je zult lang en gelukkig leven.
Dat vieze gore ongedierte gaat toch eventjes voorbij aan mijn
wat ik ook deed mijn zogenaamde Body Mass Index bleef hangen in
gevaarlijke hoogtes en alleen radicaal stoppen met al dat tarwe
gedoe bracht verlichting.
En in het laatste jaar van mijn brood etende leven at ik maar 2
sneetjes zelfgebakken brood per dag; ongeveer 180 gram per dag.
Nou zelfs 180 gram kan al forse schade toebrengen weet ik nu.
Ronduit walgelijk is hun stom gezwets, beneden is een link naar
de vieze vuile kaffers van het Voorlichtingsbureau Brood en daarin
kun je een plaatje vinden van een graankorrel.
Nou, denk jij dat je die hele graankorrel in je brood krijgt?
Vergeet het maar, alleen het zetmeel deel krijg je in je brood
en van de rest maken ze veevoer.
Nou dan ga je toch samen met je kindertjes een gezond
Ach tja, doe maar eens een Google search op 'kleinbrood
verbeteringsmiddel' en dan blijkt dat het verschil tussen witbrood
en bruinbrood alleen de gebruikte kleurmiddelen zijn...
Achterlijk en verraderlijk tot op het bot zijn ze bij
instanties als het Voorlichtingsbureau Brood.
brood een dikmaker?
End of this update, till updates.
(30Aug 2014) More on the pig hair that is
used in bread; why is it not on the list of ingredients of our
beloved bread that is given to us by The Lord?
Item 1) Another safe to use food number
observed: E 920.
Item 2) When it comes to bread, people will never learn it.
Item 1) Another safe
to use food number observed: E 920.
Ok ok, E 920 is an amino acid (those amino
acids are the building blocks for the larger proteins) and it is
found in animal hairs and also in bird feathers.
It is also found in grains, but the scary
thing is they say it is made via fermentation...
So very likely E 920 is another fantastic
fermentation product made from gluten.
Those food industry engineers; stupid without
Anyway, to make a long story short: Why Do
They Use That Stuff?
Simple answer: It makes the bread even more
fluffy and lightweight.
So adding E 920 makes the elastic properties
of the gluten even more prevalent, and I wonder how stupid you can
Because even the food engineers visit the
funerals of their parents and their grand parents when they have
died from lovely diseases like dementia.
And those food engineers, they do not
understand they did not only kill their own parents prematurely
but also their own children will die before their time.
Don't forget, animals never ever develop
Alzheimer or dementia, it has to be a food problem...
Link (in Dutch)
fabrikanten gebruiken plantaardige L-cysteïne.
Why is E 920 not on the list of 'used
That is because the food industry succeeded in convincing the
European food authorities that it is not found back in the final
product and as such it 'only helps' in the baking process.
Well, go to the supermarket and buy some of that bread.
Go home and cut a bit of your own hair, put it on fire and smell
Now you put a leave of your supermarket bread in a toaster, turn
it on and enjoy the smell.
You clearly smell the smell of burned hair,
it is subtle but it is there...
Item 2) When it comes
to bread, people will never learn it.
I already linked to part II of an anti-gluten
tirade from that USA medical doctor Auer, but in part
I of that anti gluten tirade the next hilarious quote is found (source):
1843, a physician named Stanislas Tanchou spoke at the Paris
Medical Society Conference. He claimed that he could predict the
cancer rates in major European cities over the next 50 years. He
based his predictions on the percentage of grains being consumed
in each major city. What is astonishing is that, over time, his
predictions turned out to be correct. In the cities that had the
highest grain consumption, cancer rates were the highest. This is
in stark contrast to the fact that in populations who did not
consume grains, cancer did not exist.
Comment: This is
amazing and I was shaking from laughter when you see that year
1843. For so long the dangers of grain must be known but nothing
happens of course.
rates accurately over 150 years ago and today the bakers of the
bread still do not understand what they are baking...
Once more; I am shaking from laughter, but I
am now free of that weird stuff the laughter comes
It is not for nothing I am accusing the food
industry of taking down the average lifespan of the population by
at at least five years.
So for my home country where we have about 16
to 17 million citizens, that would amount to about 80 to 85
million stolen years of life.
And that my dear reader, influences a whole
lot of people.
End of this update, if I count it correctly
this was update number 32 on our beloved food industry. Till
(29 Aug 2014) More on gluten; a nice picture
from under the microscope.
Item 1) What is so special about the wheat
Item 1) What is so
special about the wheat gluten?
Now don't get me wrong, I do not hate the
wheat or even the gluten in it.
For the wheat the gluten is a perfect way to story protein, just
like all other grains have their form of storage of proteins.
There is nothing wrong with that.
Yet when I had that skin disease named Lupus,
I had those weird stuff coming out of my skin. And I should have
done it earlier, but at the end stages I finally put it under the
The evening I put it under the microscope was
also the evening I washed out one kilo of bread dough and I swear
what I saw under the microscope looked a lot like that washing out
of the wheat dough...
My skin got healthier and I was not able to
reproduce what in a great hurry I only observed for a few
Of course I will not return to my old ways of
eating bread now I have recovered from that weird kind of
And I cannot prove it but for me it was
clear; that gluten that cannot be processed by my body is trying
to get out via my skin.
Don't forget that the human body is far more
complicated than the higher dimensional complex numbers & we
all know how popular the higher complex numbers are:
Zero point zero popularity in academic
From a screenshot from a previous Youtubber,
gluten looks like this under a more advanced microscope:
Just look at it; if you know your body cannot
break this down, guess three times what will happen if it gets
into your bloodstream?
Source file of the picture is that Youtubber
at about the 25-th minute:
of gluten related disorders
The relation with stuff like Alzheimer's
disease is not obvious, but one very interesting thing about that
brain sickness that there is a whole lot of stickiness
So from the statistical point of view it is
Have all patients with Alzheimer been eating
wheat bread all of their lives yes or no?
My guess is that you can only get the lovely
Alzheimer disease if you are eating bread...
More on the sources of Alzheimer in another
the mysteries of Alzheimer's disease
Understanding gluten is a fine
End of this update, till updates.
(28 Aug 2014) Holy cow; there seems to be a
book with the title:
Complex Numbers The Higher Dimensional Forms.
So that is the item of today.
Item 1) This is weird; is it an American that
found them too?
Item 1) This is
weird; is it an American that found them too?
By sheer coincidence I found that guy named
Dennis Morris that wrote a book with the title above and I was
curious about the content.
So I went to the bookstore, but even with the
ISBN numbers it was not available.
So I looked up the publisher, but the publisher published only one
And that book is about the higher dimensional complex
It is not hard to guess what has
Because without doubt that publisher has gone broke because even
on the academic level like the universities and other forms of
higher education, nobody is waiting for higher dimensional complex
I know that from experience for about 23
years, the book from Dennis was published in the year
Dennis, I can tell you these university
professors are a disaster just like the food engineers in your
country and on my continent:
Only when disaster strikes they will change course.
In the meantime Dennis, all the average
professional math professor can handle is the two dimensional
They are the people that live in the flat
land & are capable of getting a fairly overpaid salary from it
and boatloads of social standing. Because if you are a
professional professor in mathematics, all other people think you
are actually a very smart person...
This is how the cover of the book
Poor Dennis, the average professional math
professor is just too fucking stupid to understand higher
dimensional complex numbers in the first place.
Let's leave it with that, till updates.
(27 Aug 2014) Update number 30 on the
food stuff already...
Two items, an update on the gluten fermentation and a 70 minutes
long Youtubber on why we get fat.
Item 1) The Camembert version after 8.5
Item 2) Wise remarks from a guy named Gary Taubes; why we get
Item 1) The Camembert
version after 8.5 days.
This is day number nine in fermenting the
wheat gluten, in the first experiment where I only tried to make
the gluten rot it was already much more liquid compared to the
more controlled versions with Camembert and a home brew beer yeast
The smell is also much less, but it is
definitely a strong smell and I understand much better why the
food industry is using dangerous stuff like this.
Dangerous? Well, to my body it is.
How far this is dangerous to the general public, I don't
This is how the Camembert version looks after
8.5 days, the gluten gets softer and softer but it is still
extremely sticky. May be it is the sticky property that damages
the inside of your intestines; it simply rips off the follicles
that are in your intestines.
(Until now I have no proof for that, so it is speculation but it
is not unfounded.)
Here is the picture:
You still see the cheese in the middle, the
fungus is spreading out more and more and it smells hefty like
But seriously; you cannot eat this.
Item 2) Wise remarks
from a guy named Gary Taubes; why we get fat.
The Gary guy has a physics study done at
Harvard so I have to say that makes the information he is sharing
a bit more reliable compared to weird people like here who are
working for a semi-governmental institute like the Food Center
where you have all those lunatics promoting eating bread.
The Youtube video is 70 minutes long and
likely that is above the attention span of a lot of readers, but
it is not unwise that somewhere in your life you look at all those
We Get Fat
I also would like to point towards a society
where obesity it not much of a general problem; that society is
Japanese folks are known to be huge consumers
of green tea, but in the Western society green tea is associated
with tree huggers and other forms of peacenic behavior.
Yet I know from personal experience that even
if you are a bread eater, if you are severely overweight green tea
helps you to burn fat.
How it works I don't know, remark that chemistry is a difficult
science especially when you talk about the large molecules that
run bio stuff.
But from the Gary video I would like to
capture the next screenshot on how our fat cells regulate
themselves; stuff goes in stuff goes out & indeed every fat
cell is also a complicated dynamical system...
To put it simple:
If you eat the wrong foods, you body cannot
retrieve energy from it's basin of body fat and you end up feeling
hungry. So you eat another slice of bread...
End of update number 30 on the wonderful food
(26 Aug 2014) Humming with pleasure we have
update number 29 on the food industry. Why am I humming with
Well the more I learn about our daily bread that is given to us by
The Lord, the more I hate it.
The funny thing about food is that for every
opinion that is out there, you can also find completely
contradicting opinions. Even on something like olive oil the
opinions vary widely from all fat is dangerous to embracement of
non saturated fats...
Two items today:
Item 1) Wow man, that is a hefty weight
Item 2) History talking; UK 1930 or so with a picture of
Item 1) Wow man, that
is a hefty weight loss overnight.
Since I am off the bread every morning I
weigh my own body.
In statistical terms that gives a so called time series.
From experience I know that if you eat bread
it is hard work to shed weight, but I am not like those lazy
Americans and I am willing to work hard. But hard work only got me
from 109 kilo to 88 and I could not dive below that...
Ok, about 80 days ago I decided to cut more
crap and that crap has the name bread on it.
The last five data entries from my time
Needless to say that the morning weight of
82.3 to one day later 81.1 is huge.
Losing 1.2 kilo overnight cannot be explained
by a bit of food more or less or going to the toilet a bit more or
It's as simple as it is; once you are off
that fucking bread your body becomes the self regulating dynamical
system that The Lord has given to you.
Item 2) History
talking; UK 1930 or so with a picture of celiac kids.
Here in the Western world we take care of
ourselves, we only eat healthy foods and under the eye of
government institutions that say 'unhealthy foods simply do not
exist' we are getting older and happier and wiser by the
Only in weird places like Africa you have all
that famine and those kids with swollen stomachs...
Now here is an old picture from the UK dating
back to the 1930-ties or so.
Don't they look just like those African malnutrition
Now if you go out and just ride a bit around,
don't you observe an amazing lot of adults that have those
disproportional big bellies?
These people are obese by the standard of
Body Mass Index, but they are just as malnutritioned as the kids
as shown above.
Source of the picture:
of gluten related disorders (by Alessio Fasano)
Let's leave it with that & say hello to
Unilever and all her wise food engineers.
(25 Aug 2014) Two items today, ok when
attacking the food industry you can easily cough up 20 items a day
for a year long.
The items of today is the shortest possible
anti-wheat or anti-bread rap possible plus the Unilever
I am skipping the fact that the Russians are
cracking down on McDonnalds, just beat the shit out of that weird
food company my dear Russians...
Item 1) In the three languages that I can
speak: Bread rhymes on ...
Item 2) Unilever brand Becel and that stream of lies.
Item 1) In the three
languages that I can speak: Bread rhymes on ...
In a conversation I can speak more or less
three languages, namely my home language Dutch, furthermore I can
speak English and the language of our neighbors the Germans.
So in these three languages we ponder what
bread rhymes on...
||Bread rhymes on dead
||Brood rijmt op dood
||Brot hört wie tot.
It makes me wonder; are our forefathers
trying to tell us something or is this just a sheer
End of the shortest anti-bread rap
Item 2) Unilever brand
Becel and that stream of lies.
If here in the Dutch landscape you do a
Google search for 'broodbuik', in the English language that is a
bread belly, still the first advertisement link is from Becel.
Becel is a brand from Unilever and lately I
decided to do to Unilever what other organizations like the
Pentagon have endured for a couple of years...
Let's not do difficult about this; Unilever
represents the power of the food industry so if I can take those
weirdo's out of power guess what will happen?
You will live longer by at least five years.
So before the slaughter is done to Unilever,
the moral justification is not only the joy my brain will have but
also making the population live at least five years
Now you Unilever fuckheads still promote the
stuff that gave me the first serious skin sickness known as Lupus.
And you still talk your dumb stuff when it comes to eating fat
while in the products you promote we have all those funny E number
ranging from E 621 through E 625 also known as the gluten
Why the fuck should you put gluten salts
inside a so called 'healthy product'?
Did you know that Becel Kitchen contains more
omega 3 compared to the same amount of olive oil?
It might be true, but it also contains a
gigantic amount of gluten salts.
Therefore my dear Unilever, you are the one
that has to be slaughtered. Seeking dialog is not a viable
End of this update, till updates.
(24 Aug 2014) A picture of day six of the
gluten fermentation experiment.
Item 1) Day six; it starts to smell but it
can stay in the kitchen until now.
Item 1) Day six; it
starts to smell but it can stay in the kitchen until now.
This is how the gluten with the beer yeast is
looking after six days, it has clearly lost it's rubber like
structure but it is still extremely sticky.
It is getting softer and softer but it is very obvious you
absolutely cannot eat this stuff.
Yet in all wheat based bread about 10% of the
weight is this weird stuff that is not bio-degradable for the
From stuff like this they make the food taste
multipliers that are based on fermented gluten; here in Europe
these taste multipliers have the E numbers 621 through
And from the food industry you get all that
bla bla bla that it makes tasting salt stronger, as such
suggesting they can add less salt so that is good for you.
Yet in practice, most processed food simply contains too much salt
so once more they talk bullshit.
The two batches, one with the beer yeast and
the other with the Camembert smell very different; so with
fermentations like this you can make a wide variety of smells
& tastes and as such these are not 'taste multipliers' at
It is artificially making taste and after
that it is added as a taste additive, not a multiplier on existing
And it is dirt cheap to make; this stuff must
be a good cash cow for the food industry.
Yet how come that with using only one product
from the food industry, to be precise a 'health product' from the
branch Becel from the food multinational Unilever I developed that
funny skin sickness known as Lupus?
Can only one percent of fermented gluten give
Yes it can, furthermore the food industry and
the food engineers simply do not give a shit if some additive is
bio-degradable or not in your body.
Never ever in the history of 20-th century food that has been a
These people, these food engineers, they are
fucked up crazy.
We must kill them before they kill
End of this update, till updates.
(23 Aug 2014) Oh oh my dear Ukrainian
authorities, thanks for not attacking that humanitarian aid
convoy, but please I beg you: Can You Stop Being Childish All Of
We constantly have this and that, for example
the black box of flight 17 would definitely be tampered with. Of
course it was not...
Ok, from my side the stuff stays the same:
Swift in & swift out for the white trucks from
We proceed with the food updates, this is
update number 26 on that giant dynamical system known as the food
Item 1) A picture on the gluten fermentation
experiment, day six.
Item 2) More reasons why obese people always eat
Item 1) A picture on
the gluten fermentation experiment, day six.
The gluten experiment goes fine, after six
days the stuff starts to break down a little bit in the sense it
is not a hard rubber ball but slowly it gets softer and more
I only have one problem:
My daughter has the memory card of my camera, and now I can not
retrieve photo's from my camera.
So let's replace the photo with a nice pic
from our beloved internet:
After six days of fermentation it starts to
smell, but I can still let it be in the kitchen because the smell
is not awful enough.
It is hard to describe, but I understand as
why gluten fermented taste multipliers are important to the food
industry: It is a dirt cheap way to make strong smells.
All that garbage that using taste multipliers
makes using extra salt not needed, it is garbage... It is garbage
because we all know that in processed food most of the time it is
also loaded with too much salt.
Fuck you my dear food industry; gluten based
taste multipliers are a cheap way to produce smell & taste to
the weird products you sell to us.
Item 2) More reasons
why obese people always eat bread.
This process of overeating does not fall from
the sky but is deeply rooted into how the food industry works. It
is important to emphasize that most workers in the food industry
are not evil by definition; only the food engineers are all crazy
as hell and should be confronted harsh & rough.
The food engineers have the knowledge, but
they use it only to suck in the profits by adding all those weird
and strange food additives.
Ok, why do we overeat?
Difficult problems like overeating have many
root sources, the damage done to the indigestive system is one of
the greatest. Because that skews your capability to suck in what
you need on a large scale.
Our human bodies are rather complicated
dynamical systems themselves, so could there be more reasons as
why bread and all other wheat products make you obese?
Yes there is, eating bread and pasta is very
simple to understand because it is just like the heroin cycle.
Heroin lives shortly in the body, after that the junkie needs
another shot. You can fight a heroin addiction with methadone
because methadone lasts about 48 hours in the human
So a heroin addict, if he or she wants it,
can fight the addiction by making it controllable using methadone.
Because methadone stays so long in the body, you can use that to
downsize your daily intake without the sickness from the
You might think what heroin junkies have to
do with the bread that is given to us by The Lord?
It is the same cycle; bread eaters never eat
bread only once a week.
No daily intake is the least and preferably a few times every
Look at video number five where that USA
medical doctor explains a bit more on how sugar blood levels
influence your behavior...
fundamentals of health
Basically eating bread ensures that you
cannot burn fat, that is why we have all these fat people walking
around and why the food industry promotes eating bread because of
the fibers that are in it.
Ok ok, the food industry is the food
industry, so most fibers in bread simply are pig hairs, but that
is another story...
End of this update, till updates.
(22 Aug 2014) Two corrections, one small and
Item 1) Small stuff; this math Fields medal
Item 2) The leaking gut syndrome test does not look ok.
Item 1) Small stuff;
this Fields medal looks ok.
Lately a chick named Maryam Mirzakhani won
the Fields medal.
Most of the time they go to Jews and stuff and very often it is
completely incomprehensible as why this math should be important
Think for example at the Langlands program;
weird stuff from the beginning because many years later I do not
have one clue at what it is about.
Yesterday and today I read a few lines from
Maryan, and I have to say I do not understand it either, but it
looks a whole lot better compared to vague stuff like the
Furthermore the Fields medal only goes to
youngsters, so my advice to
Maryam would be:
Never feed your children American
Item 2) The leaking
gut syndrome test does not look ok.
Oh oh a few days back I thought there was
indeed a test that showed if you had leaky guts that make all that
shit from the food industry leaking into your bloodstream.
Such a test does not exist.
The test only measures if you have
anti-bodies against gluten in your blood.
But you only have anti-bodies in your white
blood cells if you just like me have the wrong genes for your
white blood cells...
All those people that have the 'good genes'
will still have leaky gut syndrome from eating bread or other
wheat related products.
The gluten is so sticky, you should not eat
All those other grains have not the wide
health related problems that wheat has, for example I am extremely
allergic to rye since I was child. So I avoid rye automatically
since I was child. But with wheat there is no escaping it; it is
A nice breakdown of what actually is inside
our beloved wheat is like this:
Ha ha ha, the 'gluten breakdown' is very
interesting to talk about hours and hours but we are not going to
We will hit the button named 'publish
website' and pop another gluten free beer as I make them
Source of the picture: Understanding
gluten - Part II /
(21 Aug 2014) Lately the Fields medal has
been rewarded again and since the Fields medal is the highest
possible prize in mathematics it is needless to say that 'The
empire strikes back'.
But I also have these boundary conditions in place:
At most 10% of new results will be published...
So I decided to write a nice thingeling about
quantum states where the superposition of quantum states is
written with three dimensional complex numbers.
There is nothing new in that, it is just a
simple application of the ocean of math that could be found in the
higher dimensional complex numbers.
So the embargo will still be in place while
the empire strikes back...
After having said that, weren't we on some
Yes we are, today we have one item:
Item 1) More on the gluten from wheat.
Item 1) More on the
gluten from wheat.
The second gluten experiment goes fine until
now, after a few days all those fruit flies got interested in the
fermenting gluten so I put it in a pan so the fruit flies could
not release their air power...
After four days the stuff starts to swell,
another clear indication that for the human body the present day
gluten is not bio-degradable...
Ok ok there might be some bacteria inside
your intestines that actually live on gluten, but only if you have
done the washing out the dough you will understand these bacteria
can only scratch the surface of the gluten that is formed in your
So take your time, make that wheat dough
& wash it out.
Only when you have done the washing yourself
you understand you should not eat that stuff, in particular you
should not eat present day bread as sold in the
The food industry is also making food
additives from gluten.
So I decided to make my own E numbers.
After four days into the second experiment it
starts to break down the gluten for the purpose of that particular
fungus: Camembert fungus against my own beer yeast.
This is how it looks, it is swelling nicely
suggesting fermentation is taking hold:
Yeah yeah, we all love the food
But what has been done to the wheat is
exactly the same as has been done the the bees:
Hollowing out the genetic diversity makes it
weak in the long run.
End of this update.
(19 Aug 2014) And constantly those people
from the food industry say that research has shown these
food additives are safe to eat.
But if I look into the details, it is 50 year old worse executed
Item 1) Let the science to the talking.
Item 1) Let the
science to the talking.
The five taste multipliers made from
fermenting gluten are here in Europe known as E 621 through E 625,
they are all different salts made with fermented gluten.
My own experiment with fermenting gluten
looks like this after two days (remark that two days in your body
the gluten still is intact, it is not bio degradable for the human
The Camanbert fungus is already spreading out
a little bit while the beer yeast at first sight does not do
Here in the Dutch landscape you have some
agency named Voedingscentrum (the Feed Center) and they advice the
public about food.
They also have an encyclopedia with more
information, so I looked up what they said about those taste
multipliers. And on all those pro-food industry websites it is
constantly the same:
They all say it is made from natural
Why that should be important I don't know, the thing that counts
is if your bady can digest it yes or no.
Mineral oil and iron ore are also natural products, yet we do not
Another characteristic is that these five
gluten salts are 'carefully investigated' on health effects. But
when I try to find something all they cough up is sheer
Some lousy investigation only talks about 150
persons with asthma who were given a gluten salt versus a
From the statistical point of view this is
garbage science; for a binomial variable to measure effect sharp
enough you need over a 1000 people.
Just like in the election polls; 150 people is just far to small
to be reliable...
This is pure & plain garbage
So let me try to explain how you should put
up a statistical reliable test that measures if these gluten salts
have negative health effects:
With what I know now, I would factor it
against the gluten intake.
So I would randomly put each individual from a 1500 size group
into six different groups like this. Let's call that factor I,
that is the food intake before the experiment:
Group 1) Three weeks long gluten in every meal, so bread &
Group 2) Two weeks long gluten in every meal, so bread &
Group 3) One weeks long gluten in every meal, so bread &
Group 4) Three weeks long totally gluten free, so no bread &
Group 5) Three weeks long totally gluten free, so no bread &
Group 6) Three weeks long totally gluten free, so no bread &
After that randomly having a strong gluten
salt exposure yes or no.
But it can easily done in another way because
these days there seems to be a test for having the so called
'leaky gut syndrome'. This name is a bit misleading because your
intestines do not leak into your stomach but into your
It is a blood test as far as I know; they can
see if there is garbage into your bloodstream.
Well all 1500 volunteers for the experiment
undergo this test but they are not told what the outcome is.
So that is factor II: Separate the 1500 in
two groups based upon that blood test.
After that again randomly exposure to a lot
of gluten salts yes or no.
The two factors can even be combined...
Now my dear assholes of the Voedingsinstituut;
that is the way it should be done and not your stupid ways of
coughing up some 50 year old garbage study into only 150 asthma
patients. If you have only 150 people, no wonder the results will
But my criticism goes much deeper:
If it is inconclusive, that does not say it is safe to
Years and years ago I already explained how
to conduct your statistical tests when measuring poison. In the
years thereafter, just as an example, testing the poison dioxine
here in the Dutch landscape was finally done the way it should
have been done all those years.
I published it here on 17 Oct 2008 in
relation with the Chinese baby milk scandal, but years before that
I was able to make that info more widespread.
The locals might recognize a few of the Food
Lunatics in the next picture:
The guy in the middle is the CEO of the Food Center
and he will be replaced by a shithole from the Unilever
I mention him because he has weird things to
say all the time, like 'There is no dangerous food'.
My response would be: Just go out in the city and look at all
The name of this worthless CEO is Felix
Cohen, and he also says:
'All we are saying is let science do the talking'.
Well ok you shithead Felix, that is why
today's item has it's title:
It is your science versus mine.
The chick in the picture is also extremely
dangerous, but may I have to wait for her parents to develop that
lovely thing known as the Alzheimers disease before she gets her
Links; in Dutch upon the gluten salts:
The second picture is from a food blog in the
Cohen is klaar bij het voedingscentrum /
(17 Aug 2014) A short item on the Ukraine
equation and the second item is that second experiment of
fermentation of the gluten from wheat.
Item 1) The Ukrainian equation.
Item 2) Trying to ferment the gluten from wheat.
Item 1) The Ukrainian
Yesterday the Ukrainian prez came out stating
a Russian military convoy has invaded the Ukraine and the the army
had destroyed parts of the military convoy.
And I, with my dumb head, even believed it because I was operating
from the point of view that Petro has his cognitive functions
nicely on a straight line...
So I could not bake cake from that news and I was thinking that
may be the humanitarian convoy was already in the Ukraine and that
may be because it could get attacked some Russian military stuff
But today again the almost 300 trucks were
still not in the Ukraine so this all got a bit more weird.
Well, as far as stuff is standing now, it was
all a pipe dream; there simply was no Russian military convoy in
Well to make a long story short;
It would be nice if on a very short notice at
least 50 to 80 trucks could go there and deliver the help goods.
The Ukrainian government and military forces have the right to
respond when they come under attack.
Furthermore, things should go swift;
Trucks in, deliver goods, trucks out.
It is reasonable that if needed, some
refugees can come back with those trucks, but again delivery
should go swift and all in all this is Ukrainian territory so
there is only one boss & that is the Ukrainian
That was it, but as a last remark I would
like to compliment the Ukrainian military that from an army on
paper they have managed to be some real army in a relatively short
That means my dear Ukrainians, that by far
not all hope is lost.
End of this item.
Item 2) Trying to
ferment the gluten from wheat.
About two weeks ago I washed out the gluten
from one kilo of standard bread dough and it was strange to hold
into my hands the sticky rubber like stuff that likely killed my
I tried to make the stuff rot and after 3
full days it's structure got weaker and after five days it smelled
so foul I had to replace it from the kitchen to the back of my
Two days later the foul smell, with a lot of
cheese tones in it, came through all doors so I had to place it
outside the house into the garden.
Now it is very fluid like and still smells
very strong, it constantly attracts the attention of
One thing is clear; if you get gluten in your
body, it just does not dissolve fast enough. So it should not be
in the food chain at all, but ha ha ha it is the skeleton of the
bread and if you are young you do not drop dead from it but it
gives you plenty of energy.
Ok, I have not bought some battery acid but
now I have a full kilo of pure gluten I can experiment on it as
why we have all those weird taste multipliers that here in Europe
go under the E number system as E 621 through E625.
These are made from gluten but since the
wheat gluten are simply not bio-degradable enough, they might
actually be poison.
Now I have a kilo of that stuff, here is the
start of the second experiment:
Now I am not trying desperately to make it
rot, but I put a bit of French cheese with it and a depot of beer
It is important to remark that I suspect the
French cheese named Camembert to have successfully made it to
gluten experiment number 1 because that has all that cheese tones
in it's smell.
Weird detail: If on the internet you search
for 'fermenting gluten' it is hard to find anything meaningful. Oh
oh my dear food industry, are you hiding some information?
The start of the second gluten experiment
looks like this:
And if asphalt was an E number, without doubt
the food industry would use it because it causes enough damage
that if you put it in diluted, people will overeat without knowing
It is time to hit the button named 'publish
website' so till updates my dear reader.
(16 Aug 2014) One item about the evolution of
the food industry.
This is attack/update number 21 on the food industry & the
joys those shitholes bring...
Item 1) The lifespan / foodintake equation.
Item 1) The lifespan
/ foodintake equation.
Don't worry, we are not going to solve
difficult equations but we will only be looking at a very simple
example with a few easy numbers in it.
As said many times, the food industry will
constantly put all kinds of additives in food products in order to
make you overeat. You might think that this defies logic because
if you constantly overeat you will live shorter and as such the
food industry will make less money from you.
Over your entire lifespan you will have used
a particular amount of money to buy food, ok ok we have always
inflation so a dollar or a euro from when you were young should be
recalculated to when you die. But that is standard financial
calculations and for us it is not important exactly how much money
the average person spends on food during his or her
Let's give it the letter F, so F = all money
spend on food during your life.
Suppose all my life I would have been healthy
and always have a normal weight below all definitions of
overweight/obesitas and so. For my length about 80 kilo would be
considered a healthy weight.
So for me, F is the standard money spend in
my life when I would be healthy and normal weight all the
In the USA there are plenty of folks with a
body mass index of 35 or higher, for my length that would be
something like 120 kilo, so that is about 50% above a healthy body
In order to stay that fat you need to intake
more calories, for simplicity lets assume you also need 50%
calories more and that you actually spend 50% more on food than I
If a person is 50% too heavy compared to
healthy weight the situation is actually a bit more difficult
1) If you are that fat you are also much more
lazy and less active so you need lower than 50% extra calories to
have stable overweight.
2) If you are that fat your body is much less efficient in using
the food, therefore you need even higher than 50% extra calories
to have stable weight.
I assume these two things cancel each other
Furthermore, being so fat shortens your
I have no idea about average premature death related to obesity,
but for simplicity assume you live 10% shorter.
Now we have two money spenders:
1) Me being healthy all the time and I spend
F money on food and stuff, versus
2) The fat person from 120 kilo, spending 50%
more but 10% shorter lifespan.
How much will the food industry earn on the
Spending 50% more over your lifespan means
multiplying by 1.50
Living 10% shorter of your lifespan means multiplying by
The result over your lifespan is F * 1.50 *
0.90 = 1.35
The number 1.35 means the food industry will
take in 35% extra turnover & profits from people that are
about 50% overweight.
You see on the scale of things the food
industry has no interest at all in having you a healthy life with
maximum lifespan. On the contrary, their interests are best served
when everybody eats to much...
Now take in your mind the average American
All these fat & dumb people do indeed
their stinking best to make the food industry a good investment
for guy like Warren Buffet who, as you might have noticed, is not
obese when it comes to body fat...
End of this update, till updates.
(15 Aug 2014) Two items today, the first item
is about teenagers that supposedly are reading this website. One
would think have they no games to play or facebook pages to visit
The second item is not an attack on the food
industry, but an advertisement for Mulder Pot in Kropswolde near
Zuidlaren. There you can buy 100% wheat gluten...
Item 1) Teenagers reading this website?
Item 2) Advertisement for Mulder Pot in the village of Kropswolde.
Item 1) Teenagers
reading this website?
I absolutely do not track any website
visitors in any way, but clearly when I am in the city the way
folks react makes it clear to me that a whole lot of teenagers are
also visiting this website.
That is a compliment because the last time I
looked young was from before the invention of the stone
But I considered it cute so I mixed a bit of
science in a blender; a bit of math, a bit of chemical thingelings,
a bit of planet shaped things.
And the end result is a 3 page long pdf file under the title
The basic idea is very simple:
Water molecules are very small, so we
calculate how much water molecules go into 1 liter of water.
Let's name that number X.
After that we are going to calculate how much volume X liters
So we compare X liter against X molecules
that make up one liter of water.
That's all, no hard core higher dimensional
stuff. Just some large numbers.
As usual, click on the pic for a download of
the pdf file:
Item 2) Advertisement
for Mulder Pot in the village of Kropswolde.
If you are one of those people that want to
bake their own bread because the food industry is putting stuff
like modified pig hair into the bread usually sold in the
supermarkets, you need good ingredients.
And if you are one of those people that like
to experiment with the pure gluten that is inside the grain named
wheat, locally you can buy pure gluten locally at Mulder
Now suppose all those horror stories about
wheat gluten are actually true, so that we now have a theoretical
model that explains a lot of the obesity stuff but also a lot of
the brain sickness of depression and even the elderly sickness of
Alzheimer, it is important to emphasize that folks like Mulder Pot
are not the enemy.
The enemy is the gluten and all those
weirdo's that refuse to take it out of the food chain.
Is it that hard to change the food
Yes it is because every body in the food
chain is sitting on a small island and what can they do? They can
do only their best using their local knowledge.
That is all they can do.
But there is a lot that sticks to that gluten
hypothesis, for myself speaking I do not know if indeed gluten can
pass the blood-brain barrier in our elderly.
Yet if stuff like that is confirmed, we would
have a down to earth model for a wide range of weird things. For
example why do people commit suicide while animals living in
natural conditions almost never choose that path?
If there is fucking gluten inside your brain,
what can you do?
In the next picture you see the yellow bag
that has about 100% of pure gluten, it costs 5 € per kilo. In
the back you see a 25 kilo bag of barley.
The axe is added for reasons of fun only.
End of this update, but hey now we are approaching
another 911 anniversary of the 2001 attacks in New York, once more
I like to ask the Americans:
Still going strong and getting fatter &
more stupid by the day?
(14 Aug 2014) Update number 19 on those food
industry shitholes; two items:
Item 1) There is pighair in the bread.
Item 2) When does Coca Cola fall apart?
Item 1) There is
pighair in the bread.
On a local news channel today (RTL7 to be
precise) there was the news that there is hair in the bread.
Well I know this for many years because I did
not buy a bread machine for nothing; the fact there is modified
pig hair in the bread is known to me for a couple of years.
So I decided to make my own bread because that pighair detail is
not on the list of ingredients.
If you put a slice of bread from the
supermarket in your bread toaster, you can smell there is
something in it made of hair.
The RTL7 news reporter, dumb and naive as she
is, asked why all ingredients should be on the package because
'may be you need 3 or 4 A4 size of information'.
But that is precise what we want and what we need; may be now
almost nobody is allergic for pig hair but if the food industry
goes on as she does decade in decade out, unavoidable food
allergies will only rise more and more.
Just like in our children allergic reactions
on nuts like peanuts are rising year in year out; if we do not
talk the language of the coffins against the food industry, they
will talk that language to our kids...
It is as simple as it is; let's kill and
slaughter those weirdo's.
Item 2) When does
Coca Cola fall apart?
It seems that if you add a little bit of milk
to a bottle of cola, after some time it falls apart into separate
stuff like in the picture below.
If on the website Youtube you search of cola
and milk, the first two clips that pop up have an amazingly
different time frame.
In the one clip it takes just one hour, in the other an amazing 6
hour time lapse is reported.
I did not understand why the times were so
different, but yesterday we observed that in the USA the cola also
contains brominated vegetable oil. And that brome stuff is an
additive that prevents the cola from falling apart...
If the time lapses are indeed that different
(I did not do the experiment myself) likely it is the brominated
vegetable oil that explains the difference.
The two Youtube clips with the different time
mixed with milk experiment / http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKPoQYevoLs
mixed with milk experiment / http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhofonPRrFM
At the end of this days update we ponder a philosophical
How can we get the Americans towards a
healthy lifestyle using vegetable oil?
All you have to do is add brominated
vegetable oil to the cola.
End of this update on pighair and a metal
(13 Aug 2014) In update number 18 on the
shitholes from the food industry we take another look at the most
worthless company in the world: Coca Cola.
Item 1) From phosphoric acid to brominated
oil, it is all safe says Coca Cola...
Item 1) From phosphoric
acid to brominated oil, it is all safe says Coca Cola...
On 10 Aug we looked at two engineered food
products, bread and Coca Cola, and we observed how for example
consuming the phosphoric acid in cola can lead to higher intake of
other foods like bread that bring their own poison with
The phosphoric acid washes out the calcium in your bones so one or
two days later you suddenly have an appetite for food with calcium
like bread and milk. After all you have to replenish your calcium
stockpile otherwise your bones get too weak.
Therefore it is so stupid that the food
industry say that it is the responsibility of the consumer to fulfill
A calorie in = a calorie out
because the consumer has just consumed some
poison and the consumer has to overeat to repair the damage done.
And the Coca Cola shitholes put the poison into their beverages
themselves, so they are not only stupid but also utter hypocrites.
All those different foods multiply on each
other but one characteristic is very important: All these
engineered foods are always more or less healthy apart for a few
details. Like the gluten in bread, you can eat that for decades
before your intestines are just too damaged that you have to stop
Here is that screenshot from the Dutch
website from Coca Cola once more:
So they put in phosphoric acid and after that
tell stupid nonsense like it is in fish, meat and cheese... Holy
Moses, there is no phosphoric acid in fish, meat or cheese.
All living animals and plants have phosphor
in their cells, that is the fundamental way cells transport energy
and that is known as the ATP ADP cycle.
But that has nothing to do with phosphoric acid...
But, as usual with the American food
industry, there is also more. They use stuff that goes
under the name brominated vegetable oil. Needless to say that brome
is a metal that you should not consume at all.
So why is it in
American cola? (In Europe it is not allowed to add it in)
That is to prevent the cola from falling
is theverge dot com): Coca-Cola
and PepsiCo will both remove from all of their beverages a
controversial ingredient that includes an element also found
in flame retardants. Coca-Cola intends to have the ingredient, brominated
vegetable oil (BVO), removed from its drinks by the end of the
year; PepsiCo removed BVO from Gatorade last year
and said yesterday— apparently following Coca-Cola's
announcement — that the rest of its products would
also be dropping it, though no timeframe was given.
Comment: If you look
at the average American street view you have all those fat and
extremely fat people. Therefore it is 100% obvious they have a lot
of poison into their food chain. You cannot deny that because
healthy people in general do not overeat even if there is an abundance
of food supply.
People overeat because they have shortages or are slightly but substantially
It is as simple as it
In order to understand how fucking stupid the
Coca Cola people are with stating that 'phosphor is at the root of
all life' and therefore you should drink phosphoric acid, lets
first look at the 2-dimensional Lewis structure of phosphoric
Although 2-dimensional Lewis structures are
important, they are only a projection of the real thing that lives
in a 3-dimensional world.
More on phosphoric
It is well known that phosphoric acid is
great for rust removal for rusted iron, as such it is obvious that
it should not be in the human food chain at all.
So the argument that in a diluted form it is non-toxic is
nonsense: anything if diluted enough is non-toxic...
But if you consume enough of that supposedly
'non-toxic' anything, one day you will prematurely drop dead
before you time.
After all that cognitive garbage that the
food engineers from the food industry are feeding us, we need an
antidote against all that nonsense.
And that is the miracle of energy transport
inside our cells, it is known at the ATP ADP cycle.
ATP has 3 phosphor thingelings while
ADP has 2 phosphor thingelings.
It is amazing to the bone, even vegetables
and all other plants run on that energy cycle.
It is amazing and the cell biologists have done a far better job
in finding the fundamental things compared to my fellow math
cells obtain energy
End of this relatively long update, if you
can help me slaughter the present food industry so that you and I
can live a few more years longer, I would like that...
(12 Aug 2014) We proceed with update number
17 on our fantastic food industry.
Item 1) Why do lions not get obese when there
is plenty of prey to hunt?
Item 1) Why do lions
not get obese when there is plenty of prey to hunt?
When it comes to understanding the root
causes of obesity a lot of people say that the constant stream of
available food is the culprit.
Suggesting that if you cut down on food
availability simply will bring down obesity.
Yet from nature we know that wild animals
only very seldom get obese, as a matter of fact wild animals only
get obese when they have access to the calories of the food as engineered
by our lovely food engineers.
Even if there is plenty of food around, wild
animals do not have that tendency to eat themselves to premature
death, yet when I am outside I constantly observe all those people
with that unhealthy appearance. And they are fucking fat.
The answer to the lion equation is very
Our food contains all kind of strange
additives, like the phosphoric acid in Coca Cola or the weird
forms of gluten in a standard Dutch bread.
Russia & life expectancy.
The latest rout of tit for tat economical
sanctions indicate that about 40% of imported food is banned for
about a year.
That is a good idea to start with, after all
if you look at the USA with all that weird stuff when it comes to
food you better skip that path.
When it comes to food imports from Europe I
As a rule of thumb: If a particular food
engineered product has a long list of E numbers on it,
rather likely it is not a safe food product.
After all, if phosphoric acid is 'just
another E number' and not something to avoid drinking, the
population should be protected from that poisoned engineered
All in all now we look at the scale of
Russia can easily in the long run lift life expectancy
of the population by at least five years. But they can only do
that if the food thing is executed wisely.
End of this update. Till updates.
(10 Aug 2014) Today update number 16 on the
utterly worthless food industry.
We have two items:
(Item1) The results of the gluten rot
Item 2) Why do we overeat? A thought experiment with bread &
Item 1) The results
of the gluten rot experiment.
About five days ago I washed out the dough of
what is here a standard bread of 800 gram. The result was about 90
to 100 gram of wet gluten.
A lot of people say that the human body
cannot digest gluten and that is the reason why we have all those
health problems related to bread and all things wheat
I agree with that but I am well aware of the
shit the food industry tells us, so I want to see a bit of rigid
proof that indeed the human body cannot digest over 10% of the
stuff that is in a standard bread.
The gluten I washed out was constantly kept
in a plastic sack, it was wet all the time so it could rot and
constantly there was a small opening to the air because in the
Summer time we have all those bacteria / yeast / fungus etc in the
So the conditions for maximum exposure to rot were met...
After three full days the gluten began to
smell nasty and only after three days the structure had weakened
significantly but I could still wash it out with water.
On day four it lost it's internal coherence
and now on day five it is more and more becoming a liquid so we
can conclude that indeed there are severe digestion problems to be
expected if you eat that gluten stuff.
Since all our food leaves our bodies within
that timeframe of four days it cannot be expected our digestive
system is capable of handling this stuff. So from the health point
of view, gluten is in the same category as natural rubber /
synthetic rubber / asphalt / etc etc. We do not eat asphalt so why
do we eat gluten?
Here is a picture of the rot experiment after
So that is a big difference from when you
have just washed out your dough, the smell that comes off from
this has some weird cheesy tones to it.
But the food industry is the food industry so
I will repeat this experiment a few times more while I first put
the freshly made gluten in battery acid. Battery acid has a ph
value of something like 2 while our stomach runs at an unbelievable
ph acid value of about 1...
So I hope that over about one week I can
update of the battery acid gluten rot experiment.
Item 2) Why do we
overeat? A thought experiment with bread & Coca Cola.
Until now in these 16 updates on our
worthless food industry we mainly focused on bread, for me that
was a logical thing to do because my own father died from holes in
So for me it is rather sobering to know that
my father died from that fucking bread we eat.
Yet in order to understand why in the USA
they also have those super-obese people, you know that condition
that makes you one yard wide and so, it is not only one food
source that can do that.
Now why do we overeat after eating
Very simple: bread contains a biological
non-reactive material named gluten and this gluten damages you
And once your intestines are damaged you will
enter a long array of health problems, you get leaking into your
body of stuff that does not belong there while at the same time
you do not get all of the nutriciants you need.
The important detail is the damage; it is the
damage that makes you overeat.
Now what has this to do with the noble brand
of Coca Cola (and Pepsi and Dr. Pepper etc etc)?
These brands are all patriotic American
brands, they would never want to poison their own home
Well the website of Coca Cola says that Coca
Cola contains phosphoric acid.
It is not much, on every 100 ml of Coca Cola it is about 55 mg of
For the average person this is a weird
detail; why should a reasonable food engineer put phosphoric acid
into a food? After all phosphoric acid does not sound like 'citron
acid' or the acid you can taste in oranges.
As far as I know they use the phosphoric acid
as a taste multiplier.
Needless to say, drinking phosphoric acid is
not a healthy habit.
Just like drinking sulphuric acid is not a good
Here goes our thought experiment:
You drink a lot of Coca Cola so you drink a
lot of phosphoric acid.
Now this acid washes out your bones and stuff, so you need to
replenish your calcium.
So you get hungry for calcium and stuff of
you eat a few slices more bread.
The bread damages your intestines, more and
more shortages of important stuff is observed by your body.
So you eat more and more of the lovely stuff
the food industry has baked for you.
And in the end your body mass index is above
It is all so fucking simple; yet the food
industry is a giant dynamical system that is not rules by only one
person. So all these companies are only doing their best in making
food that feeds the planet, but in the end they are only poisoning
us with weird stuff like the gluten and the phosphoric
End of this update, till updates.
(09 Aug 2014) We simply proceed with attack
number 15 on the shit holes of our present food industry. We
wonder why bread has that special status.
Item 1) Why has bread this special status in
Item 1) Why has bread
this special status in society?
Let's start with a very simple thought
experiment with city traffic:
Suppose a person wants to go from place A to
place B via car, bicycle or on foot.
And I tell this person: You cannot go via the
Tuthola street because of maintenance it is blocked.
Well, nobody would ask me how the hell to get
from place A to place B because they understand you only have to
avoid the Tuthola street in order to make it to your destination
named place B.
How different it is with stopping eating
Until now 100% of people ask me how it is
possible you can stop eating bread, they ask 'how can you do
Ok ok, I know a bit more about dangerous
addictions compared to the average person I talk to. But I do not
want to talk about difficult to prove facts about bread
I want to highlight the sheer simplicity as
why bread is that handy:
It forms a perfect layer you can add other
food to it.
Think for example a perfect pizza.
But you do not need bread for a perfect
Let's not do difficult, at present time this
is more or less what I eat.
You can make perfect layers from a whole lot of stuff...
So zero people ask how to get from A to B if
a particular street is blocked.
Yet 100% of folks are doing difficult when I
say you should not eat bread.
By the way, the box cutter in the picture is added for fun reasons
Hey New York Pizza: Still going strong and fatter by the
End of attack number 15 on the food
industry... Till updates.
(08 Aug 2014) As usual a lot has happened but
to the USA I can say I completely support bombing the shit out of
ISIS. Although given the special qualities of folks like Malawi
& Assad it is logical something as ISIS comes into existence,
all in all the ISIS folks are just too much on the apartheids
site. Just like the Israelis are btw...
Today a short list of bodyweight numbers
& again we make chopped meat of the food industry that tells us
obesity is simply the equation
A calorie in = a calorie
Item 1) Weekly bodyweight measurements.
Item 1) Weekly
Three years ago I was 109 kilo and I decided
to cut the crap.
Two years ago my minimum weight was 88 kilo and that was just
after a 110 kilometer bicycle ride in the summer.
And no matter what I did, I just could go lower.
But my Body Mass Index, or the BMI, was still elevated.
I needed to go to something like 84 kilo to be on the safe side.
Whatever I did I just could not go below 88
kilo, everything I tried failed and I more or less accepted it as
some natural barrier.
Until this year when I decided to stop eating
bread, now I know a little bit more of the content of bread I
understand why all my life I had these weird things going round.
Like all that hunger in the middle of the night.
Anyway, a long time ago I started keeping
track of my daily weight because I did not understand why I could
not go below 88 kilo.
From that list we select the Thursday weights.
Here we go:
88.0 (that was on the 29-th of May)
And this is with two fingers in my nose,
there are even lots of days when I actively decide to eat more
because weight loss has to go as slowly as possible...
Now my intestines are more or less healed
again, the body is far better in regulating it's own weight around
that what is a healthy weight for your body.
Why is the next equation often used by the
food industry nonsense?
A calorie in = a calorie
It is nonsense because your body is not a
container of calories but a dynamical system that given normal
food will perfectly regulate itself.
For example it happens when I take all
variables equal, like food intake and body exercise, day in day
out I weigh the same.
And suddenly from one day to the next, I am half a kilo
What has happened?
Very simple: During sleep some deep repair
work was done and that takes apparently a few hundred grams of
body fat to do so.
And if you go around and you see all those
males with those big bellies, why are they so fucking fat and why
do they often look not very healthy?
Also simple to answer: They eat too much
bread and the bread contains something that is completely
biologically inactive. That is this stuff, it is called gluten
from some ancient name for glue. The picture shows what is in a
standard bread of 800 gram:
So why do we overeat?
If you eat bread you also eat the stuff shown
in the picture.
That stuff kills your intestines slowly but surely.
That skews your intake of the stuff you need and you have
shortages of some things.
That creates all that hunger obese people routinely report.
And what do obese people eat when they are
Often something with bread or pasta &
that keeps the food industry cycle round and rounder and rounder.
Fat profits derived from fat people...
(07 Aug 2014) Oh oh my dear Russians, I still
have some problem flying around with a number 17 on it. Or may be
it is not flying around anymore and that is the problem.
Anyway, whoever did it, likely it was an accident.
A stupid accident, but for the majority of accidents later one
says it was a stupid accident...
Let's leave it with that for the time
I welcome the Russian moves when it comes to
economical sanctions against European and American food stuff. It
is a great help and I hope more powers will jump in to kick ass at
the food industry because there is actually no reason why those
people poison us on such a deep basis...
After having said that, this is one of the
updates I feel a little bit unease about because it is about my
skin sickness named Lupus, but now I have stopped eating bread
that fucking Lupus is gone.
So that is what this update is about:
And this is attack number 13 on the food
industry; if they can make an extra buck by giving you the skin
sickness named Lupus, they will not hesitate to do so.
Item 1) Attack number 13; Lupus why did I
have it, why is it gone?
Item 1) Attack number
13; Lupus why did I have it, why is it gone?
Some time ago when I started that engineered
food product from Unilever, Becel brand, named Meat & Jus
(good for your heart and blood veins is the sub title) I got those
skin problems and all that horrible
Since I lead an extremely steady life, I was
able to trace my skin problems directly back to the use of that
small change in my food intake: I stopped using Becel.
Within 24 hours the itching became less and
less, but weeks or months later I developed serious Lupus stuff on
With my present knowledge I know that the
Becel stuff destroyed my intestines locally and that part of my
intestines are giving the blood to my legs.
An important characteristic is the next: When
you rub your skin there are these small sharp sandgrains that come
You can best compare it to a sand particle, now sand comes in
thousands of shades but I am talking about big sand grains and
sharp sand grains.
What comes out of the skin is somewhat bigger that the largest of
sand grains and it feels much sharper.
Never heard of Lupus?
So did I, but it looks like this:
Basically it is very simple:
You eat bread.
The gluten in the bread destroys your intestines locally.
At the locally damaged intestines the gluten enters your
But gluten cannot be broken down, so it accumulates in for example
Your immune system understands it has to take away the gluten.
And your white bloodcells transport it to your skin.
Via the symptoms known as Lupus, the gluten is taken out of the
I had Lupus for a few months until I
understood what could be happening.
So I stopped eating bread.
Of course I now no longer have any Lupus,
about 10 days ago the last weird stuff came out of my skin. And
the last grains of the stuff that came out of my skin did I place
under the microscope.
It had only one view on it, but under the
microscope the stuff that came through my skin looked a lot like
washing out the dough in the last minutes (see previous update
about washing out the bread dough and again: DO IT
The Unilever shitholes even make taste
multipliers like E 623 from gluten, these people need to be
killed. The food engineers are so stupid only the language of the
coffins will reign them in...
A picture is not enough, but gluten looks
The above ball of rubber like substance is
from the amount of one standard bread of 800 gram. (800 gram is
the locally standard bread.)
(06 Aug 2014) This update is attack number 12
on the shitholes of the food industry.
We proceed with taking a closer look at pure
Item 1) Separating the gluten from the dough.
Item 1) Separating
the gluten from the dough.
In the first link of the previous update I
showed you a vid that in a simple way explained how you can
separate the gluten from the dough of your bread.
In the period I was still eating bread and
having all those health issues I already made my own bread instead
of buying pre-processed bread because a long time ago I already
understood how the food industry works:
If they succeed into making you fat and obese
they have you in the corner where the fat profits are.
It is important to remark that I do not view
them all as evil people, ok ok the food engineers with all their
knowledge about how food influences your body are in my view
criminals. But most people only do their best in 'feeding the
I view the food industry as a giant dynamical
system that is trapped into a set of equilibrium points and it
cannot get out of that equilibrium state.
The fact they cannot get out of this present weird equilibrium
state has a simple cause: there is not one person that had enough
power to do that.
Everybody is sitting on their small island in food-industry-land
and they all do their best to make locally the best
As such the food industry hangs together from
short comings, just like the financial industry was back in
Yet my problem with the food industry is that
I estimate that the entire European population will die
prematurely at least five years on average.
Beside shaving off of average lifespan, there is a wide array of
health problems that go unsolved but for the population they cause
a whole lot of suffering.
It is just not funny to see your parents die from stuff like
Alzheimer (but that is for future updates).
Now we are going to separate the gluten from
the dough, and if you have a few hours spare the next weekend or
so I strongly advice you to do it yourself.
Because if you are holding the finished
product in your own hands and you realize this stuff is from only
one standard 800 gram bread, you understand the health issues
related with it...
So with my bread machine I made a dough, if
you do not have a bread machine you will have to do the old
fashioned kneading by hand. You let the dough rise, kneading for a
second time, let it rise again for a full hour at least.
And after that you wash it out.
The washing takes about 50 minutes or so, I
did not keep records exactly.
But one thing is very important:
About 5 minutes before the water comes out flushing clear, this
gluten stuff has all kinds of holes in it. So that a good look at
that detail because if gluten gets into the body in small clusters
it will look more or less like that.
I made it yesterday and I constantly keep the
gluten in a wet environment inside a plastic bag. .
But it does not rot at all and very likely week in week out it
will not rot.
From the viewpoint of natural selection, the
wheat has hit the jackpot big time because a long long time ago
wheat has found out how to store proteins in a safe way so that no
bacteria / fungus / yeast or whatever what, could eat the
And the wheat and for example the barley has
enzymes that can break down all that energy that is stored inside
the gluten, so that when summer comes the gluten ensures the grain
can live another year...
Let's leave it with that, till updates &
don't forget to kill you average run of the mill food
(04 Aug 2014) We simply proceed with attack
number 11 on the food industry because in my view it is not only
they ensure the general population dies at least five years
too early, but somewhere in the back of my mind I know that
a lot of food engineers know this for a long long time.
So it is just like Goldman Sachs that went
short of the very stuff they sold their own clients. And what did
Goldman Sachs say?
They said there was a demand for that particular product, so they
had to sell it...
Item 1) More on gluten, how to isolate it
from the dough?
Item 1) More on
gluten, how to isolate it from the dough?
Weirdly enough it is amazingly simple to
isolate the gluten from the dough so you can see what it is.
Remark that gluten cannot be digested by our bodies, so our bodies
will do all kinds of weird stuff when it takes in too much
In the next Youtubber you can observe how
easy it is to separate the gluten from the dough:
A closer look at gluten
So pure gluten is much like rubber or so, do
you feel a strong desire to eat rubber?
And in this Youtubber you can see how gluten
can enter your bloodstream:
the grain, why gluten is bad
Those modern grains are a disaster, just look
around in the population where you live:
why are most of all these fat people looking very
That is because our food industry is
basically poisoning them, but the people from the food industry
are only doing their best to 'feed the planet'.
End of this update, till updates.
(03 Aug 2014) Because the food industry
worked so hard to earn my ire, today we place attack number 10 on
Item 1) This Unilever product is what
triggered a hefty skin decease in me.
Item 1) This Unilever
product is what triggered a hefty skin decease in me.
I still have the last unemptied bottle so I
could have made a photograph of the stuff that triggered a severe
skin decease in me, but instead I used the picture that is from
the Becel website that is a part of the Unilever
This product shows perfectly all that is
wrong with the present day food industry.
For example the label says it contains a lot
of so called 'omega 3' and indeed that is good for your heart and
blood veins... I will not deny that because that was more or less
the reason I decided to use this instead of my standard olive
So I used Becel meat & jus and guess
I got that horrible eczema and all that
terrible itching that makes you scratching your legs so hard it
almost starts bleeding. The pain from the scratching is preferable
to the intense itching...
So I had a problem, but if you click on the
picture above you land on the website of the Becel food engineers
and you see: no grain gluten is used to make it.
Yet if you dig deeper, you see it has those
taste multipliers in it and that is the first clue as why this is
a strange food product: If this is really better than olive oil,
why are there taste multipliers in it?
And if we check for the taste multipliers
itself, what are they?
Guess three times; it is a taste multiplier
that is made from gluten.
In the Dutch language it is calciumglutamaat.
Now why should a food company like Unilever
advertise healthy food that supposedly is good for your heart and
add a taste multiplier to it?
Very simple: you will overeat if the taste
multiplier is in that food...
End of attack number 10 on our food industry.